| Literature DB >> 36217206 |
Chen Xue1, Xinyu Gu1, Yalei Zhao1, Junjun Jia2, Qiuxian Zheng1, Yuanshuai Su1, Zhengyi Bao1, Juan Lu3, Lanjuan Li4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: L-tryptophan (Trp) metabolism involved in mediating tumour development and immune suppression. However, comprehensive analysis of the role of the Trp metabolism pathway is still a challenge.Entities:
Keywords: HCC; Immune escape; Metabolic phenotype; Prognosis; Risk model; Trp metabolism
Year: 2022 PMID: 36217206 PMCID: PMC9552452 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-022-02730-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 6.429
Fig. 1Identification of distinct metabolic phenotypes based on Trp-related genes. A The expression profile of Trp metabolism genes in TCGA-LIHC. B Forest plot of genes significantly correlated with prognosis. C The relative expression level of TPH1 measured by RT-qPCR in HCC cells and normal liver cell line. D Heatmap of correlation analysis of prognosis-related genes. E. CDF curve of samples. F CDF delta area curve of consensus clustering. G The sample clustering heatmap. H The survival analysis of the two subtypes in the TCGA-LIHC cohort and GSE14520 cohort. I Differences in Trp metabolism scores between C1 and C2 in the TCGA-LIHC cohort and GSE14520 cohort
Fig. 2The differences in the immune cell infiltration characteristics and immunotherapy/chemotherapy response between C1 and C2. A Different infiltrating levels of 22 immune cells between the two molecular subtypes. B The differential expression of ICI genes between C1 and C2. C Differences in TIDE scores between C1 and C2
Fig. 3Establishment of a novel risk model based on the DEGs between C1 and C2. A Volcano plot of DEGs. B The differentially expressed genes were analyzed by univariate regression. C The trajectory of each independent variable with lambda. D Confidence interval under lambda. ROC curve and survival analysis were used to construct a risk model in the TCGA-LIHC dataset (E) in the GSE76427 dataset (F)
Fig. 4Immune cell infiltration characteristics in distinct risk subgroups. A Boxplot of differences in the infiltrating abundance of 22 immune cells between different risk subgroups. B Boxplots of differences in immune scores calculated between the risk subgroups by the ESTIMATE method. C Correlation between 22 immune cell components and risk score. D Heatmap of enrichment scores of pathways. E Correlation analysis between risk score and the pathways (R > 0.7). F The correlation between the risk score and the tryptophan metabolism pathway
Fig. 5The risk model has excellent predictive power for immunotherapy and chemotherapy for HCC. A Differentially expressed immune checkpoint genes between different risk subgroups. B Differences in TIDE scores between different risk subgroups. C Correlation between risk score and TIDE scores
Fig. 6Clinical application of risk models for predicting prognosis and response to immunotherapeutic effect. A Univariate Cox analysis of clinical characteristics and RiskType based on TCGA database. B Multivariate Cox analysis of clinical characteristics and RiskType. C In the IMvigor210 cohort, SD/PD patients had higher risk scores than other types of responders. D The percentage statistics showed that the treatment effect was significantly better in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group. E Prognostic difference in risk subgroups in the whole TCGA-LIHC cohort. Prognostic difference in early-stage patients in the IMvigor210 cohort. Prognostic difference between different risk groups of early-stage patients (F) and late-stage patients in the IMvigor210 cohort (G)