Literature DB >> 36215310

A genome-wide screen identifies SCAI as a modulator of the UV-induced replicative stress response.

Jean-François Lemay1, Edlie St-Hilaire1, Daryl A Ronato2, Yuandi Gao2, François Bélanger1, Sari Gezzar-Dandashi1,3, Aimé Boris Kimenyi Ishimwe1,3, Christina Sawchyn1,4, Dominique Lévesque5, Mary McQuaid1, François-Michel Boisvert5, Frédérick A Mallette1,4,6, Jean-Yves Masson2, Elliot A Drobetsky1,6, Hugo Wurtele1,6.   

Abstract

Helix-destabilizing DNA lesions induced by environmental mutagens such as UV light cause genomic instability by strongly blocking the progression of DNA replication forks (RFs). At blocked RF, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) accumulates and is rapidly bound by Replication Protein A (RPA) complexes. Such stretches of RPA-ssDNA constitute platforms for recruitment/activation of critical factors that promote DNA synthesis restart. However, during periods of severe replicative stress, RPA availability may become limiting due to inordinate sequestration of this multifunctional complex on ssDNA, thereby negatively impacting multiple vital RPA-dependent processes. Here, we performed a genome-wide screen to identify factors that restrict the accumulation of RPA-ssDNA during UV-induced replicative stress. While this approach revealed some expected "hits" acting in pathways such as nucleotide excision repair, translesion DNA synthesis, and the intra-S phase checkpoint, it also identified SCAI, whose role in the replicative stress response was previously unappreciated. Upon UV exposure, SCAI knock-down caused elevated accumulation of RPA-ssDNA during S phase, accompanied by reduced cell survival and compromised RF progression. These effects were independent of the previously reported role of SCAI in 53BP1-dependent DNA double-strand break repair. We also found that SCAI is recruited to UV-damaged chromatin and that its depletion promotes nascent DNA degradation at stalled RF. Finally, we (i) provide evidence that EXO1 is the major nuclease underlying ssDNA formation and DNA replication defects in SCAI knockout cells and, consistent with this, (ii) demonstrate that SCAI inhibits EXO1 activity on a ssDNA gap in vitro. Taken together, our data establish SCAI as a novel regulator of the UV-induced replicative stress response in human cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36215310      PMCID: PMC9584372          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   9.593


  95 in total

Review 1.  The checkpoint response to replication stress.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-23

2.  ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA.

Authors:  Luis Ignacio Toledo; Matthias Altmeyer; Maj-Britt Rask; Claudia Lukas; Dorthe Helena Larsen; Lou Klitgaard Povlsen; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Niels Mailand; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells.

Authors:  Ophir Shalem; Neville E Sanjana; Ella Hartenian; Xi Shi; David A Scott; Tarjei Mikkelson; Dirk Heckl; Benjamin L Ebert; David E Root; John G Doench; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The Protexin complex counters resection on stalled forks to promote homologous recombination and crosslink repair.

Authors:  Richard O Adeyemi; Nicholas A Willis; Andrew E H Elia; Connor Clairmont; Shibo Li; Xiaohua Wu; Alan D D'Andrea; Ralph Scully; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 5.  53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair.

Authors:  Michal Zimmermann; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 20.808

6.  HELB Is a Feedback Inhibitor of DNA End Resection.

Authors:  Ján Tkáč; Guotai Xu; Hemanta Adhikary; Jordan T F Young; David Gallo; Cristina Escribano-Díaz; Jana Krietsch; Alexandre Orthwein; Meagan Munro; Wendy Sol; Abdallah Al-Hakim; Zhen-Yuan Lin; Jos Jonkers; Piet Borst; Grant W Brown; Anne-Claude Gingras; Sven Rottenberg; Jean-Yves Masson; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  Controlling DNA replication origins in response to DNA damage - inhibit globally, activate locally.

Authors:  Mona Yekezare; Belén Gómez-González; John F X Diffley
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.

Authors:  Sofija Mijic; Ralph Zellweger; Nagaraja Chappidi; Matteo Berti; Kurt Jacobs; Karun Mutreja; Sebastian Ursich; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Andre Nussenzweig; Pavel Janscak; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The ubiquitin ligase RFWD3 is required for translesion DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Irene Gallina; Ivo A Hendriks; Saskia Hoffmann; Nicolai B Larsen; Joachim Johansen; Camilla S Colding-Christensen; Lisa Schubert; Selene Sellés-Baiget; Zita Fábián; Ulrike Kühbacher; Alan O Gao; Markus Räschle; Simon Rasmussen; Michael L Nielsen; Niels Mailand; Julien P Duxin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  The integrated stress response induces R-loops and hinders replication fork progression.

Authors:  Josephine Ann Mun Yee Choo; Denise Schlösser; Valentina Manzini; Anna Magerhans; Matthias Dobbelstein
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.