| Literature DB >> 36213449 |
Therese Fostervold Mathisen1, Christine Sundgot-Borgen2, Beate Anstensrud3, Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen4.
Abstract
Introduction: There is a need to change the culture within the art of dance, as it has been associated with injuries and mental health consequences. This study evaluates an intervention designed to increase mental health literacy, enhance nutritional knowledge, reduce symptoms and effects of low energy availability, and strengthen understanding of sports nutrition and recovery strategies, in dance students of mixed genders. Material and methods: A total of 125 dance students received three workshops, with 39 arts and crafts students serving as references. The results were evaluated by the Eating Disorder Examination questionnaire, the Low Energy Availability in Females questionnaire, the Hopkins Symptom Check List, and questions on mental health literacy, sports nutrition, and recovery knowledge.Entities:
Keywords: body appreciation; eating disorders; energy availability; health literacy; injuries (MeSH); mental health; sports nutrition
Year: 2022 PMID: 36213449 PMCID: PMC9532567 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.727048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Sports Act Living ISSN: 2624-9367
Figure 1A diagram illustrating the flow of interventions and evaluations. Blue/dark and orange/light boxes illustrate the time for evaluations of dance students and references, respectively, and white boxes illustrate workshop interventions for dance students and their main focus. WS, workshop.
Baseline demographics of participants; values are mean (99% CI) and comparisons are made between groups and separately for sexes between the two groups.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention, total | 20.7 | 21.4 | 26.4 | |||
| Dance | 21.5 | 20.9 | 30.1 | |||
| Dance | 20.6 | 21.5 | 25.9 | |||
| References, total | 28.7 | 7.6 | 23.3 (21.9, 24.7) | 1.9 | 9.2 (4.2, 14.1) | 17.2 |
| Reference | 27.8 | 7.5 | 22.3 | - | 12.3 | 17.8 |
| Reference | 28.8 | 7.5 | 23.5 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 17.3 |
BTW, between-groups; Diff, difference between groups; BMI, body mass index; h, hours; wk, week.
Figure 2Health behavior and health literacy. The estimated mean (CI 99%) number of episodes with binge-eating and purging among dance students and references across time (Row 1), and the percentage above the respective clinical cutoffs (Row 2). Row 3 illustrates results from mental health literacy questions: “What is mental health to you?” (A), “When does an everyday problem become a mental health challenge?” (B), “Mention three physical signs of mental health challenges” (C), and “Mention three psychological signs of mental health challenges” (D). BL, baseline; PI, post-intervention; FU, 6 months follow-up; MHC, mental health challenge; *significant between-group difference (mean (CI 99%) differences of 4.9 (1.3, 8.6), g = 0.64, p = 0.001; £significant between-group difference (mean (CI 99%) differences of 6.9 (1.3, 12.3), g = 4.09, p = 0.002;$ significant within-group change (mean (CI 99%) change of 15.8 (−0.5, 32.0), g = 1.77, p = 0.016; #significant between-group difference (mean (CI 99%) differences of 21.4 (−1.5, 44.4), g = 12.9, p = 0.016. asignificant difference between groups; bsignificant change from BI among dance students; csignificant change from BI among dance students.
Symptoms of mental health challenges, mental health literacy, and knowledge in sports nutrition and recovery strategies.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Dance student | 3.5 (3.3, 3.7) | 3.5 (3.3, 3.7) | 3.7 (3.4, 3.9) | ||
| References | 3.8 (3.4, 4.1) | 3.8 (3.4, 4.2) | - | ||
| 2.1 (1.9, 2.2) | 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) | 1.9 (1.7, 2.1) | |||
| 1.5 (1.3, 1.8) | 1.3 (1.0, 1.6) | 1.3 (1.0, 1.6) | |||
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
| Dance students | 3.0 (2.8, 3.3) | 3.3 (3.0, 3.6)* | 0.3 (0.0, 0.6) | 3.3 (3.0, 3.6) - | 0.3 (0.0, 0.6) |
|
| |||||
| Dance students | 2.8 (2.6, 3.1) | 3.1 (2.7, 3.4) | 3.2 (2.9, 3.6)* | 0.4 (0.0, 0.8) | |
|
| |||||
| Dance students | 2.2 (1.9, 2.5) | 2.7 (2.3, 3.0)* | 0.5 (0.1, 0.8) | 2.9 (2.6, 3.3)* | 0.8 (0.4, 1.1) |
|
| |||||
| Dance students | 1.7 (1.4, 1.9) | 1.8 (1.6, 2.1) | 2.2 (1.9, 2.5)* | 0.5 (0.2, 0.8) | |
|
| |||||
| Dance students | (0.9, 1.3) | 1.5 (1.2, 1.7)* | 0.4 (0.1, 0.6) | 1.5 (1.2, 1.7)* | 0.4 (0.1, 0.6) |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
| Dance students | 1.7 (1.5, 1.9) | 1.8 (1.5, 2.0) | 1.8 (1.6, 2.0) | ||
| Dance students | 60 (48, 71) 25 (10, 49) | 59 (44, 73) 26 (9, 54) | 68 (53, 80) | ||
Baseline, scores before dance-intervention; Post, scores after dance-intervention; FU, 6 months follow up after dance-intervention; h, hours; BAS-2, Body appreciation scale-2; SCL-10, Symptom Check List-10; EDE-q, Eating Disorder Examination questionnaire; Δ, size of within-group change from baseline; g, Hedges g for effect size; BTW diff., between-group difference; *denotes for which group the within-group changes are reported.
Estimated mean (CI 99%) scores in mental health outcomes, knowledge on sports nutrition and recovery strategies in dance students and references, and frequency in each group mentioning diet specifically as a recovery strategy (recovery, diet). Where changes or differences were identified, the mean differences and their calculated effect size are presented.