| Literature DB >> 36213022 |
Shengru Meng1,2.
Abstract
As an important part of China's higher education, higher vocational education occupies an extraordinarily important position in China's higher education system. In order to clarify the literacy of higher vocational students, carry forward their excellent quality, and correct their bad habits, a quantitative evaluation and optimization decision-making research on the cultivation of humanistic literacy of higher vocational students based on data mining technology is proposed. By using data mining technology, the important data of students can be obtained quickly; by using advantages of information integration, the cultivation of humanistic quality of higher vocational students is evaluated from a correct perspective; by strengthening the education of campus culture construction, students' moral quality can be enhanced, students' enthusiasm for learning can be mobilized, the advantages of new media's public opinion orientation can be given full play, and a humanistic and healthy growth environment for vocational students can be created. Through experiments, it is proved that data mining can better evaluate the humanistic quality of students. During the learning process, the humanistic quality evaluation of female college students reaches 95%, and the overall quality of male and female gradually rises to 80%.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36213022 PMCID: PMC9536887 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8918871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Data mining process.
Basic information of students.
| Student ID | Student name | Age | Gender | Grade | Professional category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Student A | 17 | Female | Class of 2021 | Food quality and safety |
| 2 | Student B | 17 | Male | Class of 2021 | Electrical automation |
| 3 | Student C | 18 | Female | Class of 2020 | Industrial design |
| 4 | Student D | 19 | Female | Class of 2020 | Food quality and safety |
| 5 | Student E | 18 | Male | Class of 2020 | Electrical automation |
| 6 | Student F | 17 | Female | Class of 2021 | Food quality and safety |
| 7 | Student G | 19 | Male | Class of 2019 | Electrical automation |
| 8 | Student H | 18 | Male | Class of 2021 | Industrial design |
Figure 2Comparison of male and female students before and after optimization.
Figure 3Comparison of 16-20-year-old students before and after optimization.