Literature DB >> 32139400

Cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and humanistic impact of a pharmacist-led minor ailment service.

Sarah Dineen-Griffin1, Shalom I Benrimoj2, Kris Rogers2, Kylie A Williams2, Victoria Garcia-Cardenas2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists are well positioned to support patients' minor ailments. The objective was to evaluate the clinical and humanistic impact of a minor ailment service (MAS) in community pharmacy compared with usual pharmacist care (UC).
METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted. Intervention patients received MAS, which included a consultation with the pharmacist. MAS pharmacists were trained in clinical pathways and communication systems mutually agreed with general practitioners and received monthly support. Control patients received UC. All patients were followed up by telephone at 14 days. Clinical and humanistic impact were defined by primary (appropriate referral rate and appropriate non-prescription medicine rate) and secondary outcomes (clinical product-based intervention rate, referral adherence, symptom resolution, reconsultation and EuroQol EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS)).
RESULTS: Patients (n=894) were recruited from 30 pharmacies and 82% (n=732) responded to follow-up. Patients receiving MAS were 1.5 times more likely to receive an appropriate referral (relative rate (RR)=1.51; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.11; p=0.018) and were five times more likely to adhere to referral, compared with UC (RR=5.08; 95%CI 2.02 to 12.79; p=0.001). MAS patients (94%) achieved symptom resolution or relief at follow-up, while this was 88% with UC (RR=1.06; 95% CI 1 to 1.13; p=0.035). MAS pharmacists were 1.2 times more likely to recommend an appropriate medicine (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.3; p=0.000) and were 2.6 times more likely to perform a clinical product-based intervention (RR=2.62, 95% CI 1.28 to 5.38; p=0.009), compared with UC. MAS patients had a greater mean difference in VAS at follow-up (4.08; 95% CI 1.23 to 6.87; p=0.004). No difference in reconsultation was observed (RR=0.98; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.28; p=0.89).
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates improved clinical and humanistic outcomes with MAS. National implementation is a means to manage minor ailments more effectively in the Australian health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618000286246. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cluster randomised controlled trial; community pharmacy; minor ailment services; minor ailments; pharmacist; pharmacy practice research; professional pharmacy services; quality use of medicines; self-care; self-medication

Year:  2020        PMID: 32139400     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  9 in total

1.  Cost utility of a pharmacist-led minor ailment service compared with usual pharmacist care.

Authors:  Sarah Dineen-Griffin; Constanza Vargas; Kylie A Williams; Shalom I Benrimoj; Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  History taking and response to an adult diarrheal case among community drug retail outlets in Gondar town, north-west Ethiopia: a simulated-client survey.

Authors:  Dawit Wondimsigegn; Berhanemeskel Woldegerima; Asefa Adimasu Taddese
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2021-03-01

3.  Primary health care policy and vision for community pharmacy and pharmacists in Australia.

Authors:  Sarah Dineen-Griffin; Shalom I Benrimoj; Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2020-05-15

4.  Co-design and feasibility of a pharmacist-led minor ailment service.

Authors:  Sarah Dineen-Griffin; Shalom I Benrimoj; Kylie A Williams; Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Increased self-reported pharmacist prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and facilitators to prescribing.

Authors:  Amy Grant; Liam Rowe; Natalie Kennie-Kaulbach; Andrea Bishop; Julia Kontak; Sam Stewart; Bobbi Morrison; Ingrid Sketris; Glenn Rodrigues; Laura Minard; Anne Marie Whelan; Lisa Woodill; Elizabeth Jeffers; Judith Fisher; Juanna Ricketts; Jennifer E Isenor
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2022-08-20

6.  Impact of a pharmaceutical care service for patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a customised mobile device (the PROUD trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ji-Won Kim; Yun-Kyoung Song; Ji-Eun Park; Ju-Eun Lee; Bo-Kyung Moon; Hwajeong Lee; Sung-Hoon Park; Seong-Kyu Kim; Jung-Yoon Choe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Quantitative Evaluation and Optimal Decision-Making Study on the Cultivation under the Environment of Humanistic Literacy Based on Advanced Data Analysis Technologies.

Authors:  Shengru Meng
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-09-29

8.  Public perceptions and experiences of the minor ailment service in community pharmacy in Scotland.

Authors:  Lee Boag; Katie Maclure; Anne Boyter; Scott Cunningham; Gazala Akram; Harry Mcquillan; Derek Stewart
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2021-02-12

9.  Pharmacists' and pharmacy technicians' scopes of practice in the management of minor ailments at community pharmacies in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Vinci Mizranita; Tin F Sim; Bruce Sunderland; Richard Parsons; Jeffery D Hughes
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2021-05-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.