| Literature DB >> 36211438 |
Paula Muñiz1,2, Cristina Andrés-Zayas2,3, Diego Carbonell1,2, María Chicano1,2, Rebeca Bailén1,2, Gillen Oarbeascoa1,2, Julia Suárez-González2,3, Ignacio Gómez Centurión1,2, Nieves Dorado1,2, David Gallardo4, Javier Anguita1,2, Mi Kwon1,2, Jose L Díez-Martín1,2,5, Carolina Martínez-Laperche1,2, Ismael Buño1,2,3,6.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment for patients with hematologic malignances. Haploidentical HSCT (Haplo-HSCT) is an alternative option for patients who do not have an HLA-matched donor. The use of post-transplantation high dose cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is commonly employed for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in haplo-HSCT. Cyclophosphamide (Cy) is an alkylating agent with antineoplastic and immunosuppressive activity, whose bioactivation requires the activity of polymorphic enzymes in the liver to produce phosphoramide mustard, which is a DNA alkylating agent. To identify polymorphisms in the genes of Cy metabolism and correlate them with post-HSCT complications [GVHD, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) and transplant-related mortality (TRM)], we designed a custom next-generation sequencing panel with Cy metabolism enzymes. We analyzed 182 patients treated with haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy from 2007 to 2019, detecting 40 variants in 11 Cy metabolism genes. Polymorphisms in CYP2B6, a major enzyme involved in Cy activation, were associated with decreased activity of this enzyme and a higher risk of Graf-versus-host disease (GVHD). Variants in other activation enzymes (CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19) lead to decreased enzyme activity and were associated with GVHD. Polymorphisms in detoxification genes such as glutathione S-transferases decreased the ability to detoxify cyclophosphamide metabolites due to lower enzyme activity, which leads to increased amounts of toxic metabolites and the development of III-IV acute GVHD. GSMT1*0 a single nucleotide polymorphism previously recognized as a risk factor for SOS was associated with a higher risk of SOS. We conclude that polymorphisms of genes involved in the metabolism of cyclophosphamide in our series are associated with severe grades of GVHD and toxicities (SOS and TRM) after haplo-HSCT and could be used to improve the clinical management of transplanted patients.Entities:
Keywords: Graf-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis; cyclophosphamide metabolism genes; haploidentical stem cell transplantation; polymorphisms; post-transplant complications
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211438 PMCID: PMC9537744 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1002959
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1The metabolic pathway of cyclophosphamide. (A). Cy (prodrug) is activated by the hepatic CYP450 to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, which stays in equilibrium with aldophosphamide. These two metabolites diffuse into cells. Depending on the type of cell, in cells with low concentration of ALDH (sensitive cells as lymohocytes), aldophosphamide is spontaneously converted to phosphoramide mustard and acrolein. However, in cells with high concentration of ALDH (resistant cells such as hematopoietic stem cells) aldophosphamide is converted to carboxyphosphamide (inactive). (B) shows SNPs effect in Cy metabolism enzymes: SNPs in CYP450 and GSTs enzymes lead to decreased activity enzyme and produce low level of phosphoramide mustard and high level of toxic metabolites, respectively. This SNPs lead to higher incidence of GVHD, SOS and TRM.
Clinical characteristics of 182 patients who underwent Haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy.
| Characteristic | Whole cohort |
|---|---|
|
| 48 (16-67) |
|
| 40 (14-74) |
|
| 122/60 |
|
| 100/82 |
|
| |
| AML | 65 (35.7) |
| NHL | 25 (13.7) |
| HL | 21 (11.5) |
| ALL | 19 (10.4) |
| MDS | 18 (9.9) |
| MM | 5 (2.8) |
| Other (AA, CLL, CML) | 29 (15.9) |
|
| |
| Active disease or partial response | 79 (43.4) |
| Complete Remission | 103 (56.6) |
|
| |
| Myeloablative | 82 (45.1) |
| Reduced-intensity | 100 (54.9) |
|
| 64 (35.2) |
| Autologous transplant | 46 (71.9) |
| Allogeneic transplant | 18 (28.1) |
|
| |
| II-IV | 71 (39) |
| III-IV | 22 (12.1) |
|
| |
| Global | 68 (37.4) |
| Moderate-severe | 35 (19.2) |
|
| 53 (29.1) |
|
| 31 (28.9) |
|
| 17 (9.34) |
|
| 45 (24.73) |
|
| 65 (66.32) |
AML, Acute myeloid leukemia; NHL, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma; ALL, Acute lymphatic leukemia; MDS, Myelodysplastic syndrome; MM, Multiple myeloma; HC, Hemorrhagic cystitis; SOS, Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome; OS, Overall survival; TRM, Transplant-related mortality; AA, Aplastic anemia; CLL, Chronic lymphatic leukemia; CML, Chronic myeloid leukemia.
Figure 2Algorithm for gene variant filtration. VAF, variant allele frequency; MAF, minor allele frequency.
Univariable analysis if the association between clinical variables and complications after Haplo-HSCT.
| Variable | II-IV aGVHD | III-IV aGVHD | cGVHD | Mod-sev cGVHD | TRM | SOS | HC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-value; SHR (95%CI) | |||||||
|
| 0.66; 1.88(0.14-3.51) | 0.36; 1.28 (0.54-3.07) | 0.72; 0.85 (0.43-1.68) | 0.11; 0.50 (0.22-1.12) | 0.11; 0.87 (0.49-1.79) | 0.87; 0.92 (0.56-2.45) | 0.11; 0.13 (0.17-1.37) |
|
| 0.63; 1.03(0.12-1.37) | 0.40; 0.63 (0.33-1.59) | 0.14; 1.3 (0.67-2.43) | 0.09; 1.26 (0.41-2.97) | 0.76; 0.77 (0.25-1.89) | 0.82; 1.14 (0.72-2.34) | 0.60; 1.84 (0.58-2.65) |
|
| 0.41; 1.13 (0.69-2.55) | 0.21; 1.66 (0.62-4.47) | 0.27; 0.65 (0.31-1.34) | 0.56); 1.03 (0.44-2.36) | 0.55; 1.01 (0.51-2.01) | 0.73; 0.89 (0.31-2.57) | 0.06; 0.51(0.25-1.03) |
|
| 0.56; 1.00 (0.53-1.86) | 0.15; 0.58 (0.24-1.38) | 0.59; 0.78 (0.39-1.56) | 0.31); 0.63 (0.29-1.39) | 0.14; 0.60 (0.31-1.16) | 0.80; 1.19 (0.43-3.27) | 0.86; 0.91 (0.46-1.80) |
|
| 0.22; 0.75 (0.40-1.40) | 0.20; 0.62 (0.26-1.49) | 0.47; 0.74 (0.36-1.49) | 0.17); 0.88 (0.71-1.09) | 0.40; 0.75 (0.39-1.44) | 0.61; 0.76 (0.28-2.09) | 0.29; 0.66 (0.33-1.30) |
|
| |||||||
| Active disease or partial response | 0.63; 1.2 (0.64-2.25) | 0.17; 1.9 (0.81-4.64) | 0.35; 0.82 (0.41-1.64) | 0.53; 1.05 (0.47-2.31) | 0.06; 1.92 (0.86-3.69) | 0.56; 0.95 (0.34-2.61) | 0.86; 1.12 (0.56-2.21) |
|
| 0.16; 1.4 (0.26-1.91) | 0.28; 0.6 (0.24-1.46) | 0.21; 1.39 (0.70-2.75) | 0.59; 0.42 (0.39-1.86) | 0.47; 0.31 (0.191-2.76) | 0.30; 1.18 (0.67-5.08) | 0.73; 0.85 (0.43-1.69) |
|
| 0.09; 1.8 (0.93-3.48) | 0.35; 1.55 (0.64-3.78) | 0.51; 0.43 (0.41-1.83) | 0.67; 0.80 (0.60-2.30) | 0.12; 1.7 (0.88-3.33) | 0.59; 1.00 (0.35-2.86) | 0.27; 1.91 (0.96-3.8) |
AML, Acute myeloid leukemia; aGVHD, Acute graft-versus-host disease; cGVHD, Chronic graft-versus-host disease; CI, Confidence interval; Mod-sev cGVHD, Moderate-severe cGVHD; TRM, Transplant-related mortality; SOS, Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome; SHR, Subhazard ratio; HC, Hemorrhagic cystitis.
Univariable analysis of the association of genetic variants in cyclophosphamide metabolism genes with complications after Haplo-HSCT.
| Gene | SNP | Enzyme activity | Variant effect | Complication after Haplo-HSCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-value; SHR (95%CI) | |||||
|
|
| rs4986892 | U | Synonymous | cGVHD 0.02; 0.38 (0.12-0.98) |
| rs1801272 | Loss of function | Missense | II-IV aGVHD 0.03; 2.74 (1.20-6.25) | ||
| rs143731390 | ↓ | Missense | TRM 0.01; 3.1 (1.13-9.48) | ||
|
| rs3745274 | ↓ | Missense | Mod-sev cGVHD 0.01; 0.37 (0.17-0.83) | |
| rs3211371 | ↓ | Missense | II-IV aGVHD 0.01; 2.46 (1.16-4.44) | ||
| rs2279341 | U | Synonymous | cGVHD 0.03; 2.11 (1.73-8.74) | ||
| rs2279343 | ↑/↓ | Missense | HC 0.03; 3.16 (2.8–7.2) | ||
| rs3745274 (wt) | Normal | – | SOS 0.002; 1.6 (1.1–2.1) | ||
|
| rs10509681 | ↓ | Missense | II-IV aGVHD 0.01; 1.59 (1.01-2.50) | |
| rs11572080 | ↓ | Missense | II-IV aGVHD 0.04; 2.41 (1.91-4.68) | ||
|
| rs1799853 | ↓ | Missense | II-IV aGVHD 0.03;1.67 (1.17-3.47) | |
|
| rs4244285 | Loss of function | Synonymous | TRM 0.01; 2.45 (1.33-8.37) | |
| rs3758580 | U | Synonymous | TRM 0.04; 2.02 (1.14-10.87) | ||
|
|
| rs1051775 | U | Synonymous | III-IV aGVHD 0.003; 0.46 (0.01-0.69)TRM |
| GSTA1*B | ↓ | Missense | III-IV aGVHD 0.01; 2.53 (1.74-10.02) | ||
| (rs3957357) | |||||
|
| GSTM1*0 | Loss of function | Null allele | SOS 0.03; 2.3 (1.10-6.97) | |
|
| rs1695 | ↓ | Missense | III-IV aGVHD 0.04; 2.77 (1.28-11.19) | |
|
| GSTT1*0 | Loss of function | Null allele | III-IV aGVHD 0.01; 2.62 (1.179-5.86) | |
U, unknown SNP; CI, Confidence interval; aGVHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; cGVHD, chromic graft-versus-host disease; mod-sev cGVHD, Moderate-severe cGVHD; SOS, Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome; TRM, Transplant-related mortality; HC, Hemorrhagic cystitis; SHR, “Subhazard ratio” >1=risk; <1=protection; ↓, decreased or ↑, increased enzyme activity previously described in the bibliography; wt, wild type. CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 were studied although we did not find statistically significant differences. Decrease in enzymatic activity in the CY activation genes leads to a lower amount of the active CY metabolite. Regarding the detoxification genes, decreased activity can lead to toxic effects due to increasing levels of metabolites pathway. The enzymatic activity data were obtained from published reports ( ).
Multivariable analysis for outcomes after Haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy.
| Gene | SNP | Variant effect | Complication after Haplo-HSCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-value; SHR (95%CI) | ||||
|
|
| rs143731390 | Missense | TRM 0.003; 3.44 (1.15-9.64) |
|
| rs3745274 | Missense | Mod-sev cGVHD 0.020; 0.38 (0.28–0.72) | |
| rs3211371 | Missense | II-IV aGVHD 0.008; 2.02 (1.93–8.12) | ||
|
|
| rs1051775 | Synonymous | III-IV aGVHD 0.042; 0.42 (0.24–0.81) |
| GSTA1*B (rs3957357) | Missense | TRM 0.036; 2.32 (1.06-10.67) | ||
|
| GSTM1*0 | Null allele | SOS 0.032; 1.36 (1.11-6.32) | |
|
| GSTT1*0 | Null allele | III-IV aGVHD 0.005; 3.29 (1.28-12.23) | |
SHR, “subhazard ratio”; CI, Confidence interval; aGVHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; cGVHD, chromic graft-versus-host disease; mod-sev, Moderate-severe; SOS, Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome; TRM, Transplant-related mortality.