| Literature DB >> 36209079 |
Lanlan Zhao1,2, Cheng Wang1,2, Shanxin Peng3, Xiaosong Zhu3, Ziyi Zhang1,2, Yanyan Zhao1,2, Jinling Zhang3, Guoping Zhao1,2,4,5, Tao Zhang6,7, Xueyuan Heng8, Lei Zhang9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Integrative analysis approaches of metagenomics and metabolomics have been widely developed to understand the association between disease and the gut microbiome. However, the different profiling patterns of different metabolic samples in the association analysis make it a matter of concern which type of sample is the most closely associated with gut microbes and disease. To address this lack of knowledge, we investigated the association between the gut microbiome and metabolomic profiles of stool, urine, and plasma samples from ischemic stroke patients and healthy subjects.Entities:
Keywords: Gut microbiota; Integrative analysis; Ischemic stroke; Metabolomics; Microbiome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36209079 PMCID: PMC9548195 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03669-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 8.440
Fig. 1Metabolic profiling analysis of metabolic mixtures in feces, urine and plasma. A Venn diagram of number of identified metabolites in feces, urine, and plasma. B Volcano plots of metabolite changes of CIS versus control in feces, urine, and plasma. Each dot represents a metabolite identified in the sample. Blue dot represents a metabolite that is downregulated in the CIS. Red dot represents a metabolite that is upregulated in the CIS
Fig. 2Heatmap of the Spearman’s rank correlation of species and fecal metabolites. 7056 pairs of correlations with 72 bacteria species and 98 fecal metabolites were plotted. Red squares indicate positive associations between these microbial species and clinical indexes. Blue squares indicate negative associations. The statistical significance was denoted inside the squares (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)
Fig. 3Heatmap of the Spearman’s rank correlation of species and urinary or plasma metabolites. Red squares indicate positive associations between these microbial species and clinical indexes. Blue squares indicate negative associations. The statistical significance was denoted inside the squares (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). A 2272 pairs of correlations with 71 bacteria species and 32 urinary metabolites were plotted. B 1197 pairs of correlations with 57 bacteria species and 21 plasma metabolites were plotted
Fig. 4The proportion of variance in Chao1 diversity explained by each fecal metabolite. Red bar denotes positive associations between metabolite and Chao1 diversity, while blue bar denotes negative associations
Fig. 5Gut microbiota taxonomic and functional comparison between CIS and the controls. A depicts the indices of alpha-diversity. B depicts the Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) of beta-diversity. Each point represents a single sample in CIS and the controls. The two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 24% and 17%. C shows the relative abundance of KEGG pathways of functional annotations in the gut microbiota. The barplot with 95% confidence intervals denote the significantly different KEGG pathways between CIS and controls. D Gut bacterium-bacterium ecological network in CIS versus the controls. Correlations between taxa were calculated through Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Statistical significance was determined for all pairwise comparisons. Only statistically significant correlations (P < 0.05) with |r|> 0.5 were plotted. The size of node, corresponding to individual microbial species, is proportional to the number of significant inter-species correlations. The color of node indicates the phylum to which the corresponding microbial species belong to. The color intensity of connective lines is proportional to the correlation coefficient, where blue lines indicate inverse correlations and red lines indicate positive correlations
Fig. 6Histograms of significantly diferent abundant taxa with LDA score (log10) > 2.0 and P < 0.05
Fig. 7Heatmap of the Spearman’s rank correlation of significantly differential species and metabolites. The statistical significance was denoted inside the squares (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)
Fig. 8Association between bactriea data and the first principal coordinate (PCo1) of metabolomics data. R2 and its significance were calculated using the ischemic stroke and control samples together. The black line and gray area show a linear model and its 95% confidence interval describing the overall trend. A Correlation between Oscillibacter and the first principal coordinate (PCo1) of fecal, urine, and plasma metabolomics data. B Correlation between Oscillibacter sp.ER4 and the first principal coordinate (PCo1) of fecal, urine, and plasma metabolomics data