Literature DB >> 36204544

Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 1. Data Handling.

Pouria Rouzrokh1, Bardia Khosravi1, Shahriar Faghani1, Mana Moassefi1, Diana V Vera Garcia1, Yashbir Singh1, Kuan Zhang1, Gian Marco Conte1, Bradley J Erickson1.   

Abstract

Minimizing bias is critical to adoption and implementation of machine learning (ML) in clinical practice. Systematic mathematical biases produce consistent and reproducible differences between the observed and expected performance of ML systems, resulting in suboptimal performance. Such biases can be traced back to various phases of ML development: data handling, model development, and performance evaluation. This report presents 12 suboptimal practices during data handling of an ML study, explains how those practices can lead to biases, and describes what may be done to mitigate them. Authors employ an arbitrary and simplified framework that splits ML data handling into four steps: data collection, data investigation, data splitting, and feature engineering. Examples from the available research literature are provided. A Google Colaboratory Jupyter notebook includes code examples to demonstrate the suboptimal practices and steps to prevent them. Keywords: Data Handling, Bias, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD) © RSNA, 2022.
© 2022 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD); Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Data Handling; Deep Learning; Machine Learning

Year:  2022        PMID: 36204544      PMCID: PMC9533091          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  26 in total

1.  Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied?

Authors:  John Eng
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Improving machine learning performance by removing redundant cases in medical data sets.

Authors:  L Ohno-Machado; H S Fraser; A Ohrn
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

3.  Technical Note: MRQy - An open-source tool for quality control of MR imaging data.

Authors:  Amir Reza Sadri; Andrew Janowczyk; Ren Zhou; Ruchika Verma; Niha Beig; Jacob Antunes; Anant Madabhushi; Pallavi Tiwari; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers.

Authors:  John Mongan; Linda Moy; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-03-25

Review 5.  How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts.

Authors:  Burak Kocak; Ece Ates Kus; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  The future of radiology augmented with Artificial Intelligence: A strategy for success.

Authors:  Charlene Liew
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Challenges to the Reproducibility of Machine Learning Models in Health Care.

Authors:  Andrew L Beam; Arjun K Manrai; Marzyeh Ghassemi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.

Authors:  Sudhir Varma; Richard Simon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Preparing Medical Imaging Data for Machine Learning.

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Wojciech A Koszek; Cailin Hardell; Jie Wu; Dominik Fleischmann; Hugh Harvey; Les R Folio; Ronald M Summers; Daniel L Rubin; Matthew P Lungren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.