Kimberly A Clevenger1, Britni R Belcher2, David Berrigan1. 1. Health Behaviors Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA. 2. Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
Introduction/purpose: In the United States, it is recommended that schools provide at least 20 minutes of daily recess, but the optimal amount for health benefits is unknown. We examined associations between amount of recess and health indicators using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (NHANES; 2013-2016). Methods: For this cross-sectional analysis, parents/guardians of 6-11 year olds (n=738) reported recess provision which was classified as low (22.8%; approximately 10-15 min, 5 days per week), medium (54.9%; approximately 16-30 min, 5 days per week), or high (22.3%; approximately >30 min, 5 days per week). Outcomes measured included parent/guardian-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity (PA), blood pressure, cholesterol, grip strength, bone mineral content, weight status, percent body fat, vitamin D level, and C-reactive protein level. Linear and logistic regression compared outcomes by level of recess provision accounting for the NHANES complex survey design. Results: The odds of meeting PA guidelines according to parent/guardian reports were 1.70 and 2.05 times higher in those with medium and high (respectively) versus low recess provision. Accelerometer-measured weekday activity was highest in those with high recess provision while weekend activity was highest in those with low recess provision (Cohen's d = 0.40-0.45). There were no other significant associations. Conclusion: At least 30 minutes of daily recess is associated with two-fold greater odds of achieving recommended PA levels according to parent/guardian reports; accelerometer data suggest this is through increased weekday activity. This finding suggests current national recess recommendations are insufficient for PA promotion. More detailed data on the frequency and duration of recess are needed to quantify optimal provision more precisely.
Introduction/purpose: In the United States, it is recommended that schools provide at least 20 minutes of daily recess, but the optimal amount for health benefits is unknown. We examined associations between amount of recess and health indicators using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (NHANES; 2013-2016). Methods: For this cross-sectional analysis, parents/guardians of 6-11 year olds (n=738) reported recess provision which was classified as low (22.8%; approximately 10-15 min, 5 days per week), medium (54.9%; approximately 16-30 min, 5 days per week), or high (22.3%; approximately >30 min, 5 days per week). Outcomes measured included parent/guardian-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity (PA), blood pressure, cholesterol, grip strength, bone mineral content, weight status, percent body fat, vitamin D level, and C-reactive protein level. Linear and logistic regression compared outcomes by level of recess provision accounting for the NHANES complex survey design. Results: The odds of meeting PA guidelines according to parent/guardian reports were 1.70 and 2.05 times higher in those with medium and high (respectively) versus low recess provision. Accelerometer-measured weekday activity was highest in those with high recess provision while weekend activity was highest in those with low recess provision (Cohen's d = 0.40-0.45). There were no other significant associations. Conclusion: At least 30 minutes of daily recess is associated with two-fold greater odds of achieving recommended PA levels according to parent/guardian reports; accelerometer data suggest this is through increased weekday activity. This finding suggests current national recess recommendations are insufficient for PA promotion. More detailed data on the frequency and duration of recess are needed to quantify optimal provision more precisely.
Entities:
Keywords:
School; accelerometer; bone health; metabolic traits; surveillance
Authors: Joseph T Flynn; David C Kaelber; Carissa M Baker-Smith; Douglas Blowey; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen R Daniels; Sarah D de Ferranti; Janis M Dionne; Bonita Falkner; Susan K Flinn; Samuel S Gidding; Celeste Goodwin; Michael G Leu; Makia E Powers; Corinna Rea; Joshua Samuels; Madeline Simasek; Vidhu V Thaker; Elaine M Urbina Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Britni R Belcher; Richard P Moser; Kevin W Dodd; Audie A Atienza; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; David Berrigan Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2014-06-04
Authors: Trudy Voortman; Edith H van den Hooven; Annemieke C Heijboer; Albert Hofman; Vincent Wv Jaddoe; Oscar H Franco Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: R Glenn Weaver; Anthony Crimarco; Timothy A Brusseau; Collin A Webster; Ryan D Burns; James C Hannon Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Britni R Belcher; Dana L Wolff-Hughes; Erin E Dooley; John Staudenmayer; David Berrigan; Mark S Eberhardt; Richard P Troiano Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2021-11-01
Authors: Jakob Tarp; Abbey Child; Tom White; Kate Westgate; Anna Bugge; Anders Grøntved; Niels Wedderkopp; Lars B Andersen; Greet Cardon; Rachel Davey; Kathleen F Janz; Susi Kriemler; Kate Northstone; Angie S Page; Jardena J Puder; John J Reilly; Luis B Sardinha; Esther M F van Sluijs; Ulf Ekelund; Katrien Wijndaele; Søren Brage Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 5.095