| Literature DB >> 36203804 |
Kaiyue Zhao1, Li Zeng1, Zhongdi Cai1, Mimin Liu1, Ting Sun1, Zhuorong Li1, Rui Liu1.
Abstract
Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most common form of dementia with uncertain mechanisms and no effective treatments. microRNAs (miRNAs) and transcription factors (TFs) are considered regulatory factors of genes involved in many diseases. Therefore, this work investigated the aberrantly expressed miRNAs, TFs, corresponding target genes, and their co-regulatory networks in the cortex of rats with bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (2VO) to uncover the potential mechanism and biomarkers of VaD. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), miRNAs (DEMs), and TFs (DETFs) were identified using RNA sequencing, and their interaction networks were constructed using Cytoscape. The results showed that rats with 2VO had declined cognitive abilities and neuronal loss in the cortex than sham rats. DEGs, DEMs, and DETFs were discriminated between rats with 2VO and sham rats in the cortex, as shown by the 13 aberrantly expressed miRNAs, 805 mRNAs, and 63 TFs. The miRNA-TF-target gene network was constructed, showing 523 nodes and 7237 edges. Five miRNAs (miR-5132-5p, miR-764-3p, miR-223-3p, miR-145-5p, and miR-122-5p), ten TFs (Mxi1, Nfatc4, Rxrg, Zfp523, Foxj2, Nkx6-1, Klf4, Klf5, Csrnp1, and Prdm6), and seven target genes (Serpine1, Nedd4l, Pxn, Col1a1, Plec, Trip12, and Tpm1) were chosen as the significant nodes to construct feed-forward loops (FFLs). Gene Ontology and pathway enrichment analysis revealed that these miRNA and TF-associated genes are mostly involved in the PI3K/Akt, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, calcium signaling, and Wnt signaling pathways, along with central locations around the cell membrane. They exert functions such as growth factor binding, integrin binding, and extracellular matrix structural constituent, with representative biological processes like vasculature development, cell-substrate adhesion, cellular response to growth factor stimulus, and synaptic transmission. Furthermore, the expression of three miRNAs (miR-145-5p, miR-122-5p, and miR-5132-5p), six TFs (Csrnp1, Klf4, Nfatc4, Rxrg, Foxj2, and Klf5), and five mRNAs (Serpine1, Plec, Nedd4l, Trip12, and Tpm1) were significantly changed in rats with VaD, in line with the outcome of RNA sequencing. In the potential FFL, miR-145-5p directly bound Csrnp1 and decreased its mRNA expression. These results might help the understanding of the underlying regulatory mechanisms of miRNA-TF-genes, providing potential therapeutic targets in VaD.Entities:
Keywords: RNA sequencing; microRNA; regulatory network; transcription factor; vascular dementia
Year: 2022 PMID: 36203804 PMCID: PMC9531238 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.917489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 5.152
FIGURE 1Workflow of the present study.
FIGURE 2Cognitive decline and neuronal injury in rats with 2VO compared with sham rats. (A) Timeline of the in vivo experiment. 8-week-old SD rats were subjected to the bilateral common carotid artery occlusion, followed by the cognitive impairment test after 3 weeks. The cerebral cortices were finally collected from the 12-week-old SD rats. 2VO: bilateral common carotid artery occlusion. (B) Escape latency of rats in the navigation test for five consecutive days (n = 9). (C) Swimming speed of rats during the navigation test (n = 9). (D) Number of crossings of rats to find platforms previously located in the probe test (n = 9). (E) Duration time in the target quadrant in the probe test (n = 9). (F) Representative images of Nissl staining in the cortex of 2VO and sham rats. (G) Quantification of Nissl staining (n = 3). Results are presented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. sham.
Primers for qRT-PCR and nucleotide sequences for transfection.
| Name | Sequence |
| miR-145-5p RT | 5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG |
| TATTCGCACTGGATACGACAGGGAT-3′ | |
| miR-122-5p-RT | 5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG |
| TATTCGCACTGGATACGACCAAACA-3′ | |
| miR-21-5p-RT | 5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG |
| TATTCGCACTGGATACGACTCAACA-3′ | |
| miR-5132-5p RT | 5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT |
| U6 RT | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTA-3′ |
| miR-145-5p-F | 5′-CGGTCCAGTTTTCCCAGGA-3′ |
| miR-145-5p-R | 5′-AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT-3′ |
| miR-122-5p-F | 5′-CGCGTGGAGTGTGACAATGG-3′ |
| miR-122-5p-R | 5′-AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT-3′ |
| miR-5132-5p-F | 5′-GATATCGTGGGGCGGTGGA-3′ |
| miR-5132-5p-R | 5′-CAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′ |
| miR-764-3p-F | 5′-AACAAGGAGGAGGCCATAGTG-3′ |
| miR-764-3p R | 5′-CAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′ |
| U6-F | 5′-CAAATTCGTGAAGCGTTCCA-3′ |
| U6-R | 5′-AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT-3′ |
| 5′-GCGTCTTCCTCCACAGCCATTC-3′ | |
| 5′-TGTCTCTGTTGGATTGTGCCGAAC-3′ | |
| 5′-CGCCGTGCTGTGAAAGATACCC-3′ | |
| 5′-GTGTGACTTTGTGTTGTGGTTTGGG-3′ | |
| 5′-GTAGCATCTCTGAACAGACGCATCC-3′ | |
| 5′-CAGCCTTCTCAGCCTCCTCCAG-3′ | |
| 5′-CAGCCAGCAGCAGACCAGAATC-3′ | |
| 5′-ACTGCCGCTCTACATCCACTCTC-3′ | |
| 5′-CACCGCACTGAACTCGCTACAC-3′ | |
| 5′-GCTCGGCATCTTGGTCACTCTG-3′ | |
| 5′-CCGAATCAACTGGTGCCGAAGAG-3′ | |
| 5′-AGGAGGAAGTAGAGGCAGCAGAAG-3′ | |
| 5′-TGTTGGTCCTGCTGGCAAGAATG-3′ | |
| 5′-GTCACCTTGTTCGCCTGTCTCAC-3′ | |
| 5′-AGACGAGACAGTGCCTCAGTGG-3′ | |
| 5′-GCCAGTTCTCAGGTGCGTGATG-3′ | |
| 5′-ACGCTTCTGTAGAGGAGGACTTGG-3′ | |
| 5′-CCGAGGTGGATAGGGCTGTAGG-3′ | |
| 5′-CGAATCCTACGGCGACATGAGTG-3′ | |
| 5′-AACAAGGGTGAAGAGCTGCTTATCC-3′ | |
| 5′-GGACGGCTGTGGGTGGAAATTC-3′ | |
| 5′-TGTCGCACTTCTGGCACTGAAAG-3′ | |
| 5′-GCGGTCGTGTTCTTGAGTGTCC-3′ | |
| 5′-CAAAGCCTTCTGGTGGAGGGTAATC-3′ | |
| 5′-ACCCGCAAGCCTCTCATCTCTAC-3′ | |
| 5′-GTGGTGTGTTGGGCGACTGTATC-3′ | |
| 5′-AGAGTCAGGTCAAGGTCTGGTTCC-3′ | |
| 5′-ATCGTCGTCGTCCTCCTCGTTC-3′ | |
| 5′-CCACCACCCTCAACAACCACATC-3′ | |
| 5′-GTCTTCCAAACGCTTCAGCAAACAG-3′ | |
| 5′-GCGAGAGGAGATTGAAGTGGATGTG-3′ | |
| 5′-TGATGCTGGTGGTACTGATGTTGTC-3′ | |
| 5′-CAATGGCAAAGGGCAGCAAGTTG-3′ | |
| 5′-AGTGATGGGCAGTGGTGTAGAGG-3′ | |
| 5′-CAAGGTCATCCATGACAACTTTG-3′ | |
| 5′-GGGCCATCCACAGTCTCCT-3′ | |
|
| 5′-AGTGCCTCAGTCGTAGACCAGTTC-3′ |
|
| 5′-GCCAGTTCTCAGGTGAGTGATGTC-3′ |
|
| 5′-ATGCCATTGATGACGCCTCTGTG-3′ |
|
| 5′-GGCTGGGTAGGGCTGTAGGAAG-3′ |
|
| 5′-ATACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCC-3′ |
|
| 5′-CCTGTACGCCAACACAGTGC-3′ |
| miR-145-5p mimics | sense 5′-GUCCAGUUUUCCCAGGAAUCCCU-3′ |
| antisense 5′-GGAUUCCUGGGAAAACUGGACUU-3′ | |
| miR-122-5p mimics | sense 5′-UGGAGUGUGACAAUGGUGUUUG-3′ |
| antisense 5′-AACACCAUUGUCACACUCCAUU-3′ | |
| Negative control (NC) | sense 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ |
| antisense 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′ |
FIGURE 3Volcano plots of the transcriptome and hierarchical cluster analysis of the DEMs and DEGs in the cortex of 2VO and sham rats. (A) Volcano plots of the differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) in the cortex of rats with 2VO compared with sham rats. (B) Differentially expressed mRNAs (DEGs) in the cortex of rats with 2VO compared with sham rats. Red dots indicate the upregulated DEMs and DEGs in the brains of rats with 2VO, while green dots indicate downregulated DEMs and DEGs. The molecules with no statistically different changes in rats with 2VO are shown as gray dots. (C) Hierarchical clustering analysis of DEMs. (D) Hierarchical clustering analysis of DEGs. The X-axis shows the cluster analysis of samples, the top blue bar indicates the sham group, and the top red bar indicates the group of rats with 2VO. The Y-axis shows the cluster analysis of miRNAs or mRNAs. Upregulated DEMs and DEGs are shown in red, and downregulated DEMs and DEGs are shown in green.
Sequence and sequence homology of DEMs.
| Name | Mature sequence | Log2 (foldchange) | Sequence homology | |
| miR-21-5p | 5′-UAGCUUAUCAGACUGAUGUUGA-3′ | –2.2700 | 0.017800 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-511-3p | 5′-AAUGUGUAGCAAAAGACAGGA-3′ | –1.7300 | 0.003990 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-145-5p | 5′-GUCCAGUUUUCCCAGGAAUCCCU-3′ | –1.5300 | 0.030800 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-10b-5p | 5′-CCCUGUAGAACCGAAUUUGUGU-3′ | –1.4600 | 0.056800 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-143-3p | 5′-UGAGAUGAAGCACUGUAGCUCA-3′ | –1.4100 | 0.001360 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-214-3p | 5′-ACAGCAGGCACAGACAGGCAG-3′ | –1.2800 | 0.001750 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-764-3p | 5′-GAGGAGGCCAUAGUGGCAACUGU-3′ | –1.2700 | 0.002600 | rat, mouse |
| miR-10a-5p | 5′-UACCCUGUAGAUCCGAAUUUGUG-3′ | –1.0600 | 0.000464 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-223-3p | 5′-UGUCAGUUUGUCAAAUACCCC-3′ | –1.0500 | 0.010400 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-155-5p | 5′-UUAAUGCUAAUUGUGAUAGGGGU-3′ | –1.0400 | 0.005740 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-122-5p | 5′-UGGAGUGUGACAAUGGUGUUUG-3′ | 4.0500 | 0.011800 | rat, mouse, human |
| miR-5132-5p | 5′-CGUGGGGCGGUGGACCCAGGCU-3′ | 1.4200 | 0.015700 | rat, mouse |
| miR-802-5p | 5′-UCAGUAACAAAGAUUCAUCCU-3′ | 1.1500 | 0.039800 | rat, mouse |
FIGURE 4Identification of DETFs and DEGs jointly regulated by DEMs and DETFs. (A) Identification of 63 DETFs from DEGs using the Venn diagram. (B) Target prediction of DEMs and DETFs. A total of 535 miRNA-gene regulatory pairs, 639 TF-gene regulatory pairs, and 460 miRNA/TF-associated DEGs are identified. (C) Identification of 49 miRNA-TF regulatory pairs in total. (D) Identification of 37 TF-miRNA regulatory pairs.
FIGURE 5Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG enrichment analyses. (A) Top 20 GO terms of biological process (BP) as enrichment of 460 miRNA/TF-associated genes, including vasculature development and regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade. (B) Top 20 GO terms of cellular components (CC) from the enrichment analysis of the 460 genes, including myofibril and cell cortex. (C) Bar charts of molecular function (MF) enrichment of the 460 genes, including growth factor binding and integrin binding. (D) Top 10 signaling pathways of KEGG enrichment analysis presented in the form of a Chordal graph, such as the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and Wnt signaling pathway. Pathways are distinguished by different colors. The top 10 pathways are listed on the right side according to the P-value (from top to bottom in ascending order). Each line represents the association between two pathways. The thicker the line, the more common enriched genes between the two pathways and the stronger the association.
FIGURE 6M-T-G and PPI networks. (A) Establishment of the M-T-G network of 13 DEMs, 49 DETFs, and 460 DEGs. The genes, miRNAs, and TFs are represented by yellow circles, red rectangles, and blue triangles, respectively. The key nodes are highlighted with larger sizes. (B) Establishment of the PPI network based on the 460 joint targets of DEMs and DETFs.
Summary of key genes.
| Name | Type | Log2 (foldchange) | ||
|
| gene | –3.5300 | 0.006660 | 0.775000 |
|
| gene | –2.0100 | 0.000001 | 1.680000 |
|
| gene | –1.9300 | 0.001040 | 1.280000 |
|
| gene | –1.4300 | 0.034000 | 0.732000 |
|
| gene | 4.8400 | 0.041300 | 0.756000 |
|
| gene | 3.8700 | 0.002240 | 0.940000 |
|
| gene | 2.5500 | 0.000124 | 0.578000 |
Summary of key TFs and miRNAs.
| Name | Type | Occurrences | |
|
| transcription factor | 47100 | 1.4600 |
|
| transcription factor | 150000 | 1.4000 |
|
| transcription factor | 162000 | 1.3700 |
|
| transcription factor | 64700 | 1.3600 |
|
| transcription factor | 28700 | 1.3600 |
|
| transcription factor | 35200 | 0.7900 |
|
| transcription factor | 51000 | 0.6140 |
|
| transcription factor | 104000 | 0.4840 |
|
| transcription factor | 53600 | 0.3760 |
|
| transcription factor | 39300 | 0.3620 |
| miR-5132-5p | miRNA | 2.2200 | 1.4200 |
| miR-764-3p | miRNA | 1.6300 | 1.0700 |
| miR-223-3p | miRNA | 0.9200 | 0.9090 |
| miR-145-5p | miRNA | 0.5090 | 0.8110 |
| miR-122-5p | miRNA | 0.7340 | 0.5950 |
FIGURE 7Regulatory relationships of the M-T-G subgraph network, composite loops, and FFLs. (A) Establishment of the M-T-G subgraph network of the key nodes based on 7 DEGs, 10 DETFs, and 5 DEMs. (B) Summary of all the composite loops based on the M-T-G subgraph network. (C) Collection of the miRNA-mediated FFLs extracted from the M-T-G subgraph network. (D) Gathering of TF-mediated FFLs of key DETFs. The target genes, miRNAs, and TFs are represented with yellow circles, red rectangles, and blue triangles, respectively. The edges radiated from miRNAs are marked in red and T-shaped blunt arrow ends, while the edges projecting from TFs are marked in blue and sharp arrow ends.
FIGURE 8Three-node FFLs formed by key nodes. (A) TFs-mediated three-node FFLs of individual key DETFs. (B) A total of four miRNA-mediated three-node FFLs of key DEMs of the present study. The gene, miRNA, and TF are represented with yellow circles, red rectangles, and blue triangles, respectively. The terminal of the edges radiating from the miRNA is marked in red and T-type blunt arrow, while the one that changed to sharp arrow for the edges that radiate from TF is in blue color.
FIGURE 9Composite loops among key miRNAs, TFs, and genes. Collection of composite loops of key nodes based on mutual regulatory miRNA-TF pairs. The gene, miRNA, and TF are represented with yellow circles, red rectangles, and blue triangles, respectively. The terminal of the edges radiating from the miRNA is marked in red and T-type blunt arrow, while the one that changed to sharp arrow for the edges radiated from TF is in blue color.
FIGURE 10Validation of the expression and regulatory relationship. (A) Verification of the differential expression of the key miRNAs using qRT-PCR (n = 3). (B) Relative expression of the key TFs in the cortex of the rats with 2VO compared with the sham rats using qRT-PCR analysis (n = 3). (C) Relative expression of the key genes using qRT-PCR analysis (n = 3). (D) Wild-type (WT) or mutant-type (MUT) binding sites for the combination of miR-145-5p and Csrnp1 in the dual-luciferase reporter assay. (E) Binding sites of the wild or mutant type of miR-122-5p and Klf5. (F) Direct interaction of miR-145-5p/Csrnp1 by dual-luciferase reporter assay (n = 6). (G) No direct interaction of miR-122-5p/Klf5 by dual-luciferase reporter assay (n = 6). (H) Significant decrease of the Csrnp1 expression in the presence of miR-145-5p mimics. (I) No difference in the Klf5 expression in the presence of miR-122-5p. Results are presented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. Sham. ###P < 0.001 vs. NC.