| Literature DB >> 36203724 |
Abstract
In the current environment of globalization, the communication between people is gradually getting closer, and the society is becoming more and more complex. With the continuous development and progress of science and technology, people are more skilled in applying science and technology to their own concerns. College students are about to enter the society, will feel multiple pressure from family, school, and society, study and life problems will gradually convert into mental health problems, and we need to use machine learning basketball exercise to positively affect the mental health quality of college students. The improvement of living conditions makes people pay more attention to their physical and mental health, and learn to use machine learning sports reasonably, not only basketball exercise, to improve mental health diseases. However, we need to use machine learning to identify the different effects of different basketball exercise intensity on mental health, in order to ensure that the most appropriate basketball exercise intensity brings good aspects to the mental health of college students. Through the investigation and data sampling, it can be concluded that the machine learning-based basketball exercise intensity has a positive impact on the mental health of college students.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36203724 PMCID: PMC9532080 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9628446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
College students' identification of the value of sports (unit: %).
| Content | In full agreement | Largely agree | Disagree | Pussyfoot | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sports can promote physical and mental health | 76.8 | 22.8 | 0.4 | 0 | 100 |
| Sports can enrich your spare time life | 65.0 | 33.3 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 100 |
| Sports can develop good living habits | 46.3 | 46.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 100 |
| Sports can relax | 44.7 | 54.9 | 0.4 | 0 | 100 |
| Sports can cause fatigue and affect learning | 2.4 | 8.5 | 80.9 | 8.1 | 100 |
Daily physical and mental feeling degree of college students (unit: %).
| Insentience | Sometimes feel | Often feel | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical fatigue | 8.5 | 81.7 | 9.3 | 100 |
| Mental fatigue | 10.6 | 73.2 | 16.3 | 100 |
| Feel underexercised | 20.3 | 68.3 | 11.4 | 100 |
| Feel that obesity is happening | 44.7 | 37.4 | 17.9 | 100 |
Figure 1Basketball level.
Figure 2Step length and width of each group at 5 km/h (m).
Figure 3Gait cycle of each group at 5 km/h (seconds).
Figure 4Changes in step frequency with speed in each group (times/minute).
Comparison of heart and lung function before and after basketball exercise (20 people).
| Index | Front | Behind |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulse (b/min) | 80.84 ± 2.72 | 73.94 ± 2.10 | <0.05 |
| Diastolic pressure (kPa) | 73.74 ± 2.29 | 67.05 ± 1.65 | <0.05 |
| Systolic pressure (kPa) | 121.53 ± 2.68 | 116.89 ± 1.89 | <0.05 |
| Step index | 57.17 ± 1.44 | 59.30 ± 1.37 | <0.05 |
| Vital capacity (ml) | 4480.79 ± 134.65 | 4565.78 ± 127.96 | <0.05 |
| Spiro-index (ml/kg) | 68.15 ± 2.48 | 69.40 ± 2.32 | <0.05 |
Comparison of various qualities before and after basketball exercise (20 people).
| Index | Front | Behind |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Shuttle run (s) | 11.11 ± 0.16 | 10.54 ± 0.11 | <0.05 |
| Push-up (individual) | 27.74 ± 2.60 | 30.21 ± 2.24 | >0.05 |
| Pull-up (individual) | 3.74 ± 0.61 | 6.68 ± 1.34 | <0.05 |
| Grip (N) | 50.39 ± 1.22 | 54.85 ± 1.29 | <0.05 |
| Bending (cm) | 10.14 ± 1.07 | 10.21 ± 1.70 | >0.05 |
| Vertical jump (cm) | 50.37 ± 1.98 | 56.10 ± 1.57 | <0.05 |
| Long jump (cm) | 2.51 ± 0.04 | 2.61 ± 0.04 | <0.05 |
| 50 meters (s) | 7.50 ± 0.11 | 7.30 ± 0.11 | <0.05 |
| 1000 meters (s) | 3.97 ± 0.18 | 3.73 ± 0.17 | >0.05 |
Comparison of each circumference, skinfold thickness, and derived index before and after basketball exercise (20 people).
| Index | Front | Behind |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Stature (cm) | 174.46 ± 1.37 | 175.26 ± 1.34 | <0.05 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.13 ± 3.09 | 66.91 ± 2.90 | >0.05 |
| Bust (cm) | 91.52 ± 1.85 | 89.84 ± 1.75 | <0.05 |
| Upper-arm circumference (cm) | 30.60 ± 2.55 | 27.43 ± 0.64 | >0.05 |
| Waistline (cm) | 76.94 ± 2.59 | 74.78 ± 2.10 | <0.05 |
| Hipline (cm) | 93.49 ± 1.55 | 92.96 ± 1.46 | >0.05 |
| Thigh circumference (cm) | 53.57 ± 1.35 | 53.48 ± 1.33 | >0.05 |
| Three humerus head (cm) | 10.15 ± 1.34 | 9.27 ± 1.14 | <0.05 |
| Loin (cm) | 13.30 ± 2.01 | 12.24 ± 1.88 | <0.05 |
| Belly (cm) | 10.58 ± 1.40 | 9.66 ± 1.26 | <0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.97 ± 0.84 | 21.71 ± 0.79 | <0.05 |
| WHR | 0.82 ± 0.016 | 0.80 ± 0.012 | <0.05 |
Comparison of student SCL-90 test results before and after basketball exercise.
| Before the experiment | After the experiment |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Somatization | 1.517 ± 0.407 | 1.489 ± 0.334 | >0.05 |
| Forced symptoms | 1.719 ± 0.452 | 1.576 ± 0.487 | <0.05 |
| Interpersonal relation | 1.699 ± 0.324 | 1.424 ± 0.289 | <0.05 |
| Depressed | 1.531 ± 0.419 | 1.389 ± 0.392 | <0.05 |
| Anxious | 1.395 ± 0.281 | 1.282 ± 0.269 | <0.05 |
| Hostile | 1.282 ± 0.195 | 1.165 ± 0.264 | <0.05 |
| Terrifying | 1.484 ± 0.262 | 1.416 ± 0.261 | >0.05 |
| Bigoted | 1.197 ± 0.287 | 1.101 ± 0.236 | <0.05 |
| Psychiatric sex | 1.208 ± 0.218 | 1,132 ± 0.212 | <0.05 |
| Add | 1.412 ± 0.365 | 1.394 ± 0.313 | >0.05 |
Figure 5Comparison of SCL-90 test results of students before and after exercise.