Literature DB >> 36203524

Circulation microRNA expression profiles in patients with complete responses to chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Tirta Wardana1, Siti Nur Chasanah2, Risky Oktriani3, Cita Herawati4, Sumadi Lukman Anwar5, Indwiani Astuti6, Sofia Mubarika Haryana7.   

Abstract

Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic cancer in Southeast Asia with a relatively poor prognosis. Chemoradiotherapy is a primary treatment that advantages certain patients, particularly in the early stages. New predictive and prognostic biomarkers are required to guide and select the best treatment. Aims: To evaluate the circulation expression profile of microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with responses to chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Methods: Peripheral blood from 17 patients was collected before and after chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Differential expression circulating miRNAs were analyzed using microRNA Cancer Panels and were compared among patients with complete responses. Differential expression analysis using GenEx 7 Multid, statistic represented by GraphPad Prism 9. Alterations mechanism signaling pathways and biological function using IPA (Ingenuity Pathways Analysis).
Results: Using microRNAs Cancer Plate consisting of 116 miRNAs, we identified ten circulating miRNAs that were differentially expressed in NPC patients after chemoradiotherapy. Unsupervised clustering and confirmation using qRT-PCR showed that miR-483-5p, miR-584-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-7-5p, miR-150-5p were overexpressed and miRNA are miR-421, miR-133a-3p, miR-18a-5p, miR-106b-3p, miR-339-5p were significantly downregulated after chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.0001). In addition, ROC analysis through AUC (Area Under Curve) with 99% confidence interval (CI) p value < 0.0001. Gene enrichment analysis of microRNAs and the targeted proteins revealed that the main involved pathways for chemoradiotherapy in NPC were cell death and survival signaling pathways.
Conclusion: qPCR profiling in circulating blood compared before and after chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma can identify pathways involved in treatment responses. miR-483-5p, miR-584-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-7-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-421, miR-133a-3p, miR-18a-5p, miR-106b-3p, miR-339-5p are differentially regulated after chemoradiotherapy in NPC.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer biomarker; Chemoradiotherapy; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Plasma; Therapy; miRNA

Year:  2022        PMID: 36203524      PMCID: PMC9519485          DOI: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2022.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noncoding RNA Res        ISSN: 2468-0540


Introduction

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is a head and neck cancer with relatively high incidence, mortality, and low survival rates in Southeast Asia, including Indonesia [1]. Many are found in Southeast Asia and are associated with particular ethnicities, so this cancer is unique [2]. The cause of cancer is still unclear. Although it is more commonly found in men, the relationship with gender has not been explained. Delay in diagnosis worsens the patient's condition. The anatomical location and small size are difficult to detect early on, so it is considered the cause of the low cure rate [[3], [4], [5]]. One of the biggest challenges in the treatment is complete response and a high rate of cancer progression after treatment. The core clinical management is early diagnosis using nasopharyngeal tissue biopsy followed by radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy. In low- and middle-income countries, NPCs are usually diagnosed in late stages due to the difficulty of recognizing the disease until manifestation in the cervical lymph nodes [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. In patients with advanced stages, disease recurrences are relatively high after a particular time of clinical responses with chemoradiotherapy. Clinical biomarkers to predict disease progression in NPC are still lacking. Tumor biomarkers are essential to guide treatment, calculate disease progression risk, and design surveillance [10]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small RNA (20–25 bp) involved in the modulation of gene expression through post-translational mechanisms [11,12]. Differences in miRNA expression profiles in primary tissue samples have been used in differentiating pathophysiology risk factors [13], therapeutics response [14], and prognosis of NPC [15]. Chemoradiotherapy causes apoptosis of cancer cells, thereby affecting changes in miRNA expression. Several miRNAs have been involved in chemotherapy response after receiving 5-fluorouracil + cisplatin of NPC and 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in breast cancer [16,17]. We also previously investigated the association between the expressions of chemotherapy responses f NPC and Breast cancer using cell lines and primary tissue samples [18,19]. Chemoradiotherapy might also affect circulating tumor cells, protein, free-DNA, and RNAs. This study investigated altered miRNA expression in the plasma in NPC patients with complete responses after chemoradiotherapy.

Material and methods

Study subjects and ethics statement

17 NPC patients who received chemotherapy based on cisplatin and radiotherapy were involved. Patients come to health facilities with complaints of nasal obstruction, ear problems, nosebleeds, headaches, and lumps in the neck. Four patients were initially diagnosed in stage II B, and 4 and 9 patients were diagnosed in stage III and IV. Plasma samples were collected before treatment 3–17 months after the chemoradiotherapy. Other eligibility criteria for this study were Early Antigen (EA) > 1, Viral Capsid Antigen (VCA) > 2, and EBNA >1.6. Response to treatment was evaluated 12 weeks after using nasopharyngeal endoscopy and CT scan. Complete response (CR) was defined as no residual disease in the smooth nasopharyngeal mucosa, no mass, and no lymph nodes with confirmation of biopsy. This study was performed after approval from Jenderal Soedirman University Ethics Committee (number 898/EC/2016). Furthermore, all participants were older than 18 years old and could provide an informed consent form when recruited, which entails using samples, acquisition, and clinical data.

Chemoradiotherapy

A combination of radiation and chemotherapy is utilized to treat progressed locoregional NPC. Chemotherapy is classified as neoadjuvant, contemporaneous, or adjuvant, whether given some time recently, amid, or after radiation. Chemotherapy is chosen separately based on the patient's characteristics. Concurrent cisplatin with illumination is the standard treatment for chemoradiation in nearby maladies. In the meantime, with cisplatin + radiotherapy taken after cisplatin/5-FU or carboplatin/5-FU, chemoradiation taken after adjuvant chemotherapy may be utilized. The docetaxel/cisplatin/5 FI, docetaxel/cisplatin regimen is utilized for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cisplatin/5 FU, cisplatin/epirubicin/paclitaxel, and concordant coordination with week-by-week cisplatin or carboplatin organization. The radiation measurements endorsed were 69–74 Gy to PGTVnx, 66–70 Gy to PGTVnd, 60–66 Gy to PTV1, and 50–54 Gy to PTV2, conveyed in 30 or 33 divisions. Radiation is given once day by day, five divisions per week, for 6–6.5 weeks for IMRT arranging.

Plasma sample collection and miRNA isolation

Whole blood from patients (5 mL each) before and after therapy was collected using an EDTA vacutainer. Plasma was separated using centrifugation (1500 rpm for 10 min) and was stored at −80 °C until analysis. 200 mL of plasma was used for total RNA extraction using RNA Isolation Kit miRCURY-Biofluid (Cat No. 300 112, Exiqon). cDNA synthesis was performed using 50 mL of total RNA with cDNA Synthesis Universal kit II, 8–64 rxns (Cat No. 203 301, Exiqon) in Biorad C1000 thermal cycler (42 °C for 60 min, 95 °C for 5 min, and 4 °C). All procedures were performed following the manufacturer's recommended protocol.

Quantification microRNA panel

MicroRNA profiling was performed using real-time PCR using Cancer Focus microRNA PCR Panel. ExiLent SYBR Green master mix, 2.5 mL (Cat No. 203 402, Exiqon) consisting of 196 target primer miRNAs based on LNA (Locked Nucleic Acid). All protocols were performed following the recommended protocols provided by the manufacturer.

Data analysis

The analyses were performed using Genex 6 Pro with Exiqon qPCR wizard software MultiD. Expression analysis was performed using relative quantification of −2ΔΔCt [20]. Gene enrichment analysis of the differential miRNA expression was performed using Ineguinity Pathway Analysis (IPA). GraphPad Prism 9 software was used for data analysis and Figure configuration to represent the mean, standard deviation (SD), and the student t-test. ROC sensitivity and specificity analysis was constructed with a 99% confidence interval and p < 0.05 as a statistically significant value.

Results

Patients characteristics

In this study of patients, 13 males and 4 females with a median age of 51. Staging I-II data was performed on 4 patients and 13 at III-IV. These patients received completed chemo and radiotherapy, as shown in Table 1. Based on titer EBV infection, data showed positive EBV EA (n = 15), EBV- EBNA (n = 15) and EBV-VCA (n = 17). From the histology status, the participants were dominated by WHO type III with 14 patients.
Table 1

Demographical and clinical characteristics of the study population.

CharacteristicNPercent (%)
Pre Chemotherapy17100
Post Chemotherapy17100
Median Age (Years), Range51 (20–66)
Sex
 Male1376%
 Female424%
Histology (WHO)
 WHO I16%
 WHO II212%
 WHO III1482%
Stage at diagnosis
 I00
 II424%
 III424%
 IV953%
Pathology Anatomy
 Undifferentiated212%
 Non-Keratin, Undiff-Sub Type1376%
 Non-Keratin, Differentiated16%
 Keratin16%
EBV - EA
 Positive1588%
 Negative212%
EBV - EBNA
 Positive1588%
 Negative212%
EBV - VCA
 Positive17100%
 Negative00%
Demographical and clinical characteristics of the study population.

Differential expression

Clinical and pathological patient characteristics at diagnosis are summarized in Table 1. Analysis of relative expression using GenEx identified 20 of the most differentially deregulated miRNAs (details see Table 2). From these results, 10 miRNAs were down expressions (p < 0.0001), and 10 were up expressions (p < 0001). The heatmap of differentially expressed microRNAs is presented in Fig. 1.
Table 2

Profile dynamic changes expression of microRNAs circulating in NPC after receiving chemoradiotherapy.

NoVariableFCDifferencesP-valueExpression
1hsa-miR-483-5p−12.506−3.6451.00E-08Down Expression
2hsa-miR-584-5p−10.558−6.7081.00E-08Down Expression
3Hsa-miR-122-5p−6.312−2.6581.00E-08Down Expression
4hsa-miR-7-5p−5.225−2.3861.00E-08Down Expression
5Hsa-miR-150-5p−4.206−2.0731.00E-08Down Expression
6hsa-miR-877-5p−4.045−2.0161.00E-08Down Expression
7Hsa-miR-215-5p−2.935−1.5536.63E-07Down Expression
8Hsa-miR-192-5p−2.914−1.5431.00E-08Down Expression
9hsa-miR-141-3p−2.344−1.2291.01E-06Down Expression
10hsa-miR-16-2-3p−2.04−1.0295.22E-05Down Expression
11hsa-miR-30e-3p6.2332.641.00E-08Over Expression
12hsa-miR-16.2382.6411.00E-08Over Expression
13hsa-miR-376a-3p6.2492.6441.00E-08Over Expression
14hsa-miR-378a-3p6.4522.691.00E-08Over Expression
15hsa-miR-133b6.6742.7391.00E-08Over Expression
16hsa-miR-339-5p6.7232.7491.00E-08Over Expression
17hsa-miR-106b-3p6.9342.7941.00E-08Over Expression
18hsa-miR-18a-5p9.2243.2051.00E-08Over Expression
19hsa-miR-133a-3p10.8843.4441.00E-08Over Expression
20hsa-miR-42112.6313.6591.00E-08Over Expression
Fig. 1

Profile expression with a high significance p-value (p < 0.0001) using cancer focus microRNAs panel from circulating pretreatment (non-chemo-radiotherapy) and chemo-radiotherapy in NPC.

Profile dynamic changes expression of microRNAs circulating in NPC after receiving chemoradiotherapy. Profile expression with a high significance p-value (p < 0.0001) using cancer focus microRNAs panel from circulating pretreatment (non-chemo-radiotherapy) and chemo-radiotherapy in NPC. miRNAs expression in the circulation of 17 NPC patients with complete response after chemoradiotherapy showed an inverse expression of 20 microRNAs before and after receiving therapy (Fig. 2). Five miRNAs including miR-483-5p, miR-584-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-7-5p, and miR150-5p were upregulated. Another 5 miRNAs including miR-421, miR-133a-5p, miR-18a-5p, miR-106b-3p, and miR-339-5p were downregulated. Sensitivity and specificity analyzes were performed on 10 miRNAs that consistently experienced changes in expression after receiving chemotherapy. The analysis showed that 10 miRNAs could be suggested as candidates for assessing the response to chemoradiotherapy in NPC patients using circulating miRNAs. ROC analysis shows the AUC (Area Under Curve) value > 0.9 with a 99% confidence interval with a significance value of p < 0.0001 (can be seen in Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Relative quantification of distribution expression of microRNAs target from pretreatment to post treatment in NPC; a. miR-483-5p; b. miR-584-5p; c. miR-122-5p; d. miR-7-5p; e. miR-150-5p; f. miR-421; g. miR-133a-3p; h. miR-18a-5p; i.miR-106b-3p; j. miR-339-5p.

Fig. 3

Analysis sensitivity and specify after through ROC analysis through AUC (Area Under Curve) with 99% confidence interval (CI) p value < 0.0001; a. miR-483-5p; b. miR-584-5p; c. miR-122-5p; d. miR-7-5p; e. miR-150-5p; f. miR-421; g. miR-133a-3p; h. miR-18a-5p; i.miR-106b-3p; j. miR-339-5p.

Relative quantification of distribution expression of microRNAs target from pretreatment to post treatment in NPC; a. miR-483-5p; b. miR-584-5p; c. miR-122-5p; d. miR-7-5p; e. miR-150-5p; f. miR-421; g. miR-133a-3p; h. miR-18a-5p; i.miR-106b-3p; j. miR-339-5p. Analysis sensitivity and specify after through ROC analysis through AUC (Area Under Curve) with 99% confidence interval (CI) p value < 0.0001; a. miR-483-5p; b. miR-584-5p; c. miR-122-5p; d. miR-7-5p; e. miR-150-5p; f. miR-421; g. miR-133a-3p; h. miR-18a-5p; i.miR-106b-3p; j. miR-339-5p.

Mechanism signaling pathways

The identification of potential biological mechanisms affected by the miRNAs expression dysregulation after chemoradiotherapy was carried out using IPA (Ingenuity Analysis Pathways). Differential expression of deregulated miRNAs by analysis using IPA showed several impacts of cellular mechanisms with p-value <0.01 category with activation z-score of −1.131 – 2.256. Significant changes due to the impact of chemotherapy and radiotherapy affect the mechanism of cellular death and survival involved in the necrosis, apoptosis, cell viability, and cell death of carcinoma cell lines (Table 3). 13 downregulated miRNAs were involved in the cell viability processes. Six miRNAs were involved in cell death regulation, 23 miRNAs were associated with the biological pathways of apoptosis, and 25 miRNAs were involved in cell necrosis processes.
Table 3

Mechanism cellular analysis from profiling circulating expression of microRNAs in NPC after receiving chemo-radio therapy.

CategoriesDiseases or Functions Annotationp-valueActivation z-scoreMolecules# Molecules
Cardiovascular System Development and Function, Organismal DevelopmentAngiogenesis0.005510.67miR-122-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-126a-3p,miR-16-5p, miR-199a-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-27a-3p,miR-320b,miR-378a-3p,miR-532-5p,miR-7a-5p11
Cell CycleInterphase0.0237let-7a-5p,miR-132-3p,miR-16-5p,miR-186-5p,miR-21-5p, miR-27a-3p,miR-451a,miR-92a-3p8
Arrest in interphase0.0162miR-132-3p,miR-16-5p,miR-186-5p,miR-21-5p,miR-27a-3p,miR-451a6
G1 phase0.0491let-7a-5p, miR-16-5p,miR-21-5p,miR-27a-3p,miR-92a-3p5
Arrest in G0 phase0.000783miR-16-5p,miR-186-5p, miR-27a-3p,miR-451a4
Cell Death and SurvivalNecrosis0.000624−0.522let-7a-5p,miR-1-3p,miR-10a-5p,miR-122-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-132-3p,miR-141-3p,miR-142-3p,miR-145-5p,miR-146a-5p,miR-148a-3p,miR-150-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-186-5p, miR-199a-3p,miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-223-3p,miR-24-3p,miR-30c-5p,miR-320b,miR-378a-3p,miR-451a, miR-486-5p,miR-7a-5p25
Apoptosis0.00351−0.615let-7a-5p,miR-1-3p,miR-10a-5p,miR-122-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-132-3p,miR-141-3p,miR-145-5p,miR-146a-5,miR-148a-3p,miR-150-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-186-5p,miR-199a-3p,miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-223-3p,miR-30c-5p,miR-320b,miR-378a-3p,miR-451a,miR-486-5p,miR-7a-5p23
Cell viability0.01812.256miR-133a-3p,miR-141-3p,miR-145-5p,miR-150-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-186-5p,miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-24-3p,miR-30c-5p,miR-378a-3p,miR-486-5p,miR-7a-5p13
Cell death of carcinoma cell lines0.004960.119let-7a-5p,miR-145-5p,miR-146a-5p,miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-223-3p6
Cell Morphology, Cellular Function, and MaintenanceAutophagy of tumor cell lines0.0326miR-125b-5p,miR-130a-3p,miR-23a-3p3
Cellular DevelopmentThe epithelial-mesenchymal transition of tumor cell lines0.0187miR-141-3p,miR-483-5p,miR-7a-5p3
Cellular Development, Cellular Growth and ProliferationCell proliferation of tumor cell lines5.7E-120.694let-7a-5p,miR-10a-5p,miR-122-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-128-3p,miR-130a-3p,miR-132-3p,miR-133a-3p,miR-139-5p,miR-141-3p,miR-145-5p,miR-146a-5p,miR-148a-3p,miR-16-5p, miR-186-5p,miR-18a-5p,miR-192-5p,miR-197-3p,miR-199a-3p,miR-199a-5p, miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-223-3p,miR-23a-3p,miR-24-3p,miR-27a-3p,miR-30a-3p,miR-378a-3p,miR-451a,miR-708-5p,miR-7a-5p,miR-92a-3p32
Differentiation of thyroid precursor cells0.00514miR-144-3p,miR-451a,miR-486-5p3
Leucopoiesis0.00477−1.067miR-125b-5p,miR-132-3p,miR-144-3p,miR-146a-5p,miR-150-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-18a-5p,miR-21-5p,miR-451a,miR-486-5p10
Myelopoiesis of leukocytes0.00201−1.131miR-125b-5p,miR-144-3p,miR-16-5p,miR-21-5p,miR-451a5
Differentiation of myeloid leukocytes0.00619−1.131miR-125b-5p,miR-144-3p,miR-16-5p,miR-21-5p,miR-451a5
Granulopoiesis0.00223−1.131miR-125b-5p,miR-144-3p,miR-21-5p,miR-451a4
Cellular MovementCell movement0.008651.196let-7a-5p,miR-10a-5p,miR-122-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-130a-3p,miR-133a-3p,miR-139-5p,miR-141-3p,miR-145-5p,miR-146a-5p,miR-151-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-197-3p,miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-27a-3p,miR-320b,miR-532-5p,miR-7a-5p,miR-92a-3p20
Invasion of tumor cell lines8E-090.158miR-10a-5p,miR-122-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-126a-3p,miR-139-5p,miR-141-3p,miR-145-5p,miR-146a-5p,miR-151-5p,miR-197-3p,miR-199a-3p,miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-223-3p,miR-451a,miR-483-5p,miR-532-5p,miR-7a-5p,miR-92a-3p19
Migration of cells0.005421.64let-7a-5p,miR-10a-5p,miR-122-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-130a-3p,miR-133a-3p,miR-139-5p,miR-141-3p,miR-146a-5p,miR-151-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-197-3p,miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-27a-3p,miR-320b,miR-532-5p,miR-7a-5p,miR-92a-3p19
Cell movement of tumor cell lines6.04E-061.092let-7a-5p,miR-10a-5p,miR-122-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-130a-3p,miR-139-5p,miR-141-3p,miR-145-5p,miR-151-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-197-3p,miR-21-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-27a-3p,miR-532-5p,miR-7a-5p,miR-92a-3p17
Cellular Movement, Hematological System Development and Function, Immune Cell Trafficking, Inflammatory ResponseMigration of monocytes0.00465miR-125b-5p,miR-133a-3p,miR-146a-5p3
DNA Replication, Recombination, and RepairChromosomal aberration0.00682let-7a-5p,miR-125b-5p,miR-130a-3p,miR-708-5p4
DNA damage0.0139−0.152let-7a-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-7a-5p,miR-92a-3p4
Inflammatory ResponseInflammation of absolute anatomical region7.94E-08let-7a-5p,miR-130a-3p,miR-133a-3p,miR-150-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-197-3p,miR-199a-5p,miR-210-3p,miR-221-3p,miR-223-3p,miR-23a-3p,miR-27a-3p,miR-30c-5p,miR-320b,miR-338-3p,miR-376a-3p,miR-409-3p,miR-423-3p,miR-486-5p,miR-532-5p,miR-92a-3p21
Inflammation of body cavity4.88E-07let-7a-5p,miR-130a-3p,miR-133a-3p,miR-150-5p,miR-16-5p,miR-197-3p,miR-199a-5p,miR-210-3p,miR-221-3p,miR-223-3p,miR-23a-3p,miR-27a-3p,miR-30c-5p,miR-320b,miR-423-3p,miR-486-5p,miR-532-5p,miR-92a-3p18
Organismal SurvivalSurvival of organism0.0259−0.293let-7a-5p,miR-122-5p,miR-141-3p,miR-142-3p,miR-16-5p,miR-221-3p,miR-223-3p,miR-92a-3p8
Mechanism cellular analysis from profiling circulating expression of microRNAs in NPC after receiving chemo-radio therapy.

Discussions

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are currently the core treatment for patients with NPC. Residual disease after treatment and disease progression is frequently experienced by the patients, particularly those initially diagnosed in late stages (Table 1). Detailed molecular analysis of biological pathways involved in the complete responses after treatment might inform NPC's potential biomarker, biological pathway, and potential targeted treatment [21]. The low number of patients to achieve a complete response makes it interesting to know the molecular changes. One molecule that is known to be differentially regulated in response to the changes in cellular activities such as therapy is microRNA (miRNA). MicroRNA is responsive to the stress-like effect on hypoxia. Biological processes such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumorigenesis may provide a general overview of the microenvironment affecting miRNA expression [22,23]. Therefore, discovering candidate biomarkers based on minimally invasive is expected to provide a new approach to assessing the success of treatment to increase efforts for treatment success [24]. miRNAs are molecules that play an essential role as post-transcriptional regulators by targeting hundreds of mRNAs and are involved in many disease cases, including cancer. Previous studies have reported that miRNA expression is associated with several chemotherapy responses and resistance events in esophageal cancer [14], Oral squamous cell carcinoma [25], breast cancer [19], and lung cancer [26]. In another report on nasopharyngeal carcinoma, miR-324-3p and miR-519d are deregulated by inhibiting gene translation targeting WNT2B [27] and PDRG1 [28] toward radiotherapy sensitivity. In addition, mIR-29c is known to be jointly sensitive to cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy [18,29,30]. This study found 10 miRNAs that stably and consistently changed circulating expression after achieving a complete response to chemoradiotherapy (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). It consisted of 5 miRNAs that significantly increased expression, namely miR-483-5p, miR-584-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-7-5p, and miR-150-5p, and 5 miRNAs that had decreased expression. Significantly, namely miR-421, miR-133a-3p, miR-18a-5p, miR-106b-3p and miR-339-5p. In the previous study, Changes in the expression response of miRNAs to therapy are closely related to the type of therapeutic agent given to influence cellular mechanisms and the response by the body [31]. It is shown by giving 5-FU to chemosensitive affect miR-494 expression and chemoresistance to miR-200c in colorectal cancer. The sensitivity and specificity analysis showed that these 10 miRNAs are promising candidates for minimally invasive chemoradiotherapy response-based biomarkers in NPC incidence (Fig. 3). It was also shown as a miRNAs-based marker in advanced gastric cancer with high sensitivity, and the specificity of miR-338-3p and miR-142-3p was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.587–0.981; sensitivity = 70%, specificity = 100%) [32]. Some other studies performed that microRNAs were related to chemoradiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer, rectal adenocarcinoma, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer [[33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]]. The analysis results show that miRNA plays a role in multiple mechanisms and other cancer cases. miR-483-5p in adrenocortical and prostate cancer targets RBM5, which is involved in proliferation and invasion and is associated with poor prognosis [[39], [40], [41]]. Overexpression of mIR-584 inhibits proliferation. It induces apoptosis via the target WW domain-containing E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase 1 [42], miR-122-5p, and miR-421 inhibits cell migration and invasion by regulating DUSP4 in gastric [43,44], cancer and chemosensitizer in breast cancer [45]. miR-7-5p and miR-150-5p suppress cell proliferation and induce apoptosis of breast cancer cells [46] and colorectal cancer [47]. In another study, the down expression of miR −133a-3p has a role in promoting cell migration in bladder cancer [48] and activation of RhoA in colorectal cancer [49]. In addition, miR-18a, miR-106b-3p, and miR-339-5p modulate apoptosis and inhibit proliferation with lncRNA in carcinoma nasofaring [50], esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [51], and lung cancer [52]. To further investigate the mechanism regulation of miRNAs of this nasopharyngeal carcinoma, expressions with significance miRNAs 4 cellular regulation of cell death and survival related to chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment. We found alterations of miRNAs related to necrosis, apoptosis, cell viability, and cell death of carcinoma cell lines. Although the mechanism analysis is related to the chemoradiotherapy response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases, the direct relationship with miRNAs is unclear. There are several limitations to this study. We used a small sample size for miRNAs profiling: low survival rate and irregular treatment schedule due to unvalidated with a large cohort. Alterations expression of miRNAs on circulating can be detected by bioinformatics approaches and correlated with molecular biology change after receiving the chemoradiotherapy. Even though confirmation using the biological model and validating the differential expression of miRNAs is necessary for evaluation. Therefore, further research is needed to explain more comprehensively the mechanism and validation with a large number of samples. Meanwhile, few studies are studying the function of microRNA and circulation in the sensitivity of tumor treatment and the complete response to chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Conclusions

In conclusion, research focused on studying changes in circulating miRNA expression in response to a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is relatively limited. In this study, we created a signature profile associated with these conditions. As a result we found increased expression of miR-483-5p, miR-584-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-7-5p and miR-150-5p. In contrast, decreased expression was found in miR-421, miR-133a-3p, miR-18a-5p, miR-106b-3p and miR-339-5p.In the future, our study will validate with a larger sample size to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the obtained chemoradiotherapy biomarker candidate miRNAs.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Tirta Wardana: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition. Siti Nur Chasanah: Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft. Risky Oktriani: Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Cita Herawati: Investigation, Resources. Sumadi Lukman Anwar: Validation, Writing – review & editing. Indwiani Astuti: Supervision. Sofia Mubarika Haryana: Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors state that there is no conflict of interest in this study.
  49 in total

Review 1.  Towards the overcoming of anticancer drug resistance mediated by p53 mutations.

Authors:  Xin Cao; Jiayun Hou; Quanlin An; Yehuda G Assaraf; Xiangdong Wang
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 18.500

2.  MiR-122-5p inhibits cell migration and invasion in gastric cancer by down-regulating DUSP4.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Xu; Feng Gao; Jianjiang Wang; Lan Tao; Jinsong Ye; Li Ding; Wei Ji; Xing Chen
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  Rajesha Rupaimoole; Frank J Slack
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  miR-7-5p suppresses cell proliferation and induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells mainly by targeting REGγ.

Authors:  Yuan Shi; Xinrong Luo; Peng Li; Jinxiang Tan; Xiaoyi Wang; Tingxiu Xiang; Guosheng Ren
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Global microRNA profiles in cervical squamous cell carcinoma depend on Drosha expression levels.

Authors:  B Muralidhar; L D Goldstein; G Ng; D M Winder; R D Palmer; E L Gooding; N L Barbosa-Morais; G Mukherjee; N P Thorne; I Roberts; M R Pett; N Coleman
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  The mir-34 microRNA is required for the DNA damage response in vivo in C. elegans and in vitro in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  M Kato; T Paranjape; R U Müller; R Ullrich; S Nallur; E Gillespie; K Keane; A Esquela-Kerscher; J B Weidhaas; F J Slack
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  RRM1 gene expression evaluated in the liquid biopsy (blood cfRNA) as a non-invasive, predictive factor for radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and potential prognostic biomarker in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Radosław Mlak; Tomasz Powrózek; Anna Brzozowska; Iwona Homa-Mlak; Marcin Mazurek; Teresa Małecka-Massalska
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.388

8.  Oleuropein enhances radiation sensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by downregulating PDRG1 through HIF1α-repressed microRNA-519d.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Dajiang Xiao
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-05

9.  Methylation-mediated silencing of miR-133a-3p promotes breast cancer cell migration and stemness via miR-133a-3p/MAML1/DNMT3A positive feedback loop.

Authors:  Wanyue Shi; Tingting Tang; Xinping Li; Siwei Deng; Ruiyi Li; Yingshan Wang; Yifei Wang; Tiansong Xia; Yanfeng Zhang; Ke Zen; Liang Jin; Yi Pan
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-28

10.  Potential of miR-21 to Predict Incomplete Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Susana Ourô; Cláudia Mourato; Sónia Velho; André Cardador; Marisa P Ferreira; Diogo Albergaria; Rui E Castro; Rui Maio; Cecília M P Rodrigues
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.