| Literature DB >> 36203449 |
Yuxuan Wang1, Yuansheng Duan1, Hong Li1, Kai Yue1, Jin Liu1, Qingchuan Lai1, Mengqian Zhou1, Beibei Ye1, Yue Wu1, Jiajia Zhu1, Peng Chen1, Chao Jing1, Yansheng Wu1, Xudong Wang1.
Abstract
Objective: We analysed the diagnostic performance of thyroglobulin in fine-needle aspiration (FNA-Tg) in the suspicious lateral cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), proposed the best cutoff value and discussed the factors that may affect the diagnostic value of FNA-Tg.Entities:
Keywords: fine need aspiration; lymph nodes; metastasis; papillary thyroid carcinoma; thyroglobulin
Year: 2022 PMID: 36203449 PMCID: PMC9530248 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.909723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1The level of FNA-Tg in metastatic and non-metastatic lateral CLNs.
Difference between metastasis and benign of lateral CLNs.
| Metastasis (412) | Benign (36) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 40.9 ± 12.7 | 46.5 ± 12.5 | 0.013 |
| Sex | 0.015 | ||
| male | 140 | 8 | |
| female | 272 | 28 | |
| Size of tumor, cm, (median, range) | 1.1 (0.1-7.0) | 0.9 (0.1-2.5) | 0.374 |
| Size of CLNs, cm, (median, range) | 1.3 (0.4-4.9) | 1.0 (0.4-2.7) | 0.004 |
| ETE (presence:absence) | 49:325 (15.08%) | 5:30 (16.67%) | 0.843 |
| HT(presence:absence) | 114:260 (43.85%) | 10:17 (58.82%) | 0.477 |
| s-Tg, ng/ml, (median, range) | 24.1 (0.04-510) | 15.9 (0.14-90) | 0.030 |
| TSH, mIU/L, (median, range) | 2.1 (0.01-49.6) | 2.2 (0.03-6.4) | 0.674 |
| Tg-Ab, IU/ml, (median, range) | 13.1 (0.92-4000) | 14.0 (4.79-4000) | 0.178 |
| TPO-Ab, IU/ml, (median, range) | 9.0 (0.25-1022) | 9.0 (9-375) | 0.058 |
| FNA-Tg, ng/ml, (median, range) | 500.0 (0.04-500) | 0.45 (0.04-500) | <0.001 |
CLNs, Cervical Lymph Nodes; ETE, Extrathyroidal extension; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; s-Tg, Serum thyroglobulin; FNA-Tg, The measurement of thyroglobulin on fine-needle aspiration; Tg-Ab, anti-thyroglobulin antibody; TPO-Ab, anti-peroxidase antibody.
Figure 2The ROC curve of FNA-Tg according to definite status of the 448 lateral CLNs.
Diagnostic value in different cutoff values of FNA-Tg.
| Different cutoff values, ng/ml | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNA-Tg (0.04) | 99.03 | 25.00 | 93.79 | 69.23 | 93.08 |
| FNA-Tg (0.1) | 97.09 | 30.56 | 94.12 | 47.83 | 91.74 |
| FNA-Tg (0.5) | 95.87 | 52.78 | 95.87 | 52.78 | 92.41 |
| FNA-Tg (1) | 95.39 | 66.67 | 97.04 | 55.81 | 93.08 |
| FNA-Tg (3.69, ROC) | 92.48 | 75.00 | 97.69 | 46.55 | 91.07 |
| FNA-Tg (5) | 91.50 | 75.00 | 97.67 | 43.55 | 90.18 |
| FNA-Tg (10) | 90.29 | 75.00 | 97.64 | 40.30 | 89.06 |
| FNA-Tg (20) | 88.35 | 75.00 | 97.59 | 36.00 | 87.28 |
| FNA-Tg (50) | 87.14 | 75.00 | 97.55 | 38.57 | 86.16 |
| FNA-Tg/s-Tg>1 | 85.47 | 77.78 | 95.00 | 34.15 | 84.82 |
FNA-Tg, The measurement of thyroglobulin on the fine-needle aspiration; PPV, Positive predictive value; NPV, Negative predictive value.
Cases of CLNs with FNA-Tg between 1-3.69 ng/ml.
| Number | 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| FNAC | Positive | 8 |
| Negative | 5 | |
| Inefficient | 2 | |
| Size of CLNs, cm, (median, range) | 1.3 (0.8-2.6) | |
| Pathology | Metastasis | 12 |
| Benign | 3 | |
CLNs, Cervical Lymph Nodes; FNAC, Fine needle-aspiration cytology.
Figure 3The ROC curves of FNA-Tg in different assay kits of Tg (Patients in 2018.08-2019.09).
Figure 4The ROC curves of FNA-Tg in different assay kits of Tg (Patients in 2019.10-2021.06).
Comparison of diagnostic value between US, FNAC and FNA-Tg.
| Diagnostic methods | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) | AUC(95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNA-Tg(3.69, ROC) | 92.48 | 75.00 | 97.69 | 46.55 | 91.07 | 0.839 (0.754,0.925) |
| FNAC | 92.39 | 52.38 | 97.04 | 28.95 | 90.16 | 0.540 (0.414,0.665) |
| US | 90.39 | 30.56 | 93.62 | 22.00 | 85.52 | 0.616 (0.522,0.710) |
| FNAC+US | 97.24 | 20.00 | 95.09 | 31.25 | 92.67 | 0.787 (0.688,0885) |
| FNAC+FNA-Tg(3.69) | 94.34 | 60.71 | 97.09 | 43.59 | 92.07 | 0.815 (0.712,0.918) |
| US+FNA-Tg(3.69) | 98.04 | 27.78 | 93.90 | 55.56 | 92.34 | 0.835 (0.753.0.918) |
| FNAC+US+FNA-Tg(3.69) | 98.50 | 13.89 | 92.72 | 45.45 | 91.53 | 0.823 (0.725,0.922) |
PPV, Positive predictive value; NPV, Negative predictive value; AUC, Area under the curve; US, Ultrasound; FNAC, Fine needle-aspiration cytology; FNA-Tg, The measurement of thyroglobulin on fine-needle aspiration.
Different methods to diagnose small CLNs.
| Methods | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNAC | 88.31 | 50.00 | 91.89 | 40.00 | 83.15 |
| US | 85.87 | 42.86 | 86.81 | 40.91 | 77.78 |
| FNA-Tg | 92.47 | 76.19 | 94.51 | 69.57 | 89.47 |
PPV, Positive predictive value; NPV, Negative predictive value; US, Ultrasound; FNAC, Fine needle-aspiration cytology; FNA-Tg, The measurement of thyroglobulin on fine-needle aspiration.
Factors may influence the level of FNA-Tg.
| Factors | p Value |
|---|---|
| Year | 0.23 |
| Sex | 0.062 |
| s-Tg | 0.104 |
| TSH | 0.368 |
| Tg-Ab | <0.001 |
| TPO-Ab | 0.112 |
| CT | 0.099 |
| Size of CLNs | 0.071 |
| Characteristics of CLNs (cystic or solid) | 0.54 |
| LNR | <0.001 |
| ETE | 0.768 |
| Subtypes of PTC | 0.885 |
| BRAF | 0.365 |
| TNM | 0.549 |
| HT | 0.003 |
| Types of Tg assay kits | <0.001 |
CLNs, Cervical Lymph Nodes; ETE, Extrathyroidal extension; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; s-Tg, Serum thyroglobulin; FNA-Tg, The measurement of thyroglobulin on fine-needle aspiration; Tg-Ab, anti-thyroglobulin antibody; TPO-Ab, anti-peroxidase antibody; CT, calcitonin; LNR, the lymph node ratio.