Literature DB >> 36203041

Risk factors for femoral-to-radial artery pressure gradient after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass: a historical cohort study.

Ah Ran Oh1, Kwan Young Hong1, Jungchan Park1, Sukyoung Her1, Jong-Hwan Lee1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: After weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the radial artery pressure is frequently lower than the central pressure as reflected by femoral pressure. This discrepancy may cause improper blood pressure management. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the risk factors related to developing a significant postbypass femoral-to-radial pressure gradient, including the incidence of complications related to femoral pressure monitoring.
METHODS: From January 2017 to May 2021, we studied consecutive adult cardiovascular surgical patients undergoing CPB in a historical cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups according to developing a significant femoral-to-radial pressure gradient, which was defined as a difference of ≥ 25 mm Hg for systolic pressure or ≥ 10 mm Hg for mean pressure, lasting ≥ 5 minutes for 30 minutes after CPB weaning. Factors associated with a significant pressure gradient and femoral pressure monitoring-related complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 2,019 patients, 677 (34%) showed a significant postbypass femoral-to-radial pressure gradient. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed the following factors related to the pressure gradient development: age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for an increase in 10 years, 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.09; P < 0.001), body surface area (BSA) (aOR for an increase in 1 m2, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.21; P < 0.001), aortic cross-clamping time (aOR for an increase in 30 minutes, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.08; P < 0.001), and intraoperative epinephrine use (aOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.95; P < 0.001). The femoral pressure monitoring-related complications were observed in 11/2,019 (0.5%) patients.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that old age, smaller BSA, prolonged aortic cross-clamping time, and intraoperative epinephrine use were associated with developing a significant postbypass femoral-to-radial pressure gradient in cardiovascular surgery. Considering monitoring-related complications occurred very infrequently, it might be helpful to monitor both radial and femoral pressure simultaneously in patients with these risk factors for appropriate blood pressure management. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm our findings because our results are limited by a retrospective design and residual confounding factors.
© 2022. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arterial blood pressure; cardiopulmonary bypass; femoral artery; radial artery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36203041     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02320-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   6.713


  28 in total

1.  Relationship between aortic-to-radial arterial pressure gradient after cardiopulmonary bypass and changes in arterial elasticity.

Authors:  Masahiro Kanazawa; Haruo Fukuyama; Yoshio Kinefuchi; Mamoru Takiguchi; Toshiyasu Suzuki
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Effect of combined infusion of nitroglycerin and nicardipine on femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  K Maruyama; R Horiguchi; H Hashimoto; Y Ohi; M Okuda; T Kurioka; K Konishi; M Muneyuki; M Kusagawa
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  A comparison of radial, brachial, and aortic pressures after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  G P Gravlee; A B Wong; T G Adkins; L D Case; A L Pauca
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Anesth       Date:  1989-02

Review 4.  Radial artery cannulation: a comprehensive review of recent anatomic and physiologic investigations.

Authors:  Marek Brzezinski; Thomas Luisetti; Martin J London
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Radial artery-to-aorta pressure difference after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  A L Pauca; A S Hudspeth; S L Wallenhaupt; W Y Tucker; N D Kon; S A Mills; A R Cordell
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Can we trust the direct radial artery pressure immediately following cardiopulmonary bypass?

Authors:  D H Stern; J I Gerson; F B Allen; F B Parker
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and the femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient.

Authors:  Gerard R Manecke; Michael Parimucha; Greg Stratmann; William C Wilson; David M Roth; William R Auger; Kim M Kerr; Stuart W Jamieson; David P Kapelanski; Mark M Mitchell
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Risk Factors Involved in Central-to-Radial Arterial Pressure Gradient During Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fuda; André Denault; Alain Deschamps; Denis Bouchard; Annik Fortier; Jean Lambert; Pierre Couture
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Radial artery pressure monitoring underestimates central arterial pressure during vasopressor therapy in critically ill surgical patients.

Authors:  T Dorman; M J Breslow; P A Lipsett; J M Rosenberg; J R Balser; Y Almog; B A Rosenfeld
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Central-to-peripheral arterial pressure gradient during cardiopulmonary bypass: relation to pre- and intra-operative data and effects of vasoactive agents.

Authors:  S G De Hert; K M Vermeyen; M M Moens; V L Hoffmann; K J Bataillie
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.