Literature DB >> 34251207

Where the Methane Is-Insights from Novel Airborne LiDAR Measurements Combined with Ground Survey Data.

David R Tyner1, Matthew R Johnson1.   

Abstract

Airborne LiDAR measurements, parallel controlled releases, and on-site optical gas imaging (OGI) survey and pneumatic device count data from 1 year prior, were combined to derive a new measurement-based methane inventory for oil and gas facilities in British Columbia, Canada. Results reveal a surprising distinction in the higher magnitudes, different types, and smaller number of sources seen by the plane versus OGI. Combined data suggest methane emissions are 1.6-2.2 times current federal inventory estimates. More importantly, analysis of high-resolution geo-located aerial imagery, facility schematics, and equipment counts allowed attribution to major source types revealing key drivers of this difference. More than half of emissions were attributed to three main sources: tanks (24%), reciprocating compressors (15%), and unlit flares (13%). These are the sources driving upstream oil and gas methane emissions, and specifically, where emerging regulations must focus to achieve meaningful reductions. Pneumatics accounted for 20%, but this contribution is lower than recent Canadian and U.S. inventory estimates, possibly reflecting a growing shift toward more low- and zero-emitting devices. The stark difference in the aerial and OGI results indicates key gaps in current inventories and suggests that policy and regulations relying on OGI surveys alone may risk missing a significant portion of emissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OGI; aerial; compressors, flares; fugitive emissions; tanks; top-down/bottom-up; venting

Year:  2021        PMID: 34251207     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Multiscale Methane Measurements at Oil and Gas Facilities Reveal Necessary Frameworks for Improved Emissions Accounting.

Authors:  Jiayang Lyra Wang; William S Daniels; Dorit M Hammerling; Matthew Harrison; Kaylyn Burmaster; Fiji C George; Arvind P Ravikumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 11.357

2.  A Wavelength Modulation Spectroscopy-Based Methane Flux Sensor for Quantification of Venting Sources at Oil and Gas Sites.

Authors:  Simon A Festa-Bianchet; Scott P Seymour; David R Tyner; Matthew R Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Reduction of Signal Drift in a Wavelength Modulation Spectroscopy-Based Methane Flux Sensor.

Authors:  Scott P Seymour; Simon A Festa-Bianchet; David R Tyner; Matthew R Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.