Literature DB >> 36201488

Health system cost of breast cancer treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Tamiru Demeke1,2, Wondimu Ayele1,2, Damen Haile Mariam2, Andreas Wienke1, Mathewos Assefa3, Adamu Addissie1,2, Rafael Mikolajczyk1, Susanne Unverzagt4, Eva Johanna Kantelhardt1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women with an annual crude incidence of 27.4 per 100,000 in Ethiopia. The aims of this study were to (a) estimate the unit cost of breast cancer treatment for the standard Ethiopian patient, (b) identify the cost drivers, (c) project the total cost of breast cancer treatment for the next five years, and (d) estimate the economic burden of the disease in the main specialized tertiary hospital-Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) Addis Ababa.
METHODS: Primary data were collected from health and non-health professionals. Secondary data were collected from patient`s charts and official reports from various national and international organisations including data from TASH. To establish work-time estimates, we asked professionals on their time usage. RESULT: A total of US$ 33,261 was incurred to treat 52 Addis Ababa resident female breast cancer patients in TASH between July 2017 and June 2019. The unit cost of treatment for a hypothetical breast cancer patient to complete her treatment was US$ 536 for stage I and US$ 705 for stage II and III using the existing infrastructure. This cost increased to US$ 955 for stage I and US$ 1157 for stage II and III when infrastructure amortization was considered. The projected total costs of breast cancer treatment in TASH is between US$ 540,000 and US$ 1.48million. However, this will increase to US$ 870,000 and US$ 2.29 million when the existing fixed assets are changed.
CONCLUSION: The economic burden of breast cancer treatment is high compared to the economic status of the country. Thus, it is recommended that TASH should revise its charges and breast cancer should be included in the Social and Community based health insurance scheme. JEL classification: H51, H75, I18, P46.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36201488      PMCID: PMC9536570          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Breast cancer is a disease that is manifested when cells in the breast grow and divide uncontrollably resulting in a mass of tissue which is usually known as a ‘tumor’. The symptoms of breast cancer are abnormal lump or swelling in the breast, the most common symptom, the lumps beside the breast or under the arm, unexplained breast pain, abnormal-nipple discharge, changes in breast texture, or changes in the skin on or around the breast [1, 2] Thus, breast cancer is characterized by the presence of malignant tumors in one of the organ’s structures, which arise from the uncontrollable reproduction of cells that have gone through a complex process of disordered transformations and may progress through direct extension or metastatic dissemination [2]. Staging describes how much cancer is present in the patient’s body. The size and location of the tumor, as well as the spread the cancer to other parts of the patient’s body are the factors, among others, that influence staging a breast cancer. The American Joint Committee on Cancer’s TNM classification system is used to stage invasive breast cancer (AJCC) [3]. Accordingly, the basic stages of breast cancer are stage 0, I, II, III and IV and each of them are elaborated as follow. Breast cancer Stage 0 is defined as the cancer cells are not non-invasive. It is also known as ductal carcinoma in situ. This means there is no evidence of cancer cells or non-cancerous abnormal cells breaking out of the area of the breast where they began, or of getting through to or invading neighboring normal tissue. Breast cancer stage I refers to an extremely early stage of invasive cancer. Tumor cells have spread to normal surrounding breast tissue but are still contained in a small area at this point. Breast cancer stage II cancer is defined as cancer that has spread beyond a specific region of the breast. It shows the number of lymph nodes that may contain cancer cells. Breast cancer stage III breast cancer means that the cancer has spread further into the breast or that the tumor is larger than in earlier stages. The most advanced stage of breast cancer is stage IV. It has spread to nearby lymph nodes as well as distant areas of the body outside of the breast. This means it could affect the organs, such as your lungs, liver, or brain, as well as your bones [4-7]. The exact causes of breast cancer are largely unknown but demographic change, an unhealthy lifestyle due to economic transition, urbanization, hormonal factors, a family history of breast cancer, and a sedentary lifestyle, among others, played a paramount role in the rising incidence and prevalence of breast cancer in Africa in the last two decades [8-10]. For instance, according to cancer registry reports, breast cancer incidence rised by 3.7% in Uganda and 6.5% in South Africa per year. Moreover, most of the time, African breast cancer patients visit health facilities for treatment only after their breast cancer reached advanced stage. This is mainly due to a lack of awareness about the nature of breast cancer, insufficient screening services, large distances to health facilities, low health seeking behaviour, and poverty [11]. Consequently, treatment was more often palliative than curative [12] and breast cancer is the major cause of mortality and morbidity among women in Africa [8]. The breast cancer burden in Ethiopia was compared with neighboring and peer African countries. The Global Cancer Observatory recent report indicated in 2020 female breast cancer five years prevalence was 48.52 per 100,000 which was Somalia (31.61/100,000) and South Sudan (25.72/100,000) but lower than Eritrea (48.73/100,000), Uganda (55.46/100,000), Sudan (55.62/100,000), Kenya (57.28/100,000), Nigeria (59.31/100,000), Djibouti (74.71/100,000) and South Africa (138.90/100,000) [13]. Breast cancer is the most common and frequently diagnosed disease among women in Ethiopia. According to the GLOBOCAN report, 16,133 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer in 2020 [14]. The Five-Year National Cancer Control Plan of Ethiopia (2015–2020) indicated a need of US$ 93 million for activities related to cancer prevention, screening, diagnostic, and treatment [15]. The importance of costing has risen over time, mainly because it can help policy makers to develop appropriate health financing policies and strategies for health facilities. A costing study serves as the basis for establishing user fees, evaluating whether health care providers are cost effective, and assessing how resources are used effectively and efficiently [16-18]. This study intended to (a) estimate the total cost of breast cancer treatment for standard breast cancer patients in different stages of the disease, who completed treatment, (b) identify the most important cost drivers, (c) provide evidence on the annual budget needed for full treatment for breast cancer patients at each stage for the next 5 years, and (d) show the economic burden of the disease in Addis Ababa City.

Methods

Study setting

This study was undertaken in the Radiotherapy Center, Tikur Anbessa Specialised Hospital (TASH) in 2018. 84 health professionals (5 oncologists, 41 clinical oncology residents, 1 general practitioner, 3 medical physicists, 2 radiotherapy technicians, 4 pharmacists, 6 radiographers residents), 22 nurses and 6 non-health professional (1 porter, 2 chart keepers, 1 cashier, and 2 secretaries) had been working in the Center, which had a computer tomography (CT) Simulator for diagnosis, a Cobalt 60 for cancer treatment and 18 beds for cancer patients.

Data collection

Primary data using questionnaires were collected from health professionals, who were working in the Radiotherapy Center as well as in other medical and non-medical departments of TASH from July to December 2019. The questionnaires were distributed to 22 respondents, who were selected from pathology, laboratory, pharmacy, surgery, anaesthesiology, oncology, and radiology departments. When the questionnaires were distributed to each respondents, they were asked to read the consent form and sign on it before they start to fill the questionnaire. Thus, all the respondents who filled the questionnaire signed on the consent form. Moreover, the time required to treat a single breast cancer patient was estimated by asking each professional and observing their actual time while they provide health care services. Secondary data were collected from official reports from TASH, the Ethiopian Ministry of Health and the World Health Organisation. Other quantitative data such as employees salary, cost of pharmaceuticals, construction cost per m2, Real Gross Domestic Product, foreign exchange rates, governmental total budget, and the government’s budget for health and population growth were collected from official reports from TASH departments, the National Bank of Ethiopia, the Ministry of Finance, the International Monetary Fund, and the Central Statistical Agency. The tax revenues that the Ethiopian government will collect during the next five years were forcasted to obtain the total budget to be allocated for health care services. Prior to extracting data from the patients charts, discussion was made with Oncology department head to anonymized all data to be collected from the charts. Following this, breast cancer treatment data were extracted from 55 selected patients’ charts, who were treated between July 2016/17 and June 2018/19. The charts contained full information about the complete treatment given to the patients. For this study, a breast cancer patient was considered to have completed treatment if she took 8 cycles of chemotherapy.

Methods of cost estimation

Costs of breast cancer treatment were calculated at three levels: (a) First, the unit cost of each cost driver and service, (b) the total cost for a single breast cancer patient, and (c) lastly the total cost to treat all breast cancer patients annually (2021–2025), which will be expected to be presented at TASH. All cost drivers of breast cancer treatment were first identified, and the unit cost of each cost driver was computed using the apportioning method as indicated in Table 1. The salary data were taken from the payroll, which the human resource department of TASH provided. The salaries of human resources were estimated by multiplying hourly salaries and the total time spent to treat each patient. The existing buildings were measured in meter. The unit costs of medical and non-medical furniture and equipment were calculated using cost data from the fixed asset registration book, as well as information from contacted heads of department.
Table 1

Sources of data and apportioning method for estimating the unit of cost of each cost driver.

Cost driverSource of informationUnitsApportioning method
Salary of employeesPayroll copy from Human Resource DepartmentETB converted to US$Average monthly salary converted to hourly wage and multiplied by the time estimated for the specific activity
BuildingData collected from construction professionalsArea and ETB converted to US$Annual depreciation divided by the total number of working hours and multiplied by the amount of time the patient received service
Medical and non-medical furniture and equipmentData were collected from shops that sold the itemsNumber of items usedAnnual depreciation divided by the total amount of working hours and multiplied by the amount of time the patient received service
Consumable materials and drugsPharmacy stores of TASHNumber of items consumedBased on the dosage determined for the specific treatment
RadiotherapyMedical physicist unit and patients register in radiotherapy roomRadiation dosis (Gray) given to patients•The Cobalt 60 radiation source was depreciated for 5½ years and the investment divided by the total doses (Gy) provided to patients during the above-mentioned years•The unit cost of the Cobalt 60 machine was depreciated by 10 years, but since the machine served for more than 10 years, the depreciation value was zero
Overhead costsThe costs of different materials and activities that were used jointly by the Oncology department and other (e.g. utilities, security guard)ETB converted to US$10 % of the total of the above costs were taken

ETB: Ethiopian Birr; TASH: Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital; US$: United States of America Dollar.

ETB: Ethiopian Birr; TASH: Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital; US$: United States of America Dollar. Fixed assets are defined as all types of assets that can provide service for more than one year that includes office and medical furniture, Office and medical equipment, medical and non-medical machines, buildings, land, etc. The total costs of these items for breast cancer treatment were then calculated by multiplying the unit costs by the number of items utilized and depreciation over time. Depreciation is the value that decrease every time when a fixed asset is used. The cost of each consumable medical item was made available by the Pharmacy of the Radiotherapy center and the main pharmacy department of TASH. The total costs of each service was obtained by multiplying the unit costs of each material by the quantity of the materials used. The grand total of all services was found by summing up the total costs of each service. To include the costs of items that are commonly utilized by all departments of TASH, 10% of the total costs of other items were taken as overhead cost. The types of services that will be provided to breast cancer patients were identified as listed in Table 2. The costs of drugs that were prescribed and subsequently bought by patients, including endocrine treatment (Tamoxifen) were not included, because TASH does not supply these drugs.
Table 2

Costed consumable materials.

Service typeCosted consumable materialsCosting method
ConsultationPatient card, pen, prescription papers, and glovesUnit costs of each materials times number of materials used
LaboratoryChemicals/reagents for diagnosisCosts of each type of chemical/ reagents per mg times the quantity of chemical/ reagents used
PathologyChemicals, reagents and other related materials for diagnosisCosts of each type of chemical/ reagents per mg times the quantity of chemical/ reagents used plus the unit costs of each materials times number of materials used
UltrasoundUltrasound paper and gel and other related materials for diagnosisCosts of gel per mg times the quantity of gel used plus the unit costs of each materials times number of materials used
X-rayGloves and CD for diagnosisUnit costs of gloves and CD times number of gloves and CD used
CT-ScanGloves, contrast, plastic sheet and other related materials used in the CT scan room for diagnosisUnit costs of gloves, plastic sheet and other related materials times number of gloves, plastic and other related materials used plus costs of contrast per mg times the quantity of contrast used.
AnesthesiaChemicals and other related materials for surgery.Costs of each type of chemical/ reagents per mg times the quantity of chemical/ reagents used plus the unit costs of other related materials times number of other related materials used.
SurgeryGauze, blades, and other related materials.Unit costs of gauze, blade and other related materials times number of gauze, blade and other related materials used.
RadiotherapyThe Cobalt 60 radiotherapy source and related materialsCosts per Gray times the quantity of Gray plus the unit costs of other related materials times number of other related materials used.
ChemotherapyChemotherapy drugs (e.g. FEC, CMF, and Doxorubicin ACT) and other related materials.Unit costs of each drug times the quantity of drug plus the unit costs of other related materials times number of other related materials used.

ACT: (Adriamycin)/ Cyclophosphamide (Procytox)/ Paclitaxel (Taxol) CMF: Cyclophosphamide/Methotrexate/Fluorouracil, FEC -Fluorouracil/Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide

ACT: (Adriamycin)/ Cyclophosphamide (Procytox)/ Paclitaxel (Taxol) CMF: Cyclophosphamide/Methotrexate/Fluorouracil, FEC -Fluorouracil/Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide The units and total costs of breast cancer treatment were estimated in two scenarios. The first scenario did not include depreciation of fixed assets such as medical and non-medical equipment, machines and furniture, because these items were too old and did not have book value even if they are still giving services. The second scenario includes depreciation by using the depreciation values of the fixed assets based on their current prices, if TASH replaced the existing old fixed assets by new items and renovated the existing old building. Annual deprecation for fixed assets were computed using straight-line depreciation method over different years according to the council of ministers regulation on the federal income tax [19]. Accordingly, computers, software, all medical and non-medical machines and office furniture were depreciated by 20%, while the Cobalt 60 machine was depreciated by 15%, and building was depreciated by 5% annually. However, depreciation of the source of Cobalt 60 was calculated based on the amount of radiation Gray used and leaked every year. The medical and non-medical consumable materials were procured between August and October 2019. To estimate the costs of the aforementioned materials in July 2017 and 2019, the costs were discounted by 15 percent due to inflation during these years and converted to US$ using the average exchange rates of the these years. Thus, the treatment costs computed for these patients reflected the costs that TASH incurred during the above-mentioned years. Following the identification of the types of diagnosis and treatment provided, the costs incurred for breast cancer treatment for a single patient using the prevailing breast cancer treatment practice were estimated. The new cases of breast cancer were projected based on the growth of the female population per age and the annual growth of incidence rate of breast cancer as per the record of AAPBCR. The total costs of breast cancer treatment were calculated by multiplying the unit costs of each service by the number of breast cancer patients, who will be treated during the next five years. These costs were estimated in two scenarios. The first scenario was using the existing fixed assets including building as they are and second scenario was after renovating/replacing the existing building and fixed assets by new ones. These costs were also estimated in three scenarios by assuming the unit costs of inputs will be increased by 10%, 15% and 20%. It is assumed that TASH will treat all the projected new breast cancer patients using the existing practice and infrastructures. Following these steps, the total costs were estimated in Ethiopian Birr and then changed in US$ using the Wallet Investor website [20]. The economic burden of the projected cost of breast cancer treatment was estimated in terms of the share of the total health budget allocated at a national level, as it is difficult to estimate the health budget in Addis Ababa due to a lack of reliable data. Ethiopia’s RGDP for the next five years was forecasted using Autoregressive and Moving Average (ARIMA) and Seasonal Auto Regressive Integrated and Moving Average (SARIMA) models [21, 22].

Ethical consideration

The author obtained ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, prior to conducting the study. The study participants provided their consent in writing by signing on the informed consent form attached with the questionnaire.

Results

Costs of breast cancer treatment services for a single patient

A total of 55 breast cancer patients were assessed. Of these, three were stage I, 12 stage II, 29 stage III, eight stage IV and three of an unknown stage. These three patients were categorized as unknown stage because Oncologist did not mention the breast cancer stages in patients’ charts. Because of this, these patients were excluded from further considerations. Out of 52 patients, 42 received modified radical mastectomy. When these 42 patients were disaggregated by their stage of breast cancer, 2, 8, 29 and 3 patients were at stage I, II, III and IV respectively. Similarly, among 39 patients to whom radiotherapy was provided and of these 7, 29 and 3 patients were at stage II, III and IV respectively. Chemotherapy was provided to all patients. The chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments were provided to breast cancer patients in accordance to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Harmonized Guidelines for Sub-Saharan Africa (NCCN) guidelines by prescriping 8 cycles chemotherapy and on average 39 Gray in 13 fractions radiotherapy. Accordingly, this study found that TASH incurred US$ 33,261 for provision of full treatment for 52 breast cancer patients. When this amount was disaggregated by breast cancer stages, TASH expended US$ 1855, 8221,19558, and 3626 to treat breast cancer patients with breast cancer stage I, II, III and IV respectively. The total costs of breast cancer treatment were again itemized by the type of diagnosis and treatment provided. Accordingly, The cost of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, laboratory and other services was $11211, 7253, 4333 and 10464 respectively. The cost per patient for each stage was calculated and stage I, II, III and IV were found to cost US$ 618, 735,772 and 584 respectively.

Unit cost of breast cancer treatment by stages and scenarios

Unit cost for treatment by cancer stage is presented by stages and in two scenarios (Table 3). According to scenario I (excluding the values of fixed assets), the treatment costs for breast cancer stage I was US$ 536 whereas for stage II and III the costs of treatment were US$ 705 each. These costs increased to US$ 955 to treat breast cancer stage I and US$ 1157 to treat breast cancer stage II and III each, when the values of fixed assets were included (Table 3). Chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy services took the largest portions of the total cost among the services offered to breast cancer patients, as shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Unit cost for treatment by breast cancer stage (April 21, 2020).

Type of serviceCost of treatment per stage in US$ (%)
Scenario I excluding fixed assetsScenario II including fixed assets
Stage IStage IIStage IIIstage IStage IIStage III
Consultation/Examination31 (60%)31 (4%)31 (4%)69 (7%)69 (6%)69 (6%)
Laboratory36 (7%)36 (5%)36 (5%)91 (10%)91 (8%)91 (8%)
Pathology20 (4%)20 (3%)20 (3%)72 (8%)72 (6%)72 (6%)
Ultrasound3 (1%)3 (0.5%)3 (0.5%)13 (1%)13 (1%)13 (1%)
X-Ray2 (0.4%)2 (0.3%)2 (0.3%)14 (2%)14 (1%)14 (1%)
CT-Scan 51 (7%)51 (7%)55 (5%)55 (5%)
Surgery148 (28%)148 (21%)148 (21%)209 (22%)209 (18%)209 (18%)
Radiotherapy 118 (17%)118 (17%)147 (13%)147 (13%)
Chemotherapy297 (55%)297 (42%)297 (42%)488 (51%)488 (42%)488 (42%)
Total 536 (100%) 705 (100%) 705 (100%) 955 (100%) 1,157 (100%) 1,157 (100%)

Source: Authors’ calculations based on the data collected from respondents

Note: Due to rounding, the sums may not be equal to the total

Source: Authors’ calculations based on the data collected from respondents Note: Due to rounding, the sums may not be equal to the total When the replacement and renovation costs of fixed assets are included (scenario II), the costs of some services were increased while the costs of other services decreased (Table 3).

Cost of treating breast cancer per type of input

In scenario I, consumable materials and human resources took the lion shares of the total cost of breast cancer treatment for all stages using the existing fixed assets. However, if the existing assets are replaced by the new one and the buildings are renovated, the share of each input will vary. With scenario II, the share of consumable materials and human resources was decreased to 38% and 13% for stage I and 39% and 13% for II and III respectively. The costs of medical equipment, machines and furniture increased to 11% for stage I and 12% to treat stage II and III. The costs of non-medical equipment, machines and furniture increased from 0.1% to 2% to treat stage I, II and III of breast cancer. On the other hand, the construction cost has increased from 0% to 27% for Stage I and 25% for Stage II and III (Table 4).
Table 4

Cost of breast cancer treatment by type of input (April 21, 2020).

Type of inputs to be usedTreatment cost per type of input and stage of breast cancer in US$ (%)
Scenario I excluding fixed assetsScenario II including fixed assets
IIIIIIIIIIII
Consumable materials360 (67%)456 (65%)456 (65%)360 (38%)456 (39%)456 (39%)
Human resource124 (23%)150 (21%)150 (21%)124 (13%)150 (13%)150 (13%)
Medical equipment, machines and furniture2 (0.5%)34 (5%)34 (5%)101 (11%)133 (12%)133 (12%)
Non-medical equipment, machines and furniture0.3 (0.1%)0.4 (0.1%)0.4 (0.1%)23 (2%)24 (2%)24 (2%)
Building0(0%)0.2 (0.0%)0.2 (0.0%)259 (27%)288 (25%)288 (25%)
Others49 (9%)64 (9.%)64 (9%)87 (9%)105 (9%)105 (9%)
Total 536 (100%) 705 (100%)705 (100%)955 (100%) 1,157 (100%) 1,157 (100%)

Source: Authors’ calculations based on the data collected from respondents.

Note: Due to rounding, the sum may not equal to the total

Source: Authors’ calculations based on the data collected from respondents. Note: Due to rounding, the sum may not equal to the total

Comparison of cost of treatment between current practice and NCCN guidelines

Breast cancer treatment costs for one patient at each stage of current Ethiopian practice in TASH and NCCN are similar for nearly all types of services (Table 5). Differences were observed in CT scan diagnosis, which is not prescribed in the current treatment practice while NCCN guideline prescribed it for breast cancer stage I patients. The amount of Gy prescribed in the current radiotherapy treatment practice is a little bit higher than the amount Gy prescribed in NCCN guideline. The total cost of breast cancer treatment with the current treatment practice is US$ 536 to treat a patient in stage I and US$ 705 for stage II and III compared to the total cost of breast cancer treatment per NCCN guideline as US$ 587 for stage I and US$ 747 for breast cancer stage II and III.
Table 5

Comparison of breast cancer treatment costs between current practice and NCCN guidance (as of April 21, 2020).

Type of serviceCost of BC treatment by stage of breast cancer (US$)
As per the current practiceAs per NCCN Guidelines
QtyIIIIIIQtyIIIIII
Consultation/examination8 visits3131318 visits313131
Laboratory8 times3636368 times363636
Pathology1 time2020201 time202020
Ultrasound1 time3331 time333
X-Ray1 time2221 time222
CT-Scan1 time51511 time515151
Surgery1 time1481481481 time148148148
Radiotherapy53.68 Gy11811850 Gy160160
Chemotherapy8 Cycles2972972978 Cycles297297297
Total   536 705 705 587 747 747

NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network Harmonized Guidelines for Sub-Saharan Africa, Qty: Quantity

Source: Authors’ computation based on the data collected from respondents and NCCN guidelines

Note: Due to rounding, the sums may not be equal to the total

NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network Harmonized Guidelines for Sub-Saharan Africa, Qty: Quantity Source: Authors’ computation based on the data collected from respondents and NCCN guidelines Note: Due to rounding, the sums may not be equal to the total

Projected costs of breast cancer treatment

The number of new breast cancer patients in Addis Ababa, who might seek treatment in TASH will follow the growth of the female population per age [23] and increase from 670 in 2021 to 776 in 2025 (Table 6).
Table 6

Projection of the total costs of breast cancer treatment excluding and including the values of fixed assets from the year 2021 to 2025.

YearNumber of patientsScenario I excluding fixed assets in thousandsScenario I including fixed assets in thousands
10%15%20%10%15%20%
2021670540560590870910950
20227006206807401,0001,1001,190
20237237008009101,1401,3001,480
20247488009601,1131,3001,5501,840
20257769101,1401,4101,4801,8502.290

Source: Authors’ computation based on the data collected from AAPCR, CSA and data collected from TASH documents and reports

Source: Authors’ computation based on the data collected from AAPCR, CSA and data collected from TASH documents and reports If the unit costs of materials will increase by 10 percent every year, the total cost of breast cancer treatment for TASH will increase from US$ 540,000 in 2021 to US$ 910,000 in 2025 (Table 6). If the unit costs of materials will increase by 15%, TASH will incur from US$ 560,000 in 2021 to US$ 1.14 million in 2025. However, if the unit costs of medical and non-medical materials increased by 20%, TASH will be forced to incur from US$ 590,000 in 2021 to US$ 1.41 million in 2025. The estimated costs excluding amortization in scenario I are too low. Thus, the depreciation values of fixed assets were included assuming that the old but functional fixed assets will be either replaced by new one or renovated (scenario II). If the prices of medical and non-medical both resources will increase by 10%, the cost of breast cancer treatment will be increased to US$ 870,000 in 2021 and US$ 1.48 million in 2025 to treat 670 and 776 breast cancer patients respectively. This cost will increase to US$ 910, 000 and US$ 1.85 million in 2021 and 2025 respectively to treat the same number of breast cancer patients. When the prices of both medical and non-medical resources will increase by 20%, the cost of breast cancer treatment will increase to US$ 950, 000 and US$ 2.29 million (Table 6).

Economic burden of breast cancer

The economic burden of the health care service is determined by the share of the total health budget as well as the gross domestic product. Accordingly, if TASH continues to provide treatment, using the existing infrastructure assuming that the costs of inputs will increaseby 10%, 15% and 20%, the share of the costs of breast cancer treatment to the total health budget will be 0.042%, 0.043% and 0.045% in 2021 respectively. These shares will be increased to 0.065%, 0.081% and 0.1% in 2025. If TASH replaces the old medical and non-medical machines, equipment and furniture by new one and the existing building is renovated and if the costs of inputs increased by 10, 15 and 20%, the share of the breast cancer to the total health budget will be 0.067, 0.070 and 0.073% in 2021 respectively and these shares will be increased to 0.105, 0.131 and 0.162% in 2025.

Discussion

This study found considerable differences of costs for optimal treatment regimen of breast cancer patients. Chemotherapy was the most expensive, followed by radiotherapy and consultation costs. This study found that according to the current treatment practices at TASH, the total costs of breast cancer treatment significantly increased with higher stages of disease. Patients with stage two and three disease needed more expensive treatment compared to stage one. Out of the total cost incurred to optimally treat 55 breast cancer patients, 6% were spent for treatment of patients with stage I, 26% for stage II and 61% of the total cost for stage III breast cancer patients. Costs for all new breast cancer patients, who will present at TASH for treatment during the next five years were projected [24]. Guzha et al. also found somewhat similar findings that of the total cost of breast cancer treatment 6%, 47% and 35% of costs were incurred for treating stage I, II and III cancer respectively, though these costs were paid by the patients [25]. However, Nguyen et al indicated in their study that the initial treatment cost of breast cancer treatment was only US$ 128.7 for stage I but US$ 684.1 for stage III; for stage IV the treatment cost decreased to US$ 537.9. The five year total treatment cost increased from US$ 568.6 for stage I to US$ 901.8 for stage II but for stage III and IV the treatment cost decreased to US$ 816.1 and US$ 603.4 respectively. The reason for this decline was that the follow-up treatment for breast cancer in the years after the initial treatment was relatively simple [26]. Certainly the costs per patient increased with higher stages seeing the majority of patients treated for advanced stage further increased the costs. Furthermore, this study found that TASH incurred US$ 11,704 for chemotherapy which was US$ 180.66 per patient. Those studies, which were conducted at TASH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, indicated that patients incurred far higher costs on average US$ 1,188 and US$ 1,489 for chemotherapy respectively [25]. A study conducted in Moroco on Unit price for different drugs, cost of protocols by cycle and cost of individual whole treatment, the unit cost of chemotherapy drugs for example Cyclophosphamide (1000 mg) was US$ 7.28. The total cost of chemotherapy treatment was also US$ 84.50 for AC, US$ 1105 for Docetaxel and US$ 1560 for Trastuzumab [27]. In Vietnam the average cost of chemotherapy treatment was US$ 476.48 [26]. This shows that chemotherapy costs were rather low in Addis Ababa compared to other settings were more modern substances are used. Consumable materials took a high share out of the total costs of breast cancer treatment in all scenarios. If maintenance costs were included such as renovation of existing buildings, the share of the cost for building-renovation would be higher than the share of cost of human resources. In terms of costs of utilized for consummable inputs, the advanced stages were more costly than earlier stages of breast cancer. The costs of breast cancer treatment according to the NCCN guideline for SSA was slightly higher than the costs of breast cancer treatment according to current practice due to differences in imaging utilization and low-cost radiotherapy. Total costs certainly depend on numbers of patients in need for therapy. The projection of the number of new breast cancer cases based on AAPBCR and CSA data indicated an increase. This projection might even be an underestimate, because with expected higher awareness, the number of Addis Ababa residents, who demand breast cancer treatment may increase. As the number of breast cancer patients will increase from year to year, the budget to be allocated would need to rise to US$ 1.5 million in 2025. This is due to the increase of investment costs for newly procured medical and non-medical equipment and furniture, as well as the cost of renovation of the existing building (increase on average by 144%). Because of this, the estimated and projected total cost of breast cancer treatment will be 1.02% and 1.251% of the total health budget in 2021 and 2025 respectively. This will compel TASH to mobilise resources from both domestic and foreign sources. High costs for breast cancer treatment are also reported from other countries. Saber Boutayeb et al. also revealed that the cost of chemotherapy treatment for a breast cancer patient varies between US$ 507 up to US$ 30,088. In Vietnam also, the initial treatment and 5-Year total cost for treatment course was US$ 632.86 and US$ 975.01 respectvely [26]. The government of Moroco was suggested to allocate annual between US$ 13.3 million and US$ 28.6 million for breast cancer treatment [27]. These studies show that understanding the total cost of breast cancer treatment is critical, as it will inform the decision-makers on financing breast cancer treatment. In summary, this study found that the budget required to provide breast cancer treatment for new patients depends on the number of new patients, the proportion of advanced stage as well as the detailed decision on costly targeted therapy such as trastuzumab. It should be noted that, promoting of earlier treatment of breast cancer should be given high priority to considerably reduce the economic burden of breast cancer treatment as well as increasing survival rates [28, 29]. Thus, the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Health of Ethiopia and TASH are advised to use the data and findings of this study as a baseline, while planning and budgeting for breast cancer prevention and treatment. Moreover, from a public health perspective, the reported data in this study can be used as a resource to develop ideas on budgeting for the different components of breast cancer therapy.

Limitation of the study

The study has the following limitations: First, the study focused on the treatment given at TASH only. TASH is the most comprehensive cancer center in the country and sets high standard. We purposely choose a guideline concordant approach to assure the maximum benefit to the patients. Second, the study did not include the costs incurred to treat breast cancer stage IV, costs of treatment for adverse effects of medication given to breast cancer patients, and costs for breast cancer inpatient treatment. This would add additional costs but can have very high variability due to personal preferences and individualized approaches. Third, additional factors such as inflation, pandemic or difficulties of procurement may also alter prices of items.

Conclusion

This study shows the magnitude of current costs for breast cancer service in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. In detail, main drivers are advanced stage, investment costs such as radiotherapy machine as well as the increasing total number of patients in need of care. Hence, to alleviate the economic burden of breast cancer treatment, promoting of early diagnosis is vital. Nevertheless, it should be noted that as women’s awareness about the benefits of breast cancer treatment increase, the demand for innovative breast cancer treatment would rise as well. Negotiations with pharmaceutical companies could possibly provide access to modern therapy for low-resource countries. In general, innovative financing mechanisms have to be found to meet the demand for cancer care. Hence, we recommend that international partnership should be sought to assure costly investments, policies should be carefully revised and social and community based health insurances should include breast cancer in their schemes.

Estimted cost of breast cancer treatment at TASH.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Unit costs of breast cancer treatment.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Comparison of the cost of BC treatment.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Projected BC treatment cost.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file. 12 Jul 2022
PONE-D-22-14104
Health System cost of breast cancer treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Demeke, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please consider all the comments.
Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 26 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Ahmed Mancy Mosa, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information. If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information. 3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section. 4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "The author TD received 20% of the funding from DAAD PAGEL at Martin-Luther University University, Halle programme, Germany and 80% no specific funding for this work." Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 5. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. "Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. 6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: I Don't Know ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: My suggestions: in introduction section please refer to the main characteristics of breast cancer and define the different BC stages. It could be useful the following manuscript doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i9.594 ad others. It could be interesting compare the BC burden in Ethiopia with other countries. If possible add the questionnaire. It could be interesting evaluate also the costs for BC treatment in correlation with the BC survival rate related to its stage. Please specify the meaning of fixet assets Data reported in tables could be represented also using an aerogram. Check accurately english form and text. Reviewer #2: The study is an important and novel study to project future and current cost of the breast cancer treatment. Hence, early preparation for future prevention and treatment. The data is not fully available due to several restrictions; confidential issues-patient's chart etc. Methods have been explained in detail and obtained ethical approval. The authors need to consider to re-check the typing error (spelling/format) in several lines (Example in line 63, 166, 203, 230, 255-259). ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
9 Aug 2022 Responses to reviewers Reviewer #1: My suggestions: in introduction section please refer to the main characteristics of breast cancer and define the different BC stages. It could be useful the following manuscript doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i9.594 ad others. My response: The suggestion is accepted and I did accordingly and the following paragraphs are added from line number 47-55. Breast cancer is a disease that is manifested when cells in the breast grow and divide uncontrollably resulting in a mass of tissue which is usually known as a ‘tumor’. The symptoms of breast cancer are abnormal lump or swelling in the breast, the most common symptom, the lumps beside the breast or under the arm, unexplained breast pain, abnormal-nipple discharge, changes in breast texture, or changes in the skin on or around the breast(1, 2) Thus, breast cancer is characterized by the presence of malignant tumors in one of the organ's structures, which arise from the uncontrollable reproduction of cells that have gone through a complex process of disordered transformations and may progress through direct extension or metastatic dissemination(2). Staging describes how much cancer is present in the patient's body. The size and location of the tumor, as well as the spread the cancer to other parts of the patient’s body are the factors, among others, that influence staging a breast cancer. The American Joint Committee on Cancer's TNM classification system is used to stage invasive breast cancer (AJCC)(3). Accordingly, the basic stages of breast cancer are defined as follow; • Breast cancer Stage 0. The disease is non-invasive. This means it hasn’t broken out of your breast ducts. • Breast cancer Stage I. The cancer cells have spread to the nearby breast tissue. • Breast cancer Stage II. The tumor is either smaller than 2 centimeters across and has spread to underarm lymph nodes or larger than 5 centimeters across but hasn’t spread to underarm lymph nodes. Tumors at this stage can measure anywhere between 2 to 5 centimeters across, and may or may not affect the nearby lymph nodes. • Breast cancer Stage III. At this stage, the cancer has spread beyond the point of origin. It may have invaded nearby tissue and lymph nodes, but it hasn’t spread to distant organs. Stage III is usually referred to as locally advanced breast cancer. • Breast cancer Stage IV. The cancer has spread to areas away from your breast, such as your bones, liver, lungs or brain. Stage IV breast cancer is also called metastatic breast cancer(4). Reviewer #1 suggestion: It could be interesting compare the BC burden in Ethiopia with other countries. My response: The suggestion is accepted and I did accordingly and the following paragraphs are added from line number 84-88. The breast cancer burden in Ethiopia was compared with neighboring and peer African countries. The Global Cancer Observatory recent report indicated in 2020 female breast cancer five years prevalence was 48.52 per 100,000 which was Somalia (31.61/100,000) and South Sudan (25.72/100,000) but lower than Eritrea (48.73/100,000), Uganda (55.46/100,000), Sudan (55.62/100,000), Kenya (57.28/100,000), Nigeria (59.31/100,000), Djibouti (74.71/100,000) and South Africa (138.90/100,000)(5). Reviewer #1 suggestion: If possible, add the questionnaire. My response: Yes, possible. I attached Reviewer #1 suggestion: It could be interesting evaluate also the costs for BC treatment in correlation with the BC survival rate related to its stage. My response: The idea is nice. But I want to kindly explain that the study was focused on the cost of breast cancer (BC) treatment from the provider side if a BC patient is provided the full treatment regardless of her survival. My study takes a hypothetical woman for each stage who will be provided standard treatment and completed her treatment instead of taking the real patient. The reason is, as I mentioned earlier, to know the health system cost that will be incurred to treat a BC patient who is presented at TASH with different stages of BC. In other words, the study tries to estimate how much money Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) will incur to treat a BC who will be presented at TASH with stage I, 2 and 3 regardless of the economic status of the patient as the costs that the patient will incur for treatment is not taken into account. Thus, the assumption is that if a BC who is presented at TASH with stage I and provided standard treatment and completed her treatment, as many studies indicated, the patient’s relative survival (RS) will be around 98%, if a patient is presented at TASH with breast cancer stage II, gets standard treatment and if she completed her treatment, her RS will be around 90%. If a BC patient is presented at TASH with BC stage III, gets standard treatment and if she completed her treatment, her RS will be about 70%. Therefore, it is possible to evaluate the costs of BC treatment in correlation with the RS at each stage. In fact, this evaluation will lead us the estimation of cost effectiveness of the treatment. Nevertheless, since this not the objective of our study, we did not do as you suggested. Reviewer #1 suggestion: Please specify the meaning of fixed assets My response: I accepted the suggestion and the following statements is added from line number 143 to 145. Fixed assets are all types of assets that can provide service for more than one year that includes office and medical furniture, Office and medical equipment, medical and non-medical machines, buildings, land, etc. Reviewer #1 suggestion: Data reported in tables could be represented also using an aerogram. My response: I tried to draw a graph that shows the number on left axis and the percentage at right axis because I wanted to show the numbers and percentages at the same time in order to make clear the data analysis and results clear. Nevertheless, readers including co-authors suggested that the graph was confusing and it is difficult to understand. So, I was compelled to put these two figures in one table. Reviewer #1 suggestion: Check accurately english form and text. My response: Prior to submitting to the journal, I gave to the English native speaker who was also researcher in my university and she improved it. As per your comment, I read it again repeatedly and made minor changes. Reviewer #2 suggestion: The study is an important and novel study to project future and current cost of the breast cancer treatment. Hence, early preparation for future prevention and treatment. The data is not fully available due to several restrictions; confidential issues-patient's chart etc. Methods have been explained in detail and obtained ethical approval. The authors need to consider to re-check the typing error (spelling/format) in several lines (Example in line 63, 166, 203, 230, 255-259). My response: I did accordingly. Moreover, when I added some ideas as per the reviewer #1 comment, the following new references are added. References 1. Britannica-The Editors of Encyclopedia. Breast cancer. Encyclopedia Britannica Encyclopedia Britannica Inc.; 07 July 2022. 2. Rodrigo Sanches Peres, Manoel Antônio dos Santos. Breast Cancer, Poverty and Mental Health: Emotional Response to the Disease in Women from Popular Classes. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2007;15:786-91. 3. Beth C. Freedman , Alyssa Gillego, Susan K. Boolbol. The Surgical Management of Invasive Breast Cancer. In: Darius S. Francescatti, Melvin J. Silverstein, editors. Breast Cancer-A New Era in Management. USA: Springer; 2014. 4. Cleveland Clinic. Breast Cancer Ohio, USA: Cleveland Clinic; n.d. [cited https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/3986-breast-cancer 25th July 2022]. 5. The Global Cancer Observatory. Cancer Today France: IARC, WHO; 2021 [updated March, 2021; cited https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home 25th July 2022]. Submitted filename: Responses to reviewer.docx Click here for additional data file. 26 Aug 2022
PONE-D-22-14104R1
Health System cost of breast cancer treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Demeke , Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please, accurately, consider the comments  . 
Please submit your revised manuscript by 6 Sep. 2022. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Ahmed Mancy Mosa, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed Reviewer #2: (No Response) ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: N/A Reviewer #2: I Don't Know ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Authors improved the overall quality of the manuscript. Authors addressed all my comments. The manuscript is now accetable for publication in PlosOne Reviewer #2: Thank you for addressing the previous comments. Kindly consider to convert the point form sentences in the Introduction part into paragraph. Please check any typographical errors in the document (Font color etc). ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
29 Aug 2022 Reviewer #2: Thank you for addressing the previous comments. Kindly consider to convert the point form sentences in the Introduction part into paragraph. Please check any typographical errors in the document (Font color etc). I changed the point form sentences in to paragraphs and make all letters in the same (black) color. Submitted filename: Responses to reviewer 2nd round.docx Click here for additional data file. 13 Sep 2022 Health System cost of breast cancer treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia PONE-D-22-14104R2 Dear Dr. Demeke , We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Ahmed Mancy Mosa, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #2: N/A ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #2: (No Response) ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #2: No ********** 22 Sep 2022 PONE-D-22-14104R2 Health System cost of breast cancer treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Dear Dr. Demeke: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Ahmed Mancy Mosa Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  12 in total

Review 1.  Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Melissa M Center; Carol DeSantis; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality.

Authors:  Danny R Youlden; Susanna M Cramb; Nathan A M Dunn; Jennifer M Muller; Christopher M Pyke; Peter D Baade
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Estimation of the cost of treatment by chemotherapy for early breast cancer in Morocco.

Authors:  Saber Boutayeb; Abdesslam Boutayeb; Naoual Ahbeddou; Wiam Boutayeb; Essaadi Ismail; Mehdi Tazi; Hassan Errihani
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-09-10

4.  Breast cancer, poverty and mental health: emotional response to the disease in women from popular classes.

Authors:  Rodrigo Sanches Peres; Manoel Antônio dos Santos
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

5.  Breast cancer survival in Ethiopia: a cohort study of 1,070 women.

Authors:  E J Kantelhardt; P Zerche; A Mathewos; P Trocchi; A Addissie; A Aynalem; T Wondemagegnehu; T Ersumo; A Reeler; B Yonas; M Tinsae; T Gemechu; A Jemal; C Thomssen; A Stang; S Bogale
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Factors associated with time to first healthcare visit, diagnosis and treatment, and their impact on survival among breast cancer patients in Mali.

Authors:  Kirstin Grosse Frie; Bakarou Kamaté; Cheick Boudagari Traoré; Madani Ly; Brahima Mallé; Bourama Coulibaly; Andreas Wienke; Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Addis Ababa population-based pattern of cancer therapy, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Jana Feuchtner; Assefa Mathewos; Asmare Solomon; Genebo Timotewos; Abreha Aynalem; Tigeneh Wondemagegnehu; Amha Gebremedhin; Fekadu Adugna; Mirko Griesel; Andreas Wienke; Adamu Addissie; Ahmedin Jemal; Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cost of treatment for breast cancer in central Vietnam.

Authors:  Nguyen Hoang Lan; Wongsa Laohasiriwong; John Frederick Stewart; Nguyen Dinh Tung; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Unit cost of medical services at different hospitals in India.

Authors:  Susmita Chatterjee; Carol Levin; Ramanan Laxminarayan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.