| Literature DB >> 36201488 |
Tamiru Demeke1,2, Wondimu Ayele1,2, Damen Haile Mariam2, Andreas Wienke1, Mathewos Assefa3, Adamu Addissie1,2, Rafael Mikolajczyk1, Susanne Unverzagt4, Eva Johanna Kantelhardt1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women with an annual crude incidence of 27.4 per 100,000 in Ethiopia. The aims of this study were to (a) estimate the unit cost of breast cancer treatment for the standard Ethiopian patient, (b) identify the cost drivers, (c) project the total cost of breast cancer treatment for the next five years, and (d) estimate the economic burden of the disease in the main specialized tertiary hospital-Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) Addis Ababa.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36201488 PMCID: PMC9536570 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Sources of data and apportioning method for estimating the unit of cost of each cost driver.
| Cost driver | Source of information | Units | Apportioning method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salary of employees | Payroll copy from Human Resource Department | ETB converted to US$ | Average monthly salary converted to hourly wage and multiplied by the time estimated for the specific activity |
| Building | Data collected from construction professionals | Area and ETB converted to US$ | Annual depreciation divided by the total number of working hours and multiplied by the amount of time the patient received service |
| Medical and non-medical furniture and equipment | Data were collected from shops that sold the items | Number of items used | Annual depreciation divided by the total amount of working hours and multiplied by the amount of time the patient received service |
| Consumable materials and drugs | Pharmacy stores of TASH | Number of items consumed | Based on the dosage determined for the specific treatment |
| Radiotherapy | Medical physicist unit and patients register in radiotherapy room | Radiation dosis (Gray) given to patients | •The Cobalt 60 radiation source was depreciated for 5½ years and the investment divided by the total doses (Gy) provided to patients during the above-mentioned years |
| Overhead costs | The costs of different materials and activities that were used jointly by the Oncology department and other (e.g. utilities, security guard) | ETB converted to US$ | 10 % of the total of the above costs were taken |
ETB: Ethiopian Birr; TASH: Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital; US$: United States of America Dollar.
Costed consumable materials.
| Service type | Costed consumable materials | Costing method |
|---|---|---|
| Consultation | Patient card, pen, prescription papers, and gloves | Unit costs of each materials times number of materials used |
| Laboratory | Chemicals/reagents for diagnosis | Costs of each type of chemical/ reagents per mg times the quantity of chemical/ reagents used |
| Pathology | Chemicals, reagents and other related materials for diagnosis | Costs of each type of chemical/ reagents per mg times the quantity of chemical/ reagents used plus the unit costs of each materials times number of materials used |
| Ultrasound | Ultrasound paper and gel and other related materials for diagnosis | Costs of gel per mg times the quantity of gel used plus the unit costs of each materials times number of materials used |
| X-ray | Gloves and CD for diagnosis | Unit costs of gloves and CD times number of gloves and CD used |
| CT-Scan | Gloves, contrast, plastic sheet and other related materials used in the CT scan room for diagnosis | Unit costs of gloves, plastic sheet and other related materials times number of gloves, plastic and other related materials used plus costs of contrast per mg times the quantity of contrast used. |
| Anesthesia | Chemicals and other related materials for surgery. | Costs of each type of chemical/ reagents per mg times the quantity of chemical/ reagents used plus the unit costs of other related materials times number of other related materials used. |
| Surgery | Gauze, blades, and other related materials. | Unit costs of gauze, blade and other related materials times number of gauze, blade and other related materials used. |
| Radiotherapy | The Cobalt 60 radiotherapy source and related materials | Costs per Gray times the quantity of Gray plus the unit costs of other related materials times number of other related materials used. |
| Chemotherapy | Chemotherapy drugs (e.g. FEC, CMF, and Doxorubicin ACT) and other related materials. | Unit costs of each drug times the quantity of drug plus the unit costs of other related materials times number of other related materials used. |
ACT: (Adriamycin)/ Cyclophosphamide (Procytox)/ Paclitaxel (Taxol) CMF: Cyclophosphamide/Methotrexate/Fluorouracil, FEC -Fluorouracil/Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide
Unit cost for treatment by breast cancer stage (April 21, 2020).
| Type of service | Cost of treatment per stage in US$ (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario I excluding fixed assets | Scenario II including fixed assets | |||||
| Stage I | Stage II | Stage III | stage I | Stage II | Stage III | |
| Consultation/ | 31 (60%) | 31 (4%) | 31 (4%) | 69 (7%) | 69 (6%) | 69 (6%) |
| Laboratory | 36 (7%) | 36 (5%) | 36 (5%) | 91 (10%) | 91 (8%) | 91 (8%) |
| Pathology | 20 (4%) | 20 (3%) | 20 (3%) | 72 (8%) | 72 (6%) | 72 (6%) |
| Ultrasound | 3 (1%) | 3 (0.5%) | 3 (0.5%) | 13 (1%) | 13 (1%) | 13 (1%) |
| X-Ray | 2 (0.4%) | 2 (0.3%) | 2 (0.3%) | 14 (2%) | 14 (1%) | 14 (1%) |
| CT-Scan | 51 (7%) | 51 (7%) | 55 (5%) | 55 (5%) | ||
| Surgery | 148 (28%) | 148 (21%) | 148 (21%) | 209 (22%) | 209 (18%) | 209 (18%) |
| Radiotherapy | 118 (17%) | 118 (17%) | 147 (13%) | 147 (13%) | ||
| Chemotherapy | 297 (55%) | 297 (42%) | 297 (42%) | 488 (51%) | 488 (42%) | 488 (42%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Authors’ calculations based on the data collected from respondents
Note: Due to rounding, the sums may not be equal to the total
Cost of breast cancer treatment by type of input (April 21, 2020).
| Type of inputs to be used | Treatment cost per type of input and stage of breast cancer in US$ (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario I excluding fixed assets | Scenario II including fixed assets | |||||
| I | II | III | I | II | III | |
| Consumable materials | 360 (67%) | 456 (65%) | 456 (65%) | 360 (38%) | 456 (39%) | 456 (39%) |
| Human resource | 124 (23%) | 150 (21%) | 150 (21%) | 124 (13%) | 150 (13%) | 150 (13%) |
| Medical equipment, machines and furniture | 2 (0.5%) | 34 (5%) | 34 (5%) | 101 (11%) | 133 (12%) | 133 (12%) |
| Non-medical equipment, machines and furniture | 0.3 (0.1%) | 0.4 (0.1%) | 0.4 (0.1%) | 23 (2%) | 24 (2%) | 24 (2%) |
| Building | 0(0%) | 0.2 (0.0%) | 0.2 (0.0%) | 259 (27%) | 288 (25%) | 288 (25%) |
| Others | 49 (9%) | 64 (9.%) | 64 (9%) | 87 (9%) | 105 (9%) | 105 (9%) |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Source: Authors’ calculations based on the data collected from respondents.
Note: Due to rounding, the sum may not equal to the total
Comparison of breast cancer treatment costs between current practice and NCCN guidance (as of April 21, 2020).
| Type of service | Cost of BC treatment by stage of breast cancer (US$) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As per the current practice | As per NCCN Guidelines | |||||||
| Qty | I | II | III | Qty | I | II | III | |
| Consultation/examination | 8 visits | 31 | 31 | 31 | 8 visits | 31 | 31 | 31 |
| Laboratory | 8 times | 36 | 36 | 36 | 8 times | 36 | 36 | 36 |
| Pathology | 1 time | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 time | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Ultrasound | 1 time | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 time | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| X-Ray | 1 time | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 time | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| CT-Scan | 1 time | 51 | 51 | 1 time | 51 | 51 | 51 | |
| Surgery | 1 time | 148 | 148 | 148 | 1 time | 148 | 148 | 148 |
| Radiotherapy | 53.68 Gy | 118 | 118 | 50 Gy | 160 | 160 | ||
| Chemotherapy | 8 Cycles | 297 | 297 | 297 | 8 Cycles | 297 | 297 | 297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network Harmonized Guidelines for Sub-Saharan Africa, Qty: Quantity
Source: Authors’ computation based on the data collected from respondents and NCCN guidelines
Note: Due to rounding, the sums may not be equal to the total
Projection of the total costs of breast cancer treatment excluding and including the values of fixed assets from the year 2021 to 2025.
| Year | Number of patients | Scenario I excluding fixed assets in thousands | Scenario I including fixed assets in thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10% | 15% | 20% | 10% | 15% | 20% | ||
| 2021 | 670 | 540 | 560 | 590 | 870 | 910 | 950 |
| 2022 | 700 | 620 | 680 | 740 | 1,000 | 1,100 | 1,190 |
| 2023 | 723 | 700 | 800 | 910 | 1,140 | 1,300 | 1,480 |
| 2024 | 748 | 800 | 960 | 1,113 | 1,300 | 1,550 | 1,840 |
| 2025 | 776 | 910 | 1,140 | 1,410 | 1,480 | 1,850 | 2.290 |
Source: Authors’ computation based on the data collected from AAPCR, CSA and data collected from TASH documents and reports