Literature DB >> 24715840

Relevance of Health Economics in the Medical Treatment of Breast Cancer: The View of the Professional Association of Practicing Gynecologic Oncologists e.V. (BNGO).

Georg Heinrich1, Hindenburg Hans-Joachim2, Jörg Schilling2, Peter Klare2.   

Abstract

In this article, the position of the Professional Association of Practicing Gynecologic Oncologists e.V. (BNGO) on the health economics of medical breast cancer therapy is presented. The BNGO unites professionals and employees whose principal activity lies in highly specialized gynecologic oncology. In Germany, 139 specialists are united in 128 professional practices. According to § 12 of the Social Code, the oncological services provided by members must be 'sufficient, effective and economical; they must not exceed what is necessary'. People who are covered by statutory health insurance in Germany are entitled to sufficient benefits. Sufficient measures are measures that benefit the patient with breast cancer and have a positive effect on the course of the disease. In § 35b of the Social Code, the benefit of the patient is defined as 'improvement in health, shortening of the duration of illness, lengthening of lifespan, reduction of side effects and an improvement in the quality of life'. In the adjuvant situation, the ideal goal is healing; in the palliative situation, the most basic marker is overall survival, while surrogate markers are the progression-free interval, improved quality of life, or diminished symptoms. At the same time, the law on economic assessment stipulates 'appropriateness and reasonableness of reimbursement by the insured community'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant therapy; Aromatase inhibitors; Chemotherapy; Systemic therapy; Therapy Costs

Year:  2013        PMID: 24715840      PMCID: PMC3971801          DOI: 10.1159/000346856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  3 in total

1.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors.

Authors:  Martin Filipits; Margaretha Rudas; Raimund Jakesz; Peter Dubsky; Florian Fitzal; Christian F Singer; Otto Dietze; Richard Greil; Andrea Jelen; Paul Sevelda; Christa Freibauer; Volkmar Müller; Fritz Jänicke; Marcus Schmidt; Heinz Kölbl; Achim Rody; Manfred Kaufmann; Werner Schroth; Hiltrud Brauch; Matthias Schwab; Peter Fritz; Karsten E Weber; Inke S Feder; Guido Hennig; Ralf Kronenwett; Mathias Gehrmann; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Health care costs for patients with cancer at the end of life.

Authors:  Benjamin Chastek; Carolyn Harley; Joel Kallich; Lee Newcomer; Carly J Paoli; April H Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.840

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Health economics in breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthias W Beckmann; Michael P Lux
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Health system cost of breast cancer treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tamiru Demeke; Wondimu Ayele; Damen Haile Mariam; Andreas Wienke; Mathewos Assefa; Adamu Addissie; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Susanne Unverzagt; Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.