| Literature DB >> 36199317 |
René Simbizi1,2, Désiré Nduwimana1,2, Joël Niyoncuti1,2, Prosper Cishahayo3,4, Godefroid Gahungu3,4.
Abstract
The literature is still poor in theoretical and experimental, including both spectroscopic and thermodynamic data for protonated furan and protonated 2-cyanofuran and 3-cyanofuran (FH+, 2CFH+ and 3CFH+). These data are, however, crucial for astrophysicists and astrochemists in the detection of new species in interstellar medium (ISM), the discovery of these molecular species being not yet reported. It is in this perspective that a computational study based on quantum chemistry on FH+, 2CFH+ and 3CFH+ was undertaken. A series of properties including the proton affinity (PA) of furan and the two cyanofurans, the variations of enthalpy (Δr H), entropy (Δr S), and Gibbs free energy (Δr G) for the reactions yielding cyanofurans (neutral and protonated forms), were studied at different temperatures (5 K, 10 K, 150 K and 298 K) and pressures (P = 1 atm and P = 10-5 atm) based on modern computational models (G2MP2, G3, G4MP2 and G4). While confirming that the protonation favors the α-position for furan, the PA values show that the protonation favors the nitrogen atom in cases of 2CFH+ and 3CFH+. The Δr H, Δr S and Δr G values revealed spontaneous reactions producing these species under ISM conditions of temperature and pressure. In addition quadrupole hyperfine structures and vibrational spectra which are essential tools for the characterization and the identification of interstellar molecular species are predicted, while the region where brightest lines fall for different temperatures is discussed. The results reported in this work are expected to assist astrophysicists and astrochemists, in the search for new chemical species in interstellar environments. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36199317 PMCID: PMC9446509 DOI: 10.1039/d2ra04351c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Chemical structures of (a) furan, (b) 2-cyanofuran (2CF) and (c) 3-cyanofuran (3CF): 1 to 7 are different positions of protonation.
RMSD bond length (in Å), bond angles (in °) and rotational constants (in MHz) for furan for at different assessed levels of theory with respect to experimental results
| Level of theory | Bond lengths | Bond angles | Rotational constants |
|---|---|---|---|
| RMSD/Exp | RMSD/Exp | RMSD/Exp | |
| HF/6-31G(d) | 0.0154 | 0.3817 | 246.4136 |
| MP2/6-31G(d,p) | 0.0034 | 0.2449 | 44.9147 |
| MP3/6-311G(d) | 0.0052 | 0.2204 | 39.9478 |
| M06-2X/6-31G(d,p) | 0.0051 | 0.1852 | 91.3475 |
| M06-2X/6-311G(2d,2p) | 0.0068 | 0.2449 | 134.6708 |
| B3LYP/6-31G(d) | 0.0036 | 0.3780 | 10.4848 |
| B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) | 0.0031 | 0.2976 | 11.6142 |
| B3LYP/6-311G(2d,2p) | 0.0033 | 0.2976 | 67.2463 |
| B3LYP/6-311+G(2d,2p) | 0.0031 | 0.2928 | 60.7535 |
| B3LYP/6-31+G(d) | 0.0043 | 0.3338 | 14.7672 |
| B3LYP/6-311G(2df,2p) | 0.0075 | 0.2070 | 147.9445 |
| B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) | 0.0078 | 0.6164 | 1.3454 |
Experimental data from Bak et al. (1962).[48]
Calculated at B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) + empirical correction.
Experimental and B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) optimized geometrical parameters (including empirical corrections) for furan, 2CF, 3CF, 2CFH+ and 3CFH+ (bond lengths in Å, bond angles in °, rotational constants in MHz, principle moments of inertia and the inertial defects in amu Å2a
| Furan | 2CF | 3CF | 2CFH+ | 3CFH+ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calc | Exp | Calc | Exp | ||||
|
| |||||||
| O–C2 | 1.3584 | 1.362 | 1.3589 | — | 1.3422 | 1.3722 | 1.3212 |
| O–C5 | 1.3584 | 1.362 | 1.350 | — | 1.3605 | 1.3503 | 1.3796 |
| C2 | 1.3622 | 1.361 | 1.3679 | — | 1.3746 | 1.3726 | 1.3909 |
| C3–C4 | 1.4520 | 1.431 | 1.4462 | — | 1.44106 | 1.4423 | 1.4514 |
| C4 | 1.3622 | 1.361 | 1.3730 | — | 1.3478 | 1.3663 | 1.3519 |
| C2/C3–C6 | — | — | 1.099 | — | 1.4163 | 1.4099 | 1.3856 |
| C | — | — | 1.1717 | — | 1.1655 | 1.1716 | 1.1571 |
| N–H | — | — | — | — | — | 1.0113 | 1.0069 |
|
| |||||||
| C5–O–C2 | 107.13 | 106.5 | 105.42 | — | 107.35 | 105.60 | 108.77 |
| O–C2 | 110.814 | 110.7 | 111.29 | — | 110.41 | 111.64 | 108.63 |
| O–C5 | 110.814 | 110.7 | 113.28 | — | 110.85 | 111.99 | 111.09 |
| C5 | 105.622 | 106.0 | 103.52 | — | 105.96 | 105.89 | 104.04 |
| C2 | 105.622 | 106.0 | 105.66 | — | 105.43 | 104.87 | 107.48 |
| C2/C3–C6 | — | — | — | 179.54 | 175.05 | 179.34 | |
| C6 | — | — | — | 155.00 | 179.87 | ||
|
| |||||||
|
| 9446.06 | 9446.9 | 9220.097 | 9220.106 | 9374.251 | 9070.367 | 9092.451 |
|
| 9246.25 | 9246.6 | 2028.751 | 2029.262 | 1936.447 | 1924.174 | 1875.140 |
|
| 4672.54 | 4670.8 | 1662.861 | 1662.640 | 1604.917 | 1588.967 | 1554.545 |
|
| |||||||
|
| 191.051 | — | 195.727 | 53.911 | 55.715 | 55.717 | |
|
| 195.194 | — | 889.394 | 260.983 | 262.653 | 262.647 | |
|
| 386.245 | — | 1085.120 | 314.895 | 318.062 | 318.055 | |
| Δ | 0.000 | — | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.306 | 0.309 | |
Numbering scheme used is that of Fig. 1 and Scheme S1.
Experimental data from Bak et al.[48]
Experimental data from Engelbrecht & Sutter.[49]
Fig. 2B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) optimized 3D geometries for: (a) 2CF, (b) 3CF, (c) 2CFH+ and (d) 3CFH+ (red = O, gray = C, blue = N and light gray = H).
G2MP2 and G3 proton affinity (PA in kJ mol−1) of furan at different sites of protonation and temperatures (T = 298 K, T = 150 K, T = 10 K and T = 5 K)
| Sites of protonation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | O |
|
| O |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| G2MP2 | 701.41 | 815.91 | 771.73 | 698.92 | 813.46 | 769.54 |
| G3 | 697.78 | 814.80 | 770.18 | 719.69 | 812.35 | 767.98 |
|
|
| |||||
| G2MP2 | 696.07 | 810.72 | 766.83 | 695.97 | 810.62 | 766.73 |
| G3 | 693.19 | 809.61 | 765.28 | 693.09 | 809.50 | 765.18 |
| NIST | 812 | |||||
C α
C β are atoms number 2 (α-position) and 3 (β-position) on Fig. 1;
Experimental data from Van et al.[53] (NIST).
G2MP2 and G3 proton affinity (PA in kJ mol−1) of 2CF and 3CNF at different sites of protonation and temperatures (T = 298 K and T = 10 K)
| Sites | 2CF | 3CF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G2MP2 | G3 | G2MP2 | G3 | |
| 1 | 643.39 (635.93) | 642.18 (634.71) | 636.48 (631.33) | 635.54 (630.39) |
| 2 | 732.07 (726.97) | 727.39 (722.29) | 753.58 (748.65) | 751.89 (746.96) |
| 3 | 702.78 (698.23) | 701.18 (696.65) | 677.78 (672.97) | 672.71 (667.90) |
| 4 | 709.78 (705.07) | 707.45 (702.76) | 709.00 (704.26) | 706.34 (701.60) |
| 5 | 747.83 (742.97) | 746.38 (735.37) | 747.75 (742.78) | 745.32 (740.35) |
| N | 795.14 (790.48) | 796.35 (791.69) | 801.47 (796.57) | 802.75 (797.85) |
Position numbering scheme is from Fig. 1 and Scheme S1.
Gase phase G2MP2, G3, G4MP2 and G4 calculated enthalpy, entropy and Gibbs free energy variations (ΔrH, ΔrS and ΔrG in kJ mol−1) of reaction producing cyanofurans and their protonated forms (T = 298 K and T = 10 K for P = 10−5 atm)
| Reactions | No | 298 K | 10 K | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δr | Δr | Δr | Δr | Δr | Δr | Method | ||
| C4H4O+ + CN− → 2CF + H˙ | (1) | −532.03 | −517.07 | −0.050 | −532.98 | −533.44 | −0.045 | G2MP2 |
| −567.58 | −552.65 | −0.050 | −568.98 | −568.54 | −0.044 | G3 | ||
| −556.02 | −541.13 | −0.050 | −557.54 | −557.09 | −0.045 | G4MP2 | ||
| −561.53 | −546.64 | −0.050 | −563.05 | −562.61 | −0.045 | G4 | ||
| C4H4O+ + CN− → 3CF + H˙ | (2) | −538.90 | −523.98 | −0.050 | −539.84 | −540.29 | −0.044 | G2MP2 |
| −573.73 | −558.84 | −0.049 | −574.67 | −575.11 | −0.043 | G3 | ||
| −563.38 | −548.60 | −0.050 | −564.93 | −564.49 | −0.045 | G4MP2 | ||
| −568.66 | −553.88 | −0.050 | −570.21 | −569.77 | −0.045 | G4 | ||
| C4H3OCN + H3+ → 2CFH+ + H2 | (3) | −374.98 | −369.79 | −0.017 | −375.31 | −373.49 | −0.182 | G2MP2 |
| −375.89 | −370.63 | −0.017 | −376.00 | −375.89 | −0.010 | G3 | ||
| −372.72 | −365.70 | −0.024 | −371.85 | −371.73 | −0.011 | G4MP2 | ||
| −373.42 | −243.75 | −0.435 | −372.54 | −372.43 | −0.012 | G4 | ||
| C4H3OCN + H3+ → 3CFH+ + H2 | (4) | −381.31 | −375.59 | −0.019 | −381.49 | −379.58 | −0.190 | G2MP2 |
| −382.28 | −376.56 | −0.019 | −382.18 | −382.07 | −0.010 | G3 | ||
| −377.74 | −372.88 | −0.024 | −378.16 | −378.04 | −0.012 | G4MP2 | ||
| −378.28 | −373.42 | −0.016 | −378.69 | −377.29 | −0.139 | G4 | ||
Additional B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) calculated rotational parameters from optimized geometrical structures (including empirical corrections) of 2CFH+ and 3CFH+
| Rotational parameters | 2CFH+ | 3CFH+ |
|---|---|---|
| Δ | 0.068 | 0.061 |
| Δ | 1.002 | 12.379 |
| Δ | 2.185 | 1.901 |
| Δ | 0.012 | 0.109 |
| Δ | 1.276 | 1.107 |
|
| 3.151 | 5.417 |
|
| 1.118 | −0.045 |
|
| 1.126 | 0.380 |
|
| 3.970 | 5.430 |
|
| 1.028 | 1.247 |
|
| 0.955 | 0.347 |
|
| −1.983 | −1.595 |
|
| −0.023 | 0.019 |
|
| −0.910 | −0.918 |
Fig. 3Simulated rotational spectra (including 14N hyperfine quadrupole couplings) for (a) 2CFH+ and (b) 3CFH+ at T = 7, 10, 30, 100, 150 K and 300 K.