Literature DB >> 36194604

Taorong-type Baijiu starter: Analysis of fungal community and metabolic characteristics of middle-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu.

Yanbo Liu1,2,3,4,5, Xin Li1,4,5, Haideng Li1,6, Huimin Zhang1,4,5, Xiangkun Shen7, Lixin Zhang3, Suna Han2, Chunmei Pan1,4,5.   

Abstract

To study the difference between the fungal community compositional and fragrance components in medium- and high-Temperature Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu. The microbial communities and fragrance components of Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and headspace-solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). With an abundance at the phylum and genus levels ≥0.01% as the threshold, 3 phyla, Mucoromycota, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota, were found in both medium- and high-temperature Daqu, but their abundances differed. At the genus level, 15 and 13 genera were recognized. Rhizopus (72.40%) and Thermomyces (53.32%) accounted for the most significant proportions in medium-temperature and high-temperature Daqu, respectively. Medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu were found to have 40 and 29 fragrance components, respectively and contained the highest proportions of pyrazines (53.12%) and acids (32.68%). Correlation analyses between microbes and fragrance components showed that Aspergillus, Hyphopichia, Trichosporon, Alternaria were all highly and positively correlated with pyrazines, but the dominant fungal communities were highly correlated with only a few individual acid compounds but not with acid compounds overall. The unique Daqu -making process and environment lead to these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36194604      PMCID: PMC9531834          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Liquors(Baijiu), as treasures of the Chinese nation, are characterized by extraordinary fermentation characteristics, diverse styles, unique flavors after their long development history [1, 2]. Taorong-type Baijiu are among the 13 flavors of fragrant Baijiu in China and innovatively integrate Luzhou, Maotai, Fen, and sesame flavors. The Taorong flavor caters to numerous customers because of its fragrant, elegant and exquisite liquor, mellow and plump mouthfeel, and clean and bright aftertaste [3]. Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu is a microecological product enriched with microbial communities, bacteria and a complex Daqu fragrance and is capable of saccharification, fermentation and fragrance formation [4, 5]. High-temperature Daqu (maximum starter temperature controlled above 60°C) and medium-temperature Daqu (maximum starter temperature controlled at 50–60°C) varieties exist [6-8]. Daqu is mainly produced from wheat through natural inoculation, raw-material starter production, low-temperature fungal culture, high-temperature conversion, and storeroom storage [9, 10]. Daqu is pivotal for microbe inoculation and creates a fermentation environment for liquor-making [11]. Because of differences in Daqu production processes, Daqu from different production temperatures differs in its microbial community composition, which directly affects the compositions of the fermented mash zymophyte system, enzymatic system, and substance system [12]. Hence, the compositional analysis of microbial communities in medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu is urgently needed. Bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes play important roles in Daqu, and fungal communities are pivotal in producing alcohols, enzymes and fragrances [13]. Fungi consist of molds and saccharomycetes. Molds can secrete saccharifying enzymes, lipases, proteases and hydrolases, decompose macromolecular substances in fermented mashes and produce flavor substances and their precursors in liquors; thus, they are closely related to the formation of all flavor substances in liquors [14]. Moreover, saccharomycetes are a critical group of flora that can produce esters, fragrances and alcohols and thereby provide power for fermentation in liquors [15]. Headspace–solid-phase microextraction–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) is a practical technique for characterizing volatile components in complex systems [16, 17]. Compared with conventional flavor substance extraction, SPME is more convenient, faster, economically safer, solventless, highly selective, and more sensitive [18]. SPME can be directly combined with GC-MS, high-performance liquid chromatography, or capillary electrophoresis, which largely accelerates analysis and detection [15]. Compared with the traditional culture isolation method, high-throughput sequencing (HTS) can be used for both culturable and unculturable microbes [19]. It has the outstanding characteristics of accurate quantification, high sensitivity, a low workload, and low costs in comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, and 18S rDNA cloning library analysis [8, 19, 20]. Hence, HTS can better determine the compositions of flora communities in samples. Currently, there has been little research on fungal community compositions and fragrance compositions in medium- and high-temperature Daqu. Herein, HTS was combined with HS-SPME-GC-MS to study Yangshao Taorong-type Baijiu medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu. Specifically, the main fungal compositions and fragrance compositions of Taorong-type Baijiu medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu were analyzed. The findings will theoretically underlie the fungal flora library establishment and quality identification of Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu.

Materials and methods

Materials and reagents

The Daqu used herein was Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu (Henan Yangshao Liquor Co. Ltd.) that had been stored for 5 months. The medium-temperature Daqu (The incubation temperature is between 50°C and 60°C, and the maximum does not exceed 60°C) and high-temperature Daqu (The incubation temperature is above 60°C, and the maximum temperature can reach 70°C) were marked D-Z and E-G, respectively. Daqu was crushed, immediately placed in iceboxes, transported to the laboratory and stored in a refrigerator at -20°C. The reagents used herein included anhydrous ethanol (Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory), Goldview agarose (Beijing Mengyimei Commercial Center); PCR reagents (Biolion Technology Co. Ltd.); and soil DNA extraction kits (Guangzhou Magen Technology Co. Ltd.). In addition, AMPure XP magnetic beads were purchased from Beckman Instruments (USA).

Instruments

The instruments used included a -80°C refrigerator (Zhongke Meiling Cryogenics Co. Ltd.), a 4°C centrifuge and pipettors (Eppendorf AG, Germany), an ultrapure water apparatus (Shanghai RephiLe Bioscience), a gel-imaging system (Shanghai Biotanon Co. Ltd.), a PCR apparatus (Dongsheng Xingye Science Equipment Co. Ltd.), an agarose gel electrophoresis analyzer (Beijing Liuyi Biotechnology Co. Ltd.), a vortex oscillator (Guangzhou Wego Instrument Co. Ltd.), a GC–MS meter (Shimadzu, Japan), and a solid-phase microextraction device (Merck, USA).

Experimental methods

Detection and identification of flavor components

Pretreatment of Daqu samples. At each time point, Daqu (1 g) was placed into a headspace bottle, and 2 g of NaCl and 5 mL of distilled water were added. Then, the bottle was plugged and shaken. HS-SPME conditions. Headspace bottles containing pit mud samples were placed into a water bath at 50°C for 10 min of preheating, and then solid-phase CAR/PDMS (75 μm CAR/PDMS, carbon molecular sieve/polydimethyl silane) extraction fiber heads were inserted into the silica gel plugs for 30 min of headspace adsorption. GC conditions. An HP-FFAP column (30×0.32 mm2×0.25 μm) was used without diffusion at a flow rate of 1.21 mL/min, an inlet temperature of 250°C, and a temperature increase to 40°C over 3 min, followed by an increase at 5°C/min to 60°C, no heating, and then a temperature increase at 8°C/min to 230°C and holding for 7 min. MS conditions. An interface temperature of 220°C, electron ionization source, electron energy of 70 eV, and ion source temperature of 200°C were used [21].

Molecular identification of microorganism communities of Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu by PCR system

Crushed samples of medium-temperature Daqu or high-temperature Daqu were mixed well (each sample measured 0.25–0.5 g), and total metagenomics were extracted from the microbes using HiPure soil DNA kits. Then, the total DNA quantity and integrity were detected by agarose electrophoresis, and the DNA was stored at -20°C. ITS1_plant was amplified by PCR with the primers ITS1_F_KYO2 (5’-TAGAGGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAA-3’) and ITS86R (5’-TTCAAAGATTCGATGATTCAC-3’). The first-round amplification procedure was as follows: 1.5 μL of primer R (10 μM), 1.5 μL of primer F (10 μΜ), 3 μL of 25 mM MgSO4, 1 μL of KOD enzyme, 5 μL of 2 mM dNTPs, 5 μL of 10×Buffer KOD, and X μL of the template (100 ng) were mixed, and the volume was brought up to 50 μL with H2O. The PCR procedure was 94°C for 2 min; 98°C for 10 s, 62–66°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 30 s (30 cycles); and 68°C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified using AMPure XP beads. The second-round amplification procedure was as follows: 1 μL of universal PCR primer (10 μM), 1 μL of index primer (10 μM), 3 μL of 25 mM MgSO4, 1 μL of KOD enzyme, 5 μL of 2 mM dNTPs, 5 μL of 10×Buffer KOD, and 1 μL of template (100 ng) were mixed, and the volume was brought up to 50 μL with H2O [7]. The PCR procedure was as follows: 94°C for 2 min; 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 30 s (12 cycles); and 68°C for 5 min.

Data processing

After raw reads were acquired from sequencing, the low-quality reads were filtered using FASTP, and double-end reads were spliced into tags using FLASH. Then, the tags were filtered to form clean tags. The clean tags were clustered, and chimeric tags identified during this process were removed using UCHIME from USEARCH, which left the effective tags remaining. Then, the clean tags were clustered, and chimeric tags identified during this process were removed using UCHIME from USEARCH, leaving the remaining effective tags. The abundance of OTUs was statistically analyzed on the based on the effective tags.

Results

Rationality analysis of sequencing data

The average numbers of series in the original data of medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu were 133251 and 131595, respectively (Table 1). After quality control and filtering, the average numbers of high-quality series were 133170 and 131498, respectively. After the removing of chimeras, the average numbers of effective series were 125899 and 123639, respectively, and the average proportions of effective series were 94.48% and 93.95%, respectively.
Table 1

Basic sequencing data of medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu.

SampleRaw PEClean PEEffective TagsEffective Ratio
D-Z-113586013578012861894.67%
D-Z-213158013150212369294.01%
D-Z-313231213222812538794.77%
E-G-113111413101512313493.91%
E-G-212934812925812111693.64%
E-G-313432413422012666694.30%

Venn diagram analysis

The numbers of OTUs in medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu were 139 and 213, respectively, with 84 shared OTUs. Specifically, medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu shared 84 fungal species and possessed 55 and 129 exclusive OTUs (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Venn diagrams of OTUs from medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu.

Alpha diversity analysis

The average Shannon index of the high-temperature Daqu was larger than that of the medium-temperature Daqu (2.21 vs. 2.01, Table 2), suggesting that the microbial species diversity in the samples of high-temperature Daqu was richer and significantly more complex. The average Chao1 and ACE values of the high-temperature Daqu were both larger than those of the medium-temperature Daqu (268.3 vs. 208.7 and 274.3 vs. 212.1), indicating that the microbial diversity in high-temperature Daqu was higher. In addition, the sample coverage rates of both types of Daqu were larger than 99.9%, indicating that the sequencing results were highly reliable and sufficiently reflected the real situations of the samples.
Table 2

Medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu fungal diversity index table.

SampleShannonSimpsonGoods-CoverageChao1ACE
D-Z-12.020.5899.97%194.1205.8
D-Z-21.990.5799.97%190.7195.6
D-Z-32.010.5899.99%241.1234.9
E-G-12.210.6799.95%266.4270.8
E-G-22.170.6699.95%254.2263.0
E-G-32.270.6699.95%284.2289.0

Fungal community composition of Daqu

Based on the species annotations of OTUs, the fungal community compositions of each sample at the phylum and genus taxonomic levels were analyzed (Fig 2A and 2B).
Fig 2

(A) Fungal taxonomy of medium- and high-temperature Daqu at the phylum level. (B) Fungal taxonomy of medium- and high-temperature Daqu at the genus level.

(A) Fungal taxonomy of medium- and high-temperature Daqu at the phylum level. (B) Fungal taxonomy of medium- and high-temperature Daqu at the genus level. At the phylum level, with an abundance ≥0.01% as the threshold, 3 phyla, Mucoromycota (72.41%), Ascomycota (27.41%) and Basidiomycota (0.18%), were identified in medium-temperature Daqu (Fig 2(A)). The three phyla Ascomycota (75.51%), Mucoromycota (24.44%) and Basidiomycota (0.04%) were identified in high-temperature Daqu. At the genus level with an abundance ≥0.01% as the threshold, 15 and 13 genera were recognized in medium- and high-temperature Daqu, respectively. The genera in medium-temperature Daqu included Rhizopus (72.40%), Aspergillus (13.65%), Hyphopichia (3.97%), Thermoascus (3.49%), Thermomyces (1.30%), Alternaria (0.27%), Trichosporon (0.15%), Wickerhamomyces (0.07%), Monascus (0.07%), Issatchenkia (0.02%), Cutaneotrichosporon (0.01%), Geosmithia (0.01%), Mucor (0.01%) and Fusarium (0.01%). The genera in high-temperature Daqu included Thermomyces (53.32%), Rhizopus (24.44%), Unclassified (11.91%), Thermoascus (7.14%), Aspergillus (2.52%), Monascus (0.31%), Hyphopichia (0.09%), Alternaria (0.05%), Wickerhamomyces (0.04%), Cladosporium (0.03%), Cyphellophora (0.02%), Pseudeurotium (0.01%) and Papiliotrema (0.01%) (Fig 2(B)). The proportions of Thermomyces, Thermoascus and Monascus in high-temperature Daqu were all larger than those in medium-temperature Daqu, indicating that these three microbial genera are highly heat-resistant and adapted to hot conditions. The proportions of Rhizopus, Aspergillus, Hyphopichia, Alternaria, Trichosporon, Wickerhamomyces and Mucor all decreased with increasing starter temperatures, indicating that these microbial genera are adapted to medium-temperature environments. In addition, three genera, Cyphellophora, Pseudeurotium and Papiliotrema, were only identified in high-temperature Daqu, suggesting that these three genera are thermally resistant and can survive hot conditions. Thermomyces can thrive at up to 60°C but cannot survive below 20°C [22, 23]. They can secrete thermophilic enzymes, improve the catalytic efficiency of reactions owing to their high thermal stability, and facilitate binding between enzymes and substrates owing to their low viscosity in substrates under hot conditions, which are all advantages for catalysis by thermophilic mannanase [13]. Thermoascus can produce heat- and acid-resistant xylanase, which adapts to 70°C and pH 4.8 [24]. Monascus can produce various enzymes during the growth process, and their high enzymatic esterifying activity can catalyze the synthesis of acids and alcohols that are significant sources of fragrance in liquors [12]. Moreover, Rhizopus can generate abundant highly active amylases, proteases and lipases and can produce citric acid, gluconic acid, lactic acid, succinic acid and other organic acids [25]. Aspergillus, which is pivotal in liquor-making, can secrete saccharifying enzymes and amylases and facilitate the fermentation of Daqu, which is favorable for liquor production by fermentation [6]. Xue et al. [26] studied the microbial diversity in Daqu from Xiangyang Shihua liquors using HTS. The dominant fungal phyla in the Daqu (abundance >0.1%) were Ascomycota (99.70%), Basidiomycota (0.17%) and Mucoromycota (0.12%), and the dominant fungal genera (> 1%) included Saccharomycopsis (57.08%), Monascus (17.58%), Thermoascus (5.38%), Penicillium (4.76%), Aspergillus (1.78%) and Leiothecium (1.22%). Their findings are consistent with our results regarding phyla and genera. Zhou et al. [27] investigated the microbial community compositions in medium–high temperature Daqu and the Daqu-making environment by HTS and detected 31 genera in the Daqu and after fermentation. In particular, Aspergillus and Rhizopus were the most abundant in the Daqu, and upon fermentation, the dominant genera in the Daqu included Aspergillus (39.14±0.21%), Candida (6.39±0.31%) and Rhizopus (0.3739±0.01%). After fermentation, Thermoascus gradually became another dominant genus (23.96±0.01%). Hence, the fungal genera found in Daqu and during fermentation are consistent with our results. Chen et al. [28] analyzed the microbial community compositions in Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu by HTS and found that except for the unclassified genera in 4 Daqu samples, other dominant fungal genera were Thermoascus (44.07%), Aspergillus (10.04%), Thermomyces (3.79%), Alternaria (1.78%), Emericella (1.02%), Wickerhamomyces (0.78%) and Rhizomucor (0.42%). Their findings on fungal genera are consistent with our results. The results of the above studies are similar to our HTS results. Nevertheless, we identified more fungal communities and found Pseudeurotium and Papiliotrema for the first time in the medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu of Taorong-type Baijiu starters.

Fragrance component analysis of medium-temperature and high-temperature Daqu

In total, 40 and 29 fragrance components were identified in medium- temperature and high-temperature Yangshao Daqu, respectively (Table 3). Medium-temperature Daqu contained 14 acids, 8 esters, 4 pyrazines, 4 alcohols, 3 phenols, 2 aromatics, 2 aldehydes, 1 alkene, 1 ketone and 1 aromatic hydrocarbon, with average relative concentrations of 27.1%, 2.11%, 53.12%, 5.42%, 1.04%, 1.99%, 0.52%, 2%, 0.47% and 0.66%, respectively. High-temperature Daqu contained 9 acids, 5 alcohols, 4 esters, 2 pyrazines, 2 aromatics, 2 phenols, 2 aldehydes, 1 alkene, 1 ketone, and 1 aromatic hydrocarbon, with average relative concentrations of 32.68%, 8.12%, 3.07%, 24.4%, 3.17%, 2.91%, 1.81%, 4.06%, 1.92% and 1.38%, respectively.
Table 3

Fragrance components.

TypeMedium-temperature Daqu (D-Z)High-temperature Daqu (E-G)
No.Compound nameRelative percentage (%)Compound nameRelative percentage (%)
AlcoholsR-Aphenylethanol3.473.513.52phenylethanol3.803.813.82
R-Bcineole0.690.710.72cineole1.701.731.73
R-Cbenzyl alcohol0.530.540.55benzyl alcohol0.850.840.86
R-D3,6,9,12-tetradecane-1-methanol0.660.690.66
R-Etetrahydro-2,5-dimethyl-2hydro-pyran methanol1.061.081.07
R-F4-methylene-6-hepten-2-methanol0.660.690.69
PyrazinesS-Atetramethylpyrazine46.8846.8346.84tetramethylpyrazine22.6022.5922.58
S-Btrimethylpyrazine5.405.385.39trimethylpyrazine1.801.801.82
S-C2,3-dimethylpyrazine0.520.490.49
S-D2,3,5- trimethyl-6-ethylpyrazine0.420.380.37
AcidsT-A3-methyl butyric acid13.3013.2813.29
T-Bvaleric acid11.7811.8011.79valeric acid0.250.260.24
T-Chexanoic acid5.295.315.27hexanoic acid12.4712.4512.46
T-Dacetic acid2.652.632.67acetic acid2.392.372.35
T-Eoleic acid2.602.562.55
T-Fstearic acid1.441.441.47
T-Gbutyric acid1.101.061.05butyric acid1.071.081.09
T-Hn-palmitic acid0.680.650.65n-palmitic acid0.840.820.83
T-Ioctanoic acid0.450.420.42octanoic acid1.041.011.01
T-J4-methylvaleric acid0.360.330.364-methylvaleric acid0.900.920.91
T-Kheptanoic acid0.240.220.23heptanoic acid0.460.490.46
T-L(R)-(-)-4-methylhexanoic acid0.210.230.22
T-Mnonanoic acid0.180.190.17
T-N3-methyl-2-crotonic acid0.170.160.12
T-O2-methyl-1-methyl propyl-butyric acid0.060.080.10
EstersU-A2-isobutoxy ethyl butyrate0.510.480.48
U-B2,4-dimethyl-3-isobutyl carbonic ester0.340.370.37
U-Cethyl phenylacetate0.300.270.30
U-D2-valeric-ethoxyethyl0.270.280.29
U-Eethyl 3-phenylpropionate0.270.250.26ethyl 3-phenylpropionate0.460.430.46
U-F1-methoxyl-2-propyl acetate0.240.240.21
U-G2-ethoxy ethyl 2-methyl butyrate0.130.100.13
U-Hbutyric-2-methyl-1-methyl propyl0.070.090.08
U-Iethyl caproate1.811.821.80
U-Jethyl palmitic0.430.420.41
U-Kethyl phenylacetate0.370.390.41
PhenolsV-A2,4-bi(1,1-dimethyl ethyl)-phenol0.620.670.662,4-bi(1,1-dimethyl ethyl)-phenol1.761.751.74
V-B2-methoxyl-4-vinyl phenol0.220.190.19
V-Cp-cresol0.170.190.21p-cresol1.161.171.18
AromaticsW-Ap-xylene1.711.721.73p-xylene2.652.662.64
W-B1,4-diethylbenzene0.260.270.281,4-diethylbenzene0.500.530.50
AldehydesX-A1H-pyrrole-2-formaldehyde0.340.360.351H-pyrrole-2-formaldehyde0.870.880.86
X-Bbenzaldehyde0.190.150.17benzaldehyde0.960.940.95
AlkenesY-AD-limonene2.01.92.1D-limonene4.054.084.05
KetonesZ-A1-(1H-pyrrole-2-acetyl)-ethyl ketone0.460.460.491-(1H-pyrrole-2-acetyl)-ethyl ketone1.931.931.90
Aromatic hydrocarbonsA-Ao-isopropyl phenylmethane0.650.670.66o-isopropyl phenylmethane1.371.381.39
These results indicate that alcohols, pyrazines, esters, acids and phenols are diverse and abundant in Daqu. Alcohols are a major class of flavor substances in liquors and are the precursors of esters. Alcohols can highlight the fragrances of esters and make liquors taste mellow, which together contribute to long-lasting fragrances [29]. Pyrazines are capable of expanding blood vessels, improving blood circulation and protecting the liver (preventing alcohols from injuring the gastric mucosa and liver) [30]. Esters mostly have aromatic smells that endow liquors with fruit fragrances and are the key substances that determine the styles and quality of liquors [22]. Acids at appropriate concentrations can increase the brightness of liquors and remove dry and spicy tastes, making liquors smoother [8]. Phenols endow liquors with unique sooty, burnt, milky and pit mud tastes and are major components of the dominant flavors of liquors [31].

Heatmap of the species distribution at the genus level and correlation analysis of microbes and fragrance compositions

A redder color indicates a higher proportion of a given species in Fig 3(A). In medium-temperature Daqu, the relatively abundant genera included Rhizopus, Aspergillus, Hyphopichia, Thermoascus and Thermomyces. In high-temperature Daqu, the relatively abundant genera were Thermomyces, Thermoascus and Monascus.
Fig 3

(A) Heatmap of the species distribution at the genus level. (B) Calculated Spearman correlation coefficients of microbes and flavor components and the corresponding plotted correlations of the qualified data.

(A) Heatmap of the species distribution at the genus level. (B) Calculated Spearman correlation coefficients of microbes and flavor components and the corresponding plotted correlations of the qualified data. The Spearman correlation coefficients of microbes and flavor components were calculated, and thereby, the correlations of the qualified data were plotted.Rhizopus was largely and positively correlated with 3,6,9,12-tetradecane-1-ethanol, valeric acid, and (R)-(-)-4-methylhexanoic acid (Fig 3(B)). Aspergillus was positively correlated with pyrazines, 2-isobutoxy ethyl butyrate, and ethyl phenylacetate, showing the largest correlation with trimethyl pyrazine. Hyphopichia was positively correlated with pyrazines, showing the largest correlations with 2,3-dimethyl pyrazine and 2,3,5-trimethyl-6-ethyl pyrazine, which are two compounds that were only found in medium-temperature Daqu. Thermoascus was negatively but not highly correlated with pyrazines and positively correlated with acids and was most positively correlated with 2-ethoxy ethyl-2-methyl butyrate. Thermomyces was negatively correlated with pyrazines, and except for a negative correlation with 3,6,9,12-tetradecane-1-ethanol, it was highly and positively correlated with other types of acids, although the correlation with overall acids was low. Alternaria was positively correlated with pyrazines and most highly and positively correlated with 3,6,9,12-tetradecane-1-ethanol and 1-methoxyl-2-propyl acetate. Trichosporon was positively correlated with pyrazines and very positively correlated with 3,6,9,12-tetradecane-1-ethanol, oleic acid, 2-isobutoxy ethyl butyrate, and 1-methoxyl-2-propyl acetate.

Conclusion

The fungal community compositions and fragrance components in Yangshao medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu were studied. At the threshold of ≥0.01% abundance, three phyla were identified in both medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu: Mucoromycota, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. At the genus level, 15 and 13 genera were recognized in medium- and high-temperature Daqu, respectively. Rhizopus (72.40%) and Thermomyces (53.32%) accounted for the largest proportions in medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu, respectively. In addition, Cyphellophora, Pseudeurotium and Papiliotrema were identified in high-temperature Daqu but were not detected in medium-temperature Daqu. GC identified 40 and 29 fragrance components in Yangshao medium-temperature Daqu and high-temperature Daqu, respectively, which contained the highest proportions of pyrazines (53.12%) and acids (32.68%), respectively. Correlation analysis of microbes and fragrance compositions showed that pyrazines were highly correlated with Aspergillus, Trichosporon, Hyphopichia and Alternaria. Acids were generally not highly correlated with the dominant flora, but high correlations were found for oleic acid with Trichosporon and Hyphopichia and for valeric acid and (R)-(-)-4-methylhexanoic acid with Rhizopus. The unique starter production process and flora environment are the fundamental causes of the diversity of fungal flora in Yangshao Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu, and fragrance components are an important standard for the evaluation of Daqu and finished liquor products. Thus, HTS and HS–SPME–GC–MS were combined to analyze the major fungal compositions and fragrance components in medium-temperature and high-temperature Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu. The findings of this study will theoretically underlie the fungal flora library establishment and quality identification of Taorong-type Baijiu Daqu. 18 Jul 2022
PONE-D-22-11830
Fungal Community Compositional Diversity and Fragrance Components in Medium- and High-Temperature          Taorong-Type Daqu
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Liu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please, It is requested that all comments and suggestions from reviewers be addressed and review in detail the authors' guide.
 
Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 01 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Mónica L. Chávez-González, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section. 3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “Funding This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Henan Province of China (202102110130), Major Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province of China (181100211400), the Scientific Research Foundation for Docotors of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy (2018HNUAHEDF011) and the Key Subject Projects of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy(C3060020).” Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: “This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Henan Province of China (202102110130), Major Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province of China (181100211400), the Scientific Research Foundation for Docotors of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy (2018HNUAHEDF011) and the Key Subject Projects of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy(C3060020).” We note that you have provided additional information within the Acknowledgements Section that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. Please note that funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: “Funding This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Henan Province of China (202102110130), Major Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province of China (181100211400), the Scientific Research Foundation for Docotors of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy (2018HNUAHEDF011) and the Key Subject Projects of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy(C3060020). “ Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 5. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. 6. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure. 7. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. Additional Editor Comments: It is requested that all comments and suggestions from reviewers be addressed. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The analyzed document meets the requirements to be published as an innovation article in its area and demonstrates having an impact on the development of new research hypotheses. However, it is recommended to publish reviewing the grammatical review considerations because although the review is appreciated, the writing has spelling and writing errors and some other grammatical signs. Similar investigations were searched, and they meet the profile. observations Adscriptions Checking for double spaces and spaces after commas is required Abstract Line 24: In the results section The word largest is often overused in the text, its recommended the use of the most significant. Line 26: respectively, It appears that you have an unnecessary comma in a compound predicate. Consider removing it. Line 29: , and. Your sentence contains a series of three or more words, phrases, or clauses. Consider inserting a comma to separate the elements. Keywords Line 35: , Fungal It appears that you have improperly spaced some punctuation. Consider adding a space. Introduction Well done, only consider: Line 37: , and. Your sentence contains a series of three or more words, phrases, or clauses. Consider inserting a comma to separate the elements. Line 53: fpr change by for Line 64: It seems that you have an unnecessary comma. Consider removing the comma. Materials and Methods Line 95: iceboxes The word ice boxes seems to be miswritten. Consider replacing it. Line 97: It seems that semicolon use may be incorrect here. Consider using a comma instead of a semicolon Line 99: Consider adding a transition phrase to improve the flow of your paragraph. In addition, AMPure XP… Line 140: It appears that then may be unnecessary in this sentence. Consider removing it. Line 143: The noun phrase template seems to be missing a determiner before it. Consider adding an article. Line 149: Your sentence may be unclear or hard to follow. Consider rephrasing. (Option: The clean tags were clustered, and chimeric tags identified during this process were removed using UCHIME from USEARCH, leaving the remaining effective tags) Line 153: The phrase on the basis of may be wordy. Consider changing the wording (based on) Results Line 161: The phrase the removal of may be wordy. Consider changing the wording. (removing) Line 171: Delete respectively. Line 222: Change: Monascus can produce various enzymes during the growth process, and their high enzymatic esterifying activity can catalyze the synthesis of acids and alcohols that are significant sources of fragrance in liquors Funding Line 347: Doctors Reviewer #2: ABSTRACT The full title is confusing, the Taorong-Type Daqu, it is liquor flavor and Daqu is a type or fermentation, it must be written in English which is the language of the article and improve writing of the title to link the objective with the liquor. Must be understood in English by all readers. Maybe Fermented liquor flavor Taorong type Daqu or something. The same for the Short title Clarify in methods molecular identification of microorganism communities and characterization of the volatile components of the fermentation liquor Taorong flavor type Daqu Keywords, should not be words included in the title INTRODUCTION Review writing errors and spaces in text Unify the format of references in terms of spaces, score, etc. METHODOLOGY Clarify that a fermentation liquor that was used, is a micro-ecological product enriched with communities of microorganisms called Daqu Taorong- flavor or something and then name this Taorong-flavored Daqu. First explain, what were the temperatures medium and high The subtitle Total DNA extraction and quantitative pcr…. it is suggested to change to molecular identification of microorganism communities of taorong-flavored daqu liquor fermentation by PCR system RESULTS reference the table in the text first goes the explanation, discussion of results and then the table separate discussions from conclusions, discuss in the results ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Roberto Arredondo-Valdés Reviewer #2: Yes: MIRIAM DESIREE DAVILA MEDINA ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
3 Aug 2022 Dear Editor and Reviewers: Thank you again for your letter and for the reviewers' comments concerning our manuscript. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer 's comments are as following: Journal Requirements: 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf It has been modified. 2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section. It has been modified. 3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “Funding This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Henan Province of China (202102110130), Major Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province of China (181100211400), the Scientific Research Foundation for Docotors of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy (2018HNUAHEDF011) and the Key Subject Projects of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy(C3060020).” Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. It has been modified. I have added after the funding “all awarded to YL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.” 4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: “This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Henan Province of China (202102110130), Major Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province of China (181100211400), the Scientific Research Foundation for Docotors of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy (2018HNUAHEDF011) and the Key Subject Projects of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy(C3060020).” We note that you have provided additional information within the Acknowledgements Section that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. Please note that funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: “Funding This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Henan Province of China (202102110130), Major Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province of China (181100211400), the Scientific Research Foundation for Docotors of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy (2018HNUAHEDF011) and the Key Subject Projects of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy(C3060020). “ Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. I have removed Funding in the manuscript. please show it elsewhere. 5. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. Relevant data has been uploaded to NCBI database,and the accession numbers is PRJNA861706. 6. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure. It has been modified. 7. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. It has been modified. Response to Reviewer #1: Abstract Line 24: In the results section The word largest is often overused in the text, its recommended the use of the most significant. It has been modified. Line 26: respectively, It appears that you have an unnecessary comma in a compound predicate. Consider removing it. It has been modified. Line 29: , and. Your sentence contains a series of three or more words, phrases, or clauses. Consider inserting a comma to separate the elements. It has been modified. Keywords Line 35: , Fungal It appears that you have improperly spaced some punctuation. Consider adding a space. It has been modified. Introduction Well done, only consider: Line 37: , and. Your sentence contains a series of three or more words, phrases, or clauses. Consider inserting a comma to separate the elements. It has been modified. Line 53: fpr change by for It has been modified. Line 64: It seems that you have an unnecessary comma. Consider removing the comma. It has been modified. Materials and Methods Line 95: iceboxes The word ice boxes seems to be miswritten. Consider replacing it. It has been modified. Line 97: It seems that semicolon use may be incorrect here. Consider using a comma instead of a semicolon It has been modified. Line 99: Consider adding a transition phrase to improve the flow of your paragraph. In addition, AMPure XP… It has been modified. Line 140: It appears that then may be unnecessary in this sentence. Consider removing it. It has been modified. Line 143: The noun phrase template seems to be missing a determiner before it. Consider adding an article. It has been modified. Line 149: Your sentence may be unclear or hard to follow. Consider rephrasing. (Option: The clean tags were clustered, and chimeric tags identified during this process were removed using UCHIME from USEARCH, leaving the remaining effective tags) It has been modified. Line 153: The phrase on the basis of may be wordy. Consider changing the wording (based on) Results It has been modified. Line 161: The phrase the removal of may be wordy. Consider changing the wording. (removing) It has been modified. Line 171: Delete respectively. It has been modified. Line 222: Change: Monascus can produce various enzymes during the growth process, and their high enzymatic esterifying activity can catalyze the synthesis of acids and alcohols that are significant sources of fragrance in liquors It has been modified. Funding Line 347: Doctors It has been modified. Response to Reviewer #2: ABSTRACT The full title is confusing, the Taorong-Type Daqu, it is liquor flavor and Daqu is a type or fermentation, it must be written in English which is the language of the article and improve writing of the title to link the objective with the liquor. Must be understood in English by all readers. Maybe Fermented liquor flavor Taorong type Daqu or something. The same for the Short title Clarify in methods molecular identification of microorganism communities and characterization of the volatile components of the fermentation liquor Taorong flavor type Daqu Keywords, should not be words included in the title Revised and improved the title, new title: Taorong-type Baijiu Starter: Analysis of Fungal Community and Metabolic Characteristics of Middle-Temperature Daqu and High-Temperature Daqu. Redefined keywords: Correlation, Baijiu starter, Flavor ingredient, Microbial community. INTRODUCTION Review writing errors and spaces in text Unify the format of references in terms of spaces, score, etc. The above notes have been modified. METHODOLOGY Clarify that a fermentation liquor that was used, is a micro-ecological product enriched with communities of microorganisms called Daqu Taorong- flavor or something and then name this Taorong-flavored Daqu. First explain, what were the temperatures medium and high The medium-temperature Daqu (The incubation temperature is between 50°C and 60°C, and the maximum does not exceed 60°C) and high-temperature Daqu (The incubation temperature is above 60°C, and the maximum temperature can reach 70°C) were marked D-Z and E-G, respectively. The subtitle Total DNA extraction and quantitative pcr…. it is suggested to change to molecular identification of microorganism communities of taorong-flavored daqu liquor fermentation by PCR system It has been modified. RESULTS reference the table in the text first goes the explanation, discussion of results and then the table separate discussions from conclusions, discuss in the results It has been modified. We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. We appreciate for Editor and Reviewers' warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. If there are any shortcomings in the article, please tell me immediately, and I will seriously revise it again.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestion. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, Yanbo Liu E-mail: yanboliu@hnuahe.edu.cn Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx Click here for additional data file. 7 Sep 2022 Taorong-type Baijiu Starter: Analysis of Fungal Community and Metabolic Characteristics of Middle-Temperature Daqu and High-Temperature Daqu PONE-D-22-11830R1 Dear Dr. Yanbo Liu We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Mónica L. Chávez-González, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: 26 Sep 2022 PONE-D-22-11830R1 Taorong-type Baijiu Starter: Analysis of Fungal Community and Metabolic Characteristics of Middle-Temperature Daqu and High-Temperature Daqu Dear Dr. Liu: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Mónica L. Chávez-González Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  21 in total

1.  Saliva microbiomes distinguish caries-active from healthy human populations.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Xiaowei Zeng; Kang Ning; Kuan-Liang Liu; Chien-Chi Lo; Wei Wang; Jie Chen; Dongmei Wang; Ranran Huang; Xingzhi Chang; Patrick S Chain; Gary Xie; Junqi Ling; Jian Xu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Correlation between volatile profiles and microbial communities: A metabonomic approach to study Jiang-flavor liquor Daqu.

Authors:  Yao Jin; Dengyong Li; Mei Ai; Qiuxiang Tang; Jun Huang; Xiaofei Ding; Chongde Wu; Rongqing Zhou
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  An overview of chemical contaminants and other undesirable chemicals in alcoholic beverages and strategies for analysis.

Authors:  Nancy Xiaohe He; Stéphane Bayen
Journal:  Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 12.811

4.  Biochemical characterisation and dominance of different hydrolases in different types of Daqu - a Chinese industrial fermentation starter.

Authors:  Jingjing Liu; Jingyu Chen; Yi Fan; Xiaoning Huang; Beizhong Han
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 5.  Research progress of trace components in sesame-aroma type of baijiu.

Authors:  Jiaxin Hong; Wenjing Tian; Dongrui Zhao
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.475

6.  Effects of fortification of Daqu with various yeasts on microbial community structure and flavor metabolism.

Authors:  Weiwei Li; Guangsen Fan; Zhilei Fu; Wenhua Wang; Youqiang Xu; Chao Teng; Chengnan Zhang; Ran Yang; Baoguo Sun; Xiuting Li
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.475

7.  Profiling the composition and metabolic activities of microbial community in fermented grain for the Chinese strong-flavor Baijiu production by using the metatranscriptome, high-throughput 16S rRNA and ITS gene sequencings.

Authors:  Xiaolong Hu; Kangli Wang; Mengen Chen; Jianhui Fan; Suna Han; Jianguang Hou; Lei Chi; Yupeng Liu; Tao Wei
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 6.475

8.  Development of genetic tools for the thermophilic filamentous fungus Thermoascus aurantiacus.

Authors:  Raphael Gabriel; Julia Prinz; Marina Jecmenica; Carlos Romero-Vazquez; Pallas Chou; Simon Harth; Lena Floerl; Laure Curran; Anne Oostlander; Linda Matz; Susanne Fritsche; Jennifer Gorman; Timo Schuerg; André Fleißner; Steven W Singer
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Effects of aging on the quality of roasted sesame-like flavor Daqu.

Authors:  Guangsen Fan; Zhilei Fu; Chao Teng; Pengxiao Liu; Qiuhua Wu; Md Khondakar Raziur Rahman; Xiuting Li
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Bacterial Diversity, Organic Acid, and Flavor Analysis of Dacha and Ercha Fermented Grains of Fen Flavor Baijiu.

Authors:  Yu'ang Xue; Fengxian Tang; Wenchao Cai; Xinxin Zhao; Wen Song; Ji'an Zhong; Zhongjun Liu; Zhuang Guo; Chunhui Shan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.