| Literature DB >> 32036879 |
Weiwei Li1, Guangsen Fan1, Zhilei Fu2, Wenhua Wang2, Youqiang Xu3, Chao Teng3, Chengnan Zhang1, Ran Yang3, Baoguo Sun4, Xiuting Li5.
Abstract
Fortification of Daqu with isolated functional strains can influence the metabolic activity of the microbial community, and thus alter the flavors of the Baijiu produced with Daqu as a fermentation starter. Here, we analyzed the microbial community dynamics of, and volatile compound production by, Daqu fortified respectively with three high-yield ethyl caproate-producing yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y7#09, Hyphopichia burtonii F12507 and Clavispora lusitaniae YX3307), or with a mixture of these three strains, during the fermentation of Baijiu. The microbial community was investigated using Illumina HiSeq technology. Three bacterial genera (Bacillus, Lactobacillus and Enterobacter) and four fungal genera (Pichia, Clavispora, Saccharomyces and Saccharomycopsis) were dominant in the microbial communities. The volatile compounds were examined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Forty-one flavor compounds were detected in all samples, including seven alcohols, 26 esters and four aldehydes. In particular, an increase in ethyl caproate content was associated with Daqu fortified with S. cerevisiae Y7#09, C. lusitaniae YX3307, or the mixed inoculum. The ester content of these fortified Daqu was higher in the later stage of the fermentation than that in unfortified Daqu, or in Daqu fortified with H. burtonii F12507. Our results show that fortification of Daqu with aroma-producing yeast strains influenced the microbial community composition in the Daqu and affected its metabolic activity. Overall, this study reveals the features of fortified Daqu microbial communities in different phases and improves understanding of the relationships between aroma-producing yeast and the metabolic activity of microbial communities in Baijiu production.Entities:
Keywords: Aroma-producing yeast; Baijiu; Ethyl caproate; Fermentation; Fortified Daqu; Microbial diversity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32036879 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Res Int ISSN: 0963-9969 Impact factor: 6.475