Literature DB >> 32654928

The Effect of Patient Characteristics and Comorbidities on the Rate of Revision Rotator Cuff Repair.

Evan A O'Donnell1, Michael C Fu1, Alex E White2, Samuel A Taylor1, Joshua S Dines1, David M Dines1, Russell F Warren1, Lawrence V Gulotta1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the national rates of failed primary rotator cuff repair (RCR) requiring revision repair, using numerous patient characteristics previously defined in orthopaedic literature, including smoking history, diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia (HLD), vitamin D deficiency, and osteoporosis to determine which factors independently affect the success of primary RCR.
METHODS: A combined public and private national insurance database was searched from 2007 to 2016 for all patients who underwent RCR. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify RCRs. Laterality modifiers for the primary surgery were used to identify subsequent revision RCRs. All patients who did not have a linked laterality modifier for the RCR Current Procedural Terminology code were excluded from the study. Basic demographics were recorded. International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision codes were used to identify patient characteristics including Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking status, DM, obesity, HLD, vitamin D deficiency, and osteoporosis. Patient age categorized as <60, 60-69, 70-74, or 75+ years old. Dichotomous data were analyzed with χ2 testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to characterize independent associations with revision RCR.
RESULTS: Included in the study were 41,467 patients (41,844 shoulders, 52.7% male patients) who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR. Of all arthroscopic RCRs, 3072 patients (3463 shoulders, 53.5% male patients) underwent revision RCR (8.38%). In both primary and revision RCR, patients age 60 to 69 years were most prevalent, accounting for 38.4% and 37.6% of the cohorts, respectively. The average time from primary RCR to revision was 414.9 days (median 214.0 days). Increasing age and male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, P = .019, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.19) were significantly predictive of revision RCR. Of the remaining patient characteristics, smoking most strongly predicted revision RCR (OR 1.36, P < .001, CI 1.23-1.49). Obesity (OR 1.32, P < .001, CI 1.21-1.43), hyperlipidemia (OR 1.09, P = .032, CI 1.01-1.18), and vitamin D deficiency (OR 1.18, P < .001, CI 1.08-1.28) also increased risk of revision RCR significantly. DM was found to be protective against revision surgery (OR 0.84, P < .001, CI 0.76-0.92). Overall comorbidity burden as measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index was not predictive of revision RCR.
CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, obesity, vitamin D deficiency, and HLD are shown to be independent risk factors for failure of primary RCR requiring revision RCR. However, despite the suggestions of previous studies, DM, osteoporosis, and overall comorbidity burden did not demonstrate independent associations in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Case Series.
Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32654928     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  6 in total

Review 1.  Does the critical shoulder angle influence retear and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Mingtao Zhang; Zhitao Yang; Borong Zhang; Jin Jiang; Xiangdong Yun
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Pharmacologic Enhancement of Rotator Cuff Repair: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Maksim Vaysman; Matthew Alben; Matthew Todd; Charles Ruotolo
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-09-04

3.  Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Lower Two-Year Reoperation Rates Compared With Open Rotator Cuff Repair in a Large Cross-sectional Cohort.

Authors:  Nicole M Truong; Nicolas Cevallos; Drew A Lansdown; C Benjamin Ma; Brian T Feeley; Alan L Zhang
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-24

4.  Tripod Technique to Augment Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  A Gaukroger; M Arnander; Y Pearse; D Tennent
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-06-14

5.  Conservatively Treated Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy May Progress to a Tear.

Authors:  Noah J Quinlan; Jeffrey J Frandsen; Karch M Smith; Chao-Chin Lu; Peter N Chalmers; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 6.  The role of vitamin D and vitamin D deficiency in orthopaedics and traumatology-a narrative overview of the literature.

Authors:  Gerrit S Maier; Manuel Weissenberger; Maximilian Rudert; Klaus E Roth; Konstantin Horas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.