Literature DB >> 36192461

RNA secondary structure packages evaluated and improved by high-throughput experiments.

Hannah K Wayment-Steele1,2, Wipapat Kladwang2,3, Alexandra I Strom3,4, Jeehyung Lee2,5, Adrien Treuille2,5, Alex Becka3, Rhiju Das6,7,8.   

Abstract

Despite the popularity of computer-aided study and design of RNA molecules, little is known about the accuracy of commonly used structure modeling packages in tasks sensitive to ensemble properties of RNA. Here, we demonstrate that the EternaBench dataset, a set of more than 20,000 synthetic RNA constructs designed on the RNA design platform Eterna, provides incisive discriminative power in evaluating current packages in ensemble-oriented structure prediction tasks. We find that CONTRAfold and RNAsoft, packages with parameters derived through statistical learning, achieve consistently higher accuracy than more widely used packages in their standard settings, which derive parameters primarily from thermodynamic experiments. We hypothesized that training a multitask model with the varied data types in EternaBench might improve inference on ensemble-based prediction tasks. Indeed, the resulting model, named EternaFold, demonstrated improved performance that generalizes to diverse external datasets including complete messenger RNAs, viral genomes probed in human cells and synthetic designs modeling mRNA vaccines.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36192461     DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01605-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   47.990


  67 in total

1.  NUPACK: Analysis and design of nucleic acid systems.

Authors:  Joseph N Zadeh; Conrad D Steenberg; Justin S Bois; Brian R Wolfe; Marshall B Pierce; Asif R Khan; Robert M Dirks; Niles A Pierce
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  CONTRAfold: RNA secondary structure prediction without physics-based models.

Authors:  Chuong B Do; Daniel A Woods; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Efficient parameter estimation for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Mirela Andronescu; Anne Condon; Holger H Hoos; David H Mathews; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The eukaryotic genome as an RNA machine.

Authors:  Paulo P Amaral; Marcel E Dinger; Tim R Mercer; John S Mattick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for formation of RNA duplexes with Watson-Crick base pairs.

Authors:  T Xia; J SantaLucia; M E Burkard; R Kierzek; S J Schroeder; X Jiao; C Cox; D H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  Exploring the potential of genome editing CRISPR-Cas9 technology.

Authors:  Vijai Singh; Darren Braddick; Pawan Kumar Dhar
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  A max-margin training of RNA secondary structure prediction integrated with the thermodynamic model.

Authors:  Manato Akiyama; Kengo Sato; Yasubumi Sakakibara
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.122

8.  Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information.

Authors:  M Zuker; P Stiegler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  ViennaRNA Package 2.0.

Authors:  Ronny Lorenz; Stephan H Bernhart; Christian Höner Zu Siederdissen; Hakim Tafer; Christoph Flamm; Peter F Stadler; Ivo L Hofacker
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.405

10.  Base pair probability estimates improve the prediction accuracy of RNA non-canonical base pairs.

Authors:  Michael F Sloma; David H Mathews
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.