| Literature DB >> 36188650 |
Sajad Hadi Chelan1, Khalil Alimohammadzadeh2,3, Ali Maher2.
Abstract
Nowadays, organizations understand that they need the best talent to succeed in the complex world economy and survive in a competitive business environment. Therefore, talent management can ensure that each employee with a unique talent or ability will be placed in the correct position. This article aimed to study the relationship between talent management, senior and middle managers, and head nurses from educational health and research centers in Tabriz, in 2016. The target population included senior and middle managers and head nurses from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, approximately 197 people. The sample for this study was selected based on Morgan's table, which rounds up to 123 people. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to analyze data, and if data were normal, correlation and regression analysis were performed. There was a significant relationship between talent management and the efficiency of senior and middle management and head nurses from the educational and medical centers in Tabriz. Therefore, when talent management increases, the efficiency level also rises to a noticeable degree. Also, the linear regression showed a linear relationship between talent management as an independent variable and efficiency as a dependent variable. Applying talent management strategies in the management selection process in organizations with demanding environments such as hospitals seems inevitable so that managers with the highest efficiency are hired. ©2022 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE.Entities:
Keywords: efficiency; head nurses; managers; talent management
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36188650 PMCID: PMC9514814 DOI: 10.25122/jml-2017-0066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Life ISSN: 1844-122X
The talent management process applied.
|
|
| Pay-based competition | Individual performance |
| Work-life balance | |||
| Challenging job | |||
| The good reputation of an organization for having an effective employer | |||
|
| Psychological test | ||
| Behavior interview | |||
| Personality assessment | |||
| Work-knowledge test | |||
|
| Harmony between the job and employed | ||
| Harmony between the employed and job | |||
|
| Training talents | ||
| Talents' special career path | |||
| HR strategic planning | |||
| Successors training | |||
|
| Special compensation service system | ||
| The transitional style of leadership |
Cronbach's alpha coefficient for talent management and efficiency.
| Concept under study | Dimensions | No. of questions | Cronbach's Alpha | Concept under study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Talent management | 27 | 0.932 | 0.940 |
| Efficiency | 23 | 0.813 |
Distribution of marital status.
| Married situation | No. (frequency) | Percent |
|---|---|---|
|
| 20 | 16.26 |
|
| 103 | 83.74 |
|
| 123 | 100 |
Educational level.
| Education level | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|
|
| 3.25 |
|
| 9.76 |
|
| 71.54 |
|
| 15.45 |
Management experience.
| Statistical indicators of management experience | Number (frequency) |
|---|---|
|
| 5 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 123 |
Descriptive statistics of talent management scores.
| Statistical indicators | No. | Average | Standard Deviation | Least | Most |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 123 | 93.45 | 14.011 | 82 | 118 |
Efficiency scores.
| Statistical indicators | No. | Average | Standard Deviation | Least | Most |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 123 | 44.1 | 7.59 | 26 | 60 |
ANOVA results after studying the linear relation between the two variables.
| Model | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14.700 | 1 | 14.700 | 50.238 | 0.001 |
|
| 30.291 | 112 | .280 | - | - |
| Total | 44.991 | 113 | - | - | - |
Regression test results for determining the coefficient rates of the model between talent management and efficiency.
| Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Unstandardized coefficients | T | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Std. | Beta | |||
|
| 2.160 | .208 | .553 | 10.477 | 0.001 |
|
| .390 | .064 | 7.017 | 0.001 | |
Results of the main hypothesis correlation coefficient test.
| Type of relation | Significance level | R2 Determination coefficient | R Correlation coefficient | Error level | No. | Connection type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.001 | 0.0001 | 0.330 | 0.05 | 123 | linear |
Test results of the correlation coefficient test of the fifth hypothesis.
| Type of relation | Significance level | R2 Determination coefficient | R Correlation coefficient | Error level | No. | Connection type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.001 | 0.18 | 0.401 | 0.05 | 123 | linear |
Test results of the correlation coefficient test of the first hypothesis.
| Type of relation | Significance level | R2 Determination coefficient | R Correlation coefficient | Error level | No. | Connection type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.001 | 0.16 | 0.403 | 0.05 | 123 | linear |
Test results of the correlation coefficient test of the second hypothesis.
| Type of relation | Significance level | R2 Determination coefficient | R Correlation coefficient | Error level | No. | Connection type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.001 | 0.16 | 0.335 | 0.05 | 123 | linear |
Test results of the correlation coefficient test of the third hypothesis.
| Type of relation | Significance level | R2 Determination coefficient | R Correlation coefficient | Error level | No. | Connection type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.001 | 0.31 | 0.545 | 0.05 | 123 | linear |
Test results of the correlation coefficient test of the fourth hypothesis.
| Type of relation | Significance level | R2 Determination coefficient | R Correlation coefficient | Error level | No. | Connection type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.390 | 0.05 | 123 | linear |