| Literature DB >> 36187920 |
Xingxing Jian1,2, Guihu Zhao1, He Chen3, Yanhui Wang2, Jinchen Li1,2,4,5, Lu Xie1,2,6, Bin Li1.
Abstract
Transcriptomics studies have yielded great insights into disease processes by detecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs). In this study, due to the high heritability of Parkinson's disease (PD), we performed bioinformatics analyses on nine transcriptomic datasets regarding substantia nigra from Gene Expression Omnibus database, including seven microarray datasets and two next-generation sequencing datasets. As a result, between age-matched PD patients and normal control, we identified 630 DEGs, of which 22 hub DEGs involved in PD or ferroptosis were found to be associated with each other at the transcriptional level and protein-protein interaction network, suggesting their high correlations among these hub genes. Moreover, 16 DEGs were singled out due to their comparable AUC (>0.6) in random forest classifiers, including seven PD-related genes (MAP4K4, LRP10, UCHL1, PAM, RIT2, SNCA, GCH1) and nine ferroptosis-related genes (GCH1, DDIT4, RGS4, MAPK9, CAV1, RELA, DUSP1, ATP6V1G2, ATF4 and ISCU). Furthermore, to probe the potential of those hub genes in predicting the PD progression and survival, we constructed a Cox model featured by an eight-gene signature, including four PD-related genes (SNCA, UCHL1, LRP10, and GCH1) and four ferroptosis-related genes (DDIT4, RGS4, RELA, and CAV1), and validated it successful in an independent dataset, indicating that it would be an effective tool for clinical research to predict PD progression. In conclusion, ferroptosis-related DEGs identified in this study were closely correlated with the known PD-related genes, revealing the involvement of ferroptosis in the development of PD. This study presented the potential of several ferroptosis-related genes as novel clinical biomarkers for PD.Entities:
Keywords: Ferroptosis; Parkinson’s disease (PD); Substantia nigra; Transcriptomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 36187920 PMCID: PMC9508518 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.09.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Struct Biotechnol J ISSN: 2001-0370 Impact factor: 6.155
The datasets used in this study.
| GSE7621 | GPL570 | microarray | substantia nigra | 16 | 9 |
| GSE20141 | GPL570 | microarray | substantia nigra | 10 | 8 |
| GSE49036 | GPL570 | microarray | substantia nigra | 15 | 8 |
| GSE20164 | GPL96 | microarray | substantia nigra | 6 | 5 |
| GSE20163 | GPL96 | microarray | substantia nigra | 8 | 9 |
| GSE20292 | GPL96 | microarray | substantia nigra | 11 | 18 |
| GSE34865 | GPL517 | microarray | substantia nigra | 0 | 57 |
| GSE166024 | GPL20301 | NGS | substantia nigra | 14 | 0 |
| GSE114517 | GPL18573 | NGS | substantia nigra | 17 | 12 |
Fig. 1Identification and analysis of differentially expressed genes in Parkinson’s disease (PD). (A) Volcano plot shows the differentially expressed genes between age-matched PD samples and normal controls. (B) The significant KEGG pathways enriched by down-regulated genes in PD. (C) The significant GO biology process enriched by down-regulated genes in PD.
Fig. 2Analysis of 22 hub differentially expressed genes in PD. (A) Venn diagram presents the genes intersection. (B) The abundance of 22 hub differentially expressed genes in age-matched PD samples and normal controls. (C) Pearson’s correlation at the transcriptomic level among the 22 hub differentially expressed genes. (D) Protein-protein interaction network among the 22 hub differentially expressed genes. Nodes in cyan, in pink, and in red represent the ferroptosis-related genes, PD-risk genes, and PD-deleterious genes, respectively. Edges denote the interaction, and its size reflect the intensity. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Random forest classifiers with the AUC of greater than 0.6 constructed by the hub genes. (A-G) ROC curves of the PD-related genes, including MAP4K4, LRP10, UCHL1, PAM, RIT2, SNCA, and GCH1. (H—P) ROC curves of the ferroptosis-related genes, including DDIT4, RGS4, MAPK9, RELA, CAV1, DUSP1, ATP6V1G2, ATF4, and ISCU.
Fig. 4Survival analysis based on an eight-gene signature. (A) Forest plot of the Cox model. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing the high- and low-risk groups in the training dataset. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing the high- and low-risk groups in the independent dataset.