| Literature DB >> 36187833 |
Qian Liu1,2, Wei Zhong2, Xue Yang1, Xiaocheng Li3, Zhuang Song3, Ying Meng3, Hanlu Liu4, Li Guo2, Ting Zhang1.
Abstract
This study aimed to screen an appropriate starter and determine the optimal fermentation process parameters to optimize the fermentation process of nutrient components and bioactive contents in pharyngitis tablet residue. This study included two experiments. In experiment I, single-factor experimental design was used to study the effects of different biological starters (cellulase preparation; Lactobacillus Plantarum and Bacillus subtilis preparation; mixture of cellulase + Lactobacillus Plantarum and Bacillus subtilis) on the nutritional values and bioactive ingredient contents in pharyngitis tablet residue. In experiment II, orthogonal design experiment was adopted to study the effects of initial water content (45, 50, and 55%), fermentation temperature (35, 37, and 40°C), and fermentation time (24, 48, and 72 h) on the changes in nutrient components, biologically activity contents, and toxin contents of the residue after optimal fermentation agent treatment. Cellulase preparation was found to be the optimal starter. The optimal fermentation conditions were: initial water content, 55%; fermentation temperature, 37°C; and fermentation time, 72 h. The contents of aflatoxin B1 and vomit toxin were in line with Chinese feed hygiene production standards. The fermentation quality of pharyngitis tablet residue can be improved by using the optimal starter and fermentation conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese medicine residue; biological fermentation; nutritional assessment; process optimization; resource utilization
Year: 2022 PMID: 36187833 PMCID: PMC9521640 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.981388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Level table of optimization combination factors of fermentation conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50% (2) | 40°C (3) | 24 h (1) |
| 2 | 55% (3) | 40°C (3) | 48 h (2) |
| 3 | 45% (1) | 40°C (3) | 72 h (3) |
| 4 | 45% (1) | 35°C (1) | 24 h (1) |
| 5 | 50% (2) | 35°C (1) | 48 h (2) |
| 6 | 55% (3) | 35°C (1) | 72 h (3) |
| 7 | 55% (3) | 37°C (2) | 24 h (1) |
| 8 | 45% (1) | 37°C (2) | 48 h (2) |
| 9 | 50% (2) | 37°C (2) | 72 h (3) |
(1), (2) and (3) respectively represent the horizontal ordering under different factors.
Changes in nutrient contents of pharmaceutical residues after treatment with biological starter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM (%) | 43.94 ± 0.24B | 44.13 ± 0.91B | 43.98 ± 0.18B | 45.41 ± 0.94A | <0.0001 |
| pH-value | 4.13 ± 0.01A | 4.14 ± 0.00A | 4.06 ± 0.01B | 4.05 ± 0.00B | <0.0001 |
| EE (%) | 2.94 ± 0.25 | 3.06 ± 0.15 | 2.91 ± 0.53 | 3.08 ± 0.29 | 0.6222 |
| CP (%) | 13.83 ± 0.53 | 12.33 ± 3.51 | 13.74 ± 0.77 | 13.47 ± 0.27 | 0.3077 |
| CF (%) | 20.31 ± 0.71B | 20.19 ± 0.94B | 22.48 ± 0.63A | 20.69 ± 1.40B | 0.0002 |
| NDF (%) | 47.48 ± 2.26AB | 43.34 ± 0.99C | 49.22 ± 1.68A | 45.16 ± 2.36BC | <0.0001 |
| ADF (%) | 32.27 ± 1.73b | 31.74 ± 1.30b | 33.62 ± 0.90a | 32.71 ± 1.22ab | 0.0344 |
| Ash (%) | 12.42 ± 0.12B | 12.29 ± 0.19B | 12.48 ± 0.32B | 12.83 ± 0.30A | 0.0005 |
Different capital letters of shoulder labels in the same data indicate an extremely significant difference (P < 0.01), different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05), and no letters indicate an insignificant difference (P > 0.05). The same as below.
Content changes of bioactive components in pharmaceutical residues after treatment with biological starters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavonoid (mg/g) | 2.91 ± 0.26B | 3.92 ± 0.28A | 2.81 ± 0.29B | 2.45 ± 0.18B | 0.0006 |
| Reducing sugar (μg/g) | 4.68 ± 0.04C | 9.43 ± 0.31A | 4.89 ± 0.05C | 7.94 ± 0.21B | <.0001 |
| Alkaloid (μg/g) | 4.66 ± 2.09 | 1.52 ± 0.15 | 3.61 ± 1.06 | 2.57 ± 0.92 | 0.0726 |
| Lactic acid (μmol/g) | 308.41 ± 10.17 | 303.69 ± 7.26 | 325.63 ± 10.46 | 310.57 ± 5.72 | 0.0648 |
Analysis table of nutrient range of Chinese medicine residue after fermentation.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 56.93 | 4.63 | 2.50 | 12.10 | 10.50 | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 51.14 | 4.27 | 2.66 | 12.08 | 11.46 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 61.21 | 4.51 | 2.47 | 11.86 | 11.75 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 61.63 | 4.72 | 2.67 | 12.12 | 12.62 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 56.63 | 4.28 | 2.66 | 12.08 | 12.21 | |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 51.26 | 4.06 | 2.77 | 12.80 | 13.59 | |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.65 | 4.23 | 2.78 | 12.78 | 12.01 | |
| 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 62.06 | 4.53 | 2.59 | 13.33 | 12.44 | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 55.87 | 4.15 | 3.06 | 13.44 | 12.29 | |
| DM | K1 | 61.63 | 56.51 | 56.40 | |||||
| K2 | 56.48 | 56.19 | 56.61 | Row rank A > C > B | |||||
| K3 | 51.02 | 56.43 | 56.11 | A1B1C2 | |||||
| Range | 10.61 | 0.32 | 0.50 | ||||||
| pH | K1 | 4.59 | 4.35 | 4.53 | |||||
| K2 | 4.35 | 4,30 | 4.36 | Row rank A > C > B | |||||
| K3 | 4.19 | 4.47 | 4.24 | A3B2C3 | |||||
| Range | 0.40 | 0.17 | 0.29 | ||||||
| EE | K1 | 2.58 | 2.70 | 2.65 | |||||
| K2 | 2.74 | 2.81 | 2.64 | Row rank B > A > C | |||||
| K3 | 2.74 | 2.54 | 2.77 | A2B2C3 | |||||
| Range | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.13 | ||||||
| CP | K1 | 12.44 | 12.33 | 12.33 | |||||
| K2 | 12.54 | 13.18 | 12.50 | Row rank B > C > A | |||||
| K3 | 12.55 | 12.01 | 12.70 | A3B2C3 | |||||
| Range | 0.11 | 1.17 | 0.37 | ||||||
| Ash | K1 | 12.27 | 12.81 | 11.71 | |||||
| K2 | 11.67 | 12.25 | 12.04 | Row rank B > C > A | |||||
| K3 | 12.35 | 11.24 | 12.54 | A2B3C1 | |||||
| Range | 0.68 | 1.57 | 0.83 | ||||||
Analysis of variance of nutritional components of Chinese medicinal residues after fermentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | Model | 6 | 1,504 | 250.7 | 606.23 | <0.0001 |
| A | 2 | 1,495 | 747.4 | 1808** | <0.0001 | |
| B | 2 | 2.67 | 1.34 | 3.23* | 0.0453 | |
| C | 2 | 6.56 | 3.28 | 7.93** | 0.0008 | |
| Pure error | 73 | 30.18 | 0.41 | |||
| Cor total | 79 | 1534 | ||||
| pH | Model | 6 | 3.70 | 0.62 | 433.05 | <0.0001 |
| A | 2 | 2.18 | 1.09 | 765.58** | <0.0001 | |
| B | 2 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 134.44** | <0.0001 | |
| C | 2 | 1.14 | 0.57 | 399.13** | <0.0001 | |
| Pure error | 74 | 0.11 | 0.0014 | |||
| Cor total | 80 | 3.81 | ||||
| EE | Model | 6 | 1.71 | 0.28 | 5.71 | <0.0001 |
| A | 2 | 0.46 | 0.23 | 4.62* | 0.0129 | |
| B | 2 | 0.97 | 0.49 | 9.75** | 0.0002 | |
| C | 2 | 0.27 | 0.14 | 2.74 | 0.0710 | |
| Pure error | 73 | 3.69 | 0.05 | |||
| Cor total | 79 | 5.40 | ||||
| CP | Model | 6 | 21.66 | 3.61 | 9.60 | <0.0001 |
| A | 2 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.7487 | |
| B | 2 | 19.63 | 9.82 | 26.11** | <0.0001 | |
| C | 2 | 1.81 | 0.91 | 2.41 | 0.0970 | |
| Pure error | 74 | 27.81 | 0.38 | |||
| Cor total | 80 | 49.47 | ||||
| Ash | Model | 6 | 51.27 | 8.54 | 31.64 | <0.0001 |
| A | 2 | 7.56 | 3.78 | 14.00** | <0.0001 | |
| B | 2 | 34.22 | 17.11 | 63.37** | <0.0001 | |
| C | 2 | 9.48 | 4.74 | 17.56** | <0.0001 | |
| Pure error | 74 | 19.98 | 0.27 | |||
| Cor total | 80 | 71.25 |
*Significant difference, P < 0.05; **was significantly different, P < 0.01. The same as below.
Analysis table of different fiber content range after Chinese medicine residue fermentation.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 18.37 | 44.21 | 30.85 | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 16.87 | 41.26 | 29.69 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 18.35 | 44.21 | 31.33 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19.43 | 47.19 | 32.70 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 19.26 | 45.52 | 32.38 | |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 16.65 | 43.69 | 32.37 | |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 20.33 | 43.74 | 31.56 | |
| 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 21.31 | 46.75 | 33.53 | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 19.66 | 43.34 | 31.74 | |
| CF | K1 | 19.70 | 18.45 | 19.38 | |||
| K2 | 19.10 | 20.43 | 19.15 | Row rank B > A > C | |||
| K3 | 17.95 | 17.86 | 18.22 | A3B3C3 | |||
| Range | 1.75 | 2.57 | 1.16 | ||||
| NDF | K1 | 46.05 | 45.47 | 45.05 | |||
| K2 | 44.36 | 44.61 | 44.51 | Row rank A > B > C | |||
| K3 | 42.90 | 43.23 | 43.75 | A3B3C3 | |||
| Range | 3.15 | 2.24 | 1.30 | ||||
| ADF | K1 | 32.52 | 32.48 | 31.70 | |||
| K2 | 31.66 | 32.28 | 31.87 | Row rank B > A > C | |||
| K3 | 31.21 | 30.62 | 31.81 | A3B3C1 | |||
| Range | 1.31 | 1.86 | 0.17 | ||||
Analysis of variance of various fiber contents after fermentation of Chinese medicinal residue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF | Model | 6 | 160.45 | 26.74 | 14.30 | <.0001 |
| A | 2 | 42.36 | 21.18 | 11.33** | <.0001 | |
| B | 2 | 97.93 | 48.96 | 26.19** | <.0001 | |
| C | 2 | 20.17 | 10.09 | 5.39** | 0.0065 | |
| Pure error | 74 | 138.36 | 1.87 | |||
| Cor total | 80 | 298.82 | ||||
| NDF | Model | 6 | 226.84 | 37.81 | 11.57 | <.0001 |
| A | 2 | 134.67 | 67.33 | 20.60** | <.0001 | |
| B | 2 | 69.02 | 34.51 | 10.56** | <.0001 | |
| C | 2 | 23.15 | 11.57 | 3.54* | 0.0340 | |
| Pure error | 74 | 241.88 | 3.27 | |||
| Cor total | 80 | 468.72 | ||||
| ADF | Model | 6 | 80.15 | 13.36 | 5.03 | 0.0002 |
| A | 2 | 23.95 | 11.97 | 4.51* | 0.0142 | |
| B | 2 | 55.84 | 27.92 | 10.52** | <.0001 | |
| C | 2 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.9337 | |
| Pure error | 74 | 196.34 | 2.65 | |||
| Cor total | 80 | 276.50 |
Analysis table of range of bioactive components in Chinese medicine residue after fermentation.
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2.23 | 6.59 | 7.75 | 189.70 | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1.02 | 5.49 | 10.89 | 318.24 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.08 | 7.77 | 9.63 | 243.15 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.41 | 5.47 | 6.18 | 160.83 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1.69 | 5.14 | 8.36 | 279.24 | |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3.35 | 5.41 | 5.51 | 323.48 | |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3.92 | 6.03 | 2.35 | 260.20 | |
| 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.67 | 5.23 | 2.48 | 232.21 | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1.20 | 9.43 | 1.52 | 302.56 | |
| Flavonoid | K1 | 0.72 | 1.82 | 2.18 | ||||
| K2 | 1.71 | 2.26 | 1.46 | Row rank A > B > C | ||||
| K3 | 2.76 | 1.11 | 1.54 | A3B2C1 | ||||
| Range | 2.04 | 1.15 | 0.73 | |||||
| Reducing sugar | K1 | 6.16 | 5.34 | 6.03 | ||||
| K2 | 7.05 | 6.90 | 5.29 | Row rank C > B > A | ||||
| K3 | 5.64 | 6.62 | 7.54 | A2B2C3 | ||||
| Range | 1.41 | 1.56 | 2.25 | |||||
| Alkaloid | K1 | 6.10 | 6.68 | 5.43 | ||||
| K2 | 5.88 | 2.12 | 7.24 | Row rank B > C > A | ||||
| K3 | 6.25 | 9.42 | 5.55 | A3B3C2 | ||||
| Range | 0.37 | 7.30 | 1.81 | |||||
| Lactic acid | K1 | 212.06 | 254.52 | 203.58 | Row rank A > C > B | |||
| K2 | 257.17 | 264.99 | 276.56 | |||||
| K3 | 300.64 | 250.36 | 289.73 | A3B2C3 | ||||
| Range | 88.58 | 14.63 | 86.15 | |||||
Analysis of variance of bioactive components of Chinese medicinal residues after fermentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavonoid | Model | 6 | 9.22 | 1.54 | 0.84 | 0.6348 |
| A | 2 | 6.25 | 3.12 | 1.70 | 0.3705 | |
| B | 2 | 2.02 | 1.01 | 0.55 | 0.6451 | |
| C | 2 | 0.95 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.7956 | |
| Pure error | 2 | 3.68 | 1.84 | |||
| Cor total | 8 | 12.90 | ||||
| Reducing sugar | Model | 6 | 15.09 | 2.51 | 3.03 | 0.2685 |
| A | 2 | 3.06 | 1.53 | 1.84 | 0.3517 | |
| B | 2 | 4.15 | 2.07 | 2.50 | 0.2855 | |
| C | 2 | 7.88 | 3.94 | 4.76 | 0.1737 | |
| Pure error | 2 | 1.66 | 0.83 | |||
| Cor total | 8 | 16.74 | ||||
| Alkaloid | Model | 6 | 88.11 | 14.69 | 8.19 | 0.1128 |
| A | 2 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.9449 | |
| B | 2 | 81.76 | 40.88 | 22.80* | 0.0420 | |
| C | 2 | 6.14 | 33.07 | 1.71 | 0.3686 | |
| Pure error | 2 | 3.59 | 1.79 | |||
| Cor Total | 8 | 91.70 | ||||
| Lactic acid | Model | 6 | 25,033 | 4,172 | 27.83 | 0.0351 |
| A | 2 | 11,769 | 5,885 | 39.25* | 0.0248 | |
| B | 2 | 340.93 | 170.46 | 1.14 | 0.4680 | |
| C | 2 | 12,923 | 6,462 | 43.10* | 0.0227 | |
| Pure error | 2 | 299.87 | 149.93 | |||
| Cor total | 8 | 25,333 |
Toxin contents of pharyngitis tablet residue after fermentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48 | Qualified | 231.90 | Qualified |
| 2 | 1.12 | Qualified | 206.90 | Qualified |
| 3 | 1.11 | Qualified | 216.90 | Qualified |
| 4 | 1.38 | Qualified | 211.90 | Qualified |
| 5 | 1.06 | Qualified | 215.90 | Qualified |
| 6 | 1.05 | Qualified | 184.90 | Qualified |
| 7 | 1.05 | Qualified | 222.90 | Qualified |
| 8 | 0.92 | Qualified | 306.90 | Qualified |
| 9 | 0.96 | Qualified | 223.90 | Qualified |