| Literature DB >> 34991716 |
Jie Bai1,2, Marcia Franco3, Zitong Ding1,2, Lin Hao4, Wencan Ke1,2, Musen Wang1,2, Dongmei Xie1,2, Ziqian Li1,2, Yixin Zhang1,2, Lin Ai5, Xusheng Guo6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (BA) and Bacillus subtilis (BS) are usually used as feed supplements directly or bacterial inoculants in biological feeds for animals. However, few research have reported the effects of BA and BS on fermentation characteristics and bacterial community successions of whole-plant corn silage during ensiling. If the BA and BS inoculants have positive effects on silages, then they could not only improve fermentation characteristics, but also deliver BA or BS viable cells to ruminants, which would play its probiotic effect. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of BA and BS on the fermentation, chemical characteristics, bacterial community and their metabolic pathway of whole-plant corn silage.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus silage inoculants; Function prediction; Silage quality; Zea mays
Year: 2022 PMID: 34991716 PMCID: PMC8739699 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-021-00649-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Chemical composition of whole-plant corn forage before ensiling
| Items | Whole-plant corn |
|---|---|
| DM, g/kg FW | 291 |
| WSC, g/kg DM | 273 |
| Starch, g/kg DM | 107 |
| CP, g/kg DM | 78.6 |
| αNDF, g/kg DM | 494 |
| ADF, g/kg DM | 266 |
DM, dry matter; FW, fresh weight; WSC, water soluble carbohydrates; CP, crude protein; αNDF, neutral detergent fiber assayed with a heat stable amylase and expressed inclusive of residual ash; ADF, acid detergent fiber expressed inclusive of residual ash
Fermentation characteristics of the whole-plant corn silage during ensiling
| Items | Treatment | D | Mean | SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 60 | T | D | T × D | ||||
| pH | CK | 4.24 | 4.04 | 4.04 | 4.09 | 3.98 | 4.08 | 0.002 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| BA | 4.23 | 4.04 | 4.03 | 4.00 | 3.95 | 4.05 | |||||
| BS | 4.23 | 4.04 | 4.01 | 4.01 | 3.98 | 4.05 | |||||
| lactic acid, g/kg DM | CK | 11.3 | 22.9 | 37.8 | 48.4 | 63.0 | 36.9 | 0.52 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| BA | 16.5 | 25.7 | 48.4 | 75.7 | 72.7 | 47.8 | |||||
| BS | 16.7 | 29.3 | 45.9 | 54.1 | 67.9 | 42.8 | |||||
| Acetic acid, g/kg DM | CK | 4.26 | 8.57 | 17.0 | 25.3 | 34.6 | 18.0 | 0.09 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| BA | 6.67 | 9.35 | 21.0 | 23.2 | 29.4 | 17.9 | |||||
| BS | 5.73 | 10.2 | 21.6 | 26.4 | 34.9 | 19.8 | |||||
| Lactic acid/Acetic acid ratio | CK | 2.55 | 2.67 | 2.31 | 1.93 | 2.07 | 2.31 | 0.009 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| BA | 2.81 | 2.75 | 2.38 | 1.95 | 2.03 | 2.38 | |||||
| BS | 2.88 | 2.99 | 2.37 | 1.99 | 2.06 | 2.46 | |||||
1CK, control, no inoculations; BA, silages inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BS, silages inoculated with Bacillus subtilis
2D, Ensilage time
3SEM, standard error of the mean
4T, inoculants treatment; D, fermentation time; T × D, the interaction between inoculants treatment and fermentation time
Chemical compositions of the whole-plant corn silage after 60 d of ensiling
| Items | Treatments | SEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | BA | BS | |||
| DM, g/kg | 27.4 | 28.1 | 28.1 | 0.25 | 0.405 |
| WSC, g/kg DM | 159b | 186a | 181a | 4.5 | 0.002 |
| Starch, g/kg DM | 94.3a | 62.5b | 75.5b | 0.51 | 0.005 |
| CP, g/kg DM | 84.0b | 82.2c | 85.3a | 0.46 | < 0.001 |
| NPN, g/kg total N | 97.3b | 144.1a | 92.0c | 8.29 | < 0.001 |
| NH | 68.2 | 61.5 | 68.4 | 1.55 | 0.097 |
| αNDF, g/kg DM | 481a | 478a | 468b | 0.2 | < 0.001 |
| ADF, g/kg DM | 252a | 248a | 235b | 0.3 | < 0.001 |
a-c Means within a row without a common superscript letter differ
1DM, dry matter; WSC, water soluble carbohydrates; CP, crude protein; NPN, non-protein nitrogen; NH3-N, ammonia nitrogen; αNDF, neutral detergent fiber assayed with a heat stable amylase and expressed inclusive of residual ash; ADF, acid detergent fiber expressed inclusive of residual ash
2CK, control, no inoculations; BA, silages inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BS, silages inoculated with Bacillus subtilis
3SEM, standard error of the mean
Fig. 1Bacterial community diversities and compositions in whole-plant corn silage during ensiling. CK, Control (samples without inoculants); BA, samples inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BS, samples inoculated with Bacillus subtilis. Arabic number indicating days of ensiling. A. The variations in community alpha-diversities (Shannon index). B. The community dissimilarities in different groups and fermentation times, calculated using Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA). C. Relative abundances of whole-plant corn silage bacterial genera across different groups and fermentation times. D. Relative abundances of whole-plant corn silage bacterial species across different groups and fermentation times
Fig. 2Identification of the communities or species that have significant differences among the three groups. CK, Control (samples without inoculants); BA, samples inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BS, samples inoculated with Bacillus subtilis. Arabic number indicating days of ensiling. A. after 1 d of ensiling; B. after 3 d of ensiling; C. after 7 d of ensiling; D. after 14 d of ensiling; E. after 60 d of ensiling
Relative abundance of Bacillus during ensiling
| D | Treatments | SEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | BA | BS | |||
| 1 | 0c | 0.0104b | 0.057a | 0.0088 | <0.001 |
| 3 | 0c | 0.0137ab | 0.0259a | 0.0046 | 0.033 |
| 7 | 0b | 0.0104b | 0.0587a | 0.0093 | <0.001 |
| 14 | 0b | 0.0104b | 0.0466a | 0.0075 | 0.002 |
| 60 | 0b | 0.0104b | 0.4664a | 0.0771 | <0.001 |
a-c Means within a row without a common superscript letter differ
1D, Ensilage time
2CK, control, no inoculations; BA, silages inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BS, silages inoculated with Bacillus subtilis
3SEM, standard error of the mean
Fig. 3Bacterial alterations that contribute to functional shifts after fermentation in different groups. CK, Control (samples without inoculants); BA, samples inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BS, samples inoculated with Bacillus subtilis. Arabic number indicating days of ensiling. Summary of functional shifts predicted using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt2). For each KEGG pathways, the second level of the predicted functional shift is shown with respect to the different groups and fermentation processes. A. Clustering heat map of functional abundance (top 25 abundant functions) of whole-plant corn silage. The color corresponding to the middle heat map represents the Z value obtained after the relative abundance of the function is normalized. The closer the color is to red, the higher the abundance. B. Level 2 KEGG orthologue functional predictions explained by PICRUSt2. C. Significant differences of the 5 functional pathways among the three groups with the same silage period at P < 0.05
Fig. 4Bacterial alterations that contribute to enzyme shifts after fermentation in different groups. CK, Control (samples without inoculants); BA, samples inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; BS, samples inoculated with Bacillus subtilis. Arabic number indicating days of ensiling. Summary of enzyme shifts predicted using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt2). Significant differences of the 3 enzymes among the three groups with the same silage period at P < 0.05