| Literature DB >> 36187663 |
Milena C D Almeida1,2, António M R Cordeiro1, Aliete Cunha-Oliveira1,3, Daniele M S Barros2, Diana G S M Santos3,4, Thaísa S Lima2,5, Ricardo A M Valentim2,6.
Abstract
Syphilis is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) worldwide and has shown a rising trend in recent years, according to a report published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2021. Given this problem, the present study aims to develop a scoping review of what has been done in the world after the publication of the global strategy for the elimination of STIs, with a specific focus on syphilis. Thus, we searched for papers on health policies in response to syphilis in Pubmed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO by CINAHL, as well as in official documents from international health organizations. The period from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2022 was considered. Our search returned 880 papers addressing "Syphilis," "Health Policy," and "Health Policies" combined. Twenty-three papers fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria according to two research questions set out for this scoping review. Our findings suggest that Brazil and Peru presented the greatest adequacy of the strategies provided by WHO in 2016 and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) in 2017, aiming tothe goals set out in the UN's 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Among the studies found, six countries (Cuba, Thailand, Belarus, Armenia, Moldova, and Puerto Rico) reported the elimination of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of syphilis, but the most recent data are from 2016. Furthermore, it is essential to mention that no country has been found that has presented a comprehensive response to syphilis, noting the control or elimination of the disease in all key populations. Thus, it is necessary to constantly monitor national policies based on in-depth studies on the quality of the response, the challenges, and the national, regional, and global perspectives for the control of the disease until 2030, the year in which the SDGs will be reviewed. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/x9er5/?view_only=0cc0062222ec45dcb2f4d41484d285b6, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X9ER5.Entities:
Keywords: evaluation; health policy; healthcare policy; public health policy; syphilis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36187663 PMCID: PMC9523564 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Strategic directions for eliminating sexually transmitted infections. Source: Adapted from WHO (2016).
Figure 2Framework for the Elimination of MTCT of HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, and Chagas. Source: Adapted from PAHO (2017).
Figure 3PRISMA ScR flow diagram: Scope review process for syphilis response.
Strategies implemented according to the WHO 2016 framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor et al. ( | 2017 | Cuba, Thailand, Belarus, Armenia, and Moldova: | Universal care access, routine antenatal screening, legal frameworks, primary care services. | No | No | No |
| Leichliter et al. ( | 2017 | USA: | Prenatal syphilis screening. | No | No | No |
| Chemtob et al. ( | 2017 | Israel: | High-Intensity Behavioral Counseling; condoms distribution and STI testing | No | No | No |
| Rodrigues and Domingues ( | 2017 | Brazil: | No | No | No | No |
| WHO ( | 2017 | Asia: Cambodia ( | Cambodia: Evaluation of HIV–syphilis dual testing; China: National STI control program strategy is to integrate syphilis control activities with existing HIV control programs | No | No | No |
| Akhtar and Rehman ( | 2018 | Lusaka, Zambia: | Universal antenatal screening | No | No | No |
| Ong et al. ( | 2018 | Worldwide: | Syphilis testing in key populations | Syphilis testing programs: Focused on MSM | No | No |
| Leal et al. ( | 2018 | Brazil: | Universalization of medical assistance | Guaranteed by the SUS, with reducing inequalities in access and coverage | Provided by the Rede Cegonha Program | No |
| Kroeger et al. ( | 2018 | Caddo Parish, Louisiana, USA: | No | No | No | No |
| Andrade et al. ( | 2020 | Northeast, Brazil: | VDRL exams - up to the 20th week of pregnancy and between the 28th and 36th week of pregnancy | No | No | No |
| Acharya et al. ( | 2020 | Nepal: | STIs counseling, diagnosis and treatment services | No | No | No |
| Liu et al. ( | 2020 | California, USA: | Expansion of screened populations for syphilis and targeted screening interventions | No | No | No |
| Kimball et al. ( | 2020 | Florida, Louisiana and New York, USA: | Syphilis testing early in the third trimester | No | No | No |
| Herrero et al. ( | 2020 | Argentina: | Strategy to achieve elimination of the MTCT of HIV and congenital syphilis | No | No | No |
| Priamo et al. ( | 2020 | Bahia, Brazil: | Planning actions to qualify prenatal care | No | No | No |
| Andrade et al. ( | 2020 | Brazil: | Surveillance and health care, educommunication, governance, and syphilis research | Strengthening sexual health and reproductive health actions, especially in the context of primary care | Project “Syphilis No” - an integrated and collaborative response to syphilis that articulates health care points in an inter-federative relationship | Articulating social sectors and communities to strengthen a rapid response to syphilis |
| WHO ( | 2020 | Ukraine: | Antenatal care, testing and treatment for HIV, and testing for syphilis | No | No | No |
| Sykes et al. ( | 2021 | Arizona, USA: | Serologic testing for syphilis at 28 to 32 weeks of gestation, among “pregnant syphilis case(s) | No | No | No |
| Pinto et al. ( | 2021 | Brazil: | Implemented a network of Research and Intervention Supporters, to combat syphilis in priority municipalities; | The role of the Supporters | Project “Syphilis No”: National Agenda for Strategic Actions to Reduce Syphilis in Brazil | Adaptive model for the discovery and |
| PAHO ( | 2021 | Peru: | Use of rapid syphilis tests, rapid dual HIV/syphilis tests since 2017–2018, strengthening laboratory capacity and networks, strengthening STI case reporting, combination HIV/STI prevention | Decentralization of treatment to the first level of care | A National 2017–2021 Plan commits the country to eliminate congenital syphilis by 2021 | Applied a compartmental dynamical model of adult syphilis transmission to examine possible future program scale-up scenarios and inform national STI control strategies and targets |
| Zorilla et al. ( | 2021 | Puerto Rico: Pregnant women and congenital syphilis | Prenatal testing HIV/syphilis, allowed for the availability of treatment during pregnancy and entailed training of health professionals in obstetrical and pediatric | Safeguarding the commitment and investment in research, training, outreach, | Early screening policy | No |
| Du et al. 32] | 2022 | China: | Health care services were initially provided to all pregnant women | Service network of women and children's | China launched a pilot project on the prevention of MTCT (PMTCT) in eight counties (cities, districts) of five provinces (regions) in 2002 | No |
| Tang et al. ( | 2022 | China: Congenital syphilis in Guangdong Province | Integrating the syphilis screening with health education, the standard treatment for pregnant women and the follow-up of infants of congenital syphilis patients, alongside supportive strategies from the government | The preventive and control measures | The National Program of Syphilis Control and Prevention 2010–2020 | No |
Source: Prepared by the authors (2022).
Lines of action implemented according to the PAHO/WHO 2017 framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor et al. ( | 2017 | Cuba, Thailand, Belarus, Armenia and Moldova: | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Leichliter et al. ( | 2017 | USA: | Yes | No | No | No |
| Rodrigues and Domingues ( | 2017 | Brazil: | Yes | No | No | No |
| WHO ( | 2017 | Asia: Cambodia ( | Yes | No | No | No |
| Akhtar and Rehman ( | 2018 | Lusaka, Zambia: | Yes | No | No | No |
| Leal et al. ( | 2018 | Brazil: | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Kroeger et al. ( | 2018 | Caddo Parish, Louisiana, USA: | No | No | No | No |
| Andrade et al. ( | 2020 | Northeast, Brazil: | Yes | No | No | No |
| Kimball et al. ( | 2020 | Florida, Louisiana and New York, USA: | Yes | No | No | No |
| Herrero et al. ( | 2020 | Argentina: | No | No | No | No |
| Priamo et al. ( | 2020 | Bahia, Brazil: | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Andrade et al. ( | 2020 | Brazil: | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| WHO ( | 2020 | Ukraine: | Yes | No | No | No |
| Sykes et al. ( | 2021 | Arizona, USA: | No | No | Yes | No |
| Pinto et al. ( | 2021 | Brazil: | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PAHO ( | 2021 | Peru: | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Zorilla et al. ( | 2021 | Puerto Rico: | Yes | No | No | No |
| Du et al. ( | 2022 | China: | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tang et al. ( | 2022 | China: Congenital syphilis in Guangdong Province | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Source: Prepared by the authors (2022).
Distribution of studies regarding monitoring and evaluating syphilis policies.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Taylor et al. ( | 2017 | No |
| Leichliter et al. ( | 2017 | No |
| Chemtob et al. ( | 2017 | Epidemiologic and health policy data on STIs were analyzed from various sources |
| Rodrigues and Domingues ( | 2017 | No |
| WHO ( | 2017 | No |
| Akhtar and Rehman ( | 2018 | No |
| Ong et al. ( | 2018 | No |
| Leal et al. ( | 2018 | Analyzed indicators of antenatal and labor and delivery care and maternal and infant health |
| Kroeger et al. ( | 2018 | No |
| Andrade et al. ( | 2020 | Chi-square tests were used to compare the proportions of adolescents and adults with a record of these procedures in the prenatal cards |
| Acharya et al. ( | 2020 | Used data from the most recent nationally representative Nepal Health Facility Survey (NHFS) 2015 |
| Liu et al. ( | 2020 | No |
| Kimball et al. ( | 2020 | No |
| Herrero et al. ( | 2020 | No |
| Priamo et al. ( | 2020 | No |
| Andrade et al. ( | 2020 | Time series of Congenital Syphilis hospitalizations before and after the implementation of the “No Syphilis” Project in the Priority municipalities for the project and in other municipalities |
| WHO ( | 2020 | Methods of pre-validation assessment included reviews of forms and registries used to record information at a facility level on ANC uptake, HIV and syphilis testing and treatment in pregnant women, HIV and syphilis case reporting in pregnant women and children, and reporting on infants and children exposed to these infections |
| Sykes et al. ( | 2021 | Used surveillance data from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018, from three sources |
| Pinto et al. ( | 2021 | Scrutinized seven data sources from different perspectives to assess a health campaign launched in Brazil named “Syphilis No!”. Developed a multidimensional analysis framework and implemented an information system to process the data from a time series perspective, and assessed the effects over time, both before and after the campaign. Analyzed data related to the campaign, including e-news, search engine activity, online courses, serological tests, medication distribution and case notification rates |
| PAHO ( | 2021 | The model was calibrated to national data on syphilis prevalence, adult and congenital syphilis case notifications, risk behaviors, intervention coverage, test and condom procurement, and distribution volumes, and service delivery costs from routine surveillance, surveys, research studies, and program records |
| Zorilla et al. ( | 2021 | Epidemiological data from Puerto Rico was used to document the elimination of MTCT and Syphilis. Data to calculate the indicators was obtained from the various divisions of the Puerto Rico Department of Health, including vital statistics, surveillance data, and programmatic outcomes |
| Du et al. ( | 2022 | No |
| Tang et al. ( | 2022 | Interrupted time series analysis was conducted to compare changes in slope and level of CS notification rate from 2005 to 2020 in Guangdong Province and its three regions with different economic developmental levels. The ARIMA model was established to predict the new CS case number of Guangdong Province in 2021 |
Source: Prepared by the authors (2022).