Literature DB >> 33211993

Using Surveillance Data to Respond to an Outbreak of Congenital Syphilis in Arizona Through Third-Trimester Screening Policies, 2017-2018.

Kaitlyn J Sykes1, Rebecca A Scranton1, Lisa Villarroel1, Bree V Anderson1, Sara Salek2, Jonathan Stall2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The number of congenital syphilis (CS) cases in Arizona quadrupled from an average of 14 cases annually before 2017 to 61 cases in 2018, and a statewide outbreak was declared. The Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) analyzed statewide surveillance data to identify missed opportunities for prevention and collaborated with the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) to inform response activities.
METHODS: ADHS developed a metric to identify missed opportunities for CS prevention during pregnancy by using medical records, vital records, and case investigation notes for all mothers of infants born with CS from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018. AHCCCS conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to calculate the effect of increasing perinatal syphilis screening.
RESULTS: Arizona had 57 cases of CS during the study period, of which 17 (29.8%) could have been prevented through third-trimester screening for women who were in prenatal care but screened late (n = 9), were infected after their first prenatal visit screen (n = 7), or were reinfected after an initial reactive syphilis test and appropriate treatment and not rescreened (n = 1). The estimated net cost of combining the additional primary (screening) and secondary (treatment) costs of a third-trimester screen for all pregnant AHCCCS members and the estimated total per-year savings of all newborn hospitalizations was $527. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Third-trimester syphilis screening could prevent CS in regions where syphilis transmission is high. Partnering with health insurance agencies to evaluate the cost effectiveness of screening recommendations may improve the accuracy of the estimate of the potential cost savings by using insurance agency-specific data for the population at risk for CS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  policy; pregnant women; screening; syphilis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33211993      PMCID: PMC7856378          DOI: 10.1177/0033354920967350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  15 in total

1.  Congenital syphilis: a persisting sentinel public health event.

Authors:  John Beltrami; Stuart Berman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Inadequate syphilis screening among women with prenatal care in a community with a high syphilis incidence.

Authors:  Mary Jo Trepka; Sharon A Bloom; Guoyan Zhang; Sunny Kim; Robert E Nobles
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Patterns in prenatal syphilis screening among Florida Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Ellen K Wilson; Norma I Gavin; E Kathleen Adams; Guoyu Tao; Monique Chireau
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Effectiveness of Prenatal Screening and Treatment to Prevent Congenital Syphilis, Louisiana and Florida, 2013-2014.

Authors:  James M Matthias; Mohammad M Rahman; Daniel R Newman; Thomas A Peterman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Diagnostic tests for syphilis: New tests and new algorithms.

Authors:  Andrés F Henao-Martínez; Steven C Johnson
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2014-04

6.  Assessing compliance with a county board order for third trimester syphilis screening in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Authors:  Melissa G Collier; Melanie M Taylor; Michelle M Winscott; Tom Mickey; Bob England
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2011-06-13

7.  Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Catherine M Albright; Jenna B Emerson; Erika F Werner; Brenna L Hughes
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  State Requirements for Prenatal Syphilis Screening in the United States, 2016.

Authors:  Hardin P Warren; Ryan Cramer; Sarah Kidd; Jami S Leichliter
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-09

9.  Syphilis Infection during pregnancy: fetal risks and clinical management.

Authors:  Marco De Santis; Carmen De Luca; Ilenia Mappa; Terryann Spagnuolo; Angelo Licameli; Gianluca Straface; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-07-04

Review 10.  Early antenatal care: does it make a difference to outcomes of pregnancy associated with syphilis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah J Hawkes; Gabriela B Gomez; Nathalie Broutet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Syphilis response policies and their assessments: A scoping review.

Authors:  Milena C D Almeida; António M R Cordeiro; Aliete Cunha-Oliveira; Daniele M S Barros; Diana G S M Santos; Thaísa S Lima; Ricardo A M Valentim
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.