| Literature DB >> 36187646 |
Janet Flores-Lujano1, David Aldebarán Duarte-Rodríguez1, Elva Jiménez-Hernández2,3, Jorge Alfonso Martín-Trejo4, Aldo Allende-López1, José Gabriel Peñaloza-González5, María Luisa Pérez-Saldivar1, Aurora Medina-Sanson6, José Refugio Torres-Nava3, Karina Anastacia Solís-Labastida4, Luz Victoria Flores-Villegas7, Rosa Martha Espinosa-Elizondo8, Raquel Amador-Sánchez9, Martha Margarita Velázquez-Aviña5, Laura Elizabeth Merino-Pasaye7, Nora Nancy Núñez-Villegas2, Ana Itamar González-Ávila9, María de Los Ángeles Del Campo-Martínez2, Martha Alvarado-Ibarra7, Vilma Carolina Bekker-Méndez10, Rocío Cárdenas-Cardos11, Silvia Jiménez-Morales12, Roberto Rivera-Luna11, Haydee Rosas-Vargas13, Norma C López-Santiago14, Angélica Rangel-López15, Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda12, Elizabeth Vega16, Minerva Mata-Rocha13, Omar Alejandro Sepúlveda-Robles13, José Arellano-Galindo17, Juan Carlos Núñez-Enríquez1, Juan Manuel Mejía-Aranguré12,13,18.
Abstract
Introduction: Over the years, the Hispanic population living in the United States has consistently shown high incidence rates of childhood acute leukemias (AL). Similarly, high AL incidence was previously observed in Mexico City (MC). Here, we estimated the AL incidence rates among children under 15 years of age in MC during the period 2010-2017.Entities:
Keywords: Mexican population; acute leukemia; acute lymphoblastic leukemia; acute myeloblastic leukemia; childhood; epidemiology; incidence
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36187646 PMCID: PMC9518605 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.918921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Flow chart of the selection process. The incidence rate of AL among children of MC during the period 2010–2017 based on the MIGICCL registry. MIGICCL, Mexican Interinstitutional Group for Identification of the Causes of Childhood Leukemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloblastic leukemia; OL, other leukemias; BM, bone marrow; ALAL, AL of ambiguous lineage.
The incidence rate of AL among children in MC, based on the MIGCCL registry during the period 2010–2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| All-AL | Male | 6 | 14.06 | 200 | 102.34 | 130 | 51.29 | 142 | 55.08 | 478 | 63.78 | 66.03 | −4.2 (−11.8, 4) |
| Female | 20 | 48.88 | 156 | 82.73 | 138 | 55.46 | 111 | 44.34 | 425 | 58.35 | 60.45 | ||
| Total | 26 | 31.11 | 356 | 92.71 | 268 | 53.34 | 253 | 49.79 | 903 | 61.11 | 63.28 | ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| ALL | Male | 2 | 4.69 | 172 | 88.01 | 112 | 43.85 | 109 | 42.28 | 395 | 52.59 | 54.71 | −3.3 (−7.6, 1.3) |
| Female | 16 | 39.1 | 137 | 72.65 | 119 | 48.17 | 87 | 34.75 | 359 | 49.4 | 51.44 | ||
| Total | 18 | 21.54 | 309 | 80.47 | 231 | 45.97 | 196 | 38.57 | 754 | 51.02 | 53.1 | ||
| AML | Male | 3 | 7.03 | 25 | 12.79 | 17 | 7.05 | 29 | 11.25 | 74 | 9.99 | 10.09 | 0.7 (−10.2, 12.9) |
| Female | 3 | 7.33 | 19 | 10.08 | 17 | 6.48 | 24 | 9.59 | 63 | 8.53 | 8.58 | ||
| Total | 6 | 7.18 | 44 | 11.46 | 34 | 6.77 | 53 | 10.43 | 137 | 9.27 | 9.35 | ||
| Other | Male | 1 | 2.34 | 3 | 1.54 | 1 | 0.39 | 4 | 1.55 | 9 | 1.2 | 1.23 | – |
| Female | 1 | 2.44 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.81 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.41 | 0.43 | ||
| Total | 2 | 2.39 | 3 | 0.78 | 3 | 0.6 | 4 | 0.79 | 12 | 0.81 | 0.84 | ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| B-cell | Male | 2 | 4.69 | 151 | 77.26 | 95 | 37.19 | 88 | 34.14 | 336 | 44.74 | 46.78 | −2.6 (−7.8, 2.8) |
| Female | 15 | 36.66 | 128 | 67.88 | 109 | 44.12 | 81 | 32.35 | 333 | 45.83 | 47.75 | ||
| Total | 17 | 20.34 | 279 | 72.65 | 204 | 40.6 | 169 | 33.26 | 669 | 45.27 | 47.26 | ||
| T-cell | Male | 0 | 0 | 14 | 7.16 | 11 | 4.31 | 16 | 6.98 | 41 | 5.73 | 5.69 | −4.7 (−12.3, 3.6) |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2.65 | 4 | 1.62 | 3 | 0.4 | 12 | 1.38 | 1.48 | ||
| Total | 0 | 0 | 19 | 4.95 | 15 | 2.99 | 19 | 3.74 | 53 | 3.59 | 3.62 | ||
| ALAL | Male | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3.58 | 6 | 2.35 | 5 | 2.33 | 18 | 2.53 | 2.57 | −19.3 (−38.4, 5.7) |
| Female | 1 | 2.44 | 4 | 2.12 | 6 | 2.43 | 3 | 0.8 | 14 | 1.79 | 1.86 | ||
| Total | 1 | 1.2 | 11 | 2.86 | 12 | 2.39 | 8 | 1.57 | 32 | 2.17 | 2.22 | ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| TCF3-PBX1 | Male | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2.05 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.78 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.88 | −8.1 (−20.8, 6.6) |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2.12 | 1 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.8 | 7 | 0.96 | 1.04 | ||
| Total | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2.08 | 1 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.79 | 13 | 0.88 | 0.96 | ||
| ETV6-RUNX1 | Male | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4.09 | 5 | 1.96 | 2 | 0.78 | 15 | 2 | 2.16 | 10.7 (−3.1, 26.6) |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5.3 | 12 | 4.86 | 5 | 2 | 27 | 3.72 | 3.83 | ||
| Total | 0 | 0 | 18 | 4.69 | 17 | 3.38 | 7 | 1.38 | 42 | 2.84 | 2.98 | ||
| MLL-AFF1 | Male | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.51 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.27 | 0.29 | – |
| Female | 1 | 2.44 | 1 | 0.53 | 1 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.41 | 0.47 | ||
| Total | 1 | 1.2 | 2 | 0.52 | 2 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0.34 | 0.38 | ||
| BCR-ABL1 | Male | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.51 | 1 | 0.39 | 2 | 0.78 | 4 | 0.53 | 0.51 | – |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.53 | 4 | 1.62 | 2 | 0.8 | 7 | 0.96 | 0.92 | ||
| Total | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.52 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0.79 | 11 | 0.74 | 0.72 | ||
| Other rearrangement | Male | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.02 | 1 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.4 | 0.45 | – |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.06 | 2 | 0.81 | 3 | 1.2 | 7 | 0.96 | 0.95 | ||
| Total | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1.04 | 3 | 0.6 | 3 | 0.59 | 10 | 0.68 | 0.7 | ||
MIGCCL, Mexican Interinstitutional Group for the Identification of the Causes of Childhood Leukemia; ALAL, AL of ambiguous lineage; APC, annual percent change; cAIR, crude age incidence rates; ASIRw, age-standardized incidence rates (using Segi World Standard Population) per million children.
Figure 2(A) MC ASIRm Maps. The municipalities are alphabetically ordered. ALL ASIRm, age-standardized incidence rates by municipalities. (B) MC ASIRm Maps. The municipalities are alphabetically ordered. AML ASIRm, age-standardized incidence rates by municipalities.
Figure 3(A) Age-standardized incidence rates of childhood AL in MC (2010–2017) by subtype: ALL and AML. (B) Age-standardized incidence rates of childhood AL in MC (2010–2017) by immunophenotype: B-cell and T-cell ALL.