| Literature DB >> 36187538 |
Kirti Katherine Kabeer1, S Manoj Gowda2, Zatinahhayu Mohd-Isa3, Megan Jane Renner Thomas2, Vallipuram Gopalan2, Sadaf Jafferbhoy2, Soni Soumian2, Sankaran Narayanan2,4, Robert Kirby2, Sekhar Marla2.
Abstract
Wire-localised wide local excision (W-WLE) has been standard of care for impalpable breast lesions. Logistics and risks of wire localisation can be challenging. Magseed-localised wide local excision (M-WLE) is an alternative to W-WLE. We compare safety parameters and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients undergoing M-WLE to W-WLE. All M-WLEs performed at single institution over an 8-month period were included and compared to historic matched cohort of W-WLEs who would have been suitable for Magseed localisation. Data including patient demographics, successful placements, re-excision rates, tumour size, and length of stay (LOS) was analysed. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were included in the study. Cancers were safely excised in all cases. A significant difference in re-excisions rates favouring M-WLE group was seen (2.9% vs 10.4%). Median waiting time to surgery was significantly shorter in M-WLE group (4 h 15 min vs 7 h 3 min). No significant difference in median LOS between the two groups was seen. M-WLE has been shown to be oncologically safe and non-inferior to W-WLE with significantly lower re-excision rate. Reduced pre-operative waiting time in the M-WLE group will have a positive effect on patient journey. Further research should focus on potential impact on day-bed utilisation and theatre efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Localised breast conserving surgery; Localised wide local excision; Magseed-localised wide local excision; Wire-guided wide local excision
Year: 2022 PMID: 36187538 PMCID: PMC9515253 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01531-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol ISSN: 0975-7651