Literature DB >> 32354905

A German Study Comparing Standard Wire Localization With Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-palpable Breast Lesions.

Friedrich Kühn1, Charlotte Emmi Elisabeth Simon2, Ilhamiyya Aliyeva1, Julia KUßMAUL1, Jessica GROß1, Oliver Schweizerhof3,4, Jens-Uwe Blohmer1, Maria Margarete Karsten5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exact localization of non-palpable breast lesions is necessary to ensure that the correct lesion is removed. Conventional methods come with several disadvantages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 28 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery for a non-palpable lesion. By surgeon choice, 14 patients were assigned to undergo magnetic seed localization and 14 underwent standard wire localization. The primary outcome was the operative time, and secondary outcome was the patient pain level.
RESULTS: The mean age was 52±10 (SD) years in the seed arm, and 55±13 years in the wire arm. The median time from skin incision to tumor extraction was not significantly different between the two groups. Patients in the wire localized group significantly more often reported pain during coughing/breathing, movement, and sleep.
CONCLUSION: Using seed localization at Charité Breast Center did not lead to a significant decrease in operative time but might allow time savings once established, while increasing patient comfort and reducing organizational burden. Copyright
© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; breast conserving therapy; magnetic seeds; non-palpable breast lesions; wire localization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32354905      PMCID: PMC7279781          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  13 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  S P Poplack; W A Wells
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Is the future magnetic? Magseed localisation for non palpable breast cancer. A multi-centre non randomised control study.

Authors:  Konstantinos Zacharioudakis; Sue Down; Zaheerah Bholah; Sum Lee; Taherah Khan; Anthony J Maxwell; Miles Howe; James Harvey
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Radioactive seed localization and wire guided localization in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gui-Lin Wang; Panagiotis Tsikouras; Huai-Quan Zuo; Ming-Quan Huang; Lin Peng; Anastasia Bothou; Stefanos Zervoudis; Alexander Tobias Teichmann
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Trends in advanced breast cancer incidence rates after implementation of a mammography screening program in a German population.

Authors:  Alexandra Simbrich; Ina Wellmann; Jan Heidrich; Oliver Heidinger; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  A Randomized Prospective Comparison of Patient-Assessed Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes with Radioactive Seed Localization versus Wire Localization.

Authors:  Erica V Bloomquist; Nicolas Ajkay; Sujata Patil; Abigail E Collett; Thomas G Frazier; Andrea V Barrio
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Feasibility of Magnetic Seeds for Preoperative Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Heather I Greenwood; Jasmine M Wong; Rita A Mukhtar; Michael D Alvarado; Elissa R Price
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Occult breast lesions: A comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL).

Authors:  R Nadeem; L S Chagla; O Harris; S Desmond; R Thind; C Titterrell; R A Audisio
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: initial 6-month experience.

Authors:  James O Murphy; Tracy-Ann Moo; Tari A King; Kimberly J Van Zee; Kristine A Villegas; Michelle Stempel; Anne Eaton; Jean M St Germain; Elizabeth Morris; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Localization techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Benjamin K Y Chan; Jill A Wiseberg-Firtell; Ramesh H S Jois; Katrin Jensen; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Safety and feasibility of breast lesion localization using magnetic seeds (Magseed): a multi-centre, open-label cohort study.

Authors:  James R Harvey; Yit Lim; John Murphy; Miles Howe; Julie Morris; Amit Goyal; Anthony J Maxwell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  1 in total

1.  An Audit on Oncological Safety with Magseed Localised Breast Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Kirti Katherine Kabeer; S Manoj Gowda; Zatinahhayu Mohd-Isa; Megan Jane Renner Thomas; Vallipuram Gopalan; Sadaf Jafferbhoy; Soni Soumian; Sankaran Narayanan; Robert Kirby; Sekhar Marla
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.