Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) is a major health concern due to emerging antibiotic resistance. Along with O1A, O2, and O6A, E. coli O25B is a major serotype within the ExPEC group, which expresses a unique O-antigen. Clinical studies with a glycoconjugate vaccine of the above-mentioned O-types revealed O25B as the least immunogenic component, inducing relatively weak IgG titers. To evaluate the immunological properties of semisynthetic glycoconjugate vaccine candidates against E. coli O25B, we here report the chemical synthesis of an initial set of five O25B glycan antigens differing in length, from one to three repeat units, and frameshifts of the repeat unit. The oligosaccharide antigens were conjugated to the carrier protein CRM197. The resulting semisynthetic glycoconjugates induced functional IgG antibodies in mice with opsonophagocytic activity against E. coli O25B. Three of the oligosaccharide-CRM197 conjugates elicited functional IgGs in the same order of magnitude as a conventional CRM197 glycoconjugate prepared with native O25B O-antigen and therefore represent promising vaccine candidates for further investigation. Binding studies with two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) revealed nanomolar anti-O25B IgG responses with nanomolar K D values and with varying binding epitopes. The immunogenicity and mAb binding data now allow for the rational design of additional synthetic antigens for future preclinical studies, with expected further improvements in the functional antibody responses. Moreover, acetylation of a rhamnose residue was shown to be likely dispensable for immunogenicity, as a deacylated antigen was able to elicit strong functional IgG responses. Our findings strongly support the feasibility of a semisynthetic glycoconjugate vaccine against E. coli O25B.
Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) is a major health concern due to emerging antibiotic resistance. Along with O1A, O2, and O6A, E. coli O25B is a major serotype within the ExPEC group, which expresses a unique O-antigen. Clinical studies with a glycoconjugate vaccine of the above-mentioned O-types revealed O25B as the least immunogenic component, inducing relatively weak IgG titers. To evaluate the immunological properties of semisynthetic glycoconjugate vaccine candidates against E. coli O25B, we here report the chemical synthesis of an initial set of five O25B glycan antigens differing in length, from one to three repeat units, and frameshifts of the repeat unit. The oligosaccharide antigens were conjugated to the carrier protein CRM197. The resulting semisynthetic glycoconjugates induced functional IgG antibodies in mice with opsonophagocytic activity against E. coli O25B. Three of the oligosaccharide-CRM197 conjugates elicited functional IgGs in the same order of magnitude as a conventional CRM197 glycoconjugate prepared with native O25B O-antigen and therefore represent promising vaccine candidates for further investigation. Binding studies with two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) revealed nanomolar anti-O25B IgG responses with nanomolar K D values and with varying binding epitopes. The immunogenicity and mAb binding data now allow for the rational design of additional synthetic antigens for future preclinical studies, with expected further improvements in the functional antibody responses. Moreover, acetylation of a rhamnose residue was shown to be likely dispensable for immunogenicity, as a deacylated antigen was able to elicit strong functional IgG responses. Our findings strongly support the feasibility of a semisynthetic glycoconjugate vaccine against E. coli O25B.
Escherichia coli is a member of
the normal intestinal microbiota of mammals including humans. However,
pathogenic strains exist that can cause potentially deadly infections
even in healthy individuals.[1,2] Enteric/diarrheal disease,
urinary tract infections (UTIs), sepsis, and meningitis are common
clinical manifestations resulting from pathogenic E.
coli infections.[3] Despite
aggressive infection control measures, the rapid increase of hospital-acquired
infections is a major concern.[4,5] The global prevalence
of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic E. coli is particularly high, with 65% of isolates exhibiting resistance
to three or more drug classes, resulting in treatment-unresponsive
infections.[6,7] Hence, this bacterium has been identified
as a critical priority pathogen by the WHO. The E.
coli pathotypes responsible for extraintestinal infections
are referred to as extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), a group that includes serotype O25B.[8]The E. coli O25B sequence
type 131
(ST131) causes predominantly community-acquired infections, accounts
for more than 10% of all ExPEC infections, and is the major cause
of E. coli multidrug-resistant infections
in the United States.[9−12] Serotype O25B differs from the related O25A serotype in its O-antigen biosynthetic gene cluster and polysaccharide structure.[13−15] The O- and K-antigens are well-described
virulence factors that contribute to E. coli survival by interfering with complement-mediated killing.[16−20] These surface antigens of E. coli are highly exposed to the immune system, rendering them attractive
targets as vaccine candidates.[21,22] For example, it was
observed that levels of antibodies to surface antigens increased in
patients with bacteremia,[23] a large subset
of which were O-antigen-specific.[24,25] Antibodies against O- and K-antigens
were shown to promote phagocytosis and confer protection in preclinical
challenge models.[26] Although more than
180 different O-antigens are known for E. coli, which comprises serogroups O1 through O181,
the majority of ExPEC infections are caused by serogroups O1A, O2,
O6A, and O25B.[27−29] Within the O25 serogroup, up to 75% of isolates were
shown to belong to the O25B serotype in a recent screening of clinical
isolates from Switzerland.[30]Glycoconjugate
vaccines have proven to be an effective measure
against invasive bacterial infections in the past ∼40 years.
Covalent conjugation of bacterial polysaccharides to a carrier protein
as an immunogen results in a T-cell-dependent response able to induce
long-lasting protective immunity. Various glycoconjugate vaccines
against Haemophilus influenzae type
B, Meningococci, Pneumococci, and
recently Salmonella Typhi have been licensed[31−33] and are based on native polysaccharides harvested from bacterial
cultures.[34] Synthetic oligosaccharide–protein
conjugates (semisynthetic glycoconjugates) have emerged as powerful
alternatives[35−37] due to their well-defined chemical antigen structures
and lower levels of residual impurities.[38,39] The first clinically approved synthetic glycoconjugate vaccine Quimi-Hib
against H. influenzae type B developed
in Cuba exhibited an excellent safety profile and 99.7% protective
efficacy in children and is comprised of synthetic polyribosylribitol
phosphate with an average length of eight repeating units.[40,41] There has been great progress more recently on semisynthetic glycoconjugate
vaccines containing size-defined and homogeneous synthetic O-antigen-derived glycan antigens. A Shigella
flexneri 2a vaccine (SF2a-TT15 or GlycoShig3) was
demonstrated to be safe, well tolerated, and highly immunogenic in
a phase I clinical trial[42,43] (ClinicalTrials.gov
ID: NCT02797236) and is currently under investigation in a phase II
study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04602975). Several other fully synthetic
glycoconjugate vaccines are in different phases of clinical trials
against various drug-resistant bacteria.[44−46]There
is currently no vaccine against ExPEC. Multivalent glycoconjugate
vaccines containing various E. coliO-polysaccharides were shown to be safe in humans,
but antibody induction was variable and low, particularly for the
O25 component.[24,47] A tetravalent glycoconjugate
vaccine (ExPEC-4V) aimed against UTIs composed of isolated O-antigen from serotypes O1A, O2, O6A, and O25B conjugated
to exotoxin A was proven to be safe but elicited only weak functional
antibody response in clinical trials.[28,48−51] More recently, multivalent glycoconjugate vaccines (ExpPEC-9V and
ExPEC-10V) are being investigated in clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov
ID: NCT04899336 and NCT03819049). Despite the recent progress in preparing
glycoconjugate vaccines against ExPEC, conventional industrial-scale
production would still be challenging due to technical problems associated
with harvesting polysaccharides from bacterial cultures.[47] To address this issue and the reported poor
immunogenicity of isolated O25B, we here report the chemical synthesis
of an initial set of five well-defined O25B oligosaccharide antigens
that were shown to be immunogenic in mice when conjugated to the CRM197 carrier protein. Three of the semisynthetic vaccine candidates
induced functional IgG antibodies in orders of magnitude comparable
to a conventional glycoconjugate vaccine prepared with native isolated
O25B O-antigen conjugated to CRM197via single-end conjugation. As expected,[52,53] the magnitude and functional activity of the IgG responses varied
based on the number of repeating units and the frameshift. The in vivo immunogenicity results generated in this study allow
for the rational design of optimized synthetic oligosaccharide antigens
to be evaluated in future. Overall, our results demonstrate the feasibility
and potential of a semisynthetic glycoconjugate vaccine approach against
O25B and ExPEC infections.
Results and Discussion
The reported structure of the
O25B O-antigen pentasaccharide
repeating unit (RU) 1 consists of two glucose (Glc),
two rhamnose (Rha, out of which one is acetylated at the 2nd position)
and one N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residues (Figure ).[14,30] The immunogenicity of oligosaccharide antigens can potentially be
influenced by the length (number of RUs) and by the frameshift of
the RU as well.[52,54] To evaluate the impact of the
antigen structure on immunogenicity, we first aimed to synthesize
five possible oligosaccharide antigens, the natural pentasaccharide
RU (1RU), a decasaccharide comprising two natural RUs (2RU), a pentadecasaccharide
of three natural RUs (3RU), as well as two frameshifts of the pentasaccharide
RU termed FS1 and FS2 (Figure ). Installment of a reducing end aminoethyl linker (C2-linker)
will allow for efficient conjugation to the carrier protein.
Figure 1
Reported structure
of the natural repeat unit (RU) of the E. coli O25B O-antigen and the designed
synthetic oligosaccharide targets 1–5. Glc, glucose; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; Rha,
rhamnose.
Reported structure
of the natural repeat unit (RU) of the E. coli O25B O-antigen and the designed
synthetic oligosaccharide targets 1–5. Glc, glucose; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; Rha,
rhamnose.The syntheses of the above-listed oligosaccharides
are particularly
challenging, mainly due to the presence of a central d-glucose
that is substituted by four other sugars (Figure ). Such highly branched oligosaccharides
can substantially increase the hurdles of chemical synthesis.[55] Complexity of this core d-glucose is
further increased by the requirement for orthogonal protecting groups,
which could facilitate the α-linkage to the less nucleophilic
2-OAc-l-rhamnose (l-Rha-2-OAc). The C4 hydroxyl
group of d-glucose is less nucleophilic, so ideally the first
glycosylation should occur at this position. On the other hand, α-stereoselectivity
of d-glucose is reported to be favorable by using a 4,6-benzylidene
protection to carry out glycosylation with an l-Rha-2-OAc
building block (BB). β-linkages are also required, which could
be achieved with participating groups (typically esters) at the C2
position. However, the cleavage of conventional esters at the C2 of
glucose in the presence of the acetate at the C2 position of l-rhamnose would be problematic. With such inherent complexity, identifying
suitable orthogonal protecting groups for the C2–C6 hydroxyl
groups of the core d-glucose was challenging. Consequently,
we explored various BBs with several combinations of protecting groups
to evaluate their coupling compatibility and deprotection strategies.
The synthetic strategy suitable for one antigen may not be applicable
for the synthesis of other antigens. This means the synthetic strategy
must consider various possibilities to assemble the parent RU and
then apply the same to higher numbers of RUs.
Synthetic Strategy
Our synthetic approach toward antigens 1–3 was based on the synthesis of key
intermediates tetrasaccharide 8, pentasaccharide 9, and hexasaccharide 11 (Figure ). Similarly, for antigens 4 and 5, the key intermediate was trisaccharide 13. Given that tetrasaccharide 8, pentasaccharide 9, and hexasaccharide 11 needed the incorporation
of tetrasubstituted glucose, the key was to make an orthogonally substituted
disaccharide 6 that already incorporated the acetate
required in the final antigens at the C2 position of l-rhamnose.
The critical disaccharide 6 could be obtained from the
glycosylation of an orthogonally protected glucose 17 containing a nonparticipating benzyl group at C2, a 4,6-O-napthylidene, and a 3-O-chloroacetyl
(ClAc) group. The l-rhamnose contained the anomeric paramethoxyphenyl
(MP), which was orthogonal to naphthyl (NAP) with acetate at C2, thereby
allowing for selective cleavage to perform the respective glycosylations
and deprotection sequences to obtain key intermediates 8, 9, and 11 (Figure a). A 2-O-azidomethyl benzoyl
(AZMB) group was selected for the C2 position of the terminal glucose
BB 14 as it can serve as a participating protecting group
that can be cleaved under very mild conditions in the presence of
other ester groups.[56] Coupling of intermediate 8 with 10 will yield antigen 1 (1), combining intermediates 8 and 11 will provide antigen 2 (2), whereas coupling
of intermediates 8, 10, and 11 will give access to antigen 3 (3).
Figure 2
(a) Synthetic
strategy for antigens 1–3. (b) Synthetic
approach to assemble antigens 4 and 5. AZMB,
2-(azidomethyl)benzoyl; NAP, 2-napthylmethyl;
MP, 4-methoxyphenyl; AcCl, chloroacetyl; Troc, 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl;
TBS, tert-butyldimethylsilyl.
(a) Synthetic
strategy for antigens 1–3. (b) Synthetic
approach to assemble antigens 4 and 5. AZMB,
2-(azidomethyl)benzoyl; NAP, 2-napthylmethyl;
MP, 4-methoxyphenyl; AcCl, chloroacetyl; Troc, 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl;
TBS, tert-butyldimethylsilyl.Antigen 4 (4) and antigen 5 (5) could be obtained from trisaccharide 13, which, in turn, would be obtained from disaccharide 12. The sequential glycosylations of trisaccharide 13 with
BBs 14 and 15 will provide antigen 4 (4). Similarly, antigen 5 (5) could be obtained by sequential glycosylations of C2-linker,
donors 14 and 16(57) with trisaccharide 13 (Figure b).
Synthesis of Pentasaccharide (9)
In our
strategy, disaccharide 6 is a crucial building block
to convergently diversify our approach to access the targeted antigens.
Our initial synthetic studies toward α-glycosylation between
thio l-rhamnoside acceptor and 4,6-O-acetal-mediated
corresponding d-glucose imidate or phosphate donors varying
promoters and solvents led to predominantly aglycon transfer and resulted
in the concomitant decomposition of the product. Although α-stereoselective
glycosylation[58] between d-glucoside
and l-rhamnoside is not unknown,[59−61] however, under
the given set of protecting groups on donor and the presence of 2-OAc
on acceptor proved extremely difficult. Attempts toward the glycosylation
between donor 17 and various 2-O-orthogonally
protected groups such as p-methoxybenzyl (PMB) and p-bromobenzyl (PBB)
of l-rhamnoside were also unsuccessful. Efforts to improve
the yield and selectivity did not turn out to be better by changing
different promoters, temperatures, and solvents (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). Hence, the orthogonal
glycosylation between donor 17 and acceptor 18(62) in the presence of tert-butyldimethylsilyl
trifluorosulfonate (TBSOTf) gave disaccharide 7 (α/β
= 6:1) as an inseparable mixture in 53% (Scheme ). Regioselective reductive ring opening
of naphthylidene acetal of 6 using triethylsilane and
triflic acid (TfOH) gave 4-OH acceptor 7 in 58% as only
α-anomer after separation of the isomers. Donor 19(63) was glycosylated to 4-OH acceptor 7 using N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) and trimethylsilyl trifluorosulfonate
(TMSOTf) surprisingly to give trisaccharide 20 as an
inseparable mixture of anomers (α/β = 1:4) in 77%. Removal
of chloroacetyl in 20 followed by coupling with l-rhamnosyl donor 22(64) gave
tetrasaccharide 23 in a 74% yield. The anomers formed
in the trisaccharide formation were able to separate at this stage,
and 23 was isolated as a pure compound. Orthogonal cleavage
of the naphthyl group in the presence of p-methoxyphenyl (MP) was
achieved using 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) in
MeOH/CH2Cl2 to obtain tetrasaccharide acceptor 24 in an 80% yield. Coupling of glucosyl donor 14 with acceptor 24 in the presence of TMSOTf provided
pentasaccharide 9 in an 81% yield. MP cleavage using
ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN) followed by the conversion of the corresponding
hemiacetal to the imidate gave 25 in an 84% yield over
two steps.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Pentasaccharide 9
DABCO, 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane.
Synthesis of Pentasaccharide 9
DABCO, 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane.
Alternative Synthesis of Pentasaccharide 9
Given that only a modest selectivity of α/β = 6:1 and
lower yields were observed for the synthesis of disaccharide 6 and the surprising outcome of only α/β = 1:4
for a β-selective glycosylation to obtain trisaccharide 20 as an inseparable mixture (Scheme ), we explored different donors. One of the
best reactions turned out to be the coupling between donor 26(65) and acceptor 18 using
NIS/TMSOTf to obtain 27 in 71% with lower selectivity
(α/β = 2:1) than obtained for disaccharide 6 as an inseparable mixture (Scheme ). The anomers were separated after the benzylidene
cleavage to afford 4,6-diol 28 in 53%. The regioselective
glycosylation of 6-OH in 28 was achieved using stoichiometric
amounts of donor 14 to give a C6 glycosylated product 29 with a 70% yield. Interestingly, the coupling of trisaccharide 29 with donor 19 gave a clean reaction resulting
only in β-isomer 30, thereby overcoming the limitation
of selectivity and separation observed in Scheme . Cleavage of the NAP group followed by glycosylation
with donor 22 gave pentasaccharide intermediate 9. The alternative strategy proved to be efficient with overall
better yields and selectivities.
Scheme 2
Alternative Synthesis of Pentasaccharide 9
PTSA, p-tolylsulfonic
acid.
Alternative Synthesis of Pentasaccharide 9
PTSA, p-tolylsulfonic
acid.
Synthesis of Tetrasaccharide 8
The regioselective
ring opening of disaccharide 6 proceeded smoothly using
borane tetrahydrofuran (BH3·THF) and TMSOTf at room
temperature, and the resulting 6-OH was then used in the next step
for glycosylation with the glucose imidate 14 to provide
trisaccharide 31 in good yield. Deprotection of the chloroacetyl
group was performed using DABCO in the presence of pyridine and ethanol
at an elevated temperature to obtain the trisaccharide acceptor 32 (Scheme ). Glycosylation with imidate 22 was purely α-selective
and high yielding to provide tetrasaccharide 8. Finally,
the OMP group was cleaved using CAN and the resulting lactol was converted
to imidate 33.
Scheme 3
Synthesis of Tetrasaccharide 8
Synthesis of Antigen 1 (1)
The above-obtained tetrasaccharide imidate 33 was reacted
with acceptor 10 at −30 °C to provide the
fully protected pentasaccharide 34 in good yield (Scheme ). The deprotection
sequence was performed by initially cleaving the AZMB group, followed
by protecting group manipulation on nitrogen in GlcNAc to afford compound 35. Finally, the global deprotection of benzyl utilizing the
slightly modified hydrogenation conditions provided antigen 1 (1).
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Antigen 1 (1)
Synthesis of Antigen 2 (2)
Glycosylation of acceptor 10 with pentasaccharide donor 25 employing TMSOTf as a promotor at −30 °C proceeded
as expected; the α-linked isomer was formed in good yields,
giving access to linker-equipped hexasaccharide 36 (Scheme ). Removal of the tert-butylsilyl (TBS) group at the nonreducing end using
HF·pyridine in THF gave the hexasaccharide acceptor 37, which served as a common intermediate for the synthesis of antigens 2 (2) and 3 (3).
Scheme 5
Synthesis of Antigen 2 (2)
Reaction of 37 with tetrasaccharide
donor 33 in the presence of TMSOTf at −30 °C
gave the fully protected
decasaccharide 38 as a single isomer. A subsequent four-step
deprotection sequence including AZMB removal under Staudinger conditions
leaving the acetates intact, reductive Troc-removal with zinc followed
by acetylation of the free amine and overall hydrogenolysis of benzyl
ethers gave the desired antigen 2 (2) in
a 11% yield over four steps.
Synthesis of Antigen 3 (3)
Assembly of pentadecasaccharide 41 was achieved using
a 6+5+4 approach (Scheme ). Glycosylation of hexasaccharide acceptor 37 with donor 25 at −30 °C promoted by TMSOTf
gave undecasaccharide 39 in good yield. Following selective
TBS removal with HF·pyridine gave 40 in high yield.
The acceptor 40 was then smoothly coupled with 33, yielding fully protected pentadecasaccharide 41 in a 78% yield. The protecting groups could be removed in a four-step
procedure with a 21% overall yield to obtain antigen 3 (3).
Scheme 6
Synthesis of Antigen 3 (3)
Synthesis of Antigen 4 (4)
The fully protected antigen 4 (4) could
be accessed by a direct glycosylation of the C2-linker with donor 25; late-stage linker coupling, however, resulted in an inseparable
α/β mixture. Hence, a different synthetic 4+1 approach
was applied (Scheme ). Key intermediate 47 was assembled by consecutive
glycosylations on the central glucose BB 17. Regioselective
reductive ring opening of naphthylidene acetal of 17 using
triethylsilane and TfOH gave 4-OH acceptor 17a in an
80% yield. The free hydroxy group was subsequently glycosylated using
donor 42(66) giving disaccharide 43 in decent yields as an α/β mixture, which could
be separated after the removal of the chloroacetyl group. Next, the
glucose unit was glycosylated stereoselectively at the C3 position
with imidate 22, followed by NAP cleavage at the C6 position
giving 46. The last glycosylation on the central glucose
with BB 14 gave an excellent yield of tetrasaccharide 47. Compound 47 served as a thioglycoside donor
in the glycosylation with linker-equipped rhamnose 15 using NIS/TMSOTf at 0 °C. As expected, pentasaccharide was
only obtained in moderate yields as an α/β mixture (7:2).
However, the desired α-isomer 48 could be isolated
after AZMB removal using tributyl phosphine. Further three-step modifications
of 48 gave semiprotected intermediate, azide-functionalized 49 in decent yields. The final hydrogenolytic cleavage of
the benzyl ethers gave antigen 4 (4) in
a 73% yield.
Scheme 7
Synthesis of Antigen 4 (4)
Synthesis of Antigen 5 (5)
The synthesis of pentasaccharide FS2 antigen 5 (5) was achieved from the common intermediate 45. The α-selective glycosylation with C2-linker was obtained
in good yield but with only 3:1 selectivity in favor of desired product 50 after TBS deprotection (Scheme ). Glycosylation with acetyl rhamnose building
block 16 proceeded smoothly with very good yields. The
C6-NAP on the glucose was deprotected using standard conditions, and
the C6 glycosylation with 14 afforded the fully protected
FS2 (52). Deprotection of the AZMB group was carried
out first, followed by protecting group manipulation on the amino
group. Finally, the chloride on the linker was converted to azide
using sodium azide in DMF; the global deprotection of benzyl groups
was carried out using standard palladium conditions. The crude FS2
antigen 5 (5) was found to be stable, but
over a period of time, the C-2-O-acetate group on
the rhamnose[60,67] started to migrate,[68] which was confirmed by NMR indicating a mixture
of compounds. So finally, under alkaline conditions, the acetate group
was deprotected and the FS2 (-OAc) (53) was obtained.
Scheme 8
Synthesis of Antigen 5 (5)
Preparation and Characterization of Oligosaccharide–CRM197 Conjugates
We next sought to evaluate the potential
of oligosaccharides 1–4 and 53 (the nonacetylated version of 5) as vaccine
candidates against infections with E. coli O25B. It is established that conjugation of the otherwise poorly
immunogenic oligo- or polysaccharides to carrier proteins helps to
induce T-cell-dependent glycan-specific immune responses, including
immunoglobulin class switch.[69,70] As a carrier protein,
we selected CRM197, a detoxified mutant of diphtheria toxin
that is used in various marketed conjugate vaccines produced with
isolated polysaccharides (such as the pneumococcal vaccine Prevnar).
To prepare the conjugates, the primary amine group of antigens 1–5
(compounds 1–4 and 53) was reacted with di-N-succinimidyl adipate in
DMSO in the presence of triethylamine (Et3N). The resulting
monoester was precipitated, washed, and reacted with primary amines
of lysine residues of the CRM197 protein (Figure S1a in the Supporting Information).The resulting
conjugates 1-CRM197, 2-CRM197, 3-CRM197, 4-CRM197, and 53-CRM197 had endotoxin contents
lower than 0.01 endotoxin units per microgram protein (EU/μg)
and were thus considered safe for in vivo immunization
experiments (see Experimental section). Successful
conjugation
was verified by denaturing SDS-PAGE, revealing shifts of the conjugates
toward higher masses compared to the unconjugated carrier protein
and no indications for unreacted CRM197 (Figure S1b in the Supporting Information). This finding was
confirmed by HPLC-SEC analysis in which elution times of the conjugates
were consistently lower than that of CRM197 (Figure S1c in the Supporting Information). To
estimate the antigen to carrier protein molar ratios (antigen loading),
mass increases of the conjugates compared to CRM197 were
determined by MALDI-TOF MS (Figure S1d in
the Supporting Information). This analysis yielded average antigen
loadings of 10.3 (1-CRM197), 12.6 (2-CRM197), 13.8 (3-CRM197), 10
(4-CRM197), and 12.6 (53-CRM197). These antigen loadings were used to calculate the glycan
concentrations of the conjugates.
Semisynthetic Conjugates Are Immunogenic
Pilot studies
with native O25B O-antigen CRM197 conjugates
showed that female CD-1 mice generated more robust and homogeneous
O25B IgG responses than female C57BL/6, BALB/c, or C3H mice (data
not shown). The optimized vaccination schedule for unadjuvanted serotype
O25B conjugates, determined empirically from previous mouse immunogenicity
studies, is shown in Figure a. Mice received three doses of the vaccine candidates at
weeks 0, 5, and 13. Blood was collected for serum antibody analyses
2 weeks after the second immunization (week 7; postdose 2 [PD2]) and
1 week after the third immunization (week 14; postdose 3 [PD3]). To
evaluate the immunogenicity of the semisynthetic conjugates, 1-CRM197 through 4-CRM197 and 53-CRM197, 25 mice per group were subcutaneously
vaccinated each with an amount of conjugate corresponding to 2 μg
of glycan antigen. This dose level was selected based on the results
from previous vaccination studies (data not shown). In addition, we
included one group with a sun-type (single-end conjugation) CRM197 conjugate prepared with the isolated native O25B O-antigen including the core oligosaccharide with an average
polysaccharide chain length of 14 kDa, corresponding to 15 repeat
units. Two negative control groups, one immunized with unconjugated
native O25B O-antigen and one sham-immunized with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), were also included. We did not use
an adjuvant such as AlPO4, which is commonly used for conjugate
vaccines, as it may have reduced the ability to discriminate the antibody
responses among different conjugate vaccines, as observed in previous
studies (data not shown).
Figure 3
O25B-specific IgG responses to semisynthetic
and native CRM197-conjugates. (a) Immunization schedule.
PD2, postdose 2;
PD3, postdose 3. (b) and (c) IgG levels, as measured by the Luminex
IgG assay, at week 7 (PD2) (b) and week 14 (PD3) (c) time points.
Percentages of mice with IgG levels 5-fold greater than the baseline
lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) are indicated. 1–3RU, 1–3
repeat units; FS1, frameshift 1; FS2, frameshift 2. Statistically
significant differences to the unconjugated free O25B free native
polysaccharide comparator are marked with asterisks (one-way ANOVA
on log-transformed data; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001;
****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant). IgG level
GMTs (μg/mL) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values are shown
in Table S2 in the Supporting Information.
The horizontal lines are the geometric mean titers (GMTs), and the
whiskers indicate the 95% confidence intervals.
O25B-specific IgG responses to semisynthetic
and native CRM197-conjugates. (a) Immunization schedule.
PD2, postdose 2;
PD3, postdose 3. (b) and (c) IgG levels, as measured by the Luminex
IgG assay, at week 7 (PD2) (b) and week 14 (PD3) (c) time points.
Percentages of mice with IgG levels 5-fold greater than the baseline
lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) are indicated. 1–3RU, 1–3
repeat units; FS1, frameshift 1; FS2, frameshift 2. Statistically
significant differences to the unconjugated free O25B free native
polysaccharide comparator are marked with asterisks (one-way ANOVA
on log-transformed data; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001;
****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant). IgG level
GMTs (μg/mL) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values are shown
in Table S2 in the Supporting Information.
The horizontal lines are the geometric mean titers (GMTs), and the
whiskers indicate the 95% confidence intervals.Serum levels of isolated O25B antigen-specific
IgG elicited by
the five semisynthetic CRM197 conjugates after two (PD2)
and three (PD3) vaccination doses were determined by a Luminex IgG
assay (Figure b,c).
IgG levels were compared to those induced by the CRM197 conjugate prepared with native O25B O-antigen.
Three doses of the native O25B CRM197 conjugate were required
to generate robust IgG titers, with a geometric mean titer (GMT) of
22.0 μg/mL IgG and an 84% responder rate. The semisynthetic
conjugates were all substantially more immunogenic than the unconjugated
free O25B O-antigen, with responses to the three
repeat unit (3RU) trimers (3-CRM197) trending
higher than the 2RU (2-CRM197) or 1RU constructs
including the FS1 and FS2 frameshifts (1-CRM197, 4-CRM197, and 53-CRM197, respectively) at either time point. The best-performing semisynthetic
conjugate 3RU (3-CRM197) was not significantly
less immunogenic than the native O25B conjugate, although by PD3 it
yielded a broader range of IgG titers among individual mice and fewer
responders (68 vs 84%). Among the semisynthetic conjugates at the
PD3 time point, the 3RU variant (3-CRM197)
elicited the highest levels of O25B O-antigen-specific
IgG (4.8 μg/mL). The single repeat unit frameshift FS2 (53-CRM197) elicited comparable levels of IgG as
the 2RU conjugate 2-CRM197 (2.5 vs 2.3 μg
IgG/mL), with responses to the FS1 (4-CRM197) and 1RU (1-CRM197) variants trending lower
(1.4 and 0.3 μg IgG/mL).Knowing that the semisynthetic
conjugates were immunogenic, we
next assessed whether the generic spacer moiety (composed of ethyl
and adipoyl groups) connecting the synthetic oligosaccharides to the
CRM197 protein was immunogenic. It was shown previously
that strong spacer-specific antibody responses can suppress antibody
responses to weakly immunogenic oligosaccharide antigens, which may
explain the relatively poor immunogenicity of the 1RU (1) and FS1 (4) antigens.[71,72] To this end,
we prepared conjugates with the bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein
and five different monosaccharides with C2, C5, or polyethylene glycol
linkers (see Figure S2 in the Supporting
Information). The resulting BSA conjugates prepared with the C2-linked
monosaccharides contain a generic spacer moiety that is identical
to that of the semisynthetic CRM197 conjugates used for
vaccination experiments. An in-house generated pool of sera from vaccinated
BALB/c mice that showed a strong reactivity against the spacer moiety
(alkyl–adipoyl) was used as a positive control. Using these
BSA conjugates, we performed an ELISA analysis of pooled antisera
from the PD3 time point. IgG signals were either below the level of
detection or very weak and only seen at high antiserum concentrations,
indicating that the generic spacer moiety of the semisynthetic CRM197 conjugates used in this study was not significantly immunogenic.
Antibodies Elicited by Semisynthetic Conjugates Promote Opsonophagocytosis
Functional immunogenicity of sera from vaccinated mice was assessed
initially at the intermediate PD2 time point using a multidrug-resistant
unencapsulated O25B:K- strain via an opsonophagocytosis
assay (OPA). Individual OPA responses are shown in Figure a. As both IgG and IgM are
capable of activating complement, OPA activity reflects the composite
antigen-specific functional activities contributed by both antibody
isotypes. This likely explains why the functional responses in the
O25B:K- strain OPA at PD2 for the single repeat unit constructs [1RU
(1-CRM197), FS1 (4-CRM197), and FS2 (53-CRM197)] exceed what might
be expected based on their correspondingly weak IgG titers compared
with the other conjugate variants (Figure ). Indeed, functional responses (but not
the corresponding IgG binding titers) to the three distinct single
repeat unit conjugates were significantly higher than the activity
of the unconjugated O25B free O-antigen control group,
which, in turn, was only marginally above the baseline level observed
for unvaccinated control animals (titer of 125 vs 50 for unvaccinated
controls). The highest OPA responder rates were observed with the
synthetic 2RU conjugate 2-CRM197 (72%) and
native conjugate (80%), although GMT titers of these two groups were
not significantly higher than any of the other CRM197 conjugate
variants.
Figure 4
Results of opsonophagocytosis assays (OPAs) that measure functional
antibody responses to CRM197 conjugates with unencapsulated
(O25B:K-) strain PFEEC0068 and encapsulated (O25B:K5) strain PFEEC0066.
(a) Postdose 2 (PD2) OPA titers generated with the O25B:K- strain.
(b) PD2 OPA titers generated with the O25B:K5 strain. (c) Postdose
3 (PD3) OPA titers generated with the O25B:K5 strain. Percentages
of mice with OPA titers 4-fold greater than the prevaccination baseline
GMT titer of all pooled groups are indicated (value of 50). LOD, limit
of detection; 1–3RU, 1–3× repeat units; FS1, frameshift
1; FS2, frameshift 2. Statistical significance relative to the unconjugated
free polysaccharide comparator was assessed by one-way ANOVA on log-transformed
data: *p < 0.05: **p < 0.01;
***p = 0.001; ****p < 0.0001;
ns, not significant. OPA titer GMTs and 95% CI values are shown in Table S3 in the Supporting Information. The horizontal
lines indicate geometric mean titers (GMTs), and whiskers show the
95% confidence intervals.
Results of opsonophagocytosis assays (OPAs) that measure functional
antibody responses to CRM197 conjugates with unencapsulated
(O25B:K-) strain PFEEC0068 and encapsulated (O25B:K5) strain PFEEC0066.
(a) Postdose 2 (PD2) OPA titers generated with the O25B:K- strain.
(b) PD2 OPA titers generated with the O25B:K5 strain. (c) Postdose
3 (PD3) OPA titers generated with the O25B:K5 strain. Percentages
of mice with OPA titers 4-fold greater than the prevaccination baseline
GMT titer of all pooled groups are indicated (value of 50). LOD, limit
of detection; 1–3RU, 1–3× repeat units; FS1, frameshift
1; FS2, frameshift 2. Statistical significance relative to the unconjugated
free polysaccharide comparator was assessed by one-way ANOVA on log-transformed
data: *p < 0.05: **p < 0.01;
***p = 0.001; ****p < 0.0001;
ns, not significant. OPA titer GMTs and 95% CI values are shown in Table S3 in the Supporting Information. The horizontal
lines indicate geometric mean titers (GMTs), and whiskers show the
95% confidence intervals.We observed in previous experiments that the unencapsulated
O25B:K- E. coli OPA strain is highly
sensitive to killing
by antigen-specific antibodies. This was also reflected in this study
by the nearly 5-fold log10 range in PD2 bactericidal titers observed
across the groups vaccinated with the various O25B CRM197 conjugates (Figure a). Thus, we developed a second alternative OPA assay with a strain
expressing the K5 (heparosan) capsular polysaccharide, which is highly
virulent in mouse lethal challenge models[29] and less susceptible to OPA killing by O-antigen-specific
antibodies in vitro. The reduced sensitivity of this
strain may be due, in part, to the partial masking of the O25B O-antigen by the K5 capsule, as demonstrated in flow cytometry
experiments with bacteria treated to selectively remove the K5 capsule via 60 °C heat treatment or by heparinase digestion.[29] Sera from all groups of mice at PD2 and PD3
time points were evaluated in OPAs with this O25B:K5 strain, and results
are shown in Figure b,c. Use of this strain has the practical advantage of potentially
providing evidence of functional differences observed among conjugate
variants by using a phenotypically distinct clinically relevant isolate
as readout.As anticipated, the OPA geometric mean titers observed
with the
O25B:K5 strain compared with the O25B:K- strain at the equivalent
PD2 time point were substantially (about 50- to 100-fold) lower; overall
rates of vaccine responders for all of the CRM197 conjugates
were also reduced. However, by the PD3 time point, response rates
for the conjugates ranged from 38 to 88%, with significant differences
between group GMTs apparent relative to the unconjugated free native
O25B O-antigen control. The most immunogenic conjugates
were the semisynthetic 2RU (2-CRM197) and
3RU (3-CRM197) constructs and the native O25B O-antigen CRM197 conjugate, with responder rates
of 71, 68, and 88%, respectively. The next most immunogenic conjugate
was the single repeat unit FS2 (53-CRM197),
followed by FS1 (4-CRM197). Of the three single
repeat unit constructs evaluated at the PD3 time point, the FS2 (53-CRM197) was the most immunogenic with respect
to levels of IgG and OPA activities, although differences were only
significant for the FS2 (53-CRM197) vs 1RU
(1-CRM197) comparison of IgG titers (p = 0.0011,
one-way ANOVA on log-transformed IgG data from FS2 (53-CRM197) vs FS1 (4-CRM197) and
1RU (1-CRM197) groups; Table S2 and Table S3 in the Supporting
Information).
Functional Antibodies Recognize Different O25B Epitopes
Synthetic oligosaccharide antigens are useful not only as vaccine
antigens but also to gain information on the binding epitope of antiglycan
antibodies.[73,74] To elucidate epitope recognition
patterns, we subjected three O25B-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs),
designated as 3E9-11,[75] 71-8, and 80-11,[29] to binding studies using surface plasmon resonance
(SPR). mAb 3E9-11 was elicited in mice by whole bacteria, the other
two mAbs by an O25B long-chain lattice conjugate.[29] The three mAbs exert comparable functional activities,
as measured by OPA activity (Table ). To this end, the mAbs were passed over SPR surfaces
functionalized with the various CRM197 conjugates to obtain
binding kinetics (Table ). mAb 3E9-11 recognized the 2RU (2), 3RU (3), and the natural antigen (15RU) but did not bind to the 1RU (1), FS1 (4), and FS2 (53) antigens,
indicating that this mAb recognizes an epitope that is larger than
a pentasaccharide. KD values increased
along with the glycan chain length, largely due to slower dissociation
constants (koff). mAb 71-8 showed a different
binding pattern, recognizing all antigens except for 1RU (1). Its binding epitope is therefore likely smaller than a pentasaccharide.
In contrast to mAb 3E9-11, lower KD values
for the larger antigens were not observed, as koff values for the 2RU (2), 3RU (3), and 15RU antigens were similar. KD values for FS1 (4) and FS2 (53) were lower
than those for 2RU (2) and 3RU (3), mainly
due to increased association rates (kon). mAb 80-11 recognized all tested antigens with comparable KD values, suggesting that mAb 80-11 has the
smallest binding epitope of the three tested mAbs.
Table 1
SPR-Derived Binding Kinetics of Three
Anti-O25B mAbs, 3E9-11, 71-8, and 80-11a
immobilized antigen
KD [nM]
kon [M–1 s–1 × 105]
koff [s–1 × 10–3]
mAb 3E9-11 (OPA EC50: 31 ng/mL)
1RU-CRM197 (1-CRM197)
ND
ND
ND
2RU-CRM197 (2-CRM197)
752.1 ± 22.7
1.38 ± 0.68
140 ± 72
3RU-CRM197 (3-CRM197)
295.4 ± 79
1.78 ± 0.37
44 ± 2.4
15RU-CRM197
3.6 ± 0.85
23.44 ± 8.1
8.7 ± 3.7
FS1-CRM197 (4-CRM197)
ND
ND
ND
FS2-CRM197 (53-CRM197)
ND
ND
ND
mAb 71-8 (OPA EC50: 22 ng/mL)
1RU-CRM197 (1-CRM197)
ND
ND
ND
2RU-CRM197 (2-CRM197)
387.4 ± 153.4
0.66 ± 0.39
31.3 ± 20.8
3RU-CRM197 (3-CRM197)
385.3 ± 39.2
0.98 ± 0.68
36.5 ± 21.2
15RU-CRM197
41.8 ± 19.5
5.42 ± 0.76
36.2 ± 31.1
FS1-CRM197 (4-CRM197)
67.1 ± 8.2
10.2 ± 2.7
67.9 ± 18.7
FS2-CRM197 (53-CRM197)
166.5 ± 53.3
5.31 ± 3
73.4 ± 26.1
mAb 80-11 (OPA EC50: 17 ng/mL)
1RU-CRM197 (1-CRM197)
94.2 ± 38
0.1 ± 0.03
0.7 ± 0.1
2RU-CRM197 (2-CRM197)
41 ± 0.7
0.3 ± 0
1.4 ± 0
3RU-CRM197 (3-CRM197)
29.1 ± 4.2
0.4 ± 0.1
1.2 ± 0
15RU-CRM197
35.3 ± 2.6
0.4 ± 0
1.3 ± 0
FS1-CRM197 (4-CRM197)
30.5 ± 7.7
1.3 ± 0.5
3.5 ± 0.4
FS2-CRM197 (53-CRM197)
20.7 ± 0.2
1.2 ± 0.1
2.4 ± 0.1
Rate constants for the antibodies
are the averages of 2–4 independent experiments with standard
deviations. Functional (EC50) potencies in OPA with strain
PFEEC0068 are indicated. KD, equilibrium
dissociation constants; kon, association
rate constants; koff, dissociation rate
constants; ND, no detectable binding. Representative sensorgrams are
shown in Figure S3 in the Supporting Information.
Rate constants for the antibodies
are the averages of 2–4 independent experiments with standard
deviations. Functional (EC50) potencies in OPA with strain
PFEEC0068 are indicated. KD, equilibrium
dissociation constants; kon, association
rate constants; koff, dissociation rate
constants; ND, no detectable binding. Representative sensorgrams are
shown in Figure S3 in the Supporting Information.
Conclusions
A vaccine against ExPEC, which includes
the important member E. coli O25B,
is urgently needed. Previous experimental
vaccination approaches included glycoconjugates with natural O-antigens attached to a carrier protein[30,76] or outer membrane vesicles.[77] While these
approaches can elicit protective immunity, chemically defined antigens
may help to improve immunogenicity and safety. Moreover, the isolated
O25B polysaccharide was shown to be only weakly immunogenic, suggesting
that the isolated O-antigen may not be suitable for
a human vaccine.[50] In the present study,
we aimed to overcome these limitations by evaluating vaccine candidates
based on highly pure and defined glycan antigens obtained by chemical
synthesis. An initial set of five oligosaccharide antigens from E. coli O25B were successfully synthesized, three
pentasaccharides [1RU (1), FS1 (4), and
FS2 (53)], one decasaccharide (2RU; 2),
and one pentadecasaccharide (3RU; 3). Using these oligosaccharides,
we successfully generated five semisynthetic vaccine candidates via conjugation to the CRM197 carrier protein.
Results from the immunogenicity studies in CD-1 mice demonstrated
that three of the five semisynthetic O25B O-antigen
CRM197 conjugates elicited levels of antigen-specific IgG
or functional OPA activity that were not significantly different from
the comparator native O25B O-antigen CRM197 conjugate. Of note, the native polysaccharide, in contrast to the
synthetic antigens, contained the core oligosaccharide. LPS cores
are known to be able to elicit an immune response.[78−81] However, in the present study,
the core oligosaccharide likely did not contribute to functional immunogenicity
as antibody binding epitopes may be poorly exposed on the surface
of clinical strains expressing O-antigens, as confirmed
by flow cytometry experiments with a core-specific mAb (Figure S4 in the Supporting Information). This
is in agreement with a previous study showing that antibodies against
the core oligosaccharide cannot penetrate the O-antigen and capsular
polysaccharide layers of Gram-negative bacteria.[80,82,83] There was a trend of increased immunogenicity
from the larger oligosaccharides, specifically as measured in OPA.
The most immunogenic of the semisynthetic conjugates were the 2RU
(2-CRM197), 3RU (3-CRM197), and single repeat unit FS2 (53-CRM197)
conjugates. In comparison, the 1RU (1-CRM197) and FS1 (4-CRM197) variants trended toward
lower IgG responses and generated lower OPA activity at PD2 and PD3
time points with both serotype O25B OPA reporter strains, without
or with a capsule. For the semisynthetic constructs, higher repeat
numbers of 2RU (2-CRM197) and 3RU (3-CRM197) were associated with higher IgG titers at PD2
and PD3, which translated into improved functional OPA titers by PD3
compared with single repeat unit constructs 1RU (1-CRM197), FS1 (4-CRM197), and FS2 (53-CRM197). Similar observations were made previously
for a Salmonella O-antigen for which two or three
RUs resulted in better protection from challenge compared to one RU.[84] The immunogenicity data and the binding studies
of the three monoclonal antibodies indicate that an antigen of FS1
or FS2 with two or three repeat units has great potential to yield
an even superior IgG response. This warrants further immunization
experiments with additional semisynthetic vaccine candidates. While
glycan-specific IgGs were induced by all vaccine candidates, we did
not detect significant amounts of linker-specific antibodies. Thus,
the conjugation strategy proved suitable for the O25B glycan antigens.
Kinetic binding studies with three functional mAbs revealed that the
immune system is able to mount nanomolar KD antibody responses to O25B (Table ), in contrast to the prevailing notion that antiglycan
antibodies are typically weak binders.[85,86] However, it
has been demonstrated previously that glycoconjugate vaccines are
able to elicit nanomolar-affine antibodies.[74,87,88] The epitopes recognized by the mAbs, despite
comparable functional activity, differed in that 3E9-11 required two
repeating units to bind (suggesting an epitope larger than a pentasaccharide),
whereas 71-8 also bound to the two pentasaccharides FS1 (4) and FS2 (53) and 80-11 bound to all tested antigens
(suggesting epitopes smaller than a pentasaccharide). Of note, 71-8
showed lower KD values for FS1 antigen
(4) than for all other synthetic antigens. Thus, both
the size (number of repeating units) and frameshift can influence
the binding strength of anti-O25B antibodies. The immunological importance
of the frameshift is also reflected in the superior immunogenicity
of the FS1 (4) and FS2 (53) antigens compared
to that of 1RU (1) (Figure ). Pure antigens with defined frameshift
and nonreducing end terminal monosaccharide can be procured by chemical
synthesis but not through the isolation of heterogeneous polysaccharides.
An open question that remains is the impact of acetyl groups on the
immunogenicity of the synthetic antigens. Previous studies have found
that O-acetylation had an impact on the immunogenicity
of isolated meningococcal and Salmonella typhi vaccines, whereas in contrast for others such as the semisynthetic Shigella vaccines, no effect of acetylation was observed.[89−93] We found that both acetylated (1 through 4) and the nonacetylated antigen 53 elicited IgG responses
with functional activity against E. coli, suggesting that for this particular antigen, acetyl groups may
have a limited effect on immunogenicity. Overall, the binding studies
with the mAbs suggest that an O25B glycoconjugate vaccine elicits
IgGs characterized by heterogeneous epitope recognition patterns.
Moreover, antibodies elicited in mice by the 2RU (2)
and 3RU (3) antigens overall bound more efficiently to
native O-antigen and showed higher in vitro activity against E. coli than antibodies
raised with 1RU (1) (Figures and 4). This supports
that the larger antigens provide more diverse IgG responses due to
the availability of additional epitopes. Therefore, reverse engineering
approaches to identify glycan epitopes for vaccine development that
rely on a single mAb[52] may miss important
protective epitopes. In summary, our study demonstrates the potential
of semisynthetic glycoconjugate vaccines against E.
coli O25B, which is an important, clinically relevant
member of the ExPEC group.
Experimental Section
O-Antigen Purification and Conjugation to CRM197
The fermentation broth was treated with acetic
acid to a final concentration of 1–2% (final pH of 4.1). The
extraction of O-antigen and delipidation were achieved
by heating the acid-treated broth to 100 °C for 2 h. After acid
hydrolysis, the batch was cooled to an ambient temperature and 14%
NH4OH was added to a final pH of 6.1. The neutralized broth
was centrifuged, and the centrate was collected. To the centrate was
added 5 M CaCl2 stock solution in sodium phosphate to the
final CaCl2 concentration of 0.1–0.2 M, and the
resulting slurry was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The
solids were removed by centrifugation, and the centrate was concentrated
10- to 12-fold using a 10 kDa MWCO Sartocon Hydrostart membrane from
Sartorius, followed by two diafiltrations against 20 mM citrate pH
6.0 and water, respectively, with 10 diavolumes for each diafiltration.
The retentate, which contained the O-antigen, was
then purified using a carbon filter (3 M CUNO R32SP). The carbon filtrate
was diluted 1:1 (v/v) with 4.0 M ammonium sulfate. The final ammonium
sulfate concentration was 2 M. The ammonium sulfate-treated carbon
filtrate was further purified using a Sartobind Phenyl membrane (Sartorius)
at a loading capacity of 55 mg of O-antigen per mL
of membrane volume with 2 M ammonium sulfate as the running buffer.
The O-antigen was collected in the flow through.
The HIC filtrate was concentrated to the desired concentration level
and then buffer-exchanged against water (20 diavolumes) using a 2
kDa MWCO Sartocon Hydrostart membrane (Sartorius). For single-end
directional coupling, the O-antigen went through
activation/reduction via a linker, dithiopropionic dihydrazide, to
insert an amine thiol group at the KDO carbonyl present at the polysaccharide
reducing end. The activated O-antigen polysaccharide
was then conjugated to Bromo-CRM197.
Preparation of CRM197 Glycoconjugates and Quantification
of Protein and Endotoxin
The oligosaccharide antigens (1, 2 mg; 2, 3.4 mg; 3, 4.8 mg; 4, 1.9 mg; 53, 3 mg) were dissolved in DMSO,
and 35 equiv of Et3N was added. In a separate tube, 20
equiv of di-N-succinimidyl adipate was dissolved
in DMSO and then added to the antigen solution. The reaction mixture
was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The resulting monoester was
precipitated with EtOAc, centrifuged, and washed with EtOAc. The remaining
EtOAc was removed by lyophilization to obtain a white solid. The solid
monoester was dissolved in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7, and
about 30 equiv was added to the CRM197 protein (Pfizer)
dissolved in the same buffer. The reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature for 21 h. Then, the reaction mixture was washed twice
with 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7, and three times with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS), pH 7.4, using Amicon Ultra-4 centrifugal filters with
10 kDa MWCO (Merck Millipore, cat. no. UFC801096). Finally, the conjugates
were sterile-filtered using Ultrafree-CL 0.22 μm centrifugal
filters (Merck Millipore, cat. no. UFC40GV0S). The protein concentrations
were determined using the QuantiPro BCA Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich,
cat. no. QPBCA-1KT) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Endotoxin concentrations were determined using the LAL Chromogenic
Endotoxin Quantitation Kit (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 12117850)
according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. This yielded
the following values for endotoxin units per microgram protein (EU/μg): 1-CRM197, 0.006 EU/μg; 2-CRM197, 0.005 EU/μg; 3-CRM197, 0.003
EU/μg; 4-CRM197, 0.007 EU/μg;
and 53-CRM197, 0.008 EU/μg. The CRM197 glycoconjugate of natural O-antigen (single-end
conjugation) was prepared as previously described.[29]
SDS-PAGE
Protein samples were diluted in Laemmli loading
buffer (VWR Life Science, cat. no. M337–25ML) and heated at
95 °C for 5 min. An amount of 2.5 μg protein per well was
loaded per lane of a 10% Mini-PROTEAN TGX precast protein gel (Bio-Rad,
cat. no. 4561033). ROTI Mark TRICOLOR XTRA (cat. no. 2244.1) was used
as a protein size marker (5 μL per lane). The gel was run for
approx. 45 min at 200 V in tris–glycine buffer with 0.1% (w/v)
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), stained with GelCode Blue Safe Protein
Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 1860957), and destained
with deionized water.
Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC)
CRM197 conjugates were analyzed by SEC to quantify mass differences to
the unconjugated CRM197 protein. The samples were diluted
in 50 mM tris, 20 mM NaCl, pH 7.2, and run on a Thermo Scientific
Dionex UltiMate 3000 RS HPLC system fitted with a Tosoh TSK G2000
column (SWxl, 7.8 mm × 30 cm, 5 μm) and a Tosoh TSK gel
Guard column (SWxl 6.0 mm × 4 cm, 7 μm). The flow rate
was 1 mL per min.
MALDI-TOF MS
Mass spectra were acquired with an Autoflex
Speed MALDI-TOF system (Bruker Daltonics). Samples were spotted using
the dried droplet technique with sinapic acid as a matrix on MTP 384
ground steel target plates (Bruker Daltonics). The mass spectrometer
was operated in a linear positive mode. Mass spectra were acquired
over an m/z range from 30,000 to
210,000, and data were analyzed with FlexAnalysis software provided
with the instrument.
Mouse Immunization Studies
Female CD-1 mice (6–8
weeks old upon arrival) obtained from Charles River Lab were dosed
at 7–9 weeks old. Vaccination was administered by the subcutaneous
route with mice given either 2 μg of conjugate by glycan weight
or PBS as a control at weeks 0, 5, and 13. Animals were bled (submandibular)
at weeks 0 and 7 and exsanguinated at week 14. Endotoxin level requirements
stipulated that all antigens were below 0.1 EU per dose per animal
(below 0.05 EU per μg). All semisynthetic and native O25B conjugates
met this criterion. Eight groups of 25 female CD-1 mice were vaccinated
with semisynthetic conjugates, a native polysaccharide CRM197 conjugate, native O25B O-antigen, or PBS control.
Based on the power analysis of OPA and IgG titers at postdose 3 from
a previous O25B immunogenicity study (unpublished), it was determined
that 25 mice per group would allow for the detection of up to a 7-fold
significant difference between groups (two-tailed test, α =
0.05, power > 0.8). Animal studies were conducted according to
the
Pfizer local and global Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
(IACUC) guidelines at an Association for Assessment and Accreditation
of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC).
O25B O-Antigen-Specific Direct Binding Luminex
IgG Assay
Native O25B O-antigen was produced
in-house by early bioprocess development (Pfizer). The native O-antigen differs from the synthetic oligosaccharides by
the presence of terminal inner and outer R1 core oligosaccharides
that remain attached to the O-antigen following cleavage
from LPS by acetic acid during the bioprocessing of E. coli strains. These core oligosaccharides are
not expected to contribute to antigen functional immunogenicity, as
antibody binding epitopes are not exposed on the surface of clinical
strains expressing O-antigens (Figure S4 in the Supporting Information). The native polysaccharide
was covalently conjugated to poly-l-lysine with CDAP, and
the derived poly-l-lysine conjugate was covalently coupled
to Luminex magnetic carboxy bead microspheres with EDC/NHS. Beads
were incubated with serially diluted individual mouse sera or control
mAbs with shaking at 4 °C for 18 h. After washing, bound serotype-specific
IgG was detected with a PE-conjugated goat antimouse total IgG mouse
secondary antibody (90 min rt incubation). Microplates were read on
a FlexMap 3D instrument (Bio-Rad). A serotype-specific mouse IgG mAb
(Eco 80-11, generated in-house) was used as an internal standard to
quantify IgG levels. A standard curve plot for the mAb titration yielded
a linear slope profile across a 103-range of serum dilutions
(log luminescence vs log serum dilution). A lower limit of quantitation
(LLOQ) of 0.153 μg per mL was calculated from standard curve
bias across multiple experiments.
Clinical E. coli invasive
blood isolates were obtained from the Pfizer-sponsored Antimicrobial
Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) collection, which is maintained
by the International Health Management Associates (IHMA) clinical
lab. Strains were genotypically characterized by whole genome sequencing
(WGS) using the Illumina Miseq platform, including in silico serotyping for the prediction of O-antigen and
K-capsule types, and multilocus sequence type (MLST). Expression of
the O25B O-antigen on the bacterial surface was confirmed
by flow cytometry using rabbit antisera to the RAC/DMSO long-chain
lattice conjugate as the primary detection antibody. Growth of strains
in LB media resulted in high levels of K-capsule expression by encapsulated
strains that masked the detection of underlying O-antigens. Presence of group II K-capsule was diagnosed by the increased
detection of O25B O-antigen following 60 °C
heat treatment. The presence of K5 heparosan capsule was inferred
from an increase in O-antigen detection following
heparinase treatment. Two serotype O25B ST131 strains were selected
for OPA development: PFEEC0068, an unencapsulated isolate resistant
to carbapenem and fluoroquinolone antibiotics; and PFEEC0066, an encapsulated
O25B:K5 isolate resistant to penicillin and fluoroquinolone antibiotics
that is hypervirulent in mouse lethal challenge models. Prefrozen
bacterial stocks were prepared by growing bacteria in DMEM media to
an OD600 of between 0.5 and 1.0, and glycerol was added
to a final concentration of 20% prior to freezing. For the unencapsulated
O25B:K- strain, pretitered thawed bacteria were diluted to 1 ×105 CFU per mL in OPA buffer (Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (Life
Technologies), 0.1% gelatin, 1 mM MgCl2, 2.5mM CaCl2) and 20 μL (103 CFU) of the bacterial suspension
was opsonized with 10 μL of serially diluted sera for 30 min
at RT in a 384-well tissue culture microplate. Subsequently, 10 μL
of 2.5% complement (Baby Rabbit Serum, Pel-Freez) and 10 μL
of HL60 cells (at 200:1 ratio) were added to each well, and the mixture
was shaken at 2000 rpm for 45–60 min at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 incubator. For the encapsulated O25B:K5 strain, bacteria
were directly combined with complement and HL60 cells without the
preopsonization step and shaken at 2000 rpm for 60 min at 37 °C
under 5% CO2. In this case, 4% baby rabbit complement and
HL60 cells at a 100:1 ratio were used. After the incubation, 10 μL
of each 50 μL reaction was transferred into the corresponding
wells of a prewetted 384-well Millipore MultiScreen HTS HV filter
plate containing 50 μL of water. After vacuum-filtering the
liquid, 50 μL of 50% DMEM was applied and filtered and plate-incubated
overnight at 37 °C in a sealed zip-lock bag. The next day, the
colonies were enumerated after staining with Coomassie dye using an
ImmunoSpot analyzer and ImmunoCapture software. To establish the specificity
of OPA activity, immune sera were preincubated with 20 μg per
mL of the homologous serotype purified O-antigen prior to the opsonization
step. The OPA assay includes control reactions without HL60 cells
or complement to demonstrate the dependence of any observed killing
on these components. Individual serum OPA titers were calculated using
variable slope curve fitting (Microsoft Excel). Combined data were
plotted using GraphPad Prism to generate GMTs and associated p values for significance (one-way ANOVA with log-transformed
data).
ELISA for Spacer-Specific IgG
Conjugates with the BSA
protein and various monosaccharides with different linker moieties
(α-glucose-C2-NH2, β-glucose-C2-NH2, β-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)-C2-NH2, β-glucose-C5-NH2, and β-GlcNAc-ethylene
glycol-NH2 [structures, see Figure S1]) were prepared. Briefly, the monosaccharides were activated
using a 5-fold molar excess of bis(4-nitrophenyl) adipate in DMSO
in the presence of triethylamine for 3 h at room temperature. The
reaction mixture was frozen using liquid nitrogen and lyophilized
for 20 h. The solid crude product was washed three times with chloroform.
The washed reaction product (45 equiv) was then reacted with BSA in
100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7. The reaction mixture was stirred
at room temperature for about 20 h. Then, the reaction mixture was
washed twice with 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7, and three
times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, using Amicon Ultra-4
centrifugal filters with 10 kDa MWCO (Merck Millipore, cat. no. UFC801096).
Finally, the conjugates were sterile-filtered using Ultrafree-CL 0.22
μm filters (Merck Millipore, cat. no. UFC40GV0S). The protein
concentrations were determined using the QuantiPro BCA Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich,
cat. no. QPBCA-1KT) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Monosaccharide-to-protein ratios (loading factors) were determined
using MALDI-TOF MS analysis, as described above. The resulting BSA
conjugates were coated on ELISA plates at 2 μg glycan per well
in PBS at 4 °C overnight. The plates were then blocked with 5%
(w/v) skim milk powder in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Pooled
antisera (n = 25 mice) of the postdose 3 time points were diluted
in 5% (w/v) skim milk powder in PBS and incubated on the ELISA plates
for 1 h at room temperature. As a positive control for spacer-reactive
antibodies, we used an in-house generated pool of antisera generated
with an oligosaccharide–CRM197 conjugate in BALB/c
mice with a strong reactivity to the spacer moiety comprising a C5
linker (not shown). The secondary antibody was goat antimouse IgG-HRP
(Dianova, cat. no. 115-035-164) used in a 1:10,000 dilution and was
incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The plates were then incubated
with a 1-Step Ultra TMB-ELISA Substrate Solution (Thermo Scientific,
cat. no. 34028) for approx. 15 min at room temperature. Then, the
reaction was stopped with 2 M H2SO4 and absorbance
at 450 nm was determined in a 96-well plate reader. Data were visualized
with the GraphPad Prism software, version 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software).
Kinetic Measurements of Monoclonal Antibodies
Kinetic
measurements were performed on a Biacore T200 instrument at 30 °C
with HEPES-buffered saline buffer containing 3 mM EDTA and 0.05% (v/v)
P20 (HBS-EP) running buffer. E. coliO-antigen O25B CRM197 conjugate ligands
were immobilized on a series S sensor chip CM5 at about 50 resonance
units per flow channel. A reference surface functionalized with ethanolamine
was prepared as a negative control. Multicycle kinetics was performed
with an antibody analyte dilution series starting at 1000, 200, or
50 nM along with no analyte as reference. Analyte dilutions were passed
over ligand for 2 min at 50 μL per min flow rate followed by
a 10 min dissociation step. For successful regeneration between cycles,
an ionic cocktail was used.[94] Biacore T200
evaluation software version 3.1 generated double reference subtracted
sensorgrams before applying a 1:1 fit for all tested O25B ligand–antibody
combinations.
Authors: Valéria Szijártó; Luis M Guachalla; Zehra C Visram; Katharina Hartl; Cecília Varga; Irina Mirkina; Jakub Zmajkovic; Adriana Badarau; Gerhild Zauner; Clara Pleban; Zoltán Magyarics; Eszter Nagy; Gábor Nagy Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Germie P J M van den Dobbelsteen; Kellen C Faé; Jan Serroyen; Ingrid M van den Nieuwenhof; Martin Braun; Micha A Haeuptle; Dominique Sirena; Joerg Schneider; Cristina Alaimo; Gerd Lipowsky; Veronica Gambillara-Fonck; Michael Wacker; Jan T Poolman Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Laurent Chorro; Zhenghui Li; Ling Chu; Suddham Singh; Jianxin Gu; Jin-Hwan Kim; Kaushik Dutta; Rosalind Pan; Srinivas Kodali; Duston Ndreu; Axay Patel; Julio C Hawkins; Chris Ponce; Natalie Silmon de Monerri; David Keeney; Arthur Illenberger; C Hal Jones; Lubomira Andrew; Jason Lotvin; A Krishna Prasad; Isis Kanevsky; Kathrin U Jansen; Annaliesa S Anderson; Robert G K Donald Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Minh-Duy Phan; Kate M Peters; Sohinee Sarkar; Samuel W Lukowski; Luke P Allsopp; Danilo Gomes Moriel; Maud E S Achard; Makrina Totsika; Vikki M Marshall; Mathew Upton; Scott A Beatson; Mark A Schembri Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 5.917