| Literature DB >> 36185609 |
Junying Song1,2,3, Baoqiang Song2, Lijun Yuan4, Guodong Yang1,4.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), of which exosomes are a representative subgroup, are naturally secreted nanoparticles with a variety of payloads. With the intrinsic merits of stability, biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and large capacity, EVs are widely regarded as effective carriers of drug delivery. However, disadvantages, such as low yield, complicated isolation procedures, and low loading efficiency, hinder its clinical translation. In this review, we systematically summarize the advances in EV (especially exosomes) engineering for clinical application, focusing on strategies toward high yield, facile isolation, efficient cargo loading, improved delivery, and optimized manufacturing, which might unleash the infinite power of EVs in clinical translation. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: cargo loading; clinical translation; delivery; extracellular vesicles; isolation; manufacturing; yield
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36185609 PMCID: PMC9516239 DOI: 10.7150/thno.75899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.600
Figure 1Building blocks for clinical translation of EVs. Successful application requires an integrated platform, incorporating methodologies for high yield, facile isolation, efficient cargo loading, and improved delivery. Based on diverse disease patterns, we could customize a concrete schedule for each patient to achieve personalized treatment. EV, extracellular vesicle; PEG, polyethylene glycol.
Figure 2Bioinspired strategies for increasing EV yield. (A) Specific physical stimulations are feasible to raise the output of EVs. (B) The addition of drugs is a general form of chemical strategy in mass production by impacting different phases of EV biogenesis. (C) Altering the expression of specific genes leads to an increase in yield through genetic engineering. Exosome boosters are effective targets to be manipulated. (D) Several alternative means can be utilized to provide reliable resources. PSiNPs, porous silicon nanoparticles.
Derivations of EVs and their applications
| Derivation | Merits | Drawbacks | Application Scenarios | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Differentiated cells from induced pluripotent stem cells | -Artificial induction with selectivity | -Underlying genetic defects | -Treatment of heart failure and myocardial infarction | |
| Cancer Cells | -Characteristic biomarkers and bioactive molecules | -Limited protein profiling for derived EVs | -Biomarkers for diagnosis | |
|
| ||||
| HEK293T/AML12/RAW264.7 | -Guaranteed source | -May contain carcinogenic ingredients | -Therapeutic effect |
|
|
| ||||
| Dendritic cell | -Alter the properties under feasible stimulus (antigens/cytokines), | -Heterogeneity in different stages (deficiency of MHC-II and CD86 in immature stage) | -Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy | |
| Neutrophil | -Tumor-targeting ability | -Latent pathogenicity | -Suppress tumor growth | |
| Macrophages | -Intrinsic inflammatory chemotaxis | -Heterogeneity in functions and phenotypes of different sources | -Alleviate rheumatoid arthritis | |
|
| ||||
| Plasma | -Accessibility | -Difficulty in precise separation | -Alleviate spontaneous hypertension | |
| Red blood cells | -Biosafety (devoid of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA) | -Underlying side effect | -Therapy for Parkinson's disease | |
| Platelet | -Tumor-homing property | -Heterogeneity among donors | -Chemo-dynamic/Photothermal therapy for cancer | |
|
| ||||
| Microglia | -Rich in trophic factors | -Difficulty in cell acquisition | -Prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury | |
| Astrocytes | -Most abundant neuroglial cells | As above | -Mitigate neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease |
|
|
| ||||
| Brown adipose tissue | -Promote energy metabolism | -Limited supplement (primarily in infants or neonatal mammals) | -Anti-obesity |
|
| White (visceral) adipose tissue | -Ability to cross the placenta | -Relatively finite sources | -Related to fetal cardiac dysfunction | |
|
| ||||
| Classification as below | -Self-renewal capacity | -Safety concerns between donor and recipient | Varying from cell types as below | |
| Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells | -Various bio-signal molecules | -Discrepancy in clinical trials | -Tissue engineering | |
| Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells | -Phenotypes change under stimuli | -Relatively limited source | -Treatment of spinal cord injury | |
| Adipose-derived stem cells | -Contain Various cytokines | -Heterogeneity in methods of administration | -Remodel inflammatory microenvironment |
Summary of the isolation methods for EVs
| Isolation methods | Operating principles | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Differential centrifugation | Adjust centrifugal force via altering RPM; suspension or sediment in line with density | Widely applied and relatively standardized protocols; volume production; low cost of extraction in the condition of existing instruments | High expense of stationary instruments; cost of time and manpower; protein aggregation |
| Gradient ultracentrifugation | Form density gradient through medium; constituents with various densities lie in different positions | Highly purified; handle easily with protocols | High cost of stationary equipment; time-consuming; low productivity; latent changes under mechanical force |
| Size-exclusion chromatography | Sieve pores through crosslinking of polymers; separation on the basis of sizes | High purity; maintenance of original structure; applicable to various derivations | Relatively high expense of devices; requirement of extra procedures |
| Ultrafiltration | Filter through membranes of different apertures; isolation in dependence on the sizes | Great portability without costly equipment; fast operation; capable of mass production | Moderate purity; membrane obstructions and trapping; potential destructive effects of shear stress |
| Extrusion | Utilize extruder and designed membranes; sized-based technique | Fast preparation; high yield | Additional operations of ultracentrifugation; output as exosome-mimetics |
| Precipitation | Harness water-excluding polymers to remodel the solubility | Scalability; simple and practicable | Coprecipitation with proteins and polymers harming purity; requisite procedures of clean-up; contaminants may interfere downstream analysis |
| Immunoaffinity | High affinity between immobilized antibodies (ligands) and exosomal receptors | Highly specificity; high purity; lessened contaminants | High cost of antibodies; narrow scope of application (cell-free samples with distinct markers); elution step may impair the original states |
| Microfluidics-based method | Construct microfluidic channel systems to filter EVs; established on different principles including size, density and immunoaffinity | Focus of research with tremendous room for upgradation; high recovery rate; achievable automatic operating system; portability; development of biochips boosts this technique | Low sample capacity; require standardization of operational procedures |
| Commercial kits | Multiple product types based on the above-mentioned principles | Portability without stationary apparatus; apt to commercialization; cost-effective in the absence of stationary instruments | Low purity; different efficiencies of disparate products; relatively expensive in specific circumstances |
Figure 3Strategies for cargo loading into EVs. Mechanisms and techniques for cargo loading into EVs are diverse. Preloading and post-loading are two main patterns. (A) Preloading is related to the sorting mechanism during biogenesis. Transfection is a frequently-used technology to increase the content level. Post-loading relies on the development of methods including (B) electroporation, (C) sonication, (D) incubation, (E) click chemistry, (F) membrane fusion. Different methods exhibit advantages towards different cargoes, providing cues for patient-centered clinical application. hnRNPA2B1, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2B1; MVB, multivesicular body; FMR1, fragile X mental retardation 1; YBX1, Y-box protein 1; EXPLOR, exosomes for protein loading via optically reversible protein-protein interaction; CRY2, cryptochrome 2; CIBN, a truncated version of CIB1; GFP, green fluorescent protein; PTX, paclitaxel; Er, Erastin; RB, Rose Bengal; EV, extracellular vesicle.
Mechanisms of targeting in EVs
| Ligand | Mechanisms | Derivation of EVs | Receptor | Recipient cell/Organ | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Muscle-targeting peptide | Conjugated with CD63 through CP05 | Murine myotubes | NA | Muscle |
|
| Neuron-specific rabies viral glycoprotein peptide (YTIWMPENPRPGTPCDIFTNSRGKRASNG) | Fused to Lamp2b | Dendritic cells | Acetylcholine receptor | Brain |
|
| αv integrin-specific iRGD peptide (CRGDKGPDC) | Fused to Lamp2b | Immature dendritic cells | αv integrin | Tumor tissues (MDA-MB-231 tumor) |
|
| Ischemic myocardium-targeting peptide (CSTSMLKAC) | Fused to Lamp2b | Mesenchymal stem cell | NA | Ischemic myocardium |
|
| Cardiac-targeting peptide (APWHLSSQYSRT) | Fused to Lamp2b | HEK 293 cells | NA | Heart |
|
| Cardiac homing peptide (CSTSMLKAC) | Conjugated with exosomes through a DOPE-NHS linker | Cardiosphere-derived stem cells | NA | Infarcted heart |
|
| Cyclo(Arg-Gly-Asp-D-Tyr-Lys) peptide | Click chemistry | Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell | Integrin αvβ3 | Reactive cerebral vascular endothelial cells of ischemic brain |
|
| Adipocyte-targeting sequence (CKGGRAKDC) | Fused to Lamp2b | HEK293T | Prohibitin | Adipocyte |
|
|
| |||||
| A33 antibody | Antigen-antibody reaction | LIM1215 cells | A33 antigen | Colon cancer cells |
|
| Anti-CD3 | Connected with exosome through DSPE-PEG-NHS linker | Tumor antigen-stimulated dendritic cells | CD3 | T cells |
|
| Anti-EGFR | As above | As above | EGFR | B16-OVA cancer cells | As above |
|
| |||||
| Her2 binding affibody (VDNKFNKEMRNAYWEIALLPNLNNQQKRAFIRSLYDDPSQSANLLAEAKKLNDAQAPK) | Fused to the extra-exosomal N terminus of human Lamp2 | HEK293T cells | Her2 | 5-FU-resistant HCT-116 colon cancer cells |
|
|
| |||||
| Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC)-specific aptamer (5′-ACGACGGTGATATGTCAAGGTCGTATGCACGAGTCAGAGG-3′) | Schiff base reaction | Bone marrow stromal cell | NA | BMSC |
|
| E3 aptamer | Thiol-maleimide cross-linking reaction | HEK293T cells | NA | Prostate cancer cells |
|
|
| |||||
| IL-3 | Fused to Lamb2b | HEK293T cells | IL3 receptor | Chronic myelogenous leukemia cells |
|
|
| |||||
| CD44 | Intrinsic inflammation-tropism capability | M2 macrophage | E-selectin | Inflammatory endothelial cells |
|
| VLA4 | As above | As above | VCAM1 | As above | As above |
| LFA1 | As above | As above | ICAM1 | As above | As above |
|
| |||||
| Aminoethylanisamide | Incorporation of AA-PEG vector moiety | Primary bone-marrow derived macrophages | Sigma receptor | Lung cancer cells |
|
| Apo-A1 | Fused to CD63 | HEK293T cells | SR-B1 | HepG2 cells |
|
| Dextran sulfate | Click chemistry | Adipose-derived stem cells | SR-A | Activated macrophages in inflamed joints |
|
| Integrin β4 | Overexpression of integrin β4 | Breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) | Surfactant protein C | Non-small cell lung cancer cells |
|
| Folic acid | Attached folic acid covalently | Colostrum powder | Folate | Lung cancer cell line A549 |
|
CD, cluster of differentiation; Lamp2b, Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2b; DOPE-NHS, dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine N-hydroxysuccinimide; DSPE-PEG-NHS, phospholipid-polyethylene glycol-succinimide; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; Her2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; BMSC, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell; IL-3, interleukin 3; VLA4, very late antigen 4; VCAM1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; LFA1, lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1; ICAM1, endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule 1; AA-PEG, aminoethylanisamide-polyethylene glycol; SR-B1, scavenger receptor class B type 1; SR-A, scavenger receptor class A; NA, not available.
Figure 4Targeted delivery of EVs mediated by targeting moiety engineering. Engineered EVs possess the ability to target specific organs and lesion sites, contributing to bioeffect optimization. The modes of functionalization include peptide, antibody, aptamer, and chemical substances. Specific modifications can selectively act on damaged or diseased tissues. BMSC, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell.
Figure 5Manufacturing, characterization, and subsequent clinical translation. (A) Refinement in manufacturing is the focus of future research, covering a broad range of aspects from cell culture to storage. Multiple parameters such as temperature and additives have been identified to maintain the biological features of EVs. (B) Characterization enables precise evaluation of EVs and substantially expedites the progress of clinical translation. Pathogen and residue detections are approaches to examining purity and biosafety. The quality control of EV includes particle number, single EV, and components analysis using advanced techniques. UC, ultracentrifugation; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Representative clinical trials of EVs
| Trial identifier | Source (product name) | Modifications | Study aim | Recruitment status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT04652531 | Autologous Serum | -Unmodified | Treatment for venous trophic lesions | Recruiting |
| NCT05499156 | Human placenta MSC | -Unmodified | Safety evaluation of EVs for treating perianal fistula in patients with Crohn's disease | Active, not recruiting |
| NCT04276987 | Allogenic adipose MSC | -Unmodified | Treatment for severe novel coronavirus pneumonia | Completed |
| NCT04202770 | Amniotic fluid | -Delivery aided by focused ultrasound | Therapy of refractory depression, anxiety, and neurodegenerative dementias | Suspended |
| NCT05043181 | Bone marrow MSC | -Loaded with LDL receptor mRNA | Treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT03608631 | Mesenchymal stromal cells | -Loaded with small interference RNA against KrasG12D | Treating metastatic pancreas cancer with KrasG12D mutation | Recruiting |
| NCT01294072 | Plant | -Loaded with curcumin | Delivering curcumin to normal and colon cancer tissue | Recruiting |
| NCT05375604 | HEK 293 cells (exoASO-STAT6) | -Loaded with STAT6-targeting ASOs | Verifying the antitumor effect of exoASO-STAT6 | Recruiting |
| NCT04592484 | HEK 293 cells (ExoSTING) | -Loaded with STING agonist | Treatment for patients with certain solid tumors | Active, not recruiting |
| NCT01159288 | Dendritic cell | -Loaded with tumor antigen | Vaccination for unresectable NSCLC patients | Completed |
MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; STAT6, signal transducer and activator of transcription 6; ASO, antisense oligonucleotide; STING, STimulator of InterferoN Genes; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.