| Literature DB >> 30662554 |
Chenggui Wang1, Min Wang2, Tianzhen Xu1, Xingxing Zhang3, Cai Lin3, Weiyang Gao1, Huazi Xu1, Bo Lei2,4,5, Cong Mao1.
Abstract
Rationale: Chronic nonhealingEntities:
Keywords: bioactive exosomes; diabetic wound healing; multifunctional hydrogel; responsive sustained release
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30662554 PMCID: PMC6332800 DOI: 10.7150/thno.29766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Scheme 1Synthesis of injectable FHE hydrogel with multifunctional properties. (A) Synthesis of oxidized hyaluronic acid (HA); (B) Schiff base reaction between oxidized HA and polypeptide (ε-poly-L-lysine, EPL); (C) Thermal-responsive sol-gel process of double network hydrogel composed of F127-EPL and oxidized HA; (D) Optical pictures showing the sol-gel transition of FHE hydrogel.
Figure 1Physicochemical structure and multifunctional properties of FHE hydrogel. (A) FTIR showing the chemical structure; (B) SEM images exhibiting the porous morphology; (C) Rheological properties exhibiting the G' and G'' of various hydrogels at 4, 25 and 37℃; (D) G' and G'' of various hydrogels when the step strain switched from 1% to 1000% at 37℃; (E) G' recovery ratio of various hydrogel after two cycles of 1000% step strain at 37℃; (F) G' of the initial hydrogel and the hydrogel after healing; (G) Pictures demonstrating the self-healing performance of FHE-5 hydrogels; (H) Photographs showing the injectable ability of FHE5 hydrogel through the catheter; (I) Images presenting the adhesive characteristic to the skin for FHE-5 hydrogel; (J) Schematic illustration of the self-healing process for FHE hydrogel.
Figure 2Characterization of AMSCs and AMSCs-exo. (A) Size distribution of AMSCs-exo; (B) TEM micrograph of AMSCs-exo, scale bar: 200 nm; (C) Western blot analysis of AMSCs-exo markers of Alix, CD63, CD9 and CD81; (D) flow cytometry analysis of AMSCs markers of CD90, CD34, CD44 and CD45; n=3 independent experiments.
Figure 3Exosomes release and HUVECs biocompatibility evaluation (A) Scheme of pH- responsive exosomes release in FHE hydrogel; (B) pH-dependent release profile of loaded exosomes in FHE hydrogel; (C) CCK8 results of HUVECs treated by FHE or FHE@exo hydrogels; (D, E) Transwell migration assay results of HUVECs with different treatments. HUVECs were treated with PBS (control), FHE, exosomes and FHE@exo, and the cell migration of HUVECs was enhanced after exosomes or FHE@exo treatment (scale bar: 50 μm); (F, G) In vitro tube formation results of HUVECs with different treatments. The tube formation ability of HUVECs was improved after exosomes or FHE@exo treatment (scale bar: 200 μm).
Figure 4FHE@Exo hydrogel accelerated wound closure. (A) Representative images of healing process in wounds treated with FHE, exosomes, FHE@exo and control; (B) Wound closure rates of all four groups; (C) H&E staining images of full-thickness wounds on days 7, 14 and 21, arrows indicate newly formed dermal appendages, scale bar: 1000 μm; (D) Quantification of the length of the wound site at day 7; (E) Quantification of the length of the wound area on day 14; (F) Quantification of the number of dermal appendages in the wound area on day 21.
Figure 5Histochemical analysis of collagen I and Ⅲ expression in wounds treated by FHE@exo hydrogel. (A, C) Immunohistochemistry staining images for collagen I and collagen Ⅲ at 7 and 21 days post-wounding, respectively; (B, D) Quantitative analysis of relative density of collagen I and collagen Ⅲ at 7 and 21 days after surgery, respectively; Scale bar: 50 µm.
Figure 6Neovascularization evaluation of wounds treated by FHE@exo hydrogel. (A) Blood vessels stained with α-SMA (red) and DAPI (blue) in wound bed at days 7 postoperative. Scale bar: 20 µm, respectively; (B) Quantitative analysis of vessels pre field at 7 days after surgery corresponding to α-SMA staining.