Literature DB >> 36185535

Effect of estrous cycle phases on gene expression in bovine oviduct epithelial cells.

Ricaurte Lopera-Vásquez1, Fabián Uribe-García2, Iang Rondón-Barragán2.   

Abstract

Background and Aim: The oviduct environment is of particular importance because it is the site of fertilization and early embryo development. The oviduct, as a component of the reproductive system, responds to ovarian hormone (estradiol [E2] and progesterone [P4]) stimuli depending on the estrous cycle phase. This study aimed to elucidate the effect of estrous cycle phases (follicular and early and late luteal phases) on gene expression patterns in bovine oviduct epithelial cells (BOECs). Materials and
Methods: Oviducts were obtained from healthy slaughterhouse animals, corresponding to ipsilateral ovaries with dominant follicles or corpus luteum during early and late luteal phases. BOECs were recovered from the isthmus (IST) and ampulla (AMP), and the expression patterns of genes related to cytokinesis and mitosis mechanisms (rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase and cellular communication network factor 2 [CCN2]), growth factors (insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3, epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], vascular endothelial growth factor A, and EGFR), antioxidant mechanisms (glutathione peroxidase 4 [GPX4]), apoptosis (B-cell lymphoma 2), complement component (C3), energy metabolism (aldose reductase gene family 1-member b1 [AKRIB1] and solute carrier family 2), hormone receptors (estrogen receptor 1 and luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor), and specific glycoproteins (oviductal glycoprotein 1) were analyzed.
Results: High P4 levels (late luteal phase) affected the expression of important genes related to antioxidant mechanisms (GPX4), energy metabolism (AKRIB1), growth factors (IGBP3 and EGFR), and cell growth regulation (CCN2) in the AMP. Low P4 levels (early luteal phase) affected the expression of AKR1B1, IGBP3, and CCN2. In addition, estrogen likely had an effect on OVPGP expression in the cattle oviduct.
Conclusion: Differential gene expression patterns of BOECs in the AMP during the luteal phase (antioxidant mechanisms, energy metabolism, growth factors, and immunological regulators) and in the IST during the follicular phase (glycoproteins) may influence their renewal and population proportions, modulating the oviduct environment as well as gamete and embryo physiology. Copyright: © Lopera-Vásquez, et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bovine oviduct epithelial cells; estrus phase; follicular; gene expression; luteal; oviduct

Year:  2022        PMID: 36185535      PMCID: PMC9394134          DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1665-1675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet World        ISSN: 0972-8988


Introduction

The bovine oviduct is the part of the female reproductive system where fertilization and early embryo development occur, providing an optimum environment for final oocyte maturation, sperm capacitation, sperm storage, and fertilization as well as gamete and embryo transport [1-3]. The oviduct environment is primarily regulated by oviductal epithelial cell (OEC) secretion and plasma components [4]. OECs are crucial for gamete transport, maintenance, preparation, and early embryo development [5]. OECs can be ciliated or secretory (non-ciliated), and they are distributed in the oviduct ampulla (AMP) and isthmus (IST) [6], with the infundibulum and AMP containing the largest proportion of ciliated OECs [7]. Physiologically, hormones in the circulation reach OECs from the basolateral surface and regulate various cell functions [8]. During the estrous cycle, the oviduct is affected by ovarian sex hormones, mainly estrogens and progesterone, which result in morphological and biochemical changes for maintaining an appropriate environment for gamete and embryonic development [9]. The morphological development and ratio of ciliated and secretory OECs are completed during the estrous cycle. During the luteal phase, goat OEC cell height decreases, mainly in the ciliated cells (CCs) of the entire oviduct [10]. The number of CCs increases during the late luteal phase in the infundibulum and AMP and decreases as it approaches the IST [11]. In particular, protein synthesis in the oviduct peaks during the follicular phase due to estrogens [12], including the expression of oviductal glycoprotein 1 (OVGP1) and progesterone receptor [13]. The environment of the bovine oviduct has been studied in vitro and in vivo, enabling the characterization of secreted proteins and their roles in the oviduct environment [14]. Regulatory mechanisms for genomic pathways [15] affect capacitation, fertilization capacity, and early embryo development and competence. Schmaltz-Panneau et al. [16] found variations in OEC gene transcription in developing embryos. Therefore, studying the oviduct environment is crucial for understanding the underlying regulatory mechanisms that influence embryo development [17]. The use of bovine oviduct epithelial cells (BOECs) provides significant advances in the in vitro culture (IVC) systems of bovine embryos [18], with implications for embryo development and competence [19]. These advancements enable the development of further technologies, particularly those related to early embryo development and IVC, and establish the BOEC coculture as an appropriate model for studying the pathways for embryo-maternal communication in bovines [20]. Changes in the activity or abundance of several molecules during the estrous cycle may be crucial for the oviduct environment [21]. These molecules positively affect sperm motility, capacitation, and gamete interaction [22]. Transcriptomic studies detected a relationship between estrous cycle-dependent changes in gene expression levels and morphological changes in BOECs [23, 24]. The gene transcript upregulated in the luteal phase (under progesterone [P4] influence) is associated with the regulation of cell proliferation. In contrast, those upregulated in the follicular phase (under estradiol [E2] influence) are involved in protein modulation [25]. This study aimed to elucidate the differential expression of various BOEC genes during the estrous cycle.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

No ethical approval was required for this study because oviduct samples were recovered from bovine females from the slaughterhouse.

Study period and location

The study was carried out from January to August 2021. Molecular experiments were done in the Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Biology – LIBM of the University of Tolima.

BOEC isolation and preparation

Following slaughter, the female reproductive tract was recovered from healthy animals, and oviducts (ipsilateral) were collected based on ovarian morphology using the criteria described by Ireland et al. [26]. Oviducts were separated from connective tissue, ligated, dissected, and washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before being transported on ice to the laboratory in PBS with 2% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Sigma®, Germany). Before removing the closure in a laminar flow hood, the oviducts were briefly soaked in ethanol and rinsed in PBS. The oviduct was divided into two equal segments (AMP and IST), and each segment was gently squeezed in a stripping motion using a sterile glass slide. The oviduct content (yellowish paste) was washed twice with PBS by centrifugation at 300× g for 10 min [27] and then collected in a vial for RNA extraction. The ovarian structures identified for oviduct classification were as follows: (a) Dominant follicle at the follicular phase; (b) hemorrhagic corpus luteum at the early luteal phase; and (c) total corpus luteum at the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle [26].

Experimental design

Gene expression analyses were performed in the oviduct AMP and IST during the early luteal phase on days 2–6 (hemorrhagic corpus luteum, early), the mid-luteal phase on days 6–17 (functional corpus luteum, late), and the follicular phase on days 17–21 (follicular).

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

For each gene, a set of primers was designed using Geneious Prime v2022.1 (https://www.geneious.com/prime/), according to Kearse et al. [28] (Table-1). Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA Life Technologies; Cat# 15596018) and cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript® IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The relative expression of genes of interest was normalized using glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a reference gene and calculated using the 2-∆∆Ct method [29]. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed using QuantStudio 3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific); the Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, USA) was used. Melting curve analysis was performed to rule out gDNA contamination and non-specific primer annealing.
Table 1

Sequence of primers used for qPCR.

Gene namePrimer sequence (5´- 3´)Amplicon size (bp)GenBank accession no.
ROCK2
 FGCCTTGGAAGAAACGGGGTA191NM_174452.2
 RAGCCTTGGGAATTGGGAAGG
GPX4
 FCAAGCCTGTTGCCTGTGTTC173NM_001346430.1
 RTATTCCCACAAGGCAGCCAG
IGFBP3
 FGTCGGAAGAAGACCACAGCA178NM_174556.1
 RCTGGGTGTCTGTGCTCTGAG
ESR1
 FAGGCAGAGAATTTCCCCAGC175NM_001001443.1
 RGCGAATGAATGGCCATCCAC
VEGFA
 FCAAACCTCACCAAAGCCAGC186NM_001316955.1
 RCGCGAGTCTGTGTTTTTGCA
OVGP1
 FGCTGTCCACGTTTTCCAACC192NM_001080216.1
 RGTGAGCTGGGCCTCATTCTT
C3
 FCACTGTTGACCACAAGCTGC95NM_001040469.2
 RAAGACTTGGAGTCCCGCTTG
EGFR
 FACTCTGATGCTGGGAGGGAT126XM_002696890.5
 RCCTGTCCATCACCAACTCCC
LHCGR
 FGAGAAGATGCACAACGACGC193NM_174381.1
 RAAGTCAGTGTGGCATCCAGG
SLC2A1
 FTGGGAGGCATGATTGGTTCC157NM_174602.2
 RCGACCCAGGATCAGCATCTC
BCL2L2
 FCGTGTGAGGGTGACGTGTAA155NM_001076533.1
 RCACCCATGCAAACAGTGTGG
AKR1B1
 FTAATTTGGCCCGTGTCCCTC163NM_001012519.1
 RTTGCATGTTCCCCAGATCCC
CCN2
 FTCTTCGGAGTGTGCACAGAC134NM_174030.2
 RGTAATGGCAGGCACAGGTCT
GAPDH
 FGGGATGAGGCTCAGAGCAAGAGA118NM_173979.3
 RAGCTCGTTGTAGAAGGTGTGGTGCC

qPCR=Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Sequence of primers used for qPCR. qPCR=Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and normality tests. Gene expression levels were compared among early, late, and follicular phases of the estrous cycle in AMP and IST using a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s test as post hoc. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism software v8.0 for MacOS (Dotmatics; La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The transcript levels of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), aldose reductase gene family 1-member b1 (AKRIB1), cellular communication network factor 2 (CCN2) were significantly higher (p < 0.01), same as insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) levels which were higher in the AMP (p < 0.05) in the late luteal phase (late) than in the follicular phase (follicular), similar to transcript levels patterns of GPX4 and EGFR that were higher in late compared to the early luteal phase (early) (p < 0.05). Oviductal glycoprotein 1 (OVGP1) and complement C3 (C3) were significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the follicular phase than in the late and early phases. The early phase showed a higher AKR1B1 (p < 0.05), and significantly higher IGFBP3, and CCN2 (p < 0.01) expression than the follicular phase, whereas no significant differences in Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK), B-cell lymphoma 2 like 2 (BCL2L2), luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR), solute carrier family 2 (SLC2A1), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) expression (Figure-1) were observed. In the IST, OVGP1 expression was higher in the late phase than in the early and follicular phases (p < 0.05). However, ROCK, GPX4, BCL2L2, AKRIB1, LHCGR, SLC2A1, IGFBP3, VEGFA, EGFR, C3, and CCN2 expression did not differ significantly between phases (Figure-2).
Figure-1

Gene expression patterns of different genes related to cytokinesis and mitosis mechanisms (ROCK, rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase; CCN, Cellular communication network), growth factors (IGFBP3, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A), antioxidants mechanisms (GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4), apoptosis (BCL2, B-cell lymphoma 2), complement component (C3), energetic metabolism (AKRIB1, aldose reductase gene family 1-member b1; SLC2A1, solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1), hormones receptors (ESR, estrogen receptor; LHCGR, luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor), and specific glycoproteins (OVGP, oviduct-specific glycoprotein) on oviduct ampulla, during different estrous cycle phases. Early: Early luteal phase, Late: Mid-luteal phase, Follicular: Follicular phase. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p< 0.01. SEM=Standard error of the mean.

Figure-2

Gene expression patterns of different genes related to cytokinesis and mitosis mechanisms (ROCK, rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase; CCN, Cellular communication network), growth factors (IGFBP3, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A), antioxidants mechanisms (GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4), apoptosis (BCL2, B-cell lymphoma 2), complement component (C3), energetic metabolism (AKRIB1, aldose reductase gene family 1-member b1; SLC2A1, solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1), hormones receptors (ESR, estrogen receptor; LHCGR, luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor), and specific glycoproteins (OVGP, oviduct-specific glycoprotein) on oviduct isthmus, during different estrous cycle phases. Early: Early luteal phase, Late: Mid-luteal phase, Follicular: Follicular phase. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. SEM=Standard error of the mean.

Gene expression patterns of different genes related to cytokinesis and mitosis mechanisms (ROCK, rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase; CCN, Cellular communication network), growth factors (IGFBP3, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A), antioxidants mechanisms (GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4), apoptosis (BCL2, B-cell lymphoma 2), complement component (C3), energetic metabolism (AKRIB1, aldose reductase gene family 1-member b1; SLC2A1, solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1), hormones receptors (ESR, estrogen receptor; LHCGR, luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor), and specific glycoproteins (OVGP, oviduct-specific glycoprotein) on oviduct ampulla, during different estrous cycle phases. Early: Early luteal phase, Late: Mid-luteal phase, Follicular: Follicular phase. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p< 0.01. SEM=Standard error of the mean. Gene expression patterns of different genes related to cytokinesis and mitosis mechanisms (ROCK, rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase; CCN, Cellular communication network), growth factors (IGFBP3, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A), antioxidants mechanisms (GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4), apoptosis (BCL2, B-cell lymphoma 2), complement component (C3), energetic metabolism (AKRIB1, aldose reductase gene family 1-member b1; SLC2A1, solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1), hormones receptors (ESR, estrogen receptor; LHCGR, luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor), and specific glycoproteins (OVGP, oviduct-specific glycoprotein) on oviduct isthmus, during different estrous cycle phases. Early: Early luteal phase, Late: Mid-luteal phase, Follicular: Follicular phase. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. SEM=Standard error of the mean.

Discussion

The oviduct is a dynamic organ that is anatomically divided into three different parts: The infundibulum, the AMP, and the IST, and it has the potential to provide a suitable microenvironment for gametes and embryo development [30]. The previous studies have demonstrated that genes are differentially expressed between oviductal regions and that it is related to the estrous cycle [23, 30, 31], including variations in oviduct epithelial transcription [32]. Our findings indicate that gene expression in BOECs differs between the AMP and IST as well as among the follicular, early, and late estrous phases. This differential gene expression may be related to BOEC functional differentiation in each oviduct region. Thus, understanding specific regulatory mechanisms that are affected under the influence of E2 and P4 may help expand the knowledge of oviductal physiology, including signaling pathways and their modulation in the oviductal environment, to enhance the in vitro embryo culture environment. The oviduct’s function is dependent on its OECs, which are classified into CCs and secretory cells (SCs). SCs have secretory activity and may be larger than CCs. They exude nutrients into the oviduct lumen for gamete and embryo development and form cellular protrusions that increase in size and number as the estrous cycle progresses [33-35]. In particular, when oocytes are in the AMP after ovulation, SCs exhibit morphological changes indicative of increased activity [36], implying a link between SC morphology and endocrine levels during the estrous cycle [37]. On the other hand, CCs have hair-like projections (cilia) that generate a ciliary beating and sweep mucus and other debris off the epithelium and oviduct lumen. Changes in cilia orientation and beat frequency can modify oviduct fluid flow, which could affect gamete and embryo transport [38]. Ovarian steroids (E2 and P4) regulate oviductal function, particularly gamete and early embryo transport, by modulating SC and CC physiology [39]. E2 increases SC proliferation, secretory activity, and CC transport velocity, whereas P4 decreases SC secretory activity and CC transport velocity while initiating a process of self-renewal of the BOECs for the subsequent estrous cycle. This BOEC renewal, which is required for proper maternal receptivity, is regulated by proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [40]. This study analyzed ROCK and CCN2 gene transcripts, which are related to OEC renewal. Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) regulates cell division, cell-matrix adhesions, and the activation of the c-Fos serum response element [41]. Our findings indicate that the estrous phase and oviduct region have no effect on ROCK expression patterns, implying the absence of Rho-dependent kinase mechanisms during different estrous phases. On the other hand, CCN2 mRNA levels were upregulated in the AMP (late-early), with no differential expression in the IST, which may be related to P4 secretion. Cyclin B1 (CCN) is a regulatory protein that is involved in both the oocyte cell cycle and embryonic development. It assembles a complex with p34 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1) to form mitosis-promoting factor, which is required for the proper control of the G2/M transition phase of the cell cycle [42]. Genistein, which induces cell cycle arrest, downregulates CCN and BCL-2/BAX expression in BOEC primary cultures, resulting in reduced cellular proliferation and migration [43]. In mice, maternal factors and ovarian steroids regulate CCN2 (CTGF) and transforming growth factor-beta 1 expression in the uterus [44]. The differential expression of both genes reflects the dynamics of cytokinetic processes during the estrous cycle phases in oviduct regions. Growth factors play a pivotal role in the oviduct microenvironment, modulating cell proliferation, wound healing, and cellular differentiation [45]. In this study, IGFBP3, EGFR, and VEGFA gene expression were analyzed. IGFBP3 is an IGF-binding protein [46]; in BOECs expressing IGFBP3, particularly in the IST, it may help create a synchronized IGF-I and IGF-II gradient along the oviduct as the embryo passes through it [47, 48]. BOEC IGFBP3 secretion increases in response to early embryo development in a conditioned medium [49]. Our findings suggest that this growth factor receptor in the AMP may be responsive to P4, exhibiting increased expression during the early and late luteal phases, corresponding to the early embryo development till day 4. These patterns were similar to those of the EGFR, where P4 (late-early) had an effect on the AMP. EGFR is a transmembrane glycoprotein of the protein kinase superfamily [50] that binds to EGF, promoting receptor dimerization and tyrosine autophosphorylation, which promotes cell proliferation [51]. It may also be involved in the regulation of the bovine oviductal microenvironment [52] by modulating OEC renewal and oviduct lumen characteristics by controlling apoptotic gene expression (BAX and BCL-2) [53]. The mid-luteal stage exhibits enhanced EGF secretion and EGFR mRNA expression in the bovine endometrium, which may regulate uterine function [54]. Angiogenesis plays an important role in cyclical mechanisms during the estrous cycle, such as follicular growth and corpus luteum formation, which are dependent on the development of a dense capillary net [55], and transudation from plasma contributes to the defining characteristics of the luminal microenvironment in cattle, such as uterine and oviductal fluid [56]. VEGFA is a member of the platelet-derived VEGF family that encodes a heparin-binding protein, which promotes vascular endothelial cell proliferation and migration [57]. Our findings indicate that the estrous phase and oviduct region have no effect on the expression patterns of this gene. However, a previous study in heifers demonstrated that low follicle count downregulated VEGFA expression in ipsilateral oviducts compared to the contralateral IST [58]. VEGF and its receptors, flk-1 and flt-1a, are secreted in the bovine oviduct [59], where they have autocrine and paracrine effects on BOECs, influencing physiological functions through permeability modifications. VEGFs, which are angiogenic in nature, are associated with vascular support in the oviduct, being directly associated with OEC support and oviductal fluid perfusion. The redox state of the bovine oviduct is pivotal for gamete physiology and embryo survival, and antioxidant expression has been reported [60, 61]. GPX4 catalyzes the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and organic and lipid hydroperoxides, thereby protecting cells from oxidative stress [62]. GPX4 is also essential for sperm development; consequently, it is classified as a “moonlighting” protein based on its ability to function as both a peroxidase and a structural protein in mature spermatozoa [63]. GPX4 transcript levels decreased in BOEC cultured embryos [49] but increased in the IST ipsilateral to the dominant follicle during the follicular phase and in the post-ovulatory period [64]. Our findings suggest that P4 levels (late) have an effect on GPX4 expression in the AMP. Previously, a significantly increased transcript abundance of GPX4 in ipsilateral BOECs was observed in the early luteal phase [27], which is consistent with our findings. On the other hand, apoptosis mechanisms are well known in gametes and early embryos and are directly linked to their viability. Therefore, the presence of these factors in the oviduct environment should be investigated. An apoptosis regulator, B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) control outer mitochondrial membrane permeabilization (MOMP) protein that regulates apoptosis mitochondrial pathway [65]. In contrast to the findings of GPX4, the estrous phase and oviduct region had no effect on BCL2 expression patterns in our study. Recently, researchers found that increased BCL2 and BAX mRNA expression in BOEC c onditioned media and exosomes influence apoptosis in embryos [5]. In other mammals, apoptosis levels are P4 dependent (caudal oviduct and uterotubal junction) and can affect spermatozoa bound to OECs as well as the fertilization process [66]. The C3a peptide, also known as C3a anaphylatoxin, is a complement component that regulates inflammation and has antimicrobial effects [67]. Complement proteins have been suggested to mediate functional homeostasis, which has been linked to physiological aspects of cattle oviduct and fertility [56], sperm-oocyte interaction [68], and embryo development [69]. In rodents, C3 is secreted by OECs and increases trophectoderm development, blastocyst size, and hatching rates [70, 71]. Our findings suggest that C3 transcription levels in the oviduct AMP may be influenced by E2 levels. Glucose is an essential energy source for mammalian pre-implantation embryo development, and oviduct glucose and lactate concentrations have been linked to oviduct and epithelial differential regulation [72]. Glucose and lactate levels are important to gamete and early embryo processes, and multiple genes are involved in regulatory mechanisms. The AKRIB1 is a key enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of several aldehydes as well as steroid metabolism [73], including P4 (for implantation) [74] and prostaglandin F2α synthesis (luteolysis and completing pregnancy). The increased AKRIB1 expression in our study indicates a possible effect of P4 on the AMP during late and early phases, which was not evident on the IST, and can influence the oviductal environment, including early embryos in transit during the first stages of development. In bovines, AKR1B1 upregulation in blastocyst biopsies influences the pregnancy absence and endometrial resorption during luteolysis, and it has been related to early embryo pro-apoptotic pathways [75]. Similarly, solute carrier family 2 (SLC2A1), facilitated glucose transporter member 1 (SLC2A1), or GLUT1, is a major glucose transporter in the mammalian blood–brain barrier, mammary gland, kidney, muscle [76], fetus [77], and ovary [78], where it is responsible for maintaining basal glucose [79]. In the present study, SLC2A1 mRNA level did not vary between the estrous phase and the oviduct region, contrasting with previous studies where SLC2A showed differential expression in murine early embryos and laying hen oviducts based on glucose metabolism [80, 81]. E2 has an effect on several regions of the reproductive tract, including the oviduct, and its receptors are essential for sexual development and reproductive activity [82]. E2 concentrations during the estrous phase suggest that a large amount of E2 is delivered to the oviduct [83]. Estrogen receptor ( ESR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor composed of several domains essential for E2 hormone-binding, DNA-binding, and transcription activation [84]. In particular, ESR1 is highly expressed in the IST during the follicular phase [85]. In mice, disrupting the E2 signal in OECs causes defective embryo transport, implying that the E2 signal through ESR1 is necessary for embryo transport in the oviduct. In humans, increased pre-ovulatory estradiol levels act through epithelial ERα, suppressing protease-mediated aspects of innate immunity in the oviduct, influencing the mucosal immunological barrier to support fertilization and embryo development [86]. However, the ESR mRNA levels in BOECs in our study were comparable between estrous phases in both oviduct regions, suggesting that receptor expression in BOECs is stable regardless of the estrous cycle phase. The LHCGR belongs to the G-protein coupled receptor 1 family and its function is regulated by G proteins that activate adenylate cyclase [87]. Alterations in this gene influence the appearance of secondary sexual characteristics in males, such as familial male early puberty (testotoxicosis), secondary hypogonadism, Leydig cell adenoma (early puberty), and hypoplasia (male pseudohermaphroditism). However, BOEC luteinizing hormone: Human chorionic gonadotropin (LH: hCG) under exogenous LH: hCG promotes OGP expression by increasing transcript stability [88]. LHCGR expression levels on BOECs are reported for the first time in this study, and it is suggested that the estrous phase and oviduct region have no impact on its expression patterns. Oviduct-specific glycoprotein (OVGP) is related to the mucin and glycosyl hydrolase 18 gene families. OVGP expression and protein secretion occur during final follicular development through cleavage-stage embryo development, suggesting that OVGP expression is E2 dependent. OVGP is secreted from SCs and associates with ovulated oocytes, blastomeres, and spermatozoan acrosome regions. OVGP1 mRNA expression and its relationship with cell in vivo behavior constitute a marker for functionality [22], whereas it indicates OEC physiological phenotype under in vitro conditions [89]. In our study, OVGP expression was upregulated in the oviduct AMP and IST in response to E2 and P4. The effect of E2 on OVGP expression is comparable to an in vivo study finding, in which BOECs showed increased OVGP1 mRNA expression in response to E2 [89], although the effect of P4 on OVGP expression was not described. However, due to the lack of significant variations in ESR expression, a clear association between this type of interaction and OVGP expression cannot be established. Understanding the physiological events of the female reproductive tract necessitates an understanding of the expression patterns of functions that elucidate the dynamics of the oviductal environment during the estrous cycle, gamete transport, and early embryo development.

Conclusion

The luteal phase (early and late) of the estrous cycle affected gene expression patterns, which were reflected in antioxidant mechanisms (GPX4), energy metabolism (AKRIB1), growth factors (IGFBP3, EGFR), and cell adhesion - communication ( CCN2) in the oviductal AMP, while the follicular phase influenced the gene expression of an essential glycoprotein, OVGP, in the oviductal IST. The dynamics of specific mechanisms in OECs, both in the AMP and IST, influence oviductal epithelial renewal and population proportions, which further modify oviductal lumen conditions, as well as oviductal fluid secretions and volume, which influence gamete and embryo physiology during transit.

Authors’ Contributions

RL, IR, and FU: Conceived and designed the study. RL, IR, and FU: Performed the experiments. IR, RL, and FU: Analyzed the data. RL and IR: Drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
  81 in total

Review 1.  Formation of Fallopian tubal fluid: role of a neglected epithelium.

Authors:  H J Leese; J I Tay; J Reischl; S J Downing
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  A novel regulation of the oviductal glycoprotein gene expression by luteinizing hormone in bovine tubal epithelial cells.

Authors:  T Sun; Z M Lei; C V Rao
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  1997-07-04       Impact factor: 4.102

3.  Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in the ovine oviduct during the oestrous cycle.

Authors:  K R Stevenson; D C Wathes
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1996-09

Review 4.  Complement component C3 - The "Swiss Army Knife" of innate immunity and host defense.

Authors:  Daniel Ricklin; Edimara S Reis; Dimitrios C Mastellos; Piet Gros; John D Lambris
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Ultrastructural features of secretory cells in the bovine oviduct epithelium.

Authors:  T Eriksen; O Terkelsen; P Hyttel; T Greve
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1994-12

6.  Study of the functional anatomy of bovine oviductal mucosa.

Authors:  J L Yániz; F Lopez-Gatius; P Santolaria; K J Mullins
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2000-11-01

7.  Temporal effect of human oviductal cell and its derived embryotrophic factors on mouse embryo development.

Authors:  J S Xu; T M Cheung; S T Chan; P C Ho; W S Yeung
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 8.  Deadly decisions: the role of genes regulating programmed cell death in human preimplantation embryo development.

Authors:  Andrea Jurisicova; Beth M Acton
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Development rate and gene expression of IVP bovine embryos cocultured with bovine oviduct epithelial cells at early or late stage of preimplantation development.

Authors:  A Cordova; C Perreau; S Uzbekova; C Ponsart; Y Locatelli; P Mermillod
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  The aldo-keto reductases (AKRs): Overview.

Authors:  Trevor M Penning
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.