| Literature DB >> 36183086 |
C M Andreasen1,2,3, R F Klicman4,5, T Herlin6,4, E M Hauge6,4, A G Jurik4,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to assess changes in radiological disease activity in children with chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) receiving pamidronate therapy and to test a modified radiological index for non-bacterial osteitis (mRINBO) in CNO. mRINBO was used for standardized reporting and quantification of whole-body MRI (WBMRI) findings resulting in an individual summary patient score.Entities:
Keywords: Case-study; Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis; Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis; Diphosphonates; Pamidronate; Radiological outcome measure; Standardized reporting; Whole body magnetic resonance imaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36183086 PMCID: PMC9526975 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-022-00746-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ISSN: 1546-0096 Impact factor: 3.413
The original and the modified radiologic index for standardized reporting of whole-body MRI in patients with chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis
| Parameter of interest | Criterion RINBO | Criterion mRINBO | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| No of patient’s radiological active lesions | |||
| Unifocal | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Paucifocal | 2–4 | 2–4 | 2 |
| Multifocal | ≥ 5 | ≥ 5 | 3 |
| Maximum size of patients’ radiological active lesion | |||
| Minor | < 10 mm | < 20 mm | 1 |
| Average | 10–100 mm | 20–50 mm | 2 |
| Major | > 100 mm | > 50 mm | 3 |
| Extramedullary affection | |||
| Acute | Periostal reaction and/or soft tissue edema | Periostal reaction and/or soft tissue edema | 1 |
| Chronic | Hyperostosis | Hyperostosis | 1 |
| Spinal involvement | |||
| Acute | Radiologically active vertebral lesion | Radiologically active vertebral lesion | 1 |
| Chronic | CNO related vertebral body deformation | CNO related vertebral body deformation | 1 |
RINBO Radiologic index for chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (21), mRINBO Modified RINBO score with new definitions of the maximum size of patients’ radiological active lesion
based on the current sizes and exclusion of radiological active lesions in the metatarsal bones
Fig. 1Flowchart. Fifty-one children were diagnosed with chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) according to the Bristol Criteria. Children with symmetrical multifocal or spinal inflammatory bone lesions and a poor clinical response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were treated with pamidronate (n = 32). Reasons for study exclusion were insufficient imaging or concomitant treatment with TNF-α inhibitors. Eighteen children were included in the study. WBMRI: whole-body magnetic resonance imaging
Fig. 2Whole-body MRI following one year of pamidronate treatment. Representative MRI images of a 7-year-old girl diagnosed with chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) and imaging following one year of pamidronate treatment. A Pre-pamidronate whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) short tau inversion recovery (STIR), coronal image shows multiple areas of bone marrow edema as signs of radiologically active lesions (RAL) (white thin arrows). B Post-pamidronate coronal WBMRI STIR image showed resolution of RAL in the left acetabulum and regression of RAL in the right femur. Assessment of RAL in the distal femur and proximal tibia is challenged by bisphosphonate bands (dotted arrows) C Pre-pamidronate and D post-pamidronate coronal MRI STIR images of the clavicles showing post-treatment regression of bone marrow edema and surrounding soft tissue edema
Distribution of radiologically active bone lesions at baseline and after one year of pamidronate therapy
| Baseline | Year 1 | Baseline | Year 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAL n (%) | RAL n (%) | Children n (%) | Children n (%) | ||
| Mandibula | 1 (1) | 1 (2) | 1 (6) | 1 (6) | |
| Clavicula | 3 (3) | 3 (5) | 3 (17) | 3 (17) | |
| Sternum | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 (6) | 0 | |
| Scapula* | 2 (2) | 2 (3) | 2 (11) | 2 (11) | |
| Proximal humerus | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 (6) | 0 | |
| Distal humerus | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 (6) | 0 | |
| Proximal radius/ulna | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 (6) | 0 | |
| Distal radius/ulna | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 (6) | 0 | |
| Pelvis-ileum* | 11 (10) | 5 (8) | 8 (44) | 4 (22) | |
| Pelvis-pubis | 1 (1) | 1 (2) | 1 (6) | 1 (6) | |
| Pelvis-ischium | 2 (2) | 3 (5) | 2 (11) | 3 (17) | |
| Pelvis-sacrum | 7 (6) | 4 (7) | 6 (33) | 4 (22) | |
| < | |||||
| Proximal femur* | 10 (9) | 6 (10) | 7 (39) | 3 (17) | |
| Distal femur | 8 (7) | 3 (5) | 6 (33) | 2 (11) | |
| Proximal tibia* | 11 (10) | 4 (7) | 9 (50) | 3 (17) | |
| Distal tibia* | 15 (14) | 9 (15) | 9 (50) | 6 (33) | |
| Proximal fibula | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Distal fibula | 5 (4) | 4 (7) | 4 (22) | 3 (17) | |
| Foot-calcaneus * | 5 (4) | 6 (10) | 4 (22) | 4 (22) | |
| Foot- talus* | 3 (3) | 2 (3) | 3 (17) | 2 (11) | |
| Foot-middle | 5 (4) | 2 (3) | 4 (22) | 1 (6) | |
| < | |||||
| Cervical vertebra | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Thoracic vertebra* | 15 (14) | 2 (3) | 5 (28) | 2 (11) | |
| Lumbar vertebra* | 1 (1) | 4 (7) | 1 (6) | 1 (6) | |
Distribution of radiologically active lesions (RALs) at baseline and after one year of pamidronate treatment (n = 18). Anatomic locations were categorized into seven anatomic regions. Anatomic distribution of RALs was assessed by WBMRI prior to and following one year of pamidronate treatment. RALs are presented as number (and percentage of total RALs) prior to pamidronate (total 110 RAL) and year one (total 61 RAL). RALs are also presented as number of children (and percentage of 18 children) with RALs at the different anatomic locations. McNemar´s test was used to compare distribution of RALs in children during pamidronate treatment. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. *Indicates anatomic locations with new RAL at year one
Fig. 3Changes in radiological disease activity following one year of pamidronate treatment. Radiological response to pamidronate treatment in children diagnosed with severe CNO (n = 18). WBMRI was assessed prior to pamidronate treatment and following one year of treatment. A Changes in the modified radiological index for non-bacterial osteitis (mRINBO), p = 0.05 B Changes in total number of radiologically active lesions (RAL) per patient, p = 0.02 C Changes in the size of the largest RAL for each patient (RALmax) p < 0.01. D Changes in the number of RAL for each patient in the spine, p < 0.01. Comparison between baseline and year one was made using Wilcoxon signed rank test