Elisabeth P Golden1, Morgan McCreary2, Steven Vernino2. 1. Department of Medicine (Neurology Section), University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA. Elisabeth.golden@uthct.edu. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As understanding of multiple system atrophy (MSA) pathophysiology improves, clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies are starting. Outcome measures responsive to disease progression will be critical, but the United MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS) has limitations. The MSA multidisciplinary clinic at the University of Texas Southwestern is a longitudinal clinic with structured assessments performed at fixed time intervals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of clinical measures in assessing MSA progression over time. METHODS: Data from 73 subjects with clinically diagnosed MSA were analyzed using repeated measures correlation models. Observations were made every 4 months, with up to 3 years of data included for each patient. RESULTS: UMSARS-I and UMSARS-II correlated positively with the MSA Quality of Life (QOL) scale. The rate of change was 3.12 points per year (ppy) for UMSARS-I and 5.55 ppy for UMSARS-II. Some individual UMSARS questions contributed more significantly than others to overall UMSARS rate of change. Based on this finding, and using repeated measures correlations between question combinations and QOL, an optimization of UMSARS parts I and II was curated. The amended UMSARS-I included 8 of the 12 subquestions, and the amended UMSARS-II included 10 of the 14 subquestions. CONCLUSIONS: Data from a longitudinal MSA clinic allows better characterization of the performance of UMSARS as a clinical outcome measure. A curated set of UMSARS questions appears more responsive to change and accounts for correlation with QOL, and could be the starting point for an improved MSA outcome measure.
PURPOSE: As understanding of multiple system atrophy (MSA) pathophysiology improves, clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies are starting. Outcome measures responsive to disease progression will be critical, but the United MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS) has limitations. The MSA multidisciplinary clinic at the University of Texas Southwestern is a longitudinal clinic with structured assessments performed at fixed time intervals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of clinical measures in assessing MSA progression over time. METHODS: Data from 73 subjects with clinically diagnosed MSA were analyzed using repeated measures correlation models. Observations were made every 4 months, with up to 3 years of data included for each patient. RESULTS: UMSARS-I and UMSARS-II correlated positively with the MSA Quality of Life (QOL) scale. The rate of change was 3.12 points per year (ppy) for UMSARS-I and 5.55 ppy for UMSARS-II. Some individual UMSARS questions contributed more significantly than others to overall UMSARS rate of change. Based on this finding, and using repeated measures correlations between question combinations and QOL, an optimization of UMSARS parts I and II was curated. The amended UMSARS-I included 8 of the 12 subquestions, and the amended UMSARS-II included 10 of the 14 subquestions. CONCLUSIONS: Data from a longitudinal MSA clinic allows better characterization of the performance of UMSARS as a clinical outcome measure. A curated set of UMSARS questions appears more responsive to change and accounts for correlation with QOL, and could be the starting point for an improved MSA outcome measure.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Brenda L Minor; Veida Elliott; Michelle Fernandez; Lindsay O'Neal; Laura McLeod; Giovanni Delacqua; Francesco Delacqua; Jacqueline Kirby; Stephany N Duda Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: S Gilman; G K Wenning; P A Low; D J Brooks; C J Mathias; J Q Trojanowski; N W Wood; C Colosimo; A Dürr; C J Fowler; H Kaufmann; T Klockgether; A Lees; W Poewe; N Quinn; T Revesz; D Robertson; P Sandroni; K Seppi; M Vidailhet Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-08-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Phillip A Low; Stephen G Reich; Joseph Jankovic; Clifford W Shults; Matthew B Stern; Peter Novak; Caroline M Tanner; Sid Gilman; Frederick J Marshall; Frederick Wooten; Brad Racette; Thomas Chelimsky; Wolfgang Singer; David M Sletten; Paola Sandroni; Jay Mandrekar Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Jose-Alberto Palma; Patricio Millar Vernetti; Miguel A Perez; Florian Krismer; Klaus Seppi; Alessandra Fanciulli; Wolfgang Singer; Phillip Low; Italo Biaggioni; Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann; Maria Teresa Pellecchia; Maria José Martí; Han-Joon Kim; Marcelo Merello; Iva Stankovic; Werner Poewe; Rebecca Betensky; Gregor Wenning; Horacio Kaufmann Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2021-02-07 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Gregor K Wenning; Felix Geser; Florian Krismer; Klaus Seppi; Susanne Duerr; Sylvia Boesch; Martin Köllensperger; Georg Goebel; Karl P Pfeiffer; Paolo Barone; Maria Teresa Pellecchia; Niall P Quinn; Vasiliki Koukouni; Clare J Fowler; Anette Schrag; Christopher J Mathias; Nir Giladi; Tanya Gurevich; Erik Dupont; Karen Ostergaard; Christer F Nilsson; Håkan Widner; Wolfgang Oertel; Karla Maria Eggert; Alberto Albanese; Francesca del Sorbo; Eduardo Tolosa; Adriana Cardozo; Günther Deuschl; Helge Hellriegel; Thomas Klockgether; Richard Dodel; Cristina Sampaio; Miguel Coelho; Ruth Djaldetti; Eldad Melamed; Thomas Gasser; Christoph Kamm; Giuseppe Meco; Carlo Colosimo; Olivier Rascol; Wassilios G Meissner; François Tison; Werner Poewe Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 44.182