Literature DB >> 36181538

TLS/FUS-ERG fusion gene in acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome evolved to acute leukemia: report of six cases and a literature review.

Heyang Zhang1, Qianru Zhan1, Xiaoxue Wang1, Feng Gao1, Jinxiang Yu1, Jing Wang1, Wei Fu1, Pingping Wang1, Xin Wei1, Lijun Zhang2.   

Abstract

To investigate the pathogenesis and the refractory/relapse mechanisms in patients with t(16;21)(p11;q22), we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of six cases in our hospital and sixty-two cases reported in the literature. Among the patients in our hospital, five cases were diagnosed as acute leukemia, and one was myelodysplastic syndrome evolved to acute myeloid leukemia, harboring TLS/FUS-ERG fusion gene; all the cases were detected t(16;21)(p11;q22) translocation, and five cases showed additional chromosomal abnormalities. We firstly report a novel three-way translocation t(11;16;21)(q13;p11;q22), which may affect the prognosis of leukemia with TLS-ERG fusion gene because this patient shows a more satisfactory treatment effect and deeper remission. And we found patients with TLS-ERG are more likely to have bone and arthrosis pain. Besides, CD56 and CD123 were positive in these cases, which are related to poor prognosis and the character of refractory. Moreover, some gene mutations are involved, and GATA2 and SMAD4 mutations were identified when the disease progressed from myelodysplastic syndrome to leukemia. Among sixty-two patients reported in the literature, valid positive percent of CD56 and CD123 were 81% and 14.3%, respectively. Mutation of the RUNX1 gene was detected in four cases, and one patient had multiple mutations, including BCOR, PLCG1, DIS3, BRAF, JAK2, and JAK3. The prominent feature of leukemia carrying the TLS/FUS-ERG gene is its poor prognosis. The relevant mechanism includes new mutation, jumping translocation, different transcripts, and so on. The mechanism still acquaints scarcely, which requires further study.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Fusion gene; Myelodysplastic syndrome; TLS/FUS-ERG; t(11;16;21)(q13;p11;q22); t(16;21)(p11;q22)

Year:  2022        PMID: 36181538     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-04979-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   4.030


  48 in total

1.  t(16;21) in a Ph positive CML.

Authors:  M R Ferro; P Cabello; J M Garcia-Sagredo; M Resino; C San Roman; J G Larana
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1992-06

2.  Novel chromosome 16 abnormality--der(16)del(16) (q13)t(16;21)(p11.2;q22)--associated with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  P Sharma; N Watson; L Robson; J Gallo; A Smith
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1999-08

3.  Prognostic impact of t(16;21)(p11;q22) and t(16;21)(q24;q22) in pediatric AML: a retrospective study by the I-BFM Study Group.

Authors:  Sanne Noort; Martin Zimmermann; Dirk Reinhardt; Wendy Cuccuini; Martina Pigazzi; Jenny Smith; Rhonda E Ries; Todd A Alonzo; Betsy Hirsch; Daisuke Tomizawa; Franco Locatelli; Tanja A Gruber; Susana Raimondi; Edwin Sonneveld; Daniel K Cheuk; Michael Dworzak; Jan Stary; Jonas Abrahamsson; Nira Arad-Cohen; Malgorzata Czogala; Barbara De Moerloose; Henrik Hasle; Soheil Meshinchi; Marry van den Heuvel-Eibrink; C Michel Zwaan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  MOZ-TIF2, but not BCR-ABL, confers properties of leukemic stem cells to committed murine hematopoietic progenitors.

Authors:  Brian J P Huntly; Hirokazu Shigematsu; Kenji Deguchi; Benjamin H Lee; Shinichi Mizuno; Nicky Duclos; Rebecca Rowan; Sonia Amaral; David Curley; Ifor R Williams; Koichi Akashi; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  TLS/FUS-ERG fusion gene in acute lymphoblastic leukemia with t(16;21)(p11;q22) and monitoring of minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Takashi Kanazawa; Chitose Ogawa; Takeshi Taketani; Tomohiko Taki; Yasuhide Hayashi; Akihiro Morikawa
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  The oncogene ERG: a key factor in prostate cancer.

Authors:  P Adamo; M R Ladomery
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  MEIS2 Is an Oncogenic Partner in AML1-ETO-Positive AML.

Authors:  Naidu M Vegi; Josef Klappacher; Franz Oswald; Medhanie A Mulaw; Amit Mandoli; Verena N Thiel; Shiva Bamezai; Kristin Feder; Joost H A Martens; Vijay P S Rawat; Tamoghna Mandal; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Karsten Spiekermann; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Konstanze Döhner; Hartmut Döhner; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Michaela Feuring-Buske; Christian Buske
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Fusion of CHOP to a novel RNA-binding protein in human myxoid liposarcoma.

Authors:  A Crozat; P Aman; N Mandahl; D Ron
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  FUS/ERG gene fusions in Ewing's tumors.

Authors:  Danielle C Shing; Dominic J McMullan; Paul Roberts; Kim Smith; Suet-Feung Chin; James Nicholson; Roger M Tillman; Pramila Ramani; Catherine Cullinane; Nicholas Coleman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  The Oncogenic Transcription Factor RUNX1/ETO Corrupts Cell Cycle Regulation to Drive Leukemic Transformation.

Authors:  Natalia Martinez-Soria; Lynsey McKenzie; Julia Draper; Anetta Ptasinska; Hasan Issa; Sandeep Potluri; Helen J Blair; Anna Pickin; Asmida Isa; Paulynn Suyin Chin; Ricky Tirtakusuma; Daniel Coleman; Sirintra Nakjang; Salam Assi; Victoria Forster; Mojgan Reza; Ed Law; Philip Berry; Dorothee Mueller; Cameron Osborne; Alex Elder; Simon N Bomken; Deepali Pal; James M Allan; Gareth J Veal; Peter N Cockerill; Christian Wichmann; Josef Vormoor; Georges Lacaud; Constanze Bonifer; Olaf Heidenreich
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 38.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.