Literature DB >> 36181052

Durable response to olaparib combined low-dose cisplatin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with FANCA mutation: A case report.

Yi-Hsuan Lai1, Kai-Che Tung2,3, San-Chi Chen4,5,6.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: To date, there is no actionable gene has been discovered in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tumor cells with DNA damage response and repair (DDR) gene loss-of-function mutation is sensitivity to poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum chemotherapy in ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancers. There is a case report demonstrated the efficacy of PARP inhibitor for BRCA2 mutation that belongs to DDR gene in HCC, which suggested the potential role of PARP inhibitor for HCC with DDR gene mutation. PATIENT CONCERNS: We reported a 44-year-old woman with non-viral HCC who was refractory to multiple treatment including target therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. The tumor tissue was submitted to next-generation sequencing using the commercially available ACTOnco®+ (ACT Genomics, Taiwan) assay that interrogates 440 and 31 cancer-related genes and fusion genes, respectively. DIAGNOSIS: A truncating mutation FANCA p.Q1307fs was also observed. The tumor was microsatellite stable and had low tumor mutational burden of 4.5 muts/Mb. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: Given FANCA belongs to DDR genes, the inactivation evoked the idea of using PARP inhibitor and cisplatin. Therefore, the patient started to use olaparib combined with low-dose cisplatin (30 mg/m2, every 4 weeks) therapy in December 2019. Significant reduction in the tumor marker level in 1 month (PIVKA-II from 17,395 to 411 ng/dL) and follow-up CT scan showed stable disease. Her tumor did not progress until December 2020 with a progression-free survival of 12 months. LESSONS: We report the first case of FANCA-mutated HCC that responded well to olaparib and low-dose cisplatin. This addressed the potential therapeutic role of DDR gene mutation in HCC and the possible synergistic effect of PARP inhibitor and cisplatin. These findings highlight areas where further investigation and effort are needed.
Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36181052      PMCID: PMC9524966          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The standard treatment includes multiple-kinase inhibitors and anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Recently, atezolizumab combined bevacizumab have been firstly recommended in advanced HCC due to the better efficacy than sorafenib. However, there is no actionable driven gene has been discovered in HCC. DNA damage response and repair (DDR) is responsible for homologous recombination repair), which is an important process when DNA double-strand breaks. Alterations of DDR genes lead to homologous recombination deficiency, genomic instability, and higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) in cancers. Common DDR genes include BRCA1/2, PALB2, CDK12, RAD51, CHEK2, ATM, and FANCA. Among these, BRCA1/2 are well-known to increase the cancer risk.[ The Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway, also called the FA-BRCA pathway, is an essential DNA repair pathway that recognized DNA damage and orchestrated DNA damage responses. The FA core complex that encoded by FANCA and FANCG interacts with other DNA-repair proteins to perform homologous recombination.[ On the contrary, the mutation of FANCA disrupts FA-BRCA repair pathway leads to the increase of sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. In HCC, the incidence of DDR genes mutation is up to 20.9% and BAP1, CHEK2 are the most common. Regarding to FANCA mutations, the incidence is only 2% of HCC patients.[ Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) is a crucial protein in the DNA single-strand break repair pathway but also plays a role in double-strand break repair pathway. The inhibition of PARP leads to accumulation of unpaired single-strand break, which are converted to double-strand break. Thus, in the presence of DDR genes mutation, the use of PAPR inhibitor results in synthetic lethality in breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers.[ However, the efficacy of PARP inhibitor for DDR genes mutation in HCC is unknown. In this article, we present a patient of HCC with FANCA mutation who achieved durable response to the combination of olaparib and low-dose cisplatin.

2. Case presentation

In October 2017, a 44-year-old female was admitted to the Veteran General Hospital with right upper quadrant abdominal fullness. A tumor sized 15 cm with diaphragm invasion was found, without portal vein thrombosis. Patient was diagnosed with HCC, pT3aN0Mx, stage IIIA, and BCLC stage B. She underwent segmentectomy but 2 months later at least 4 tumors recurred. Thus, she underwent repeated trans-arterial chemoembolization but recurrence persisted. Due to trans-arterial chemoembolization refractory, she received systemic therapy subsequently, including lenvatinib, nivolumab, gemcitabine plus cisplatin and bevacizumab, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, FOLFOX (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin), and sorafenib. Her tumor did not respond to any of the above treatment and the tumor persisted to progress. Multiple bone metastasis and left humeral pathologic fracture developed in 2019 and thus she received open reduction internal fixation and palliative radiotherapy. Systemic treatment was changed to regorafenib, and pembrolizumab. However, her tumor still progressed. The soft tissue from left humeral metastasis was subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the commercially available ACTOnco®+ (ACT Genomics, Taiwan) assay that interrogates 440 and 31 cancer-related genes and fusion genes, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). A total of 24 single nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions were identified. Neither copy number amplification nor homozygous deletion was identified. The tumor was microsatellite stable and had low tumor mutational burden of 4.5 muts/Mb. Among these alterations, the CTNNB1 p.K335I gain-of-function mutation was considered oncogenic but not actionable. A truncating mutation FANCA p.Q1307fs was also observed (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Gene contents of ACTOnco®+ assay. ACTOnco®+ assay identifies genetic alternations (single nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, and copy number variations) of 440 cancer-related genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status from DNA.

ABCB1* AURKB CBL CDKN2B E2F3 FAT1 GRIN2A JAK2 MED12 NOTCH4 PMS1 RAD51D SLCO1B3 * TNFRSF14
ABCC2* AXIN1 CCNA1 CDKN2C EGFR FBXW7 GSK3B JAK3 MEF2B NPM1 PMS2 RAD52 SMAD2 TNFSF11
ABCG2* AXIN2 CCNA2 CEBPA* EP300 FCGR2B GSTP1* JUN MEN1 NQO1* POLB RAD54L SMAD3 TOP1
ABL1 AXL CCNB1 CHEK1 EPCAM FGF1* GSTT1 KAT6A MET NRAS POLD1 RAF1 SMAD4 TP53
ABL2 B2M CCNB2 CHEK2 EPHA2 FGF10 HGF KDM5A MITF NSD1 POLE RARA SMARCA4 TPMT
ADAMTS1 BAP1 CCNB3 CIC EPHA3 FGF14 HIF1A KDM5C MLH1 NTRK1 PPARG RB1 SMARCB1 TSC1
ADAMTS13 BARD1 CCND1 CREBBP EPHA5 FGF19 HIST1H1C* KDM6A MPL NTRK2 PPP2R1A RBM10 SMO TSC2
ADAMTS15 BCL10 CCND2 CRKL EPHA7 FGF23 HIST1H1E* KDR MRE11 NTRK3 PRDM1 RECQL4 SOCS1* TSHR
ADAMTS16 BCL2 CCND3 CRLF2 EPHB1 FGF3 HNF1A KEAP1 MSH2 PAK3 PRKAR1A REL SOX2 TYMS
ADAMTS18 BCL2L1 CCNE1 CSF1R ERBB2 FGF4* HR KIT MSH6 PALB2 PRKCA RET SOX9 U2AF1
ADAMTS6 BCL2L2 CCNE2 CTCF ERBB3 FGF6 HRAS KMT2A MTHFR * PARP1 PRKCB RHOA SPEN UBE2A
ADAMTS9 BCL6 CCNH CTLA4 ERBB4 FGFR1 HSP90AA1 KMT2C MTOR PAX5 PRKCG RICTOR SPOP UBE2K
ADAMTSL1 BCL9 CD19 CTNNA1 ERCC1 FGFR2 HSP90AB1 KMT2D MUC16 PAX8 PRKCI RNF43 SRC UBR5
ADGRA2 BCOR CD274 CTNNB1 ERCC2 FGFR3 HSPA4 KRAS MUC4 PBRM1 PRKCQ ROS1 STAG2 UGT1A1 *
ADH1C* BIRC2 CD58 CUL3 ERCC3 FGFR4 HSPA5 LCK MUC6 PDCD1 PRKDC RPPH1 STAT3 USH2A
AKT1 BIRC3 CD70 CYLD ERCC4 FH IDH1 LIG1 MUTYH PDCD1LG2 PRKN RPTOR STK11 VDR *
AKT2 BLM CD79A CYP1A1* ERCC5 FLCN IDH2 LIG3 MYC PDGFRA PSMB8 RUNX1 SUFU VEGFA
AKT3 BMPR1A CD79B CYP2B6* ERG FLT1 IFNL3* LMO1 MYCL PDGFRB PSMB9 RUNX1T1 SYK VEGFB
ALDH1A1* BRAF CDC73 CYP2C19* ESR1 FLT3 IGF1 LRP1B MYCN PDIA3 PSME1 RXRA SYNE1 VHL
ALK BRCA1 CDH1 CYP2C8* ESR2 FLT4 IGF1R LYN MYD88 PGF PSME2 SDHA TAF1 WT1
AMER1 BRCA2 CDK1 CYP2D6 ETV1 FOXL2 IGF2 MALT1 NAT2* PHOX2B PSME3 SDHB TAP1 XIAP
APC BRD4 CDK12 CYP2E1* ETV4 FOXP1 IKBKB MAP2K1 NBN PIK3C2B PTCH1 SDHC TAP2 XPO1
AR BRIP1 CDK2 CYP3A4* EZH2 FRG1 IKBKE MAP2K2 NEFH PIK3C2G PTEN SDHD TAPBP XRCC2
ARAF BTG1 CDK4 CYP3A5* FAM46C FUBP1 IKZF1 MAP2K4 NF1 PIK3C3 PTGS2 SERPINB3 TBX3 ZNF217
ARID1A BTG2* CDK5 DAXX FANCA GATA1 IL6 MAP3K1 NF2 PIK3CA PTPN11 SERPINB4 TEK
ARID1B BTK CDK6 DCUN1D1 FANCC GATA2 IL7R MAP3K7 NFE2L2 PIK3CB PTPRD SETD2 TERT
ARID2 BUB1B CDK7 DDR2 FANCD2 GATA3 INPP4B MAPK1 NFKB1 PIK3CD PTPRT SF3B1 TET1
ASXL1 CALR CDK8 DICER1 FANCE GNA11 INSR MAPK3 NFKBIA PIK3CG RAC1 SGK1 TET2
ATM CANX CDK9 DNMT3A FANCF GNA13 IRF4 MAX NKX2-1 PIK3R1 RAD50 SH2D1A TGFBR2
ATR CARD11 CDKN1A DOT1L FANCG GNAQ IRS1 MCL1 NOTCH1 PIK3R2 RAD51 SLC19A1* TMSB4X*
ATRX CASP8 CDKN1B DPYD FANCL GNAS IRS2 MDM2 NOTCH2 PIK3R3 RAD51B SLC22A2 TNF
AURKA CBFB CDKN2A DTX1 FAS GREM1 JAK1 MDM4 NOTCH3 PIM1 RAD51C SLCO1B1 TNFAIP3

Analysis of copy number alteration not available.

Table 2

Fusion genes of ACTOnco®+ assay. ACTOnco®+ assay identifies 31 fusion genes from RNA.

ABL1 ALK BCR BRAF CD74 ERG ESR1 ETV1 ETV4 ETV5
ETV6 EZR FGFR1 FGFR2 FGFR3 KMT2A (MLL) MET NRG1 NTRK1 NTRK2
NTRK3 NUTM1 PDGFRA PDGFRB RARA RET ROS1 RSPO2 SDC4 SLC34A2
TMPRSS2
Figure 1.

The next generation sequencing (NGS) results of the left humeral metastasis tumor biopsy. The NGS results showed the FANCA Q1307fs (c.3918dupT) that caused truncated loss-of-function FANCA protein.

Gene contents of ACTOnco®+ assay. ACTOnco®+ assay identifies genetic alternations (single nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, and copy number variations) of 440 cancer-related genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status from DNA. Analysis of copy number alteration not available. Fusion genes of ACTOnco®+ assay. ACTOnco®+ assay identifies 31 fusion genes from RNA. The next generation sequencing (NGS) results of the left humeral metastasis tumor biopsy. The NGS results showed the FANCA Q1307fs (c.3918dupT) that caused truncated loss-of-function FANCA protein. Given FANCA belongs to DDR genes, the inactivation evoked the idea of using PARP inhibitor and cisplatin. Therefore, the patient started to use olaparib combined with low-dose cisplatin (30 mg/m2, every 4 weeks) therapy in December 2019. Significant reduction in the tumor marker level in 1 month (PIVKA-II from 17,395 to 411 ng/dL) and follow-up CT scan showed stable disease (Figures 2 and 3). The patient experienced grade 1 nausea without other severe adverse events during the cancer treatment. Her tumor did not progress until December 2020 with a progression-free survival of 12 months.
Figure 2.

Computerized tomography scan before and after treatment.

Figure 3.

The dynamic change of tumor marker level (PIVKA-II).

Computerized tomography scan before and after treatment. The dynamic change of tumor marker level (PIVKA-II).

3. Discussion

The case with heavily treated, metastatic, FANCA-mutated HCC, had stable disease to the 12-month combination treatment of olaparib and low-dose cisplatin. Our experience with this case suggested that PARP inhibitor may be a potential therapeutic option for FANCA mutation; PARP inhibitor combined with cisplatin may lead to synergistic efficacy with tolerable toxicity; and DDR gene mutation may respond to PARP inhibitor in HCC. The response for FANCA mutation to PARP inhibitor is not clear because of limited data. In a phase 2 clinical trial (TRITON2), 2 cases of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with FANCA homozygous deletion responded to rucaparib (1 partial response and 1 stable disease).[ Another phase 2 study of olaparib for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, revealed 3 patients with homozygous deletion of FANCA, 1 of which had partial response.[ In yet another phase 2 study (TBCRC 048), metastatic breast cancer demonstrated 1 case of somatic FANCA mutation achieved stable disease with olaparib treatment.[ A study enrolling high-grade serous ovarian cancer harboring DDR gene mutation, with the exception of BRCA, showed better response to PARP inhibitors compared with those harboring wild-type DDR gene. FANCA mutation is presented in 1 patient of the DDR mutation group.[ Based on our literature review, FANCA mutation is rare among cancers. Although several reports showed the FANCA mutation is sensitive to the treatment of PRAP inhibitor, the role of PARP inhibitor in FANCA mutation is still controversial so far. Genomic instability score (GIS) is calculated based on the results of homologous recombination repair mutation to predict the efficacy of PAPR inhibitor. In a phase 3 PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (NCT02477644) trial, GIS ≥ 42 was found to predict better PARP inhibitor efficacy. However, the mutation in FANCA gene present with a median GIS score of <42. This may explain the variable response of FANCA mutation to PARP inhibitor.[ Homologous recombination deficiency was known to render high response to the platinum agent that cross-link DNA strands leading to cell apoptosis. In addition, PARP inhibitor is being actively investigated with promising results in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. These provided a rationale to combine platinum agent with PARP inhibitor for the treatment of cancers with loss-of-function mutations in DDR genes. In fact, this combination has been found to improve progression-free survival in ovarian and breast cancers as opposed to those receiving chemotherapy alone.[ Therefore, a phase 2 clinical trial to explore efficacy and safety of olaparib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer is ongoing [NCT01081951]. In this case, olaparib combined with a relative low dose of cisplatin showed durable response, presumably a favorable synergistic effect. This report has several limitations. First, NGS data was obtained from tumor tissue. Therefore, whether the mutation is somatic or germline is unknown. Second, ACTOnco®+ was used for the NGS testing that provided a panel of 440 oncogenes, making the genes outside the panel and the score of genomic instability unavailable.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we report the first case of FANCA-mutated HCC that responded well to olaparib and low-dose cisplatin. This addressed the potential therapeutic role of DDR gene mutation in HCC and the possible synergistic effect of PARP inhibitor and cisplatin. These findings highlight areas where further investigation and effort are needed.

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to acknowledge Tan Kien Thiam for the support of genomic analysis.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Y-HL, S-CC. Performed the experiments: K-CT. Analyzed the data: K-CT, S-CC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Y-HL, K-CT, S-CC. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Y-HL, K-CT, S-CC. Conceptualization: San-Chi Chen, Yi-Hsuan Lai. Data curation: San-Chi Chen, Yi-Hsuan Lai. Formal analysis: Kai-Che Tung, San-Chi Chen, Yi-Hsuan Lai. Methodology: Kai-Che Tung. Supervision: San-Chi Chen. Writing – original draft: Kai-Che Tung, Yi-Hsuan Lai. Writing – review & editing: San-Chi Chen.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of DNA cross-link repair by the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway.

Authors:  Hyungjin Kim; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Joaquin Mateo; Suzanne Carreira; Shahneen Sandhu; Susana Miranda; Helen Mossop; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Dan Robinson; Aurelius Omlin; Nina Tunariu; Gunther Boysen; Nuria Porta; Penny Flohr; Alexa Gillman; Ines Figueiredo; Claire Paulding; George Seed; Suneil Jain; Christy Ralph; Andrew Protheroe; Syed Hussain; Robert Jones; Tony Elliott; Ursula McGovern; Diletta Bianchini; Jane Goodall; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Chris T Williamson; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Ruth Riisnaes; Bernardette Ebbs; Gemma Fowler; Desamparados Roda; Wei Yuan; Yi-Mi Wu; Xuhong Cao; Rachel Brough; Helen Pemberton; Roger A'Hern; Amanda Swain; Lakshmi P Kunju; Rosalind Eeles; Gerhardt Attard; Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth; Mark A Rubin; Karen E Knudsen; Felix Y Feng; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Emma Hall; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Olaparib combined with chemotherapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Amit M Oza; David Cibula; Ana Oaknin Benzaquen; Christopher Poole; Ron H J Mathijssen; Gabe S Sonke; Nicoletta Colombo; Jiří Špaček; Peter Vuylsteke; Holger Hirte; Sven Mahner; Marie Plante; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Helen Mackay; Jacqui Rowbottom; Elizabeth S Lowe; Brian Dougherty; J Carl Barrett; Michael Friedlander
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Maintenance Olaparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Moore; Nicoletta Colombo; Giovanni Scambia; Byoung-Gie Kim; Ana Oaknin; Michael Friedlander; Alla Lisyanskaya; Anne Floquet; Alexandra Leary; Gabe S Sonke; Charlie Gourley; Susana Banerjee; Amit Oza; Antonio González-Martín; Carol Aghajanian; William Bradley; Cara Mathews; Joyce Liu; Elizabeth S Lowe; Ralph Bloomfield; Paul DiSilvestro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes.

Authors:  Nadine M Tung; Mark E Robson; Steffen Ventz; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Rita Nanda; Paul K Marcom; Payal D Shah; Tarah J Ballinger; Eddy S Yang; Shaveta Vinayak; Michelle Melisko; Adam Brufsky; Michelle DeMeo; Colby Jenkins; Susan Domchek; Alan D'Andrea; Nancy U Lin; Melissa E Hughes; Lisa A Carey; Nick Wagle; Gerburg M Wulf; Ian E Krop; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer; Judy E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation.

Authors:  Mark Robson; Seock-Ah Im; Elżbieta Senkus; Binghe Xu; Susan M Domchek; Norikazu Masuda; Suzette Delaloge; Wei Li; Nadine Tung; Anne Armstrong; Wenting Wu; Carsten Goessl; Sarah Runswick; Pierfranco Conte
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Johann de Bono; Joaquin Mateo; Karim Fizazi; Fred Saad; Neal Shore; Shahneen Sandhu; Kim N Chi; Oliver Sartor; Neeraj Agarwal; David Olmos; Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Niven Mehra; Carsten Goessl; Jinyu Kang; Joseph Burgents; Wenting Wu; Alexander Kohlmann; Carrie A Adelman; Maha Hussain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Multigene Panel Testing in Individuals With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Identifies Pathogenic Germline Variants.

Authors:  Anya Mezina; Neil Philips; Zoe Bogus; Noam Erez; Rui Xiao; Ruoming Fan; Kim M Olthoff; K Rajender Reddy; N Jewel Samadder; Sarah M Nielsen; Kathryn E Hatchell; Edward D Esplin; Anil K Rustgi; Bryson W Katona; Maarouf A Hoteit; Katherine L Nathanson; Kirk J Wangensteen
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Candidate biomarkers of PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ovarian cancer beyond the BRCA genes.

Authors:  Darren R Hodgson; Brian A Dougherty; Zhongwu Lai; Anitra Fielding; Lynda Grinsted; Stuart Spencer; Mark J O'Connor; Tony W Ho; Jane D Robertson; Jerry S Lanchbury; Kirsten M Timms; Alexander Gutin; Maria Orr; Helen Jones; Blake Gilks; Chris Womack; Charlie Gourley; Jonathan Ledermann; J Carl Barrett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.