| Literature DB >> 36180878 |
Xianzheng Wang1, Huanan Liu1, Weijian Wang1, Yapeng Sun1, Fei Zhang1, Lei Guo1, Jiaqi Li2, Wei Zhang3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the pathological and radiological outcomes of multifidus degeneration in scoliosis and lumbar disc herniation patients.Entities:
Keywords: Fatty infiltration; Lumbar disc herniation; Myogenic disease; Rimmed vacuole; Scoliosis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36180878 PMCID: PMC9526284 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05841-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.562
Fig. 1Two cases of scoliosis. Patient 1: A1-E1. Patient 2: A2-E2.
(A1) The X-ray radiograph shows the degree of scoliosis. (B1) The T2-weighted axial MRI at L2 shows the multifidus morphology. (C1) The hematoxylin-eosin staining shows the rimmed vacuole. (D1) The NADH dehydrogenase staining shows the NADH dehydrogenase activity decreased. (E1) The Cytochrome C oxidase enzymes staining shows the Cytochrome C oxidase enzymes activity decreased. (A2) The X-ray radiograph shows the degree of scoliosis. (B2) The T2-weighted axial MRI at L1 shows the multifidus morphology. (C2) The Succinate dehydrogenase staining shows severe activity disorder of succinate dehydrogenase. (D2) The NADH dehydrogenase staining shows severe activity disorder of NADH dehydrogenase. (E2) The Cytochrome C oxidase enzymes staining shows severe activity disorder of Cytochrome C oxidase enzymes
Fig. 2Two cases of lumbar disc herniation. Patient 1: A1-E1. Patient 2: A2-E2.
(A1) The T2-weighted axial at L5 MRI shows the multifidus morphology. (B1) The hematoxylin-eosin staining shows the rimmed vacuole. (C1) The NADH dehydrogenase staining shows the NADH dehydrogenase activity decreased and rimmed vacuole. (D1) The Succinate dehydrogenase staining shows shows the Succinate dehydrogenase staining activity decreased. (E1) The Cytochrome C oxidase enzymes staining shows the Cytochrome C oxidase enzymes activity decreased. (A2) The T2-weighted axial MRI at L4 shows the multifidus morphology. (B2) The hematoxylin-eosin staining shows severe fatty infiltration. (C2, D2, E2) The hematoxylin-eosin staining, NADH dehydrogenase staining, Cytochrome C oxidase enzymes staining shows myofibrillar network disorder
Patient demographic and radiographic data
| Variable | Scoliosis | LDH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 24) | (n = 26) | ||
| Age, years | 52.27 ± 3.96 | 51.54 ± 3.06 | 0.465† |
| Sex (male, female) | 9, 15 | 11, 15 | 0.779§ |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.01 ± 0.62 | 21.34 ± 0.95 | 0.120‡ |
| SFTT (mm) | 13.43 ± 7.04 | 15.42 ± 7.14 | 0.329† |
| Total Fatty area (pixels) | 1808.47 ± 96.17 | 1497.39 ± 101.14 | < 0.001† |
| Total CSA (pixels) | 7995.05 ± 229.11 | 9976.49 ± 235.97 | < 0.001‡ |
| Total FIR (%) | 22.67 ± 1.37 | 15.00 ± 1.09 | < 0.001‡ |
Data were presented as mean ± SD or as shown
LDH, lumbar disc herniation; CSA, cross-sectional area; FA, fatty area; FIR, fatty infiltration rate; SFTT, subcutaneous fat tissue thickness
†, Student t test; ‡, Wilcoxon nonparametric test; §, Pearson Chi-square test
Radiographic evaluation of fatty infiltration
| Scoliosis | LDH | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scores | Concavity | Convexity | Affected side | Unaffected side | ||
| Fatty area (pixels) | 1006.84 ± 93.38 | 807.11 ± 42.51 | < 0.001¶ | 714.52 ± 106.46 | 703.31 ± 116.97 | 0.683¶ |
| CSA (pixels) | 4008.72 ± 210.25 | 4034.11 ± 214.83 | 0.109¶ | 4996.10 ± 178.93 | 5015.88 ± 191.29 | 0.158¶ |
| FIR (%) | 25.07 ± 1.11 | 20.01 ± 0.41 | < 0.001¶ | 14.25 ± 1.63 | 14.02 ± 2.24 | 0.668¶ |
Data were presented as mean ± SD.
LDH, lumbar disc herniation; CSA, cross-sectional area; FA, fatty area; FIR, fatty infiltration rate;
¶, Paired t test
Histological evaluation of fatty infiltration
| Scoliosis | LDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | (n = 24) | (n = 26) |
| None (0) | 0 | 0 |
| Scarce (1) | 5 | 8 |
| Mild (2) | 7 | 11 |
| Moderate (3) | 5 | 6 |
| Severe (4) | 7 | 1 |
| < 0.001‡ | ||
LDH, lumbar disc herniation
‡, Wilcoxon nonparametric test
Pathological features
| Variable (n, %) | Scoliosis | LDH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 24) | (n = 26) | ||
| Rimmed vacuoles | 5 (20.8%) | 7 (26.9%) | 0.614§ |
| Type I fiber predominance | 0 | 2 (7.7%) | 0.491$ |
| Nuclear aggregation | 2 (8.3%) | 0 | 0.469$ |
| Abnormal enzyme activity | |||
| Adenosine monophosphate | 0 | 1 (3.8%) | 1$ |
| Adenosine triphosphate cyclase | 2 (8.3%) | 0 | 0.225$ |
| Acid phosphatase | 0 | 1 (3.8%) | 1$ |
| NADH dehydrogenase | 1 (4.2%) | 2 (7.7%) | 1$ |
| Cytochrome C oxidase staining enzymes | 1 (4.2%) | 1 (3.8%) | 1$ |
| Succinate dehydrogenase | 0 | 1 (3.8%) | 1$ |
Data were presented as number (percentage)
§, Pearson Chi-square test; $, Fisher’s exact test
Fig. 3(A) Correlation between the FIR and FID in the scoliosis group. (B) Correlation between the FIR and FID in the LDH group. (C) Correlation between the cobb angle and concavity-convexity FIR difference in the scoliosis group. (D) Correlation between the lumbar dorsal muscle strength and FIR in the LDH group. FIR, fatty infiltration rate; FID, fatty infiltration degree; LDH, lumbar disc herniation
The correlation analysis.
| Group |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scoliosis FIR | 22.67 ± 1.37% |
| |
| Scoliosis FID | 2.58 ± 1.13 | 0.929 | < 0.01 |
| LDH FIR | 15.00 ± 1.09% |
| |
| LDH FID | 2.00 ± 0.84 | 0.915 | < 0.01 |
| Cobb angle | 43.09 ± 12.85 |
| |
| Concavity-convexity FIR difference | 5.05 ± 1.24% | 0.721 | < 0.01 |
| LDH strength | 54.45 ± 8.70 |
| |
| LDH FIR | 15.00 ± 1.09% | -0.887 | < 0.01 |
Data were presented as mean ± SD.
r: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient; r: Pearson correlation coefficient.