Literature DB >> 36180531

Measuring key human carbohydrate digestive enzyme activities using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection.

Elizabeth Barber1, Michael J Houghton1, Rizliya Visvanathan1, Gary Williamson2.   

Abstract

Carbohydrate digestion in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract is catalyzed by α-amylases and α-glucosidases to produce monosaccharides for absorption. Inhibition of these enzymes is the major activity of the drugs acarbose and miglitol, which are used to manage diabetes. Furthermore, delaying carbohydrate digestion via inhibition of α-amylases and α-glucosidases is an effective strategy to blunt blood glucose spikes, a major risk factor for developing metabolic diseases. Here, we present an in vitro protocol developed to accurately and specifically assess the activity of α-amylases and α-glucosidases, including sucrase, maltase and isomaltase. The assay is especially suitable for measuring inhibition by compounds, drugs and extracts, with minimal interference from impurities or endogenous components, because the substrates and digestive products in the enzyme activity assays are quantified directly by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAE-PAD). Multiple enzyme sources can be used, but here we present the protocol using commercially available human α-amylase to assess starch hydrolysis with maltoheptaose as the substrate, and with brush border sucrase-isomaltase (with maltase, sucrase and isomaltase activities) derived from differentiated human intestinal Caco-2(/TC7) cells to assess hydrolysis of disaccharides. The wet-lab assay takes ~2-5 h depending on the number of samples, and the HPAE-PAD analysis takes 35 min per sample. A full dataset therefore takes 1-3 d and allows detection of subtle changes in enzyme activity with high sensitivity and reliability.
© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36180531     DOI: 10.1038/s41596-022-00736-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   17.021


  33 in total

1.  Direct starch digestion by sucrase-isomaltase and maltase-glucoamylase.

Authors:  Amy Hui-Mei Lin; Bruce R Hamaker; Buford L Nichols
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.839

2.  Maltoheptaoside hydrolysis with chromatographic detection and starch hydrolysis with reducing sugar analysis: Comparison of assays allows assessment of the roles of direct α-amylase inhibition and starch complexation.

Authors:  Rizliya Visvanathan; Michael J Houghton; Gary Williamson
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 7.514

3.  Naringenin inhibits α-glucosidase activity: a promising strategy for the regulation of postprandial hyperglycemia in high fat diet fed streptozotocin induced diabetic rats.

Authors:  David Hansi Priscilla; Debasish Roy; Aishwarya Suresh; Vinod Kumar; Kavitha Thirumurugan
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.192

4.  Reducing value methods for maltodextrins. I. Chain-length dependence of alkaline 3,5-dinitrosalicylate and chain-length independence of alkaline copper.

Authors:  J F Robyt; W J Whelan
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 5.  Critical review on conventional spectroscopic α-amylase activity detection methods: merits, demerits, and future prospects.

Authors:  Rizliya Visvanathan; Mallique Qader; Chathuni Jayathilake; Barana Chaminda Jayawardana; Ruvini Liyanage; Ramiah Sivakanesan
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 6.  Structural Studies of the Intestinal α-Glucosidases, Maltase-glucoamylase and Sucrase-isomaltase.

Authors:  David R Rose; Marcia M Chaudet; Kyra Jones
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.839

7.  Amino acids interference on the quantification of reducing sugars by the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid assay mislead carbohydrase activity measurements.

Authors:  Ricardo Sposina Sobral Teixeira; Ayla Sant'Ana da Silva; Viridiana Santana Ferreira-Leitão; Elba Pinto da Silva Bon
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 8.  Polyphenols and their effects on diabetes management: A review.

Authors:  Naheed Aryaeian; Sara Khorshidi Sedehi; Tahereh Arablou
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-12-26

9.  Different sucrose-isomaltase response of Caco-2 cells to glucose and maltose suggests dietary maltose sensing.

Authors:  Min-Wen Cheng; Mohammad Chegeni; Kee-Hong Kim; Genyi Zhang; Mustapha Benmoussa; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Buford L Nichols; Bruce R Hamaker
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.114

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.