Background: Obesity is increasingly common in kidney transplant candidates and may limit access to transplantation. Obesity and diabetes are associated with a high risk for post-transplant complications. The best approach to weight loss to facilitate active transplant listing is unknown, but bariatric surgery is rarely considered due to patient- and physician-related apprehension, among other factors. Methods: We aimed to determine the magnitude of weight loss, listing, and transplant rates in 28 candidates with a mean BMI of 44.4±4.6 kg/m2 and diabetes treated conservatively for 1 year post weight-loss consultations (group 1). Additionally, we evaluated 15 patients (group 2) who met the inclusion criteria but received bariatric intervention within the same time frame. All patients completed a multidisciplinary weight management consultation with at least 1 year of follow-up. Results: In the conservatively managed group (group 1), the mean weight at the time of initial consultation was 126.5±18.5 kg, and the mean BMI was 44.4±4.6 kg/m2. At 1 year post weight-loss consultation, the mean weight decreased by 4.4±8.2 kg to 122.9±17 kg, and the mean BMI was 43±4.8 kg/m2, with a total mean body weight decrease of 3% (P=0.01). Eighteen patients (64%) did not progress to become candidates for active listing/transplantation during the follow-up time of 4±2.9 years, with 15 (54%) subsequently developing renal failure/diabetes-related comorbidities prohibitive for transplantation. In contrast, mean total body weight decreased by 19% at 6 months post bariatric surgery, and the mean BMI was 34.2±4 and 32.5±3.7 kg/m2 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Bariatric surgery was strongly associated with subsequent kidney transplantation (HR=8.39 [95% CI 1.71 to 41.19]; P=0.009). Conclusions: A conservative weight-loss approach involving multidisciplinary consultation was ineffective in most kidney transplant candidates with diabetes, suggesting that a more proactive approach is needed.
Background: Obesity is increasingly common in kidney transplant candidates and may limit access to transplantation. Obesity and diabetes are associated with a high risk for post-transplant complications. The best approach to weight loss to facilitate active transplant listing is unknown, but bariatric surgery is rarely considered due to patient- and physician-related apprehension, among other factors. Methods: We aimed to determine the magnitude of weight loss, listing, and transplant rates in 28 candidates with a mean BMI of 44.4±4.6 kg/m2 and diabetes treated conservatively for 1 year post weight-loss consultations (group 1). Additionally, we evaluated 15 patients (group 2) who met the inclusion criteria but received bariatric intervention within the same time frame. All patients completed a multidisciplinary weight management consultation with at least 1 year of follow-up. Results: In the conservatively managed group (group 1), the mean weight at the time of initial consultation was 126.5±18.5 kg, and the mean BMI was 44.4±4.6 kg/m2. At 1 year post weight-loss consultation, the mean weight decreased by 4.4±8.2 kg to 122.9±17 kg, and the mean BMI was 43±4.8 kg/m2, with a total mean body weight decrease of 3% (P=0.01). Eighteen patients (64%) did not progress to become candidates for active listing/transplantation during the follow-up time of 4±2.9 years, with 15 (54%) subsequently developing renal failure/diabetes-related comorbidities prohibitive for transplantation. In contrast, mean total body weight decreased by 19% at 6 months post bariatric surgery, and the mean BMI was 34.2±4 and 32.5±3.7 kg/m2 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Bariatric surgery was strongly associated with subsequent kidney transplantation (HR=8.39 [95% CI 1.71 to 41.19]; P=0.009). Conclusions: A conservative weight-loss approach involving multidisciplinary consultation was ineffective in most kidney transplant candidates with diabetes, suggesting that a more proactive approach is needed.
Authors: Daniel Moritz Felsenreich; Christoph Bichler; Felix Benedikt Langer; Mahir Gachabayov; Gerhard Prager Journal: Surg Technol Int Date: 2020-05-28
Authors: Al-Faraaz Kassam; Ahmad Mirza; Young Kim; Dennis Hanseman; E Steve Woodle; Ralph C Quillin; Bobby L Johnson; Amit Govil; Michael Cardi; Daniel P Schauer; Eric P Smith; Tayyab S Diwan Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2019-11-16 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Raymond J Lynch; David N Ranney; Cai Shijie; Dennis S Lee; Niharika Samala; Michael J Englesbe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Maryam Afkarian; Michael C Sachs; Bryan Kestenbaum; Irl B Hirsch; Katherine R Tuttle; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Ian H de Boer Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Massini A Merzkani; Andrew J Bentall; Byron H Smith; Xiomara Benavides Lopez; Matthew R D'Costa; Walter D Park; Walter K Kremers; Naim Issa; Andrew D Rule; Harini Chakkera; Kunam Reddy; Hasan Khamash; Hani M Wadei; Martin Mai; Mariam P Alexander; Hatem Amer; Aleksandra Kukla; Mireille El Ters; Carrie A Schinstock; Manish J Gandhi; Raymond Heilman; Mark D Stegall Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2022-01-13