Literature DB >> 36175815

Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search while reading.

Ralph S Redden1,2, Kaylee Eady3, Raymond M Klein1, Jean Saint-Aubin4.   

Abstract

Individual differences in working memory capacity are related to variations in a wide range of cognitive tasks. Surprisingly, effects of individual differences in working memory capacity are somewhat limited in visual search tasks. Here we tested the hypothesis that such an effect would be robust when search was one component of a dual task. Participants were presented strings of letters using rapid serial visual presentation and were required to detect all instances of a particular target letter. In Experiment 1, participants performed the letter search task in three contexts, while: (a) reading a prose passage, (b) processing a stream of random words, or (c) processing a random stream of non-words. In the absence of the dual task of reading prose, and in line with much of the literature on individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search, search performance was unaffected by working memory capacity. As hypothesized, however, higher working memory capacity participants detected more target letters than lower capacity participants in the "true" dual task (searching while reading prose). The hypothesized results from the prose passage were replicated in Experiment 2. These results show that visual search efficiency is dramatically affected by working memory capacity when searching is combined with another cognitive task but not when it is performed in isolation. Our findings are consistent with recent suggestions that visual search efficiency will be affected by working memory capacity so long as searching is embedded in a context that entails managing resource allocation between concurrent tasks.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Individual differences; Missing-letter effect; Reading; Visual search; Working memory capacity

Year:  2022        PMID: 36175815     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01357-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Contrasting effects of age of acquisition in lexical decision and letter detection.

Authors:  Egbert M Assink; Sonja van Well; Paul P Knuijt
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2003

3.  Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.

Authors:  Katherine Guérard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Marie Poirier; Constantina Demetriou
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2012-06-11

4.  Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Bradley J Poole; Stephen W Tuholski; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters.

Authors:  A F Healy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Working Memory and Executive Attention: A Revisit.

Authors:  Randall W Engle
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03

7.  An acoustic factor in letter cancellation.

Authors:  D W Corcoran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1966-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Visual search demands dictate reliance on working memory storage.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Visual search elicits the electrophysiological marker of visual working memory.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Jay Pratt; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.