Literature DB >> 36175615

Trends in Termination of Pregnancy for Foetal Urological Abnormalities in England and Wales: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Megan Jeffery1, Sarah Tai-MacArthur2, Panicos Shangaris3,4,5, Martin Duggan6, Julia Spencer6, Srividhya Sankaran7,6.   

Abstract

The detection of developmental abnormalities in the foetus is considered an essential component of antenatal screening. Among the most frequently identified sonographically, and possibly one of the easiest recognised, are those affecting the urinary tract, with an incidence of 1-4 in 1000 pregnancies. As such, foetal urological abnormalities represent up to 30% of all prenatally diagnosed congenital anomalies. We analysed information recorded on the Health and Social Act 4 (HSA4) forms submitted to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) for 2015 to 2019. There were 915 cases of termination of pregnancy for foetal urological anomaly between 2015 and 2019 in England and Wales, representing 0.09% of total abortions. There has been a steady increase in cases, from 186 in 2015 to 222 in 2018, followed by a more recent decline in 2019 to 172. All 915 cases were justified under Ground E of The Abortion Act 1967. Most terminations of pregnancy for foetal urological anomaly were carried out at 20 weeks gestation. Isolated urinary tract single diagnoses were the commonest, with megacystis being the most prevalent, followed by bilateral renal agenesis and bilateral cystic kidneys. Nearly a third of cases (32.2%) were performed in women aged 30-34 years, and almost 4/5 of women (78.7%) were of White ethnicity. Foetal urological abnormality is a complex issue affecting a significant minority of pregnant women. When severe abnormalities are detected by prenatal diagnosis, most women choose to terminate the pregnancy.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36175615     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-01094-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   2.924


  7 in total

1.  Advanced Maternal Age and the Risk of Major Congenital Anomalies.

Authors:  Katherine R Goetzinger; Anthony L Shanks; Anthony O Odibo; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Diagnosis of fetal urinary tract malformations: prenatal management and postnatal outcome.

Authors:  A Ryckewaert-D'Halluin; G Le Bouar; S Odent; J Milon; D D'Hervé; J Lucas; F Rouget; P Loget; P Poulain; E Le Gall; S Taque
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Causes of renal oligohydramnios: impact on prenatal counseling and postnatal outcome.

Authors:  Sebastian Loos; Markus J Kemper
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Congenital renal agenesis: case-control analysis of birth characteristics.

Authors:  Chirag R Parikh; Daniel McCall; Corinne Engelman; Robert W Schrier
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Birth defects in the newborn population: race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Alexander C Egbe
Journal:  Pediatr Neonatol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Fetal, perinatal, and infant death with congenital renal anomaly.

Authors:  J E S Scott
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Feticide in second- and third-trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies: Results of a national survey.

Authors:  Paul Maurice; Alexandra Letourneau; Alexandra Benachi; Jean-Marie Jouannic
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.050

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.