Alexander C Egbe1. 1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: cegbe2001@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Racial variability in certain prenatal risk factors, such as prenatal vitamin supplementation and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly, has altered the racial prevalence of birth defects. Analysis of a single large representative population is required to analyze current racial differences in the prevalence of birth defects in the United States. METHODS: This is a population-based cross-sectional study to analyze racial differences in the prevalence of birth defects. We reviewed all live births in the 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and determined birth prevalence of 55 selected birth defects in Caucasians. We then calculated the relative risk of these birth defects in African-Americans, Hispanics, and Asians relative to Caucasians. RESULT: Overall birth defect prevalence was 29.2 per 1000 in a cohort of 1,048,252 live births, of which 51% were Caucasians. Compared with Caucasians, the risk of overall birth defects was lower in African-Americans (relative risk = 0.9, confidence interval 0.8-0.9) and Hispanics (relative risk = 0.9, confidence interval 0.8-0.9). The risk of overall birth defects was similar in Caucasians and Asians. Relative to the Caucasians, African-Americans had a lower risk of cardiac, genitourinary, and craniofacial malformations but a higher risk of musculoskeletal malformations. Hispanics had a lower risk of genitourinary and gastrointestinal malformation. Asians had a higher risk of craniofacial and musculoskeletal malformations. CONCLUSION: This is a comprehensive description of racial differences in the risk of birth defects in the United States. Observed racial differences in the risk of birth defects may be related to genetic susceptibilities, to cultural or social differences that could modify exposures, or to the many potential combinations between susceptibilities and exposures.
BACKGROUND: Racial variability in certain prenatal risk factors, such as prenatal vitamin supplementation and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly, has altered the racial prevalence of birth defects. Analysis of a single large representative population is required to analyze current racial differences in the prevalence of birth defects in the United States. METHODS: This is a population-based cross-sectional study to analyze racial differences in the prevalence of birth defects. We reviewed all live births in the 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and determined birth prevalence of 55 selected birth defects in Caucasians. We then calculated the relative risk of these birth defects in African-Americans, Hispanics, and Asians relative to Caucasians. RESULT: Overall birth defect prevalence was 29.2 per 1000 in a cohort of 1,048,252 live births, of which 51% were Caucasians. Compared with Caucasians, the risk of overall birth defects was lower in African-Americans (relative risk = 0.9, confidence interval 0.8-0.9) and Hispanics (relative risk = 0.9, confidence interval 0.8-0.9). The risk of overall birth defects was similar in Caucasians and Asians. Relative to the Caucasians, African-Americans had a lower risk of cardiac, genitourinary, and craniofacial malformations but a higher risk of musculoskeletal malformations. Hispanics had a lower risk of genitourinary and gastrointestinal malformation. Asians had a higher risk of craniofacial and musculoskeletal malformations. CONCLUSION: This is a comprehensive description of racial differences in the risk of birth defects in the United States. Observed racial differences in the risk of birth defects may be related to genetic susceptibilities, to cultural or social differences that could modify exposures, or to the many potential combinations between susceptibilities and exposures.
Authors: Margot E Bowen; Jacob McClendon; Hannah K Long; Aryo Sorayya; Jeanine L Van Nostrand; Joanna Wysocka; Laura D Attardi Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Michael Balistreri; Justin A Davis; Katherine F Campbell; André Monteiro Da Rocha; Marjorie C Treadwell; Todd J Herron Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Stuart K Shapira; Lin H Tian; Arthur S Aylsworth; Ellen R Elias; Julie E Hoover-Fong; Naomi J L Meeks; Margaret C Souders; Anne C-H Tsai; Elaine H Zackai; Aimee A Alexander; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp; Laura A Schieve Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2019-05
Authors: Abigail Wilpers; Anna Y Lynn; Barbara Eichhorn; Amy B Powne; Megan Lagueux; Janene Batten; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar; Cary P Gross Journal: Fetal Diagn Ther Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 2.208