| Literature DB >> 36172449 |
Shoichi Ishikawa1, Shun Matsumura2, Akiko Yana2, Clara Kurishima2, Yoichi Iwamoto1,2, Hirotaka Ishido2, Satoshi Masutani2, Ryo Nakagawa1, Hideaki Senzaki1.
Abstract
Objective: Fontan circulation maintains preload and cardiac output by reducing venous capacitance and increasing central venous pressure (CVP). The resultant congestive end-organ damage affects patient prognosis. Therefore, a better circulatory management strategy to ameliorate organ congestion is required in patients with Fontan circulation. We sought to verify whether aggressive arterial and venous dilation therapy in addition to pulmonary dilation (super-Fontan strategy) can improve Fontan circulation and reduce congestion.Entities:
Keywords: ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin type II receptor blocker; BP, blood pressure; BV, blood volume; CI, cardiac index; CVP, central venous pressure; Cv, venous capacitance; Fontan; HR, heart rate; MCP, mean circulatory filling pressure; NO, nitric oxide; PVP, peripheral venous pressure; Rp, pulmonary vascular resistance; Rs, systemic vascular resistance; TPR, total pulmonary resistance; central venous pressure; congenital heart disease; hemodynamics
Year: 2022 PMID: 36172449 PMCID: PMC9510926 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JTCVS Open ISSN: 2666-2736
Characteristics of patients who received the super-Fontan strategy
| Characteristics | Pre–super-Fontan | Post–super-Fontan | N, mean ± SD, |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 30 | ||
| Sex (male:female) | 21:9 | ||
| Age, y | |||
| Fontan surgery | 2.8 ± 1.2 | ||
| Evaluation before the super-Fontan strategy | 8.9 ± 4.4 | ||
| Introduction of the super-Fontan strategy | 9.1 ± 4.4 | ||
| Evaluation after the super-Fontan strategy | 11.4 ± 4.4 | ||
| Underlying disease, n | |||
| Single left ventricle | 3 | ||
| Single right ventricle | 12 | ||
| Tricuspid atresia | 3 | ||
| Pulmonary atresia/intact septum | 6 | ||
| Hypoplastic left heart syndrome | 3 | ||
| Others | 3 | ||
| Asplenia/polysplenia | 6/1 | ||
| Fenestration | 22 (73) | 20 (67) | .57 |
| Medications, n (%) | |||
| Diuretics | 18 (60) | 20 (67) | .592 |
| ACEI/ARB | 22 (73) | 29 (97) | .011 |
| β-Blockers | 11 (36) | 12 (40) | .822 |
| Pulmonary dilators | 25 (83) | 27 (90) | .448 |
| Bosentan, mg/kg/d | 16 (4.0 ± 0.7) | 14 (4.1 ± 0.7) | |
| Macitentan, mg/kg/d | 5 (0.19 ± 0.02) | 9 (0.21 ± 0.03) | |
| Sildenafil, mg/kg/d | 1 (3.5) | 1 (3.7) | |
| Tadalafil, mg/kg/d | 18 (1.1 ± 0.2) | 20 (4.0 ± 0.7) | |
| Digoxin | 2 (7) | 2 (7) | 1.000 |
| Warfarin/aspirin | 28 (93) | 30 (100) | .150 |
| Antiarrhythmics | 2 (7) | 2 (7) | 1.000 |
| Nitrates | 0 (0) | 30 (100) | <.001 |
SD, Standard deviation; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin type II receptor blocker.
Hemodynamic changes with the super-Fontan strategy
| Pre- | Post- | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CVP, mm Hg | 11.7 ± 2.4 | 9.7 ± 2.2 | <.001 |
| mBP, mm Hg | 73.5 ± 14.1 | 67.8 ± 9.8 | .009 |
| HR, bpm | 78.7 ± 16.0 | 80.4 ± 17.1 | .816 |
| CI, L/min/m2 | 3.09 ± 1.01 | 3.54 ± 1.19 | .047 |
| SpO2, % | 87.7 ± 7.9 | 91.4 ± 5.3 | <.001 |
| BV, mL/kg | 92.0 ± 22.7 | 101.9 ± 33.5 | .328 |
| Cv, mL/kg/mm Hg | 3.21 ± 1.27 | 3.79 ± 1.30 | .017 |
| MCP, mm Hg | 29.6 ± 12.7 | 27.8 ± 7.8 | .088 |
| TPR, RUm2 | 4.28 ± 1.65 | 2.92 ± 0.93 | .006 |
| Rs, RUm2 | 22.3 ± 8.7 | 17.0 ± 6.4 | .078 |
CVP, Central venous pressure; mBP, mean blood pressure; HR, heart rate; bpm, beats per minute; CI, cardiac index; SpO, oxygen saturation; BV, blood volume; Cv, venous capacitance; MCP, mean circulatory filling pressure; TPR, total pulmonary resistance; Rs, systemic vascular resistance.
The characteristics of patients with Fontan circulation (before the initiation of the therapy) and the control patients who underwent treadmill exercise testing
| Fontan (n = 25) (pre–super-Fontan) | Control (n = 28) (biventricle) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male:female) | 19:6 | 17:11 | .234 |
| Age, y | 10.1 ± 3.7 | 11.6 ± 4.7 | .209 |
| Hemodynamics at rest | |||
| CVP, mm Hg | 10.3 ± 1.6 | 6.1 ± 1.2 | <.001 |
| BP systolic, mm Hg | 111 ± 13 | 109 ± 13 | .540 |
| BP diastolic, mm Hg | 64 ± 11 | 60 ± 14 | .262 |
| CI, L/min/m2 | 2.91 ± 0.71 | 3.75 ± 0.79 | <.001 |
| Max stage, treadmill | 4.5 ± 1.4 | 5.9 ± 1.2 | <.001 |
CVP, Central venous pressure; BP, blood pressure; CI, cardiac index.
Figure 1Changes in hemodynamics during exercise. During exercise, patients with Fontan circulation had limited increases in HR and CO, whereas mBP significantly increased compared with controls. CVP significantly increased during exercise in both groups, although the degree of CVP elevation was much greater in patients with Fontan circulation than in control. bpm, Beats per minute; HR, heart rate; CO, cardiac output; BV, biventricular; mBP, mean blood pressure; CVP, central venous pressure.
The effects of the super-Fontan strategy during exercise
| Pre- | Post- | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| n (male:female) | 18 (13:5) | ||
| Age, y | 10.6 ± 4.0 | 11.9 ± 4.1 | <.001 |
| Max stage | 4.2 ± 1.3 | 4.9 ± 1.3 | .051 |
| Max METS | 13.3 ± 3.5 | 14.8 ± 3.0 | .115 |
| Hemodynamics at rest | |||
| CI, L/min/m2 | 2.82 ± 0.63 | 3.18 ± 0.81 | .175 |
| CVP, mm Hg | 8.7 ± 2.3 | 8.0 ± 1.4 | <.001 |
| mBP, mm Hg | 81 ± 11 | 78 ± 11 | .235 |
| HR, bpm | 75 ± 19 | 75 ± 17 | .881 |
| Cv, mL/kg/mm Hg | 2.37 ± 1.01 | 3.46 ± 0.62 | .006 |
| TPR, Rum2 | 3.45 ± 0.92 | 2.82 ± 1.19 | .009 |
| Rs, Rum2 | 28.9 ± 7.6 | 24.3 ± 8.5 | .405 |
| Hemodynamics at peak exercise | |||
| CI, L/min/m2 | 7.21 ± 2.42 | 7.59 ± 1.15 | .939 |
| CVP, mm Hg | 19.6 ± 5.3 | 15.4 ± 2.7 | .002 |
| mBP, mm Hg | 99 ± 17 | 89 ± 14 | .010 |
| HR, bpm | 150 ± 25 | 139 ± 20 | .029 |
| TPR, RUm2 | 3.19 ± 1.59 | 2.03 ± 0.55 | .032 |
| Rs, Rum2 | 12.6 ± 3.9 | 10.2 ± 2.1 | .047 |
METS, Metabolic equivalent; CI, cardiac index; CVP, central venous pressure; mBP, mean blood pressure; HR, heart rate; bpm, beats per minute; Cv, venous capacitance; TPR, total pulmonary resistance; Rs, systemic vascular resistance.
Figure 2Relationships of maximum central venous pressure during exercise with venous capacitance and pulmonary resistance in patients with Fontan circulation. Max CVP and the slope of CVP elevation during exercise in the Fontan group was negatively correlated with Cv, but not with Rp. These results suggest that CVP elevation during exercise depends on Cv rather than Rp. Slope was defined as the difference between pre-exercise (standing) CVP and maximum CVP divided by the maximum exercise stage. Max CVP, Maximum central venous pressure; CVP, central venous pressure; Cv, venous capacitance; Rp, pulmonary resistance.
Figure 3Relationships between liver function markers and central venous pressure. CVP at rest and maximum CVP were significantly and positively correlated with γ-GTP and type 4 collagen 7S (r = 0.422, P = .045 and r = 0.627, P = .009, respectively). These results indicate that suppressing the elevation of CVP not only at rest but also during exercise may greatly contribute to the improvement of organ congestion and maintenance of function. γ-GTP, Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; CVP, central venous pressure; CVP Max, maximum central venous pressure.
Figure 4A decrease in Cv is an important adaptive mechanism to maintain the cardiac output in the Fontan circulation. However, it causes an increase in CVP that leads to end-organ damages. The afterload is also increased in Fontan circulation, contributing to a decrease in cardiac output. The super-Fontan strategy increases the Cv and decreases afterload, thereby improving the Fontan hemodynamics at rest and during exercise. SVC, Superior vena cava; RPA, right pulmonary artery; LA, left atrium; LPV, left pulmonary vein; RV, right ventricle; IVC, inferior vena cava; Cv, venous capacitance; CVP, central venous pressure.
Figure 5Graphical abstract depicting the study's methods, results, and implications. Cv, Venous capacitance; CVP, central venous pressure; CI, cardiac index.