Literature DB >> 36172406

A word of caution: Spontaneous rupture of the noncoronary sinus of the Freestyle xenograft: Two cases and review of the literature.

Ziyad Gunga1, Salah Dine Qanadli2, Guillaume Fahrni2, Mario Verdugo-Marchese1, Simon Koestner1, Valentina Rancati3, Zied Ltaief3, Matthias Kirsch1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36172406      PMCID: PMC9510863          DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JTCVS Open        ISSN: 2666-2736


× No keyword cloud information.
Endovascular virtual reality angiography highlighting the fenestration (arrow) of the noncoronary sinus seen from the inside (case 2). Freestyle bioprosthesis is an ideal substitute for aortic root replacement. Rupture of the Freestyle has been rarely described. We present 2 cases of spontaneous rupture of the noncoronary sinus. The porcine stentless Freestyle xenograft (Medtronic Inc) has proved to be an ideal substitute for aortic root replacement (ARR) as it provides excellent hemodynamics and durability., Nonetheless, like other bioprostheses, structural valve deterioration is observed in the long term, mostly due to aortic cusp tears. However, spontaneous rupture of the Freestyle xenograft aortic wall has also been reported., We present 2 patients who developed pseudoaneurysm after ARR using a Freestyle xenograft, related to spontaneous rupture of the noncoronary sinus (NCS) of Valsalva.

Case 1

In November 2018, an 80-year-old male patient with a history of aortic root dilation had a complete ARR using a 25-mm Freestyle xenograft. In August 2020, the patient was hospitalized for acute lung edema related to massive aortic valve insufficiency due to deformation of the xenograft by a pseudoaneurysm. Intraoperative findings noted a tear of the upper portion of the NCS of the Freestyle xenograft. This part was trimmed, and a reconstruction of the sinotubular junction was achieved using a 24-mm Dacron graft, strengthened by an extraluminal pericardial patch. In October 2020, a computed tomography scan highlighted a recurring pseudoaneurysm, triggering a third operation. A 1-cm rupture of the NCS was identified, without sign of infection. The Freestyle xenograft was trimmed, leaving the annulus, and a redo ARR was performed using a 23-mm Freestyle xenograft. The patient died 1 week later due to sudden cardiac arrest secondary to acute hypoxemia following bronchoaspiration. Transthoracic echocardiogram confirmed the absence of pericardial tamponade.

Case 2

A 72-year-old female patient with a history of aortic valve replacement in 2018 was admitted emergently for type A dissection in February 2020. ARR using a 25-mm Freestyle xenograft was performed, associated with hemiarch replacement. In November 2020, the patient was reoperated for severe tricuspid insufficiency, and operative findings pinpointed a small pseudoaneurysm on the suture line between the distal portion of the Freestyle xenograft and the Dacron prosthesis. This 2-mm orifice was sutured and strengthened with heterologous pericardium and BioGlue (CryoLife, Inc). In October 2021, an acute thoracic pain triggered a computed tomography scan that showed a large circulating pseudoaneurysm of the aortic root originating from a tear in the NCS of the Freestyle xenograft (Figure 1). Intraoperative findings confirmed the rupture in the central part of the NCS, without sign of infection (Video 1). A redo ARR using a 25-mm Freestyle was performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery. Both patients gave written informed consent for the use of their data for publication use.
Figure 1

Left, Computed tomography and 3-dimensional reconstruction (cases 1 and 2); right, operative image rupture of the noncoronary sinus (case 2, arrow).

Left, Computed tomography and 3-dimensional reconstruction (cases 1 and 2); right, operative image rupture of the noncoronary sinus (case 2, arrow).

Comment

The Freestyle xenograft is the only currently commercially available aortic root xenograft. It provides excellent hemodynamic results in terms of postoperative transvalvular gradients, effective orifice area, and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Furthermore, excellent durability has been reported by several studies, with 1-year freedom from reoperation rates of more than 90%., However, early- and mid-term structural valve deteriorations have been outlined. In addition to cusp tears, the aortic wall of the Freestyle xenograft seems also vulnerable, as highlighted by the present cases. Six similar cases of spontaneous rupture of the Freestyle xenograft wall have been previously reported, and are summarized in Table 1. Interestingly, the rupture occurred most frequently in the noncoronary sinus of the xenograft.
Table 1

A review of literature in PubMed highlighting 6 cases of noncoronary sinus perforation of the Freestyle Medtronic bioprosthesis

StudyAge, ySexSurgeryEtiologyTime after surgery, moCT scan diagnosisOperative findingsFenestration siteReoperationInfection
Kameda et al571FemaleFull root Freestyle + AAR (Dacron)Aneurysm + AR15Aortopulmonary fistula (aortic wall rupture)2 holes: 3 × 7 mm/3 × 5 mmNoncoronary sinusStrengthened with patch and AAR with Dacron graftNo evidence
Ozaki et al363MaleFull root Freestyle 23 mmAneurysm + AR51Pseudoaneurysm (aortic wall rupture)1 hole: 15 × 5 mmNoncoronary sinusFull root FreestyleNo evidence
Ozaki et al362MaleFull root Freestyle 21 mmAneurysm + AR20Pseudoaneurysm (aortic wall rupture)1 hole: 15 mmNoncoronary sinusFull root Freestyle 21 mmNo evidence
Ozaki et al363FemaleFull root Freestyle 25mm + archAneurysm + AR17Pseudoaneurysm (aortic wall rupture)2 holes: 20 mmNon-coronary + left sinusesFull root Freestyle 25 mmNo evidence
Ozaki et al363FemaleFull root Freestyle 25 mm + archBentall redo20Pseudoaneurysm (aortic wall rupture)3 holes: 20 mmNoncoronary + left sinusesAVR with CE 23-mm with AAR 28-mm straight graftNo evidence
Kitamura et al665MaleFull root Freestyle 25 mmAneurysm + AR18Pseudoaneurysm (aortic wall rupture)1 holeNoncoronary sinusComposite graftNo evidence

CT, Computed tomography; AAR, ascending aortic replacement; AR, aortic regurgitation; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CE, Carpentier-Edwards.

A review of literature in PubMed highlighting 6 cases of noncoronary sinus perforation of the Freestyle Medtronic bioprosthesis CT, Computed tomography; AAR, ascending aortic replacement; AR, aortic regurgitation; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CE, Carpentier-Edwards. Since neither of the cases has been related to an infectious origin, we retain 3 hypotheses to explain these clinical observations. Ozaki and colleagues suggested a weakness in the transitional zone between annular collagen fibers and the aortic elastic wall. Similarly, using biomechanical analyses, Takaya and colleagues noted that NCS was significantly thinner and less elastic than the other sinuses, hence inherently more vulnerable and at greater risk of tissue failure. Alternatively, traumatic manipulation of the Freestyle xenograft, such as pinching of the prosthetic wall, could contribute to its subsequent failure. In our practice, we used to invaginate the Freestyle into the left ventricular outflow tract to facilitate tying of the proximal suture line. In view of the present cases, this practice cannot be recommended anymore. Finally, a toxic factor could also be incriminated. Indeed, Kazui and colleagues have reported that BioGlue surgical adhesive might occasionally cause severe injury to aortic tissue, such as excessively thinning of aortic tissue at the site of adhesive application, hence inciting pseudoaneurysm formation. We underline the importance of additional multidimensional imaging in the follow-up to depict structural aortic abnormalities after Freestyle implantation, insufficiently unveiled by TEE as suggested by Dagnegård and colleagues.

Conclusions

Spontaneous rupture of the NCS constitutes a rare hazard after ARR using the Freestyle xenograft. Atraumatic handling of the bioprosthesis and avoidance of potentially toxic surgical adhesives should be recommended. Meticulous follow-up should be devised to detect this potential complication.
  8 in total

1.  Role of biologic glue repair of proximal aortic dissection in the development of early and midterm redissection of the aortic root.

Authors:  T Kazui; N Washiyama; A H Bashar; H Terada; K Suzuki; K Yamashita; M Takinami
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Morphometrical and biomechanical analyses of a stentless bioprosthetic valve: an implication to avoid potential primary tissue failure.

Authors:  Hiroki Takaya; Shinya Masuda; Masaaki Naganuma; Ichiro Yoshioka; Goro Takahashi; Masatoshi Akiyama; Osamu Adachi; Kiichiro Kumagai; Shukei Sugita; Yoshikatsu Saiki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28

3.  Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of the Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Siamak Mohammadi; Vincent Tchana-Sato; Dimitri Kalavrouziotis; Pierre Voisine; Daniel Doyle; Richard Baillot; Sandro Sponga; Jacques Metras; Jean Perron; François Dagenais
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Perforation of the Valsalva sinus after implantation of Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Nobuchika Ozaki; Yutaka Hino; Yuji Hanafusa; Teruo Yamashita; Kenji Okada; Takuro Tsukube; Yutaka Okita
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Aortopulmonary fistula due to perforation of the aortic wall of a freestyle stentless valve.

Authors:  Yoichi Kameda; Kazumi Mizuguchi; Toshiyuki Kuwata; Tohru Mori; Shigeki Taniguchi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Reoperation for early failure of a freestyle bioprosthesis using a full root technique.

Authors:  Aki Kitamura; Nobuhiro Handa; Yu Shomura; Hidetaka Wakiyama; Masahiko Shinka; Hiroshi Fujiwara; Michihiro Nasu; Kazuaki Tanabe; Tomoko Tani; Shigefumi Morioka; Yukikatsu Okada
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2007-05

7.  Freedom from structural valve deterioration among patients aged < or = 60 years undergoing Freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  David S Bach; Jacques Metras; John R Doty; Kwok L Yun; Jean G Dumesnil; Neal D Kon
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2007-11

8.  Structural abnormalities after aortic root replacement with stentless xenograft.

Authors:  Hanna Sofia Holmgren Dagnegård; Per Ejlstrup Sigvardsen; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Kirstine Bekke; Jan Brink Valentin; Laurence Lefebvre; Søren Paaske Johnsen; Lars Søndergaard; Jens Teglgaard Lund; Morten Holdgaard Smerup
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.