Literature DB >> 36171910

Improvement in Validity and Reliability of Airway Assessment Using Ultrasonography by Novice Personnel: A Learning Cohort Study.

Sumidtra Prathep1, Pawarit Sikarettrakul2, Sasikaan Nimmaanrat1, Wipharat Juthasantikul1, Orarat Karnjanawanichkul1, Nalinee Kovitwanawong1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To assess improvements in the validity and reliability of novices' skills in performing ultrasonography for airway assessment. Patients and
Methods: A learning cohort study was conducted with 20 anesthesiology residents and 10 volunteers in the Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University. The four parameters of airway assessment were soft tissue thickness at the level of 1) hyoid bone (STT-HY), 2) true vocal cords (STT-VC), 3) thyroid isthmus (STT-TI), and 4) suprasternal notch (STT-SN). The magnitude of discrepancies between the residents' and experienced anesthesiologists' measurements was evaluated over the sequence of measurements in the 10 volunteers.
Results: The mean ultrasonic measurements of STT-HY by the experienced anesthesiologists and residents were significantly different (11.09 ± 3.14 mm vs 8.53 ± 3.02 mm, respectively; P = 0.008), whereas measurements of STT-VC, STT-TI, and STT-SN were not (7.18 ± 1.70 vs 7.14 ± 1.93, P = 0.32; 7.81 ± 2.14 vs 7.73 ± 2.19, P = 0.62; and 11.32 ± 3.33 vs 10.30 ± 3.02, P = 0.35, respectively). The mean discrepancy between the residents' and experienced anesthesiologists' measurements was close to zero throughout the sequence of measurements of STT-TI and STT-VC. However, the residents' measurements of STT-HY and STT-SN were considerably lower than those of anesthesiologists. The range of discrepancies between residents and experienced anesthesiologists in each sequential measurement was wide for all measurements, particularly for the measurement values of STT-HY, and the standard deviation of the discrepancies did not decrease over the sequence of measurements.
Conclusion: Over the sequence of measurements for airway assessment in 10 volunteers by 20 residents in this learning trial, we found no evidence of improvement in measurement accuracy. Discrepancies between the residents' and anesthesiologists' measurements and the variability in discrepancy across residents were greatest in the measurement of STT-HY.
© 2022 Prathep et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway management; anesthesiology; learning curve; ultrasonography; ultrasound

Year:  2022        PMID: 36171910      PMCID: PMC9512031          DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S377403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract        ISSN: 1179-7258


  17 in total

Review 1.  Point-of-care ultrasound utilizations in the emergency airway management: An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Ali Pourmand; Danny Lee; Steven Davis; Kelsey Dorwart; Hamid Shokoohi
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Evaluation of the reliability of preoperative descriptive airway assessment tests in prediction of the Cormack-Lehane score: A prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Onur Selvi; Tugce Kahraman; Ozgur Senturk; Serkan Tulgar; Ercan Serifsoy; Zeliha Ozer
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 9.452

Review 3.  Complications and failure of airway management.

Authors:  T M Cook; S R MacDougall-Davis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Apfelbaum; Carin A Hagberg; Robert A Caplan; Casey D Blitt; Richard T Connis; David G Nickinovich; Carin A Hagberg; Robert A Caplan; Jonathan L Benumof; Frederic A Berry; Casey D Blitt; Robert H Bode; Frederick W Cheney; Richard T Connis; Orin F Guidry; David G Nickinovich; Andranik Ovassapian
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Assessment before airway management.

Authors:  Paul Baker
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2015-06

6.  Comparison of sonography and computed tomography as imaging tools for assessment of airway structures.

Authors:  Arun Prasad; Eugene Yu; David T Wong; Reena Karkhanis; Patrick Gullane; Vincent W S Chan
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Direct ultrasound methods: a confirmatory technique for proper endotracheal intubation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Saeed Abbasi; Davood Farsi; Mohammad A Zare; Majid Hajimohammadi; Mahdi Rezai; Peyman Hafezimoghadam
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.799

8.  Ultrasound as a new tool in the assessment of airway difficulties: An observational study.

Authors:  Francesco Alessandri; Giuseppe Antenucci; Edoardo Piervincenzi; Costantino Buonopane; Riccardo Bellucci; Chiara Andreoli; Danilo Alunni Fegatelli; Marco V Ranieri; Federico Bilotta
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Can ultrasound be useful for predicting the size of a left double-lumen bronchial tube? Tracheal width as measured by ultrasonography versus computed tomography.

Authors:  Alan Sustić; Damir Miletić; Alen Protić; Aldo Ivancić; Tedi Cicvarić
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.452

10.  Diaphragm ultrasound as a new method to predict extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Shereen Farghaly; Ali A Hasan
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.