| Literature DB >> 36167540 |
Hongxin Deng1, Lei He1, Chong Wang1, Teng Zhang1, Hua Guo1, Hongwei Zhang1, Yanning Song1, Bangtao Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pathophysiological mechanisms of aggression are manifold and they may closely interconnect. Current study aimed to determine the gut microbiota and its metabolites, and clarify their correlations with inflammation, oxidation, leaky gut and clinical profiles underlying aggression in schizophrenia (ScZ).Entities:
Keywords: Aggression; Correlation; Gut microbiota; Inflammation; Leaky gut; Neurotransmitter; Oxidative stress; Schizophrenia; Short-chain fatty acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36167540 PMCID: PMC9513873 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04255-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 4.144
Clinic characteristics of all inpatients at baseline
| Items | ScZ-Ag ( | NScZ-Ag ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male, n(%) | 8 (32.00) | 9 (36.00) | 0.996 |
| Age, mean (SD), years | 33.52 (8.94) | 32.88 (8.91) | 0.801 |
| BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 24.53 (3.55) | 22.91 (2.59) | 0.071 |
| No. of ScZ episodes, n (%) | 5.72 (2.88) | 4.52 (2.84) | 0.144 |
| ScZ course, mean (SD), years | 7.82 (3.78) | 6.68 (2.56) | 0.491 |
| Total PANSS score, mean (SD) | 66.12 (8.26) | 62.72 (10.14) | 0.216 |
| Total MOAS score, mean (SD) | 14.56 (6.78) | 1.56 (0.82) | |
| TNF-α,pg/mL | 181.92 (54.43) | 38.91 (10.48) | |
| CRP,ng/mL | 10.25 (5.21) | 4.93 (3.88) | |
| Stool calprotectin, μg/g | 162.03 (99.19) | 110.49 (33.43) | |
| Stool IgA, OD | 211.80 (41.35) | 185.60 (69.39) | 0.111 |
| I-FABP, pg/mL | 83.08 (20.32) | 26.29 (4.87) | |
| Claudin-3, ng/mL | 56.95 (17.72) | 35.63 (8.27) | |
| 8-OH-DG, pg/mL | 13.54 (6.23) | 8.19 (3.72) | |
| 8-ISO, pg/mL | 27.59 (9.98) | 19.18 (5.72) |
BMI body mass index, ScZ-Ag schizophrenia with aggression, NScZ-Ag schizophrenia without any aggression, PANSS positive and negative syndrome scale, MOAS modified overt aggression scale, Chi-square or student t test was used for statistical differences between groups
α diversity analysis in the two groups
| Items | OUT level | Genus level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScZ-Ag | NScZ-Ag | ScZ-Ag | NScZ-Ag | |||
| Sobs | 220.56 ± 54.20 | 287.16 ± 58.14 | 0.000 | 88.40 ± 17.58 | 110.24 ± 21.57 | |
| Chao | 282.15 ± 63.77 | 349.95 ± 75.84 | 0.002 | 101.28 ± 19.66 | 125.70 ± 28.40 | |
| Ace | 284.48 ± 65.06 | 344.90 ± 68.62 | 0.003 | 101.82 ± 19.16 | 125.47 ± 25.57 | |
| Shannon | 2.42 ± 0.53 | 3.36 ± 0.61 | 0.000 | 1.36 ± 044 | 2.48 ± 0.69 | |
| Simpson | 0.20 ± 0.08 | 0.10 ± 0.08 | 0.000 | 0.52 ± 0.15 | 0.22 ± 0.16 | |
| Simpsoneven | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.000 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | |
| Shannoneven | 0.45 ± 0.08 | 0.60 ± 0.10 | 0.000 | 0.30 ± 0.09 | 0.53 ± 0.13 | |
| Good coverage | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.279 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.379 |
| PD_ indexes | 19.46 ± 3.89 | 23.51 ± 4.40 | 0.002 | 13.63 ± 2.43 | 15.94 ± 2.47 | 0.002 |
OUT operational taxonomic units, Wilcox rank sum test was used for statistical differences between groups
Fig. 1β diversity analysis of gut microbial structure. On Genus level, Hierarchical clustering tree (A), principal co-ordinates analysis (B) and comparison of distance rank by ANOSIM analysis (C) were performed as Methods specified. ScZ-Ag, schizophrenia with aggression; NScZ-Ag, schizophrenia without any aggression
Fig. 2Analysis of fecal microbiota compositions and differences. The composition and relative proportion of gut bacteria in the two groups on Genus level (A). Wilcoxon rank-sum test bar plot on Genus level (B). Differently abundant taxa identified using LEfSe analysis from phylum to genus levels between the two groups (C). LDA showing the impact of different Genra on the difference between the two groups and visualization of only Genra meeting an LDA ≥3.5 (D)
Fecal SCFAs concentrations between the two groups
| Items | ScZ-Ag | NScZ-Ag | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetic acid | 125.09(84.05) | 358.85(75.31) | |
| Propanoic acid | 141.68(126.69) | 369.70(151.45) | |
| Butyric acid | 77.04(52.51) | 335.93(146.94) | |
| Isobutyric acid | 12.18(12.39) | 24.67(20.19) | |
| Valeric acid | 12.48(12.89) | 19.27(15.66) | 0.101 |
| Isovaleric acid | 20.08(30.51) | 70.85(79.15) | |
| Hexanoic acid | 3.99(9.20) | 10.09(18.65) | 0.149 |
| Isohexanoic acid | 0.12(0.18) | 1.77(3.01) |
All the units for SCFAs are ng/mg and all data were presented as mean (SD). Student t test was used for difference analysis between ScZ-Ag and NScZ-Ag groups
Fecal neurotransmitters concentrations between the two groups
| Items | ScZ-Ag | NScZ-Ag | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tryptamine | 0.11(0.16) | 0.17(0.66) | 0.233 |
| Tryptophan | 12.56(10.73) | 15.86(12.83) | 0.329 |
| Serotonin hydrochloride | 1.13(2.64) | 0.16(0.41) | 0.351 |
| 5-Hydroxytryptophan | 0.04(0.03) | 0.07(0.03) | |
| Dopamine hydrochloride | 0.07(0.13) | 0.12(0.20) | 0.256 |
| Levodopa | 0.17(0.12) | 0.28(0.24) | |
| Noradrenaline hydrochloride | 8.48(7.70) | 14.75(12.20) | |
| Adrenaline hydrochloride | 0.03(0.04) | 0.07(0.06) | |
| Kynurenic acid | 0.08(0.12) | 0.25(0.23) | |
| Kynurenine | 0.10(0.11) | 0.14(0.12) | 0.292 |
| Aminobutyric acid | 13.67(12.79) | 15.40(22.32) | 0.737 |
| Tyramine | 12.25(13.48) | 11.18(8.75) | 0.741 |
| Tyrosine | 65.54(39.09) | 73.10(39.28) | 0.498 |
| Histamine | 5.11(6.82) | 6.60(11.68) | 0.452 |
| Histidine | 0.73(0.75) | 1.49(1.91) | |
| Glutamine | 110.58(69.53) | 121.02(89.04) | 0.646 |
| Glutamic acid | 112.27(76.22) | 124.14(103.27) | 0.646 |
| Picolinic acid | 0.01(0.04) | 0.02(0.07) | 0.400 |
| Acetylcholine chloride | 2.62(3.41) | 2.34(2.50) | 0.738 |
| 5-Hydroxyindole-3-Acetic acid | 0.09(0.11) | 0.15(0.11) | 0.073 |
| Xanthurenic acid | 1.73(1.93) | 3.21(4.02) | 0.105 |
| Vanillymandelic Acid | 0.68(1.22) | 1.10(1.58) | 0.298 |
| Melatonine | 0.001(0.001) | 0.001(0.001) | 1.000 |
All the units for neurotransmitter are μg/mg and all data were presented as mean (SD). Student t test was used for difference analysis between ScZ-Ag and NScZ-Ag groups
Relations of bacterial metabolites to cytokines and MOAS
| Variables | CRP | TNF-α | Calprotectin | I-FABP | Claudin-3 | 8-OH-DG | 8-ISO | MOAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetic acid | 0.027* | 0.000* | 0.607 | 0.000* | 0.000* | 0.022* | 0.112 | 0.000* |
| Propanoic acid | 0.149 | 0.000* | 0.717 | 0.000* | 0.000* | 0.380 | 0.475 | 0.000* |
| Butyric acid | 0.023* | 0.000* | 0.099 | 0.000* | 0.000* | 0.004* | 0.064 | 0.000* |
| Isobutyric acid | 0.192 | 0.036* | 0.120 | 0.055 | 0.342 | 0.407 | 0.492 | 0.017* |
| Isovaleric acid | 0.206 | 0.046* | 0.744 | 0.008* | 0.081 | 0.240 | 0.721 | 0.054 |
| Isohexanoic acid | 0.826 | 0.141 | 0.246 | 0.168 | 0.309 | 0.250 | 0.224 | 0.132 |
| 5-Hydroxytryptophan | 0.679 | 0.059 | 0.875 | 0.000* | 0.000* | 0.980 | 0.746 | 0.053 |
| Levodopa | 0.785 | 0.181 | 0.602 | 0.207 | 0.924 | 0.795 | 0.858 | 0.272 |
| Noradrenaline hydrochloride | 0.594 | 0.274 | 0.802 | 0.097 | 0.093 | 0.913 | 0.655 | 0.280 |
| Adrenaline hydrochloride | 0.802 | 0.031* | 0.661 | 0.020* | 0.115 | 0.060 | 0.393 | 0.051 |
| Kynurenic acid | 0.340 | 0.026* | 0.470 | 0.016* | 0.220 | 0.056 | 0.651 | 0.067 |
| Histidine | 0.102 | 0.099 | 0.781 | 0.018* | 0.095 | 0.641 | 0.683 | 0.115 |
*P < 0.05. Analyses using partial correlation analysis. All the relevance indices (R)<0
Fig. 3Correlation analysis of gut bacteria and clinical characteristics (A), cytokines (B), fecal SCFAs (C) or neurotransmitters (D)