| Literature DB >> 35372130 |
Yao Song1,2, Kena Dan2, Zhengqiu Yao2, Xi Yang2, Bangtao Chen3, Fei Hao2.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a histamine-mediated inflammatory skin disease, and second-generation non-sedating H1-antihistamines (nsAH) at licensed doses have long been the first-line therapy in CSU. However, about 50% of patients are resistant to nsAH, and the precise pathogenesis remains largely unknown but seems to be associated with low-level systemic or intestinal inflammation. We aim to determine the fecal microbial composition and clarify its correlation with the clinical profiles og CSU with nsAH resistance.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; antihistamine resistance; chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU); gut microbiota; inflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35372130 PMCID: PMC8967245 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.831489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of the three groups.
| Items | RCSU (n = 25) | CSU (n = 19) | HC (n = 19) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (M/F)# | 16/9 | 12/7 | 11/8 |
| Age, (years) | 34.42 ± 10.51 | 32.75 ± 10.83 | 31.45 ± 8.42 |
| BMI, (kg/m2) | 22.61 ± 1.50 | 21.98 ± 1.43 | 22.03 ± 1.36 |
| Disease duration, (month) | 12.28 ± 5.49*** | 7.00 ± 3.54 | NA |
| UAS at sample collecting | 3.60 ± 1.29* | 2.81 ± 0.89 | NA |
| UAS7 | 21.52 ± 9.49*** | 12.68 ± 4.67 | NA |
| ASST: −/1+/2+/3+# | 9/13/2/1 | 7/11/1/0 | ND |
| Total serum IgE (μg/ml) | 3.75 ± 1.32 | 3.07 ± 1.49 | ND |
| ESR (mm/h) | 14.20 ± 4.36*** | 7.70 ± 2.40 | ND |
| Serum CRP (mg/L) | 8.97 ± 3.08*** | 5.49 ± 1.98 | ND |
| Serum IL-6 (pg/ml) | 8.71 ± 2.82*** | 4.48 ± 1.69 | ND |
| Calprotectin (μg/g) | 183.92 ± 98.41* | 125.49 ± 73.96 | 119.81 ± 68.78 |
BMI, body mass index; UAS, urticaria activity score; CSU, chronic spontaneous urticaria; RCSU, refractory CSU; Reference range of ESR, serum CRP, serum IL-6 is 0–15 mm/h, 0–4 mg/L, and 0–7 pg/ml. The assay ranges of IgE and Calprotectin ELISA kits are 0.1–4.5 μg/ml and 1–200 μg/g, respectively. Data were presented as mean ± SD except when indicated (#, cases). Chi-square or Student t-test was used for statistical differences between two groups. Compared with the CSU group,*P <0.05,**P <0.01,***P <0.001. ND, not detected; NA, not applicable.
Figure 1Analysis of 16s rRNA sequencing depth. Refraction curve analysis with Shannon (A) or Sobs index (B) on OTU level.
α Diversity analysis in the three groups at OTU level.
| RCSU1 | CSU2 | HC3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sobs | 225.36 ± 66.75 | 263.56 ± 71.903 | 285.32 ± 97.31 | 0.085 | 0.515 |
| Chao | 279.64 ± 87.01 | 311.22 ± 92.69 | 346.72 ± 127.11 | 0.266 | 0.416 |
| Ace | 282.13 ± 82.54 | 309.19 ± 89.23 | 338.63 ± 118.21 | 0.318 | 0.472 |
| Shannon | 2.88 ± 0.56 | 3.47 ± 0.56 | 3.27 ± 0.81 | 0.478 | |
| Simpson | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.13 ± 0.13 | 0.313 | |
| Simpsoneven | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.083 | |
| Shannoneven | 0.53 ± 0.09 | 0.63 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.12 | 0.283 | |
| Good coverage | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 0.991 | 0.321 |
| PD_ indexes | 20.05 ± 5.13 | 22.59 ± 5.23 | 23.72 ± 7.17 | 0.120 | 0.644 |
Wilcox rank-sum test was used for statistical differences between groups. *Corrected P <0.05 for all variables.
Figure 2β Diversity analysis of gut microbial structure. (A) Comparison of distance rank on OTU level among three groups was shown by partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). (B) Similarities in the microbial composition on OTU level among three groups were presented by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). R, RCSU; N, CSU; C, HC.
Figure 3The composition and relative proportion of gut bacteria in the three groups on Phylum level (A) and Genus level (B).
Relative abundance of genera bacterium among the three groups.
| Items | RCSU | CSU | HC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.72 ± 19.30 | 26.16 ± 26.87 | 28.69 ± 26.22 | |
| 34.28 ± 33.28* | 15.12 ± 22.27 | 12.82 ± 15.32 | |
| 5.54 ± 4.72 | 8.28 ± 5.07 | 7.40 ± 5.58 | |
| 10.99 ± 15.48* | 3.38 ± 6.01 | 3.34 ± 6.11 | |
| 2.34 ± 2.80 | 4.32 ± 3.99 | 4.41 ± 4.61 | |
| 2.08 ± 2.34* | 4.04 ± 2.72 | 3.62 ± 2.72 | |
| 1.09 ± 1.17 | 2.76 ± 4.12 | 2.08 ± 2.12 | |
| 0.61 ± 0.64 | 1.27 ± 1.56 | 1.67 ± 1.57 | |
| 0.59 ± 0.97* | 1.40 ± 1.48 | 0.91 ± 1.51 | |
| 0.25 ± 0.37** | 0.95 ± 1.11 | 1.19 ± 1.81 | |
| 0.55 ± 0.94 | 0.88 ± 0.70 | 0.73 ± 0.51 | |
| 0.36 ± 0.48* | 0.94 ± 1.15 | 0.76 ± 0.88 | |
| 0.72 ± 1.28 | 0.74 ± 0.43 | 0.51 ± 0.58 | |
| 0.57 ± 1.64 | 0.78 ± 0.52 | 0.63 ± 0.77 | |
| 1.16 ± 1.85*** | 0.11 ± 0.25 | 0.11 ± 0.17 |
Relative abundances of genera bacterium were presented as M ± SD, and differences were assessed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test among the RCSU and the CSU groups or the CSU and the HC groups. Compared with CSU group,*P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001, #corrected P <0.001.
Figure 4Differently abundant taxa identified using LEfSe analysis among groups. Distribution of differently abundant taxa from phylum to genera levels between the RCSU and the CSU groups (A) and between the CSU and the HC groups (C). LDA showing the impact of different species on the difference between the RCSU and the CSU groups (B), and between the CSU and the HC groups (D), and visualization of only taxa meeting an LDA ≥2.
Figure 5Correlation analysis of gut bacteria and related clinical indicators.